HEMOSTASIS DISORDERS IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 130 PATIENTS.

The laboratory detection of factors that participate in coagulation mechanisms in patients with coronary heart disease may lead to important findings regarding the contribution of endothelial function to atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the role of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), von Willebrand factor (vWF) activity, thrombomodulin (TM), ADAMTS13 activity and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in patients undergoing coronary angiography due to non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable angina (UA) and stable angina pectoris with positive stress testing-induced myocardial ischemia (controls). Furthermore, the measured biomarkers were examined among patients with classical cardiovascular risk factors. 50 NSTEMI patients, 50 UA patients and 30 controls referred to coronary angiography were included in the study. The blood samples were collected before the catheter procedure. MPO, TM and ADAMTS13 activity were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while vWF activity was calculated with INNOVANCE vWF Ac. When the laboratory results were compared between the three study groups, hs-CRP was found to be higher in NSTEMI patients compared to UA patients (p=0.0015) and controls (p<0.0001). ADAMTS13 activity was higher in NSTEMI (p=0.0035) and UA patients (p=0.0102) compared to controls and TM was lower in NSTEMI patients compared to UA patients (p=0.0307) and controls (p=0.0002). Moreover, MPO was higher in UA patients compared to the control group (p=0.0227). Finally, each of the aforementioned biomarkers was compared in the presence of the following cardiovascular risk factors: smoking, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). The results of this study add more data to the current medical literature concerning the role of coagulation disorders, endothelial damage and immunothrombosis in patients with coronary artery disease and their correlation with traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Hospital attendance and admission trends for cardiac diseases during the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown in Greece.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, along with implementation of lockdown and strict public movement restrictions, in Greece has affected hospital visits and admissions. We aimed to investigate trends of cardiac disease admissions during the outbreak of the pandemic and possible associations with the applied restrictive measures. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study. METHODS: Data for 4970 patients admitted via the cardiology emergency department (ED) across 3 large-volume urban hospitals in Athens and 2 regional/rural hospitals from February 3, 2020, up to April 12 were recorded. Data from the equivalent (for the COVID-19 outbreak) time period of 2019 and from the postlockdown time period were also collected. RESULTS: A falling trend of cardiology ED visits and hospital admissions was observed starting from the week when the restrictive measures due to COVID-19 were implemented. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 outbreak time period, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [145 (29/week) vs. 60 (12/week), -59%, P < 0.001], ST elevation myocardial infarction [46 (9.2/week) vs. 21 (4.2/week), -54%, P = 0.002], and non-ST elevation ACS [99 cases (19.8/week) vs. 39 (7.8/week), -60% P < 0.001] were reduced at the COVID-19 outbreak time period. Reductions were also noted for heart failure worsening and arrhythmias. The ED visits in the postlockdown period were significantly higher than in the COVID-19 outbreak time period (1511 vs 660; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data show significant drops in cardiology visits and admissions during the COVID-19 outbreak time period. Whether this results from restrictive measures or depicts a true reduction of cardiac disease cases warrants further investigation.

Organization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational survey.

BACKGROUND: The present survey aims to describe the intensive cardiac care unit organization and admission policies in Europe. METHODS: A total of 228 hospitals (61% academic) from 27 countries participated in this survey. In addition to the organizational aspects of the intensive cardiac care units, including classification of the intensive cardiac care unit levels, data on the admission diagnoses were gathered from consecutive patients who were admitted during a two-day period. Admission policies were evaluated by comparing illness severity with the intensive cardiac care unit level. Gross national income was used to differentiate high-income countries (n=13) from middle-income countries (n=14). RESULTS: A total of 98% of the hospitals had an intensive cardiac care unit: 70% had a level 1 intensive cardiac care unit, 76% had a level 2 intensive cardiac care unit, 51% had a level 3 intensive cardiac care unit, and 60% of the hospitals had more than one intensive cardiac care unit level. High-income countries tended to have more level 3 intensive cardiac care units than middle-income countries (55% versus 41%, p=0.07). A total of 5159 admissions were scored on illness severity: 63% were low severity, 24% were intermediate severity, and 12% were high severity. Patients with low illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, whereas patients with high illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 2 and 3 intensive cardiac care units. A policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; some patients with high illness severity were admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more often in middle-income countries, whereas some patients with low illness severity were admitted to level 3 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more frequently in high-income countries. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the admitted patients were considered intermediate or high risk. Although patients with higher illness severity were mostly admitted to high-level intensive cardiac care units, an admission policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; this mismatch was partly related to insufficient logistic intensive cardiac care unit capacity.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for distal coronary graft anastomosis le-sions: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Management of coronary artery graft failure, especially at the site of a recent distal anastomosis, is a challenging clinical situation, and literature data are scarce. CASE SERIES: We present a case series of patients with coronary artery bypass graft failure up to six months after surgical revascularization, who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention at the site of distal graft anastomosis through the graft or the native vessel. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention at distal graft anastomotic lesions is challenging, it can be performed from either the graft or the native vessel, and the angiographic result may not always be optimal. HIPPOKRATIA 2019, 23(2): 87-91.

Ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery cannulation during the same coronary catheterization procedure.

BACKGROUND: Switching to femoral after a failed radial approach carries an increased risk of bleeding complications since the femoral artery puncture is performed in patients already anticoagulated. Moreover, dedicated radial operators find it more and more difficult to use the femoral approach, and ulnar artery cannulation provides them with the opportunity to further reduce its use. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery cannulation during the same coronary catheterization procedure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all cardiac catheterizations, from January 2015 until June 2016, with initial radial approach and conversion to ipsilateral ulnar approach. Patients with sheath insertion both in radial and ipsilateral ulnar arteries were further evaluated. RESULTS: Four thousand one hundred and two procedures were performed during the study period, and 3,876 (94.5 %) of them were performed initially through a radial approach. Radial and ipsilateral ulnar catheterization was accomplished in nine patients, resulting in successful catheterization and procedure completion, without any serious complications recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Ipsilateral radial and ulnar artery catheterization proved to be feasible and safe, without any serious complications. Hippokratia 2016, 20(3): 249-251.

Serum interleukin-6 is elevated in symptomatic carotid bifurcation disease.

INTRODUCTION: The levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines may express the extent of the inflammatory response and their participation in plaque progression and rupture needs to be evaluated. We aimed to investigate differences in circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines and in plaque infiltration by macrophages between patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic disease. METHODS: One hundred nineteen patients (91 men and 28 women; mean age 66 +/- 8 years; range 42-83 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy for significant (>70%) carotid bifurcation stenosis were enrolled in this study. Patients were characterized as symptomatic (n = 62) or asymptomatic (n = 57) after neurological examination. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), IL-1beta, serum amyloid A (SAA), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were evaluated. Macrophage infiltration of the plaque was assessed quantitatively from endarterectomy specimens using the monoclonal antibody CD68. RESULTS: Serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with symptomatic compared with those with asymptomatic carotid disease (3.3 [2.0-6.5] pg/ml vs 2.5 [1.9-4.1] pg/ml, P = 0.02). TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, SAA, and hs-CRP levels did not differ significantly between the two groups. Symptomatic patients had also more intense macrophage accumulation in the carotid plaque compared with asymptomatic patients (0.6 +/- 0.1% vs 0.4 +/- 0.1%, P < 0.001). Although there were correlations between the levels of the different inflammatory markers, there were no correlation between any of them and the extent of plaque macrophage infiltration. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic disease have elevated serum IL-6 levels compared with asymptomatic patients. Symptomatic patients have also more intense macrophage infiltration of the atherosclerotic plaque suggesting that inflammatory process may contribute to the destabilization of the carotid plaque.

Cardiac troponin I in patients with acute upper and lower limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the presence, etiology and clinical significance of elevated troponin I in patients with acute upper or lower limb ischemia. The high sensitivity and specificity of cardiac troponin for the diagnosis of myocardial cell damage suggested a significant role for troponin in the patients investigated for this condition. The initial enthusiasm for the diagnostic potential of troponin was limited by the discovery that elevated cardiac troponin levels are also observed in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction, even conditions without obvious cardiac involvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 71 consecutive patients participated in this study. 31 (44%) of them were men and mean age was 75.4 +/- 10.3 years (range 44-92 years). 60 (85%) patients had acute lower limb ischemia and the remaining (11; 15%) had acute upper limb ischemia. Serial creatine kinase (CK), isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) and troponin I measurements were performed in all patients. RESULTS: 33 (46%) patients had elevated peak troponin I (> 0.2 ng/ml) levels, all from the lower limb ischemia group (33/60 vs. 0/11 from the acute upper limb ischemia group; p = 0.04). Patients with lower limb ischemia had higher peak troponin I values than patients with upper limb ischemia (0.97 +/- 2.3 [range 0.01-12.1] ng/ml vs. 0.04 +/- 0.04 [0.01-0.14] ng/ml respectively; p = 0.003), higher peak CK values (2504 +/- 7409 [range 42-45 940] U/ml vs. 340 +/- 775 [range 34-2403] U/ml, p = 0.002, respectively, in the two groups) and peak CK-MB values (59.4 +/- 84.5 [range 12-480] U/ml vs. 21.2 +/- 9.1 [range 12-39] U/ml, respectively, in the two groups; p = 0.04). Peak cardiac troponin I levels were correlated with peak CK and CK-MB values. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lower limb ischemia often have elevated troponin I without a primary cardiac source; this was not observed in patients presenting with acute upper limb ischemia. It is very important for these critically ill patients to focus on the main problem of acute limb ischemia and to attempt to treat the patient rather than the troponin elevation per se. Cardiac troponin elevation should not prevent physicians from providing immediate treatment for limb ischaemia to these patients, espescially when signs, symptoms and electrocardiographic findings preclude acute cardiac involvement.