Multiplexed mapping of the interactome of GPCRs with receptor activity-modifying proteins.

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) form complexes with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and may regulate their cellular trafficking and pharmacology. RAMP interactions have been identified for about 50 GPCRs, but only a few GPCR-RAMP complexes have been studied in detail. To elucidate a comprehensive GPCR-RAMP interactome, we created a library of 215 dual epitope-tagged (DuET) GPCRs representing all GPCR subfamilies and coexpressed each GPCR with each of the three RAMPs. Screening the GPCR-RAMP pairs with customized multiplexed suspension bead array (SBA) immunoassays, we identified 122 GPCRs that showed strong evidence for interaction with at least one RAMP. We screened for interactions in three cell lines and found 23 endogenously expressed GPCRs that formed complexes with RAMPs. Mapping the GPCR-RAMP interactome expands the current system-wide functional characterization of RAMP-interacting GPCRs to inform the design of selective therapeutics targeting GPCR-RAMP complexes.

Expanding the GPCR-RAMP interactome.

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) can form complexes with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and regulate their cellular trafficking and pharmacology. RAMP interactions have been identified for about 50 GPCRs, but only a few GPCR-RAMP complexes have been studied in detail. To elucidate a complete interactome between GPCRs and the three RAMPs, we developed a customized library of 215 Dual Epitope-Tagged (DuET) GPCRs representing all GPCR subfamilies. Using a multiplexed suspension bead array (SBA) assay, we identified 122 GPCRs that showed strong evidence for interaction with at least one RAMP. We screened for native interactions in three cell lines and found 23 GPCRs that formed complexes with RAMPs. Mapping the GPCR-RAMP interactome expands the current system-wide functional characterization of RAMP-interacting GPCRs to inform the design of selective GPCR-targeted therapeutics.

Multiplexed selectivity screening of anti-GPCR antibodies.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control critical cellular signaling pathways. Therapeutic agents including anti-GPCR antibodies (Abs) are being developed to modulate GPCR function. However, validating the selectivity of anti-GPCR Abs is challenging because of sequence similarities among individual receptors within GPCR subfamilies. To address this challenge, we developed a multiplexed immunoassay to test >400 anti-GPCR Abs from the Human Protein Atlas targeting a customized library of 215 expressed and solubilized GPCRs representing all GPCR subfamilies. We found that ~61% of Abs tested were selective for their intended target, ~11% bound off-target, and ~28% did not bind to any GPCR. Antigens of on-target Abs were, on average, significantly longer, more disordered, and less likely to be buried in the interior of the GPCR protein than the other Abs. These results provide important insights into the immunogenicity of GPCR epitopes and form a basis for designing therapeutic Abs and for detecting pathological auto-Abs against GPCRs.

Itch receptor MRGPRX4 interacts with the receptor activity-modifying proteins.

Cholestatic itch is a severe and debilitating symptom in liver diseases with limited treatment options. The class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) Mas-related GPCR subtype X4 (MRGPRX4) has been identified as a receptor for bile acids, which are potential cholestatic pruritogens. An increasing number of GPCRs have been shown to interact with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs), which can modulate different aspects of GPCR biology. Using a combination of multiplexed immunoassay and proximity ligation assay, we show that MRGPRX4 interacts with RAMPs. The interaction of MRGPRX4 with RAMP2, but not RAMP1 or 3, causes attenuation of basal and agonist-dependent signaling, which correlates with a decrease of MRGPRX4 cell surface expression as measured using a quantitative NanoBRET pulse-chase assay. Finally, we use AlphaFold Multimer to predict the structure of the MRGPRX4-RAMP2 complex. The discovery that RAMP2 regulates MRGPRX4 may have direct implications for future drug development for cholestatic itch.

Elucidating the Interactome of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to interact with several other classes of integral membrane proteins that modulate their biology and pharmacology. However, the extent of these interactions and the mechanisms of their effects are not well understood. For example, one class of GPCR-interacting proteins, receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs), comprise three related and ubiquitously expressed single-transmembrane span proteins. The RAMP family was discovered more than two decades ago, and since then GPCR-RAMP interactions and their functional consequences on receptor trafficking and ligand selectivity have been documented for several secretin (class B) GPCRs, most notably the calcitonin receptor-like receptor. Recent bioinformatics and multiplexed experimental studies suggest that GPCR-RAMP interactions might be much more widespread than previously anticipated. Recently, cryo-electron microscopy has provided high-resolution structures of GPCR-RAMP-ligand complexes, and drugs have been developed that target GPCR-RAMP complexes. In this review, we provide a summary of recent advances in techniques that allow the discovery of GPCR-RAMP interactions and their functional consequences and highlight prospects for future advances. We also provide an up-to-date list of reported GPCR-RAMP interactions based on a review of the current literature. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) have emerged as modulators of many aspects of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)biology and pharmacology. The application of new methodologies to study membrane protein-protein interactions suggests that RAMPs interact with many more GPCRs than had been previously known. These findings, especially when combined with structural studies of membrane protein complexes, have significant implications for advancing GPCR-targeted drug discovery and the understanding of GPCR pharmacology, biology, and regulation.

