Microsatellite Status and IκBα Expression Levels Predict Sensitivity to Pharmaceutical Curcumin in Colorectal Cancer Cells.

Clinical utilization of curcumin in colorectal cancer (CRC) was revived as a result of the development of novel curcumin formulations with improved bioavailability. Additionally, identification of biomarkers for curcumin sensitivity would also promote successful clinical applications. Here, we wanted to identify such biomarkers in order to establish a predictive model for curcumin sensitivity. Thirty-two low-passage CRC cell lines with specified tumor characteristics were included. Curcumin suppressed cell proliferation, yet sensitivity levels were distinct. Most curcumin-sensitive CRC cell lines were microsatellite stable and expressed high levels of IκBα. The predictive capacity of this biomarker combination possessed a statistical significance of 72% probability to distinguish correctly between curcumin-sensitive and -resistant CRC cell lines. Detailed functional analyses were performed with three sensitive and three resistant CRC cell lines. As curcumin's mode of action, inhibition of NF-κB p65 activation via IκBα was identified. In consequence, we hypothesize that novel curcumin formulations-either alone or, more likely, in combination with standard therapeutics-can be expected to prove clinically beneficial for CRC patients with high IκBα expression levels.

Enhanced Histone Deacetylase Activity in Malignant Melanoma Provokes RAD51 and FANCD2-Triggered Drug Resistance.

DNA-damaging anticancer drugs remain a part of metastatic melanoma therapy. Epigenetic reprogramming caused by increased histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity arising during tumor formation may contribute to resistance of melanomas to the alkylating drugs temozolomide, dacarbazine, and fotemustine. Here, we report on the impact of class I HDACs on the response of malignant melanoma cells treated with alkylating agents. The data show that malignant melanomas in situ contain a high level of HDAC1/2 and malignant melanoma cells overexpress HDAC1/2/3 compared with noncancer cells. Furthermore, pharmacologic inhibition of class I HDACs sensitizes malignant melanoma cells to apoptosis following exposure to alkylating agents, while not affecting primary melanocytes. Inhibition of HDAC1/2/3 caused sensitization of melanoma cells to temozolomide in vitro and in melanoma xenografts in vivo HDAC1/2/3 inhibition resulted in suppression of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination because of downregulation of RAD51 and FANCD2. This sensitized cells to the cytotoxic DNA lesion O(6)-methylguanine and caused a synthetic lethal interaction with the PARP-1 inhibitor olaparib. Furthermore, knockdown experiments identified HDAC2 as being responsible for the regulation of RAD51. The influence of class I HDACs on DSB repair by homologous recombination and the possible clinical implication on malignant melanoma therapy with temozolomide and other alkylating drugs suggests a combination approach where class I HDAC inhibitors such as valproic acid or MS-275 (entinostat) appear to counteract HDAC- and RAD51/FANCD2-mediated melanoma cell resistance. Cancer Res; 76(10); 3067-77. ©2016 AACR.

Aberrant expression and activity of histone deacetylases in sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Activation and differentiation of fibroblasts into contractile protein-expressing myofibroblasts and their acquired apoptosis-resistant phenotype are critical factors towards the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal disease characterised by distorted pulmonary structure and excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. The molecular mechanisms underlying these processes in IPF remain incompletely understood. We investigated the possible implication of aberrant overexpression and activity of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in IPF. METHODS: We analysed lung tissues from patients with sporadic IPF (n=26) and non-diseased control lungs (n=16) for expression of class I and II HDACs. Primary IPF fibroblasts were treated with HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) LBH589 or valproic acid (VPA). RESULTS: Compared to control lungs, protein levels of class I (HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC8) and class II HDACs (HDAC4, HDAC 5, HDAC 7, HDAC 9) were significantly elevated in IPF lungs. Using immunohistochemistry, strong induction of nearly all HDAC enzymes was observed in myofibroblasts of fibroblast foci and in abnormal bronchiolar basal cells at sites of aberrant re-epithelialisation in IPF lungs, but not in controls. Treatment of primary IPF fibroblasts with the pan-HDACi LBH589 resulted in significantly reduced expression of genes associated with ECM synthesis, proliferation and cell survival, as well as in suppression of HDAC7, and was paralleled by induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis. The profibrotic and apoptosis-resistant phenotype of IPF fibroblasts was also partly attenuated by the class I HDACi VPA. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant overexpression of HDACs in basal cells of IPF lungs may contribute to the bronchiolisation process in this disease. Similarly, generation and apoptosis resistance of IPF fibroblasts are mediated by enhanced activity of HDAC enzymes. Therefore, pan-HDAC inhibition by LBH589 may present a novel therapeutic option for patients with IPF.

Comparative proteome analysis of lung tissue from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and organ donors.

Among the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP), the two entities IPF and NSIP seem to be clinically related, but NSIP has a better outcome. The proteomic signatures which distinguish NSIP from IPF remain still elusive. We therefore performed comparative proteomic analysis of peripheral lung tissue from patients with sporadic IPF (n=14) and fibrotic NSIP (fNSIP, n=8) and organ donors (Controls, n=10), by using the 2-dimensional DIGE technique and MALDI-TOF-MS. The study revealed that the proteomic profiles of IPF and fNSIP were quite similar. Among the upregulated proteins in IPF and fNSIP were stress-induced genes involved in the ER stress-pathway, whereas downregulated proteins in IPF and fNSIP included antiapoptotic factors and antifibrotic molecules. The comparison fNSIP versus IPF indicated upregulation of subunits of the proteasome activator complex and antioxidant enzymes of the peroxiredoxin family. We conclude, that only few protein expression changes exist between IPF and fNSIP, and that epithelial ER- and oxidative stress play a major role in the pathogenesis of both diseases. In contrast to IPF, intracellular clearance of ROS and misfolded protein carbonyls seem to be enhanced in fNSIP due to enhanced expression of antioxidant acting proteins, and may explain the better outcome and survival in patients with fNSIP. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: IPF and fibrotic NSIP (fNSIP) belong to the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias and are usually fatal, but fNSIP has a better outcome. In order to identify molecular mechanisms and differences between IPF and fNSIP, we herein present results of a comparative proteome analysis of IPF, fNSIP and control lung tissue. Our data including validation experiments suggest that ER stress and a general stress-response as well as the decline of antioxidant capacity in alveolar epithelium is key in the pathogenesis of IPF and fNSIP. In addition, we could observe a signature of an increased alveolar epithelial protection against oxidative and ER-stress in fNSIP as compared to IPF, which could help to explain the better outcome of fNSIP patients.