Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Loop Diuretics on Antibiotic Pharmacokinetics.

Loop diuretics and antibiotics are commonly co-prescribed across many clinical care settings. Loop diuretics may alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) via several potential drug interactions. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate the impact of loop diuretics on antibiotic PK. The primary outcome metric was the ratio of means (ROM) of antibiotic PK parameters such as area under the curve (AUC) and volume of distribution (Vd) on and off loop diuretics. Twelve crossover studies were amenable for metanalysis. Coadministration of diuretics was associated with a mean 17% increase in plasma antibiotic AUC (ROM 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.25, I2 = 0%) and a mean decrease in antibiotic Vd by 11% (ROM 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97, I2 = 0%). However, the half-life was not significantly different (ROM 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.13, I2 = 26%). The remaining 13 observational and population PK studies were heterogeneous in design and population, as well as prone to bias. No large trends were collectively observed in these studies. There is currently not enough evidence to support antibiotic dosing changes based on the presence or absence of loop diuretics alone. Further studies designed and powered to detect the effect of loop diuretics on antibiotic PK are warranted in applicable patient populations.

Systematic Review of Safety of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators in Healthy Adults: Implications for Recreational Users.

Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) are not FDA approved, and obtaining SARMs for personal use is illegal. Nevertheless, SARM use is increasingly popular amongst recreational athletes. Recent case reports of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and tendon rupture raise serious concerns for the safety of recreational SARM users. On 10 November 2022 PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies that reported safety data of SARMs. A multi-tiered screening approach was utilized, and any study or case report of generally healthy individuals exposed to any SARM was included. Thirty-three studies were included in the review with 15 case reports or case series and 18 clinical trials (total patients N = 2136 patients, exposed to SARM N = 1447). There were case reports of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) (N = 15), Achilles tendon rupture (N = 1), rhabdomyolysis (N = 1), and mild reversible liver enzyme elevation (N = 1). Elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was commonly reported in clinical trials in patients exposed to SARM (mean 7.1% across trials). Two individuals exposed to GSK2881078 in a clinical trial were reported to have rhabdomyolysis. Recreational SARM use should be strongly discouraged, and the risks of DILI, rhabdomyolysis, and tendon rupture should be emphasized. However, despite warnings, if a patient refuses to discontinue SARM use, ALT monitoring or dose reduction may improve early detection and prevention of DILI.

Beta-Lactam Probability of Target Attainment Success: Cefepime as a Case Study.

INTRODUCTION: Probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis using Monte Carlo simulations has become a mainstay of dose optimization. We highlight the technical and clinical factors that may affect PTA for beta-lactams. METHODS: We performed a mini review in adults to explore factors relating to cefepime PTA success and how researchers incorporate PTA into dosing decisions. In addition, we investigated, via simulations with a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, factors that may affect cefepime PTA success. RESULTS: The mini review included 14 articles. PTA results were generally consistent, given the differences in patient populations. However, dosing recommendations were more varied and appeared to depend on the definition of pharmacodynamic (PD) target, definition of PTA success and specific clinical considerations. Only 3 of 14 articles performed formal toxicological analysis. Simulations demonstrated that the largest determinants of cefepime PTA were the choice of PD target, continuous vs. intermittent infusion and creatinine clearance. Assumptions for protein binding, steady state vs. first dose, and simulating different sampling schemes may impact PTA success under certain conditions. The choice of one or two compartments had a minimal effect on PTA. CONCLUSIONS: PTA results may be similar with different assumptions and techniques. However, dose recommendation may differ significantly based on the selection of PD target, definition of PTA success and considerations specific to a patient population. Demographics and the PK parameters used to simulate time-concentration profiles should be derived from patient data applicable to the purpose of the PTA. There should be strong clinical rationale for dose selection. When possible, safety and toxicity should be considered in addition to PTA success.

Hemoperfusion with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter Unlikely to Require Increased Antibiotic Dosing: A Simulations Study Using a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Approach.

INTRODUCTION: The Seraph® 100 Microbind® Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) is a hemoperfusion device that can remove pathogens from central circulation. However, the effect of Seraph 100 on achieving pharmacodynamic (PD) targets is not well described. We sought to determine the impact of Seraph 100 on ability to achieve PD targets for commonly used antibiotics. METHODS: Estimates of Seraph 100 antibiotic clearance were obtained via literature. For vancomycin and gentamicin, published pharmacokinetic models were used to explore the effect of Seraph 100 on ability to achieve probability of target attainment (PTA). For meropenem and imipenem, the reported effect of continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) on achieving PTA was used to extrapolate decisions for Seraph 100. RESULTS: Seraph 100 antibiotic clearance is likely less than 0.5 L/h for most antibiotics. Theoretical Seraph 100 clearance up to 0.5 L/h and 2 L/h had a negligible effect on vancomycin PTA in virtual patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) = 14 mL/min and CrCl >14 mL/min, respectively. Theoretical Seraph 100 clearance up to 0.5 L/h and 2 L/h had a negligible effect on gentamicin PTA in virtual patients with CrCl = 120 mL/min and CrCl <60 mL/min, respectively. CKRT intensity resulting in antibiotic clearance up to 2 L/h generally does not require dose increases for meropenem or imipenem. As Seraph 100 is prescribed intermittently and likely contributes far less to antibiotic clearance, dose increases would also not be required. CONCLUSION: Seraph 100 clearance of vancomycin, gentamicin, meropenem, and imipenem is likely clinically insignificant. There is insufficient evidence to recommend increased doses. For aminoglycosides, we recommend extended interval dosing and initiating Seraph 100 at least 30 min to 1 h after completion of infusion to avoid the possibility of interference with maximum concentrations.

Comparison of Piperacillin and Tazobactam Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients with Trauma or with Burn.

Critical illness caused by burn and sepsis is associated with pathophysiologic changes that may result in the alteration of pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics. However, it is unclear if one mechanism of critical illness alters PK more significantly than another. We developed a population PK model for piperacillin and tazobactam (pip-tazo) using data from 19 critically ill patients (14 non-burn trauma and 5 burn) treated in the Military Health System. A two-compartment model best described pip-tazo data. There were no significant differences found in the volume of distribution or clearance of pip-tazo in burn and non-burn patients. Although exploratory in nature, our data suggest that after accounting for creatinine clearance (CrCl), doses would not need to be increased for burn patients compared to trauma patients on consideration of PK alone. However, there is a high reported incidence of augmented renal clearance (ARC) in burn patients and pharmacodynamic (PD) considerations may lead clinicians to choose higher doses. For critically ill patients with normal kidney function, continuous infusions of 13.5-18 g pip-tazo per day are preferable. If ARC is suspected or the most stringent PD targets are desired, then continuous infusions of 31.5 g pip-tazo or higher may be required. This approach may be reasonable provided that therapeutic drug monitoring is enacted to ensure pip-tazo levels are not supra-therapeutic.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of intra-articular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis: A narrative review.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of joint disease and activity limitation in adults. Common therapies to treat OA-related pain are oral and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids. However, prolonged courses of oral NSAIDs are associated with systemic adverse effects and repeat IA corticosteroid injections may cause cartilage degeneration. IA NSAIDs may be an alternative therapy possibly minimizing systemic side effects while maintaining efficacy. Therefore, we sought to summarize the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of IA NSAIDs to help providers make a more informed decision on the use of IA NSAIDs. METHODS: We searched the National Library of Medicine Database with terms "intraarticular and nsaid", yielding 1032 results. Only traditional formulations of NSAIDs were considered for inclusion. Animal studies were included if animals were healthy or if the method of arthritis induction was a reasonable model of osteoarthritis. Human studies were included if humans were healthy or if the primary disease studied was osteoarthritis of a large joint. Of 1032 results, 31 research articles met the inclusion criteria and were summarized in this review. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We found that single doses of IA NSAIDs provided far less total systemic and synovial exposure compared to a one week course of oral NSAIDs, but maximum concentrations to the synovium with IA administration were much higher. IA NSAIDs had an excellent safety profile in small animals, large animals and humans, although these injections were associated with non-specific cartilage inflammation in healthy animals. In animal models, IA NSAIDs had similar efficacy to PO NSAIDs in treating OA-related pain. In humans, IA NSAIDs had similar efficacy to PO NSAIDS and IA corticosteroids in treating OA-related pain; however, many trials did not have a placebo control and outcome measures were heterogeneous. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Overall, single doses of IA NSAIDs appear safe and efficacious across animals and humans. The optimal use of IA NSAIDs is still to be determined and further research is needed. However IA NSAIDs may be an additional beneficial therapy to treat OA-related pain. Potential uses may be to augment IA corticosteroids injections, to interrupt multiple IA corticosteroid injections or as an alternative in patients that are high risk for corticosteroid-related adverse events.

Prescription Patterns and Relationship to Pharmacogenomics Testing in the Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical utilization of pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing is highly institutionally dependent, and little information is known about provider practices of PGx testing in the Military Health System (MHS). In this study, we aimed to characterize Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) actionable prescription (Rx) patterns and their temporal relationship with PGx testing in the MHS. METHODS: Using data from the Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool (M2) database, this retrospective cohort study included all patients receiving at least one PGx test and at least one CPIC actionable Rx from January 2015 to August 2020 (845 patients, 1,471 PGx, 7,725 index CPIC actionable Rxs). Rx patterns and temporal relationships with PGx testing were characterized via descriptive statistics. Binomial regression was used to determine which patient and provider characteristics were associated with a patient receiving a PGx test within 30 days of an index Rx. RESULTS: Patients had a median of 9 index CPIC actionable Rx's (range 1-26). Pain medications were most commonly prescribed (N = 794, 94% patients with at least 1 Rx). However, pain medication had the lowest Rx-PGx match rate (40%) compared to an average of 62% Rx-PGx match rate for all CPIC drugs. Antidepressants were also commonly prescribed (N = 668, 79.1% patients with at least 1 Rx), and antidepressants had the highest Rx-PGx match rate of 86.7%. A minority of providers (20%, N = 249) ordered the majority of PGx tests (86.1%, N = 1,266) and only 8.3% of PGx tests (N = 398) matched to a CPIC actionable drug within 30 days of the test (defined by Rxs ordered within 30 days before or after the PGx test). However, approximately 39.8% of patients (N = 317) had at least one drug match to a PGx test within 30 days. The largest predictor of whether a patient received a PGx test within 30 days of any index Rx was whether or not a specific psychiatry provider ordered the PGx test (odds ratio; OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.13-6.54, P < 0.001). Neither the CPIC level of evidence nor FDA PGx actionable or informative labels had a significant effect on PGx test timing. CONCLUSIONS: PGx testing was generally limited to high Rx-drug users and was found to be an under-utilized resource. PGx testing did not typically follow CPIC guidelines. Implementing PGx testing protocols, simplifying PGx test-ordering by incorporating at minimum CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 into PGx-testing panels, and unifying providers' PGx knowledgebase in the MHS are feasible and would improve the clinical utilization of PGx tests in the MHS.

Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus by antimuscarinic agents among adult females receiving care in the military health system.

PURPOSE: To explore patterns of antimuscarinic medication as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of females 18 years or older within the Military Health System from 2006 to 2016. Administrative and claims data were used to select patients who initiated therapy with tolterodine, fesoterodine, oxybutynin, darifenacin, solifenacin, or trospium. Patients with no documented history of T2DM were followed for the occurrence of T2DM, the end of the study or loss of eligibility. Rates of T2DM were calculated for the overall population, by duration of therapy and by individual drugs. Crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazards were calculated to assess differences by duration of use and specific muscarinic antagonist. RESULTS: Over 2.6 million antimuscarinic prescriptions were dispensed to 241 829 females (mean age/SD, 62 ± 18 years). Patients exposed to M3 selective antagonists had highest risk of developing T2DM compared to those exposed to nonselective antagonists. Using oxybutynin, a nonselective antagonist as a comparator, adjusted rate ratios of T2DM were 57% (HR 1.57, 95%CI 1.48-1.67) and 29% (HR 1.29, 95%CI 1.24-1.35) significantly higher for darifenacin and solifenacin, respectively (both M3 selective). CONCLUSIONS: We found exposure to M3 selective antagonists darifenacin and solifenacin had the highest risk of developing T2DM compared to nonselective antagonist oxybutynin. This is supported by well described physiologic mechanisms and may allow for more informed prescribing decisions, particularly if minimizing risk of T2DM is a priority.

Fractional Third and Fourth Dose of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Candidate Vaccine: A Phase 2a Controlled Human Malaria Parasite Infection and Immunogenicity Study.

BACKGROUND: Three full doses of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine provides partial protection against controlled human malaria parasite infection (CHMI) and natural exposure. Immunization regimens, including a delayed fractional third dose, were assessed for potential increased protection against malaria and immunologic responses. METHODS: In a phase 2a, controlled, open-label, study of healthy malaria-naive adults, 16 subjects vaccinated with a 0-, 1-, and 2-month full-dose regimen (012M) and 30 subjects who received a 0-, 1-, and 7-month regimen, including a fractional third dose (Fx017M), underwent CHMI 3 weeks after the last dose. Plasmablast heavy and light chain immunoglobulin messenger RNA sequencing and antibody avidity were evaluated. Protection against repeat CHMI was evaluated after 8 months. RESULTS: A total of 26 of 30 subjects in the Fx017M group (vaccine efficacy [VE], 86.7% [95% confidence interval [CI], 66.8%-94.6%]; P < .0001) and 10 of 16 in the 012M group (VE, 62.5% [95% CI, 29.4%-80.1%]; P = .0009) were protected against infection, and protection differed between schedules (P = .040, by the log rank test). The fractional dose boosting increased antibody somatic hypermutation and avidity and sustained high protection upon rechallenge. DISCUSSIONS: A delayed third fractional vaccine dose improved immunogenicity and protection against infection. Optimization of the RTS,S/AS01 immunization regimen may lead to improved approaches against malaria. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01857869.