Proteomics Update and Perspectives from the Proteomics in Cell Biology and Disease Mechanisms Conference.

Proteomics, or the large-scale study of proteomes, has benefitted from many recent advances in chemical biology, mass spectrometry, and machine learning. The Proteomics in Cell Biology and Disease Mechanisms conference showcased the synergy between these elements and the vast range of biological questions that proteomics can now help us to answer.

Caspase-1 interdomain linker cleavage is required for pyroptosis.

Pathogen-related signals induce a number of cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) to form canonical inflammasomes, which activate pro-caspase-1 and trigger pyroptotic cell death. All well-studied inflammasome-forming PRRs oligomerize with the adapter protein ASC (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD) to generate a large structure in the cytosol, which induces the dimerization, autoproteolysis, and activation of the pro-caspase-1 zymogen. However, several PRRs can also directly interact with pro-caspase-1 without ASC, forming smaller "ASC-independent" inflammasomes. It is currently thought that little, if any, pro-caspase-1 autoproteolysis occurs during, and is not required for, ASC-independent inflammasome signaling. Here, we show that the related human PRRs NLRP1 and CARD8 exclusively form ASC-dependent and ASC-independent inflammasomes, respectively, identifying CARD8 as the first canonical inflammasome-forming PRR that does not form an ASC-containing signaling platform. Despite their different structures, we discovered that both the NLRP1 and CARD8 inflammasomes require pro-caspase-1 autoproteolysis between the small and large catalytic subunits to induce pyroptosis. Thus, pro-caspase-1 self-cleavage is a required regulatory step for pyroptosis induced by human canonical inflammasomes.

Multiplexed analysis of the secretin-like GPCR-RAMP interactome.

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) have been shown to modulate the functions of several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but potential direct interactions among the three known RAMPs and hundreds of GPCRs have never been investigated. Focusing mainly on the secretin-like family of GPCRs, we engineered epitope-tagged GPCRs and RAMPs, and developed a multiplexed suspension bead array (SBA) immunoassay to detect GPCR-RAMP complexes from detergent-solubilized lysates. Using 64 antibodies raised against the native proteins and 4 antibodies targeting the epitope tags, we mapped the interactions among 23 GPCRs and 3 RAMPs. We validated nearly all previously reported secretin-like GPCR-RAMP interactions, and also found previously unidentified RAMP interactions with additional secretin-like GPCRs, chemokine receptors, and orphan receptors. The results provide a complete interactome of secretin-like GPCRs with RAMPs. The SBA strategy will be useful to search for additional GPCR-RAMP complexes and other interacting membrane protein pairs in cell lines and tissues.

The asymmetric function of Dph1-Dph2 heterodimer in diphthamide biosynthesis.

Diphthamide, the target of diphtheria toxin, is a post-translationally modified histidine residue found in archaeal and eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (EF2). In the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis, a [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing radical SAM enzyme, Dph1-Dph2 heterodimer in eukaryotes or Dph2 homodimer in archaea, cleaves S-adenosylmethionine and transfers the 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl group to EF2. It was demonstrated previously that for the archaeal Dph2 homodimer, only one [4Fe-4S] cluster is necessary for the in vitro activity. Here, we demonstrate that for the eukaryotic Dph1-Dph2 heterodimer, the [4Fe-4S] cluster-binding cysteine residues in each subunit are required for diphthamide biosynthesis to occur in vivo. Furthermore, our in vitro reconstitution experiments with Dph1-Dph2 mutants suggested that the Dph1 cluster serves a catalytic role, while the Dph2 cluster facilitates the reduction of the Dph1 cluster by the physiological reducing system Dph3/Cbr1/NADH. Our results reveal the asymmetric functional roles of the Dph1-Dph2 heterodimer and may help to understand how the Fe-S clusters in radical SAM enzymes are reduced in biology.

SIRT2 and Lysine Fatty Acylation Regulate the Activity of RalB and Cell Migration.

Protein lysine fatty acylation is increasingly recognized as a prevalent and important protein post-translation modification. Recently, it has been shown that K-Ras4a, R-Ras2, and Rac1 are regulated by lysine fatty acylation. Here, we investigated whether other members of the Ras superfamily could also be regulated by lysine fatty acylation. Several small GTPases exhibit hydroxylamine resistant fatty acylation, suggesting they may also have protein lysine fatty acylation. We further characterized one of these GTPases, RalB. We show that RalB has C-terminal lysine fatty acylation, with the predominant modification site being Lys200. The lysine acylation of RalB is regulated by SIRT2, a member of the sirtuin family of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent protein lysine deacylases. Lysine fatty acylated RalB exhibited enhanced plasma membrane localization and recruited its known effectors Sec5 and Exo84, members of the exocyst complex, to the plasma membrane. RalB lysine fatty acylation did not affect the proliferation or anchorage-independent growth but did affect the trans-well migration of A549 lung cancer cells. This study thus identified an additional function for protein lysine fatty acylation and the deacylase SIRT2.