The Perception of Surgery Program Directors of Residency Applicants From Longitudinal Integrated Curriculum Medical Schools: A Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery Members.

Research statement This study explores whether longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) students are competitive general surgery applicants and if they are perceived as adequately prepared for general surgery residency compared to traditional block rotation (BR) students. Background/relevance of the study There is increasing interest in LIC models of clinical education versus BR models. LIC students have been shown to perform similarly on examinations to BR students. However, while LICs seem well suited for students pursuing primary care specialties, little is known about how this approach impacts clinical education for surgery. Design and methods An electronic survey was prepared and approved by the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) and our university's institutional review board (IRB). Ten multiple-choice questions were administered along with an option for narrative comments. Surveys were sent over a one-month period to members of APDS Listserv. Returned emails were de-identified, and the results were tabulated. Results From 43 responses, the majority identified as program directors (PDs) (65%) and reported being somewhat familiar or very familiar with LICs (90%). When asked about the statement "LIC students are prepared for surgical residency," 22% "disagreed" or "strongly disagreed." When asked "How would you rank a LIC prospective applicant in comparison to a BR student?" 35% responded that they would rank the LIC student lower or not at all. Of the respondents, 47% reported that they have current residents who were LIC students. Most of these residents (65%) are graded as "average" for current performance. Conclusions The results suggest that medical students who are trained using LICs may be disadvantaged when applying to general surgery residencies. Interpretation is limited by the small number of respondents, and it only reflects the opinions of active APDS Listserv members. Further study is needed to confirm these findings and elucidate the basis of perceived deficiencies in LICs. Students from these schools should be advised to obtain additional surgery experience.

To Wait or Two Weeks: The Relationship Between Step 2 CK Scores and the Length of Dedicated Study Time Within a Longitudinal Interleaved Clerkship Curriculum.

INTRODUCTION: Graduate medical education program directors report that United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 CK exam scores will likely have greater importance in the future selection of residents due to USMLE Step 1 transitioning to a pass/fail score as early as January 2022. With emphasis moving to the Step 2 exam, it is important to examine factors that maximize student Step 2 CK performance, such as third-year curriculum models and exam timing. This study analyzes whether or not Step 2 performance is affected by a specific length of dedicated study time within a Longitudinal Interleaved Clerkship (LInC) curriculum. METHODS: A regression model was used to predict Step 2 scores for 102 students using previous performance measures. Actual and predicted scores were compared to indicate which students overperformed or underperformed on Step 2. A t-test was used to compare the mean difference between predicted and actual performance of students who had two weeks or less of dedicated study time for Step 2 CK versus students who had a longer dedicated study period.  Results: Students who completed Step 2 with two weeks or less of dedicated study significantly overperformed (t(100)=2.06, p=0.042) on the exam (Mean=1.61, SD=9.21) compared to students who had more than two weeks of dedicated study (Mean=-1.67, SD=6.44) in a LInC curriculum. CONCLUSION: Although studies of Step 2 preparation time have shown the importance of taking Step 2 soon after completion of clinical rotations, this study adds a specific timeframe. Our findings show that a dedicated study period of two weeks or less for Step 2 CK within a LInC curriculum is associated with better performance. This study was limited to a LInC curriculum and may not apply to other clinical year curricula.

Predicting United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Scores from Previous Academic Performance Measures within a Longitudinal Interleaved Curriculum.

Background United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 is a common metric looked at by residency programs to determine invitations for candidates to interview. However, USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) has also been an important factor for selecting applicants to interview and plays a significant role during applicant selection. This study aims to identify academic performance measures that correlate with USMLE Step 2 CK scores and to develop a model to predict USMLE Step 2 CK scores using previous academic measures from the first two cohorts in the longitudinal interleaved clerkship (LInC) at the Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (KSOM). Setting The KSOM is a newly accredited US allopathic medical school that accepted its first class in 2017. At KSOM, a LInC model is used in the primary clinical year. In this model, rotations are two weeks in duration before moving on to the next specialty. Students complete the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) subject examinations in all six specialties in one week at the midpoint and the end of the LInC. Students who passed an exam at the midpoint can opt out of that exam at the end as the higher of the two exam scores is recorded. However, most students choose to take all the exams again to improve their scores and prepare for USMLE Step 2 CK. Methodology Academic performance measures were gathered from the class of 2021 and 2022 (n = 101) including undergraduate grade point average (GPA), undergraduate science GPA, medical college admission test score, USMLE Step 1 score, NBME clinical subject exam scores, and USMLE Step 2 CK scores. Pearson correlations were run between the performance variables and USMLE Step 2 CK scores to measure influence variables individually, then a regression model measured impacts of variables together. Results All variables except undergraduate science GPA significantly correlated with USMLE Step 2 CK score. USMLE Step 1 had the strongest correlation (r = 0.752, p < 0.001). The regression model had an R of 0.859 with the internal medicine subject exam showing the highest beta coefficient (0.327, p < 0.001). Conclusions This study determined that USMLE Step 2 CK scores can be effectively predicted using available performance measures. With USMLE Step 1 becoming pass/fail in January 2022, the importance of USMLE Step 2 CK as a screening tool in the residency application process will likely increase. This study was conducted within a LInC curriculum and may have limited value in the prediction of scores within other clinical year curricula.