Assessing social-emotional development in infants and toddlers using parent-reports: Comparing the ASQ-SE-NL to the Social-Emotional Scale of the Bayley-III-NL.

BACKGROUND: The Ages and Stages Questionnaire Social-Emotional (ASQ-SE) is a parent-report screening instrument designed to assess children's social-emotional development and detect those at risk for delay or problems. Psychometric properties of this questionnaire have been studied before, but the ASQ-SE has never been compared to the Social-Emotional Scale of the Bayley-III (Bayley-III-SE). AIM: To compare the Dutch ASQ-SE (ASQ-SE-NL) to the Dutch Bayley-III-SE (Bayley-III-NL-SE; criterion measure). METHOD: A Dutch community sample of mothers with children aged 3-41 months (n = 1014) filled out both questionnaires. Cut-off scores for the ASQ-SE-NL were determined using: 1) >1 SD above the mean and 2) ROC curves. For the Bayley-III-NL, Dutch norm scores were used. RESULTS: Specificity (70.8% and 88.5%) and screen-out accuracy (0.65 and 0.77) of the ASQ-SE-NL were good. Sensitivity was only sufficient (70.6%) when using ROC curves and only for the ASQ-SE-NL ≥18 months age versions. Screen-in accuracy was insufficient (<0.49). Positive predictive value was 34.7% and 32.7%, and negative predictive value was 87.5% and 92.3%. False positive cases on the ASQ-SE-NL scored significantly lower on the Bayley-III-NL-SE than true negative cases. CONCLUSION: Using the Bayley-III-NL-SE as the criterion, the ASQ-SE-NL performed well in identifying children not at risk for delay or problems. The ASQ-SE-NL sufficiently detected children at risk for delay or problems in the ≥18 months ASQ-SE-NL age versions when cut-off scores were determined by ROC curves. The ASQ-SE-NL can be used in a monitoring routine, but early rescreening is advised after a positive test result, given the number of false positive results.

Benefits of Social Contact in Individuals With Psychotic Symptoms: Do Closeness of the Contact and Empathic Skills Make the Difference?

Objectives: Social contact is known to be beneficial for humans' mental health. Individuals with psychotic symptoms (PS) tend to show poorer social and interpersonal functioning. However, in this patient population, social contact may be crucial for their mental wellbeing and treatment success. Additionally, closeness of social contact (familiar versus less familiar others), rather than only the presence or absence of social contacts, may play an important role. Empathy may heighten the beneficial effects of social/close contact on mental health, facilitating interactions. We investigated the association between social contact and closeness of contact on mental health, defined as positive symptoms, positive affect and negative affect in PS and control participants, with empathy as a moderator. Methods: Participants were 16-30 years old. Information regarding social/close contact and mental health was obtained using the experience sampling method in individuals with PS (n = 29) and healthy controls (n = 28). Empathy was measured using a self-report questionnaire. Results: Social contact was associated with higher positive affect in the total sample. Contact with close as opposed to less close others was related to better mental health: It was associated with lower positive symptoms in the PS group, and with more positive affect in the total sample. Empathy moderated the association between closeness of contact and positive affect in the total sample, in which the combination of higher levels of empathy combined with the presence of close contact was associated with higher positive affect in the total sample. However, the direct association between empathy and positive affect was not significant per group of contact. Conclusion: The results suggest that social contact, but especially contact with a close other is important for mental health outcomes: Contact with close others is beneficial for positive affect in the total sample and for positive symptoms in individuals with PS.