RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Preoperative anxiety is a complex and subjective phenomenon, most commonly observed in patients posted for elective surgery. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety Information Scale (APAIS) has been widely used in preoperative settings to measure anxiety quickly. This study aimed to translate the APAIS into Kannada and to evaluate its psychometric properties. METHOD: The study involved forward and backward translation of APAIS into Kannada followed by a cognitive interview of 10 patients by clinical psychologist to confirm the correct translation. The translated version was then administered to 240 patients who were posted for elective surgery along with the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A). Reliability and internal consistency were assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed by principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Criteria validity was assessed by evaluating the correlation between APAIS and VAS-A. RESULT: The Kannada-translated version of APAIS was completed by 224 patients posted for elective surgery. Cronbach's alpha was 0.82 and 0.83 for anxiety and need for information items, respectively. Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) were 0.07, 0.98, and 0.96, respectively, for three-factor model, indicating it to be best fit for Kannada version of APAIS. CONCLUSION: The Kannada version of APAIS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The management of glaucoma in uveitis is challenging. A meticulous combination of anti-glaucoma and anti-inflammatory agents is often needed to control the intraocular pressure (IOP) and preserve the visual status in an otherwise blinding disease. AIM: To study the clinical course and management of glaucoma in uveitic eyes. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzing the case records of patients over 12 years, referred for the management of uveitic glaucoma in the last two decades. RESULTS: The analysis of 582 uveitic glaucoma eyes of 389 patients was done, and the mean IOP at baseline was 25.89 (±13.1) mmHg. Non-granulomatous uveitis (102 eyes) was the most common diagnosis. Granulomatous uveitis was the most common diagnosis among the treatment failure eyes and in eyes requiring more than one surgical intervention for glaucoma. CONCLUSION: An appropriate and adequate combination of anti-inflammatory and IOP-lowering therapy will lead to better clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common cause of mortality worldwide. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves the victim's outcome, especially when the response time for advanced life support is prolonged. We performed a study to estimate the difference in knowledge among first-year medical students after basic life support (BLS) training (part of their foundation course) before and during the novel COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited first-year medical college students (batch of 2019-20: pre-COVID group - P and batch of 2020-21: COVID-19 era group - C) who were undergoing BLS training for the first time and consented to this study. Since the training was delayed and affected by COVID-19 for the batch of 2020-21, their training duration was shorter with more usage of audiovisual aids. The difference in the change in knowledge (by a questionnaire with 10 questions of one mark each) after training by the two methods was analysed. Analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square tests was used as applicable to compare the groups, and p-value <0.05 was considered significant. The results are analysed by IBM SPSS version 20.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: The median (inter-quartile range) marks in group P (89 students) in the pre-test was 3 (4-2) and in the post-test was 6 (7-5) (out of 10). The corresponding marks in group C (112 students) in the pre-test were 3 (4-2) and in post-test was 7 (8-6). The knowledge improvement in group C was more with all the three changes being significant (p=0.0001). In group C, females had more improvement than males (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: We found a significant increase in the improvement of the knowledge after the BLS training in group C compared to group P. In group C, the improvement was better in females (59% increase in mean marks versus 22% in males).