Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJOG ; 128(9): 1487-1496, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629490

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Limited data are available from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on the relationship of haemoglobin levels to adverse outcomes at different times during pregnancy. We evaluated the association of haemoglobin levels in nulliparous women at two times in pregnancy with pregnancy outcomes. DESIGN: ASPIRIN Trial data were used to study the association between haemoglobin levels measured at 6+0 -13+6  weeks and 26+0 -30+0  weeks of gestation with fetal and neonatal outcomes. SETTING: Obstetric care facilities in Pakistan, India, Kenya, Zambia, The Democratic Republic of the Congo and Guatemala. POPULATION: A total of 11 976 pregnant women. METHODS: Generalised linear models were used to obtain adjusted relative risks and 95% CI for adverse outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm birth, stillbirth, neonatal death, small for gestational age (SGA) and birthweight <2500 g. RESULTS: The mean haemoglobin levels at 6+0 -13+6  weeks and at 26-30 weeks of gestation were 116 g/l (SD 17) and 107 g/l (SD 15), respectively. In general, pregnancy outcomes were better with increasing haemoglobin. At 6+0 -13+6  weeks of gestation, stillbirth, SGA and birthweight <2500 g, were significantly associated with haemoglobin of 70-89 g/l compared with haemoglobin of 110-129 g/l The relationships of adverse pregnancy outcomes with various haemoglobin levels were more marked at 26-30 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSIONS: Both lower and some higher haemoglobin concentrations are associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes at 6+0 -13+6  weeks and at 26-30 weeks of gestation, although the relationship with low haemoglobin levels appears more consistent and generally stronger. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Both lower and some higher haemoglobin concentrations were associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes at 6-13 weeks and 26-30 weeks of gestation.


Assuntos
Hemoglobinas/análise , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Morte Perinatal , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Adulto , Países em Desenvolvimento , Índices de Eritrócitos , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Fatores de Risco
2.
BJOG ; 125(12): 1591-1599, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29782696

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound is widely regarded as an important adjunct to antenatal care (ANC) to guide practice and reduce perinatal mortality. We assessed the impact of ANC ultrasound use at health centres in resource-limited countries. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Clusters within five countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia) METHODS: Clusters were randomised to standard ANC or standard care plus two ultrasounds and referral for complications. The study trained providers in intervention clusters to perform basic obstetric ultrasounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of maternal mortality, maternal near-miss mortality, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality. RESULTS: During the 24-month trial, 28 intervention and 28 control clusters had 24 263 and 23 160 births, respectively; 78% in the intervention clusters received at least one study ultrasound; 60% received two. The prevalence of conditions noted including twins, placenta previa, and abnormal lie was within expected ranges. 9% were referred for an ultrasound-diagnosed condition, and 71% attended the referral. The ANC (RR 1.0 95% CI 1.00, 1.01) and hospital delivery rates for complicated pregnancies (RR 1.03 95% CI 0.89, 1.20) did not differ between intervention and control clusters nor did the composite outcome (RR 1.09 95% CI 0.97, 1.23) or its individual components. CONCLUSIONS: Despite availability of ultrasound at ANC in the intervention clusters, neither ANC nor hospital delivery for complicated pregnancies increased. The composite outcome and the individual components were not reduced. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Antenatal care ultrasound did not improve a composite outcome that included maternal, fetal, and neonatal mortality.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Assistência Perinatal , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise por Conglomerados , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Mortalidade Materna , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
3.
BJOG ; 125(2): 131-138, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28139875

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to classify causes of stillbirth for six low-middle-income countries using a prospectively defined algorithm. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Communities in India, Pakistan, Guatemala, Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia and Kenya. POPULATION: Pregnant women residing in defined study regions. METHODS: Basic data regarding conditions present during pregnancy and delivery were collected. Using these data, a computer-based hierarchal algorithm assigned cause of stillbirth. Causes included birth trauma, congenital anomaly, infection, asphyxia, and preterm birth, based on existing cause of death classifications and included contributing maternal conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary cause of stillbirth. RESULTS: Of 109 911 women who were enrolled and delivered (99% of those screened in pregnancy), 2847 had a stillbirth (a rate of 27.2 per 1000 births). Asphyxia was the cause of 46.6% of the stillbirths, followed by infection (20.8%), congenital anomalies (8.4%) and prematurity (6.6%). Among those caused by asphyxia, 38% had prolonged or obstructed labour, 19% antepartum haemorrhage and 18% pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. About two-thirds (67.4%) of the stillbirths did not have signs of maceration. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm determined cause of stillbirth from basic data obtained from lay-health providers. The major cause of stillbirth was fetal asphyxia associated with prolonged or obstructed labour, pre-eclampsia and antepartum haemorrhage. In the African sites, infection also was an important contributor to stillbirth. Using this algorithm, we documented cause of stillbirth and its trends to inform public health programs, using consistency, transparency, and comparability across time or regions with minimal burden on the healthcare system. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Major causes of stillbirth are asphyxia, pre-eclampsia and haemorrhage. Infections are important in Africa.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Sistema de Registros , Natimorto/epidemiologia , África/epidemiologia , Ásia/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Saúde Global , Guatemala/epidemiologia , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Materno-Infantil , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
BJOG ; 125(9): 1137-1143, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29094456

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the causes of maternal death in a population-based cohort in six low- and middle-income countries using a standardised, hierarchical, algorithmic cause of death (COD) methodology. DESIGN: A population-based, prospective observational study. SETTING: Seven sites in six low- to middle-income countries including the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Guatemala, India (two sites), Kenya, Pakistan and Zambia. POPULATION: All deaths among pregnant women resident in the study sites from 2014 to December 2016. METHODS: For women who died, we used a standardised questionnaire to collect clinical data regarding maternal conditions present during pregnancy and delivery. These data were analysed using a computer-based algorithm to assign cause of maternal death based on the International Classification of Disease-Maternal Mortality system (trauma, termination of pregnancy-related, eclampsia, haemorrhage, pregnancy-related infection and medical conditions). We also compared the COD results to healthcare-provider-assigned maternal COD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assigned causes of maternal mortality. RESULTS: Among 158 205 women, there were 221 maternal deaths. The most common algorithm-assigned maternal COD were obstetric haemorrhage (38.6%), pregnancy-related infection (26.4%) and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (18.2%). Agreement between algorithm-assigned COD and COD assigned by healthcare providers ranged from 75% for haemorrhage to 25% for medical causes coincident to pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The major maternal COD in the Global Network sites were haemorrhage, pregnancy-related infection and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. This system could allow public health programmes in low- and middle-income countries to generate transparent and comparable data for maternal COD across time or regions. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: An algorithmic system for determining maternal cause of death in low-resource settings is described.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Morte Materna/classificação , Complicações na Gravidez/mortalidade , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Guatemala/epidemiologia , Humanos , Renda , Índia/epidemiologia , Quênia/epidemiologia , Morte Materna/etiologia , Mortalidade Materna , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Zâmbia/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA