Perception of In-Person Prerounding Amongst Neurology Residents Across Two Academic Centers.

Background and Purpose: In-person prerounding has long been a routine practice for residents in the field of neurology. However, with the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions, including our two academic neurology centers, have shifted to computer rounding. This study aims to assess the effects of computer rounding alone compared to a combination of computer rounding and in-person prerounding from the perspective of neurology residents. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, including a survey administered to 79 neurology residents and a qualitative thematic analysis of their responses. Results: The quantitative analysis revealed that residents who engaged in inperson prerounding spent significantly more time on prerounding and computer rounding compared to those who did not. The majority of residents reported a neutral effect of in-person prerounding on their relationship with patients and bedside time, but a significant impact on personal lives and other tasks. Qualitative analysis identified four key themes: accessibility to team members, learning opportunities gained and lost, inefficiency, and sleep disturbance. Conclusions: Overall, residents perceived in-person prerounding as inefficient and causing sleep disruption for both patients and themselves. While some residents valued the face-to-face interaction and improved accessibility, others felt that computer rounding allowed for thorough review of patient data, improving preparedness and efficiency. The potential elimination of in-person prerounding from residents' routines may enhance their overall wellbeing. Further research is needed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of removing this classic approach to caring for patients from the perspective of residents, attendings and patients.

Moving Beyond the Dichotomous Assessment of Professionalism in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: Results of a National Survey of Clerkship Directors.

PURPOSE: This study examines how internal medicine clerkship faculty and leadership conceptualize professionalism and professional behaviors and attitudes, identifies whether and how faculty use metrics to assess professionalism and factor it into clerkship grades, and describes barriers that prevent faculty from feeling prepared to support the development of professional behaviors in students. METHOD: The Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine opened a call for thematic survey section proposals to its physician-faculty members, blind-reviewed all submissions, and selected 4 based on internal medicine clinical clerkship training experience relevance. The survey launched on October 5 and closed on December 7, 2021. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 137 core clerkship directors (CDs) at Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited medical schools, 103 (75.2%) responded to the survey. Of 102 respondents (1 nonrespondent), 84 (82.4%) identified professional behavior lapses in involvement and 60 (58.8%) identified introspection lapses. Of 103 respondents, 97 (94.2%) reported that their clerkships ask clinical faculty and residents to formally evaluate professionalism, and 64 (62.1%) reported that they factor professionalism assessments into final clerkship grades. CDs reported multiple barriers to addressing professionalism directly with students, including logistical barriers, professionalism assessment subjectivity concerns, and the possible adverse effect of an unprofessional label for students. CONCLUSIONS: Professionalism assessment and remediation in medical education currently center on a deficit model that seeks to identify and remediate professionalism lapses, rather than a developmental model that seeks to nurture growth. This dichotomous characterization of behaviors as professional or unprofessional limits assessment and can adversely affect the learning environment. The authors propose a shift to a developmental model that considers professionalism as a continuous process parallel to the acquisition of clinical skills and medical knowledge.

An exploratory study of goal orientations of traditional block and longitudinal integrated clerkship students.

BACKGROUND: Achievement goal theory links goal setting, motivation, and learning and describes three orientations: 'mastery' (seeking learning), 'performance' (seeking positive judgments), and 'performance-avoidance' (avoiding negative judgments). Mastery orientation is considered most adaptive. The authors investigated goal orientations of traditional block clerkship (TBC) and longitudinal integrated clerkship (LIC) students. METHODS: This was an exploratory study conducted at one US medical school. Three hundred and twenty students completed an anonymous survey consisting of three tools with validation evidence: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey, Task-choice Goal Measures, and Questionnaire Goal Choice Items. The authors analyzed the data using regression analyses, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests. RESULTS: While all students rated mastery items most highly on the five-point Likert scale (mean 4.58/5.00), LIC students rated performance-orientation lower (ß = -0.36, p = .04), chose personal mastery-orientation items more frequently (92% vs. 64.4%, p = .005), and perceived their learning environment as promoting less performance (ß = -0.60, p = .002) and performance-avoidance (ß = -0.78, p < .001) compared to TBC students. CONCLUSIONS: LIC and TBC students differed in their report of personal and clerkship goal orientations. These differences may inform educational design and future research to promote students' mastery orientation.

The Pre-Radiology Internship: Room for Improvement?

BACKGROUND: A clinical internship is currently required by the American Board of Radiology prior to Radiology residency. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate practicing radiologists' perspectives on the value of the internship and their recommendations for optimization. METHODS: A five-minute online survey was distributed via email to practicing radiologist members of the American College of Radiology. RESULTS: A total of 566 completed responses (11.3% response rate) were received. Most respondents agreed that their internship was essential for improving non-radiology clinical knowledge (84%) and affirming their decision to become a radiologist (74%). Most respondents (59%) disagree that the one-year internship before residency should be eliminated. Most (53%) of the radiologists in an academic practice agreed that internship should be integrated into Radiology residency. If radiologists were to redesign the internship ("PreRad Internship"), a majority of the respondents would include training in other medical specialties (71%), working along technologists (55%) and informatics/AI/computer science (54%). While the greatest proportion (50%) of interventional radiologists reported a Surgery internship would be the most beneficial for their primary subspecialty (50%), diagnostic radiologists most commonly (27%) reported the PreRad Internship would be the most beneficial. The greatest proportions of Abdominal-, Breast-, and Neuroradiology-trained respondents reported a PreRad Internship would be the most beneficial internship for their primary field of subspecialty Radiology practice (32%, 36%, and 33%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The internship before Radiology residency offers some benefits but could be further optimized. There is support from practicing radiologists for a redesigned, more Radiology-specific PreRad Internship.

The Harvard Medical School Pathways curriculum: A comprehensive curricular evaluation.

PURPOSE: The Harvard Medical School Pathways curriculum represents a major reform effort. Our goals were to enhance reasoning and clinical skills and improve the learning environment and students' approach to learning via use of collaborative, case-based pedagogy; early clinical exposure; and enhanced approaches to teaching and evaluating clinical skills. We evaluated the impact of Pathways on key outcomes related to these goals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, mixed-methods study, we compared the last prior-curriculum cohort (2014 matriculation, n = 135) and first new-curriculum cohort (2015 matriculation, n = 135). Measures included Likert-type surveys, focus groups, and test scores to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with prior-curriculum students, new-curriculum students reported higher mean preclerkship learning environment ratings (Educational Climate Inventory, 62.4 versus 51.9, p < 0.0001) and greater satisfaction with the quality of their preclerkship education (88% versus 73%, p = 0.0007). Mean USMLE Step-1 and Step-2 scores did not differ between groups. At graduation, new-curriculum students rated their medical school experience higher in 6 of 7 domains, including 'fostering a culture of curiosity and inquiry' (4.3 versus 3.9, p = 0.006) and focus on 'student-centered learning' (3.9 versus 3.4, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The new curriculum outperformed or was equal to the prior one on most measures of learning environment and perceived quality of education, without a decline in medical knowledge or clinical skills. Robust longitudinal evaluation provided important feedback for ongoing curriculum improvement.

Educational adaptation to clinical training during the COVID-19 pandemic: a process analysis.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented in terms of the extent and rapidity of the disruption forced upon formal clinical education, most notably the extensive transition of clinical skills learning to interactive video-based clinical education. METHODS: In a phenomenologic study, we used thematic analysis to explore the COVID-19 disruption to clinical training and understand processes relating to adaptation in a large academic medical center. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 clinical teachers and 16 trainees representing all levels of clinical learning. Interviews occurred within the initial three months of the crisis, and data were analyzed following a thematic analysis coding process. RESULTS: We constructed eight themes synthesizing our participants' perceptions of the immediate unanticipated disruption, noