Retrospective Analysis of Presymptomatic Treatment In Sturge-Weber Syndrome.

Background: Ninety percent of infants with Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) brain involvement have seizure onset before 2 years of age; this is associated with worse neurologic outcome. Presymptomatic treatment before seizure onset may delay seizure onset and improve outcome, as has been shown in other conditions with a high-risk of developing epilepsy such as tuberous sclerosis complex. Electroencephalogram (EEG) may be a biomarker to predict seizure onset. This retrospective clinical data analysis aims to assess impact of presymptomatic treatment in SWS. Methods: This two-centered, IRB-approved, retrospective study analyzed records from patients with SWS brain involvement. Clinical data recorded included demographics, age of seizure onset (if present), brain involvement extent (unilateral versus bilateral), port-wine birthmark (PWB) extent, family history of seizure, presymptomatic treatment if received, neuroscore, and anti-seizure medication. EEG reports prior to seizure onset were analyzed. Results: Ninety-two patients were included (48 females), and 32 received presymptomatic treatment outside of a formal protocol (5 aspirin, 16 aspirin and levetiracetam; 9 aspirin and oxcarbazepine, 2 valproic acid). Presymptomatically-treated patients were more likely to be seizure-free at 2 years (15 of 32; 47% versus 7 of 60; 12%; p<.001). A greater percentage of presymptomatically-treated patients had bilateral brain involvement (38% treated versus 17% untreated; p=.026). Median hemiparesis neuroscore at 2 years was better in presymptomatically-treated patients. In EEG reports prior to seizure onset, the presence of slowing, epileptiform discharges, or EEG-identified seizures was associated with seizure onset by 2 (p=.001). Conclusion: Presymptomatic treatment is a promising approach to children diagnosed with SWS prior to seizure onset. Further study is needed, including prospective drug trials, long-term neuropsychological outcome, and prospective EEG analysis to assess this approach and determine biomarkers for presymptomatic treatment.

Changes in pediatric referrals after the 2009 ketogenic diet consensus recommendations.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the International Ketogenic Diet Study Group published recommendations for children receiving ketogenic diet (KD) therapy for epilepsy. The document included a table listing epilepsy syndromes and conditions in which the KD has been particularly beneficial, hoping that physicians would refer children for the KD sooner. PURPOSE: To measure the impact of these 2009 recommendations on referral practice, we compared children initiated on the KD at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) 10 years before and after the recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, children referred to the KD who met indications increased from the pre- to post-recommendation group, 44 % (112/256) to 69 % (175/255) (p < 0.001), with JHH neurologists specifically referring more frequently (10/112, 9 % to 58/175, 33 %) (p < 0.01). Referrals increased for Glut-1 deficiency (0 % to 2.4 %, p = 0.015), Dravet syndrome (0 % to 6.7 %, p < 0.01), Rett syndrome (0.4 % to 3 %, p = 0.018), and formula-fed only status (16 % to 31 %, p < 0.01). The chances of > 50 % seizure reduction for all children referred improved slightly between decades (56 % to 61 %, p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Following the 2009 recommendations, our study shows there was an increase in referrals for children with indications at our center. Referrals from neurologists at our own institution increased the most. Ketogenic diet efficacy improved slightly over time but did not reach significance.

Ketogenic Diet: Parental Experiences and Expectations.

BACKGROUND: The ketogenic diet may be difficult for some patients and their families to implement and can impact physical, emotional, and social well-being. METHODS: Through principles of fundamental qualitative description, we completed an exploratory study on parents' experiences and expectations on the use and efficacy of the ketogenic diet for children with medically refractory epilepsy. RESULTS: Seventeen parents (10 mothers and 7 fathers) of 12 children with epilepsy participated. At the time of the interview, parents had experienced an average of 25 months of ketogenic diet treatment for their child (range 2 months to 98 months). Half of the caregivers learned about the ketogenic diet from their neurologist, whereas the remainder had heard about it from another source (ie, the internet). Most caregivers' (n = 13) diet expectations were related to seizure control. However, child development (n = 5) and quality of life (n = 5) were also crucial to some. Physical impacts of the diet were most commonly gastrointestinal for children (n = 9). Social and emotional effects were noted in some older children with typical development. Most caregivers described negative impacts on finances (n = 15), relationships (n = 14), and emotional well-being (ie, stress) (n = 12). Caregivers benefited from the ketogenic diet team's regular communication, close follow-up, and family-centered care. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the impacts that the ketogenic diet may have on caregivers' emotional and social well-being, the positive impacts of the diet were felt to outweigh any perceived risks. Effects (both positive and negative) on quality of life and child development (eg, social, emotional, cognitive) are essential for caregivers and require additional investigation.