Impact of COVID-19 on hospital hand hygiene performance: a multicentre observational study using group electronic monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Reliable reports on hand hygiene performance throughout the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking as most hospitals continue to rely on direct observation to measure this quality indicator. Using group electronic hand hygiene monitoring, we sought to assess the impact of COVID-19 on adherence to hand hygiene. METHODS: Across 12 Ontario hospitals (5 university and 7 community teaching hospitals), a group electronic hand hygiene monitoring system was installed before the pandemic to provide continuous measurement of hand hygiene adherence across 978 ward and 367 critical care beds. We performed an interrupted time-series study of institutional hand hygiene adherence in association with a COVID-19 inpatient census and the Ontario daily count of COVID-19 cases during a baseline period (Nov. 1, 2019, to Feb. 29, 2020), the pre-peak period of the first wave of the pandemic (Mar. 1 to Apr. 24, 2020), and the post-peak period of the first wave (Apr. 25 to July 5, 2020). We used a Poisson regression model to assess the association between the hospital COVID-19 census and institutional hand hygiene adherence while adjusting for the correlation within inpatient units. RESULTS: At baseline, the rate of hand hygiene adherence was 46.0% (6 325 401 of 13 750 968 opportunities) and this improved beginning in March 2020 to a daily peak of 79.3% (66 640 of 84 026 opportunities) on Mar. 30, 2020. Each patient admitted with COVID-19 was associated with improved hand hygiene adherence (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.0621, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0619-1.0623). Increasing Ontario daily case count was similarly associated with improved hand hygiene (IRR 1.0026, 95% CI 1.0021-1.0032). After peak COVID-19 community and inpatient numbers, hand hygiene adherence declined and returned to baseline. INTERPRETATION: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with significant improvement in hand hygiene adherence, measured using a group electronic monitoring system. Future research should seek to determine whether strategies that focus on health care worker perception of personal risk can achieve sustainable improvements in hand hygiene performance.

Association Between Hospital Outbreaks and Hand Hygiene: Insights from Electronic Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is an important patient safety measure linked to the prevention of health care-associated infection, yet how outbreaks affect HH performance has not been formally evaluated. METHODS: A controlled, interrupted time series was performed across 5 acute-care academic hospitals using group electronic monitoring. This system captures 100% of all hand sanitizer and soap dispenser activations via a wireless signal to a wireless hub; the number of activations is divided by a previously validated estimate of the number of daily HH opportunities per patient bed, multiplied by the hourly census of patients on the unit. Daily HH adherence 60 days prior and 90 days following outbreaks on inpatient units was compared to control units not in outbreaks over the same period, using a Poisson regression model adjusting for correlations within hospitals and units. Predictors of HH improvement were assessed in this multivariate model. RESULTS: In the 60 days prior to outbreaks, units destined for outbreaks had significantly lower HH adherence compared to control units (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], .90-.93; P < .0001). Following an outbreak, the HH adherence among the outbreak units increased above that of the controls (IRR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; P < .0001). Greater improvements were noted for outbreaks on surgical units, for outbreaks involving antibiotic-resistant organisms and enteric pathogens, and in those outbreaks where health-care workers became ill. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital outbreaks tend to occur in units with lower HH adherence and are associated with rapid improvements in HH performance. Group electronic monitoring of HH could be used to develop novel, prospective feedback interventions designed to avert hospital outbreaks.

Lessons from across the pond: Student perspectives on the Internal Medicine clerkship experience at an Irish and Canadian medical school.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. There is an increasing number of Canadians studying medicine outside of Canada, with a large cohort studying in Ireland. Studying abroad often means different foci in medical training which may make transitioning to residency in a different system more challenging. Students often enter North American elective rotations with little knowledge of student roles and responsibilities. This paper provides insight into the differences in learning objectives and student experiences in an Internal Medicine clerkship at a medical school in Canada and Ireland. Learning objectives are similar between systems; but there is an experiential discordance. In Ireland, clerks see many different patients, gaining exposure to a breadth of topics and clinical signs, but medical student presentations rarely inform decisions around patient care. In Canada, clerks have more direct patient responsibilities, performing physical examinations, reviewing investigations, writing progress notes, and devising management plans as part of their professional development. Overall, the Irish system places emphasis on the mastery of core clinical skills and maximizing breadth of patient exposure whereas the Canadian clerkship is more focused on graduated responsibility and formulating management plans, at the expense of some breadth of exposure. Such discrepancies may not affect the quality of residents, but are important considerations for Canadians studying abroad when repatriating for electives and residencies.

Do physicians clean their hands? Insights from a covert observational study.

Physicians are notorious for poor hand hygiene (HH) compliance. We wondered if lower performance by physicians compared with other health professionals might reflect differences in the Hawthorne effect. We introduced covert HH observers to see if performance differences between physicians and nurses decreased and to gain further insights into physician HH behaviors. Following training and validation with a hospital HH auditor, 2 students covertly measured HH during clinical rotations. Students rotated off clinical services every week to increase exposure to different providers and minimize risk of exposing the covert observation. We compared covertly measured HH compliance with data from overt observation by hospital auditors during the same time period. Covert observation produced much lower HH compliance than recorded by hospital auditors during the same time period: 50.0% (799/1597) versus 83.7% (2769/3309) (P < 0.0002). The difference in physician compliance between hospital auditors and covert observers was 19.0% (73.2% vs 54.2%); for nurses this difference was much higher at 40.7% (85.8% vs 45.1%) (P < 0.0001). Physician trainees showed markedly better compliance when attending staff cleaned their hands compared with encounters when attending did not (79.5% vs 18.9%; P < 0.0002). Our study suggests that traditional HH audits not only overstate HH performance overall, but can lead to inaccurate inferences about performance by professional groupings due to relative differences in the Hawthorne effect. We suggest that future improvement efforts will rely on more accurate HH monitoring systems and strong attending physician leadership to set an example for trainees. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015;11:862-864. © 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine.