Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Viral Hepat ; 26(7): 911-918, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920700

RESUMO

The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends hepatitis C testing people born from 1945 to 1965, "birth cohort" as well as hepatitis C and hepatitis B testing people from countries of birth with endemic infection risk. We automated the hospital electronic health record system to test birth cohort and those born in countries with endemic infection risk. A script is launched searching the laboratory database upon registration for any hepatitis C antibody, hepatitis C RNA and/or hepatitis B surface antigen result. If no positive result was found, a hepatitis C antibody/reflex RNA and/or hepatitis B surface antigen were ordered. A patient navigator received weekly results and assisted patients with positive serology to schedule an appointment with their primary care provider or treatment specialist. A total of 10 726 participants were hepatitis C antibody tested, with 6.9% antibody positive. Monthly hepatitis C testing from January to July 2016 compared to August 2016-August 2017 increased 342% as a result of "birth cohort" testing. Following country of birth testing, monthly hepatitis B and hepatitis C testing increased 91%, and 44%, respectively, during June-August 2017 compared to September 2017-March 2018. 67% of hepatitis C-positive patients were linked to care. If the navigator contacted the patient, 92% were linked to care, and 32% were treated. Of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients, 43% were linked to care, 5% were on treatment, and 15% started treatment. Automated electronic health record ordering of hepatitis C and/or hepatitis B testing is feasible and increases testing. In the population tested, much improvement is needed with linkage to care and treatment.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hepatite Viral Humana/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Vírus de Hepatite/classificação , Vírus de Hepatite/genética , Vírus de Hepatite/imunologia , Hepatite Viral Humana/diagnóstico , Humanos , Testes Sorológicos
2.
Ann Surg ; 241(4): 622-8, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15798464

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine utility of practice of chest computed tomography (CCT) and bone scan (BS) in patients with early-stage hepatoma evaluated for transplantation (LT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Consensus-based policy mandates routine CCT and BS in LT candidates with hepatoma. No data exist either to support or refute this policy. METHODS: From January 1999 to December 2002, stages I and II hepatoma patients evaluated at 4 centers were included. Scan interpretation was positive, indeterminate, or negative. Outcomes of evaluation and transplantation were compared between groups based on scans. Total charges incurred were derived from mean of charges at the centers. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen stages I and II patients were evaluated. None had positive scans, 78 had negative, 29 had at least 1 indeterminate, and 10 did not have 1 or both scans. Twelve patients were declined listing, 6 from progression of hepatoma but none from CCT or BS findings. Two listed patients were delisted for progression of the hepatoma. Proportion of patients listed, transplanted, clinical and pathologic stage of hepatoma, and recurrence after LT were similar in groups with negative and indeterminate scans. Indeterminate scans led to 6 invasive procedures, 1 patient died of complications of a mediastinal biopsy, and none of the 6 showed metastases. Charges of $2933 were generated per patient evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Positive yield of routine CCT and BS in patients with hepatoma is very low despite substantial charges and potential complications. CCT and BS performed only when clinically indicated will be a more cost-effective and safer approach.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Transplante de Fígado , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Radiografia Torácica/economia , Radiografia Torácica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Arch Surg ; 139(9): 992-6, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15381619

RESUMO

HYPOTHESIS: There is a marked variation in the outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with respect to race and ethnicity. Rates among African American and Hispanic individuals are elevated as compared with those among white individuals. DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective database. Demographic information, clinical staging, and other defining factors, including the absence or presence of hepatitis, cirrhosis, and alcohol abuse, were analyzed by patient interviews and review of the medical record. SETTING: Urban tertiary referral teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients diagnosed as having hepatocellular carcinoma between July 1997 and June 2003 (N = 264). Main Outcome Measure Overall survival rates. RESULTS: Based on multivariate analysis, race was identified as an independent predictor of survival. While there was no difference in the distribution of patient or tumor characteristics between the 2 groups, African American/Hispanic patients had a 5-year survival rate of 12%, which was significantly lower than that of white patients (50%; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant discrepancy in overall survival of African American/Hispanic patients as compared with that of white patients. The reason for this difference cannot be explained by patient or tumor characteristics or completely by treatment allocation. These data suggest that there may be socioeconomic, biological, and/or cultural determinants contributing to this observed difference in outcome.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etnologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etnologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
4.
J Am Coll Surg ; 197(5): 759-64, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14585410

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enthusiasm for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased. The data for recurrence after RFA for patients with HCC is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tumor recurrence patterns after RFA in patients with unresectable HCC. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 3-year period, 50 patients having RFA for unresectable HCC were identified at a single institution. Medical records and radiologic studies were reviewed and outcomes factors analyzed. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 46 patients underwent RFA by a percutaneous approach under CT guidance. Most patients underwent either one (n = 22) or two ablations (n = 23). At the time of this report, 14 patients (28%) were tumor-free by radiologic and biochemical (alpha-fetoprotein) parameters. Eighteen additional patients had persistence of tumor at the ablation site and 14 patients had recurrence in the liver at sites different from the ablation site. An additional four patients had recurrence in extrahepatic sites. Twelve patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation after RFA. Of these 12, 5 (42%) demonstrated no viable tumor in the explanted liver. Independent predictors of tumor recurrence included tumor size, serum AFP levels, and the presence of hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that factors such as tumor size should be considered before employing RFA therapy. In addition to treating the primary tumor, other therapies aimed at the liver's inflammatory state might also be important in achieving a durable response after RFA.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alcoolismo/complicações , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/sangue , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiologia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hepatite/complicações , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangue , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiologia , Transplante de Fígado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , alfa-Fetoproteínas/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA