RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The pain experienced by a patient during a prostate fusion biopsy is cumulative and can also be modulated by many factors. The aim of the study was to assess the association between the degree of pain intensity during prostate biopsy and the region of the biopted organ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a group of 143 patients who underwent prostate fusion biopsy under local analgesia followed by blockage of the periprostatic nerve. After a biopsy, the patients completed the original questionnaire about the pain experienced during the procedure. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in pain score between cores taken in the apex (median 5 (IQR 2-5)), medium level (median 1 (IQR 1-2)), and prostate base (median 1 (IQR 1-3)) (p < 0.001). The malignancy scale ISUP ≥ 2 (p = 0.038) and lower PSA value (r = -0.17; p = 0.046) are associated with higher pain during procedure. Biopsy time was correlated with discomfort (r = 0.19; p = 0.04). Age (p = 0.65), lesion size (p = 0.29), PI-RADS score (p = 0.86), prostate volume (p = 0.22), and the number of cores (p = 0.56) did not correspond to the pain scale. CONCLUSIONS: The apex is the most sensitive sector of the prostate. ISUP ≥ 2 and patients with low PSA levels more often indicated higher values on the pain rating scale.
RESUMO
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imgaing (MRI) targeted biopsy is the gold standard for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. In this study, we examined the association between the operator's experience and the improvement in the precision of the MRI prostate biopsy procedure and the detection of PCa. Material and methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent prostate fusion biopsy. Data on biopsy duration, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, lesion size, number of samples taken, number of cores involved, and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade were subjected to statistical analysis, with the study group divided into three consecutive time periods (tertiles). Results: There were statistically significant differences in biopsy duration between tertiles (p <0.001). The greatest difference in the involved/taken cores ratio occurred between the first and third tertile (p = 0.002). The difference between the first and second tertile was insignificant (p = 0.4), while the difference between the second and third tertile was statistically significant (p = 0.004). The differences between tertiles in Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System v2.1 were also significant (p = 0.003). The PSA value (p = 0.036) was statistically significant, unlike prostate volume (p = 0.16), digital rectal examination (DRE) (p = 0.7), and ISUP grade (p = 0.7). There was no statistical difference between tested tertiles in the number of detected PCa ISUP ≥2 (Z = 0.191; p = 0.8). Conclusions: The abilities and precision of the operator increase with the increase in the number of procedures performed. The biopsy duration is shortened, and the detection of PCa during the procedure seems to improve with the operator's experience.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer (TC), due to its non-specific symptoms and occurrence in young men, is particularly dangerous. A critical point for early diagnosis is awareness of the disease and the willingness to perform a testicular self-examination (TSE). The main aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of 771 adult men about testicular cancer. Additionally, the sources of information on TC and TSE were analyzed and the influence of demographic factors on the willingness to join preventative programs was examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out during the Movember2020 campaign, where a testicular ultrasound was performed on participants. They were asked to complete a questionnaire with 26 questions to assess their knowledge. RESULTS: The results obtained in the study indicate a low level of knowledge (average 3.5 points out of 18) about TC. Living in a large city (OR = 1.467; p = 0.03), as well as an earlier conversation about TC (OR = 1.639; p = 0.002), increased the awareness about the disease. Additionally it showed that many participants do not perform TSE at all (52.4%) and that only few perform TSE frequently (18.4%). Relationship status (OR = 2.832; p < 0.001) and previous conversations about TC (OR = 1.546; p = 0.02) was reported to be the main contributing factors in males deciding to have TSE. CONCLUSIONS: Our research indicates large educational neglect in terms of knowledge about TC and reluctance in performing TSE. It is worth carrying out preventative actions periodically on an increasing scale, not only for the screening of testicular cancer, but also to expand knowledge on this subject.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas , Neoplasias Testiculares , Adulto , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Polônia , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor with subsequent BCG immunotherapy is the current gold standard in the treatment of high risk and some medium-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Clinical factors like stage, grade, age and gender are well-know predictors of progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In recent years novel hematological biomarkers were shown to be independent predictors of progression. This study aimed to evaluate which of these novel markers has the highest prognostic value of progression in patients with bladder cancer receiving BCG immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 125 patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who received BCG immunotherapy. Of these, 61 progressed to muscle-invasive disease or had high-grade recurrence. These patients were compared with the group who did not progress (n = 64). Clinical data including stage, grade, age, gender, smoking status and observational time was collected. Besides, information on blood count analysis was obtained from ambulatory digital charts. On this basis neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was counted and compared between groups. RESULTS: NLR, PLR and LMR were shown to be independent prognostic markers of progression in multivariable analysis. The model with stage, grade, age, gender, smoking status and LMR had the highest prognostic values of all models (area under curve [AUC] = 0.756). The cut-off point according to ROC curves for LMR was 3.25. Adding LMR to the baseline model including clinical variables significantly increased area under curve by 0.08 (p = 0.001). NLR and PLR did not increase areas under curve significantly to baseline model. CONCLUSIONS: LMR outperformed NLR and PLR for prediction of progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer receiving BCG immunotherapy. LMR, as an easily obtainable biomarker, should be incorporated to the present risk stratification models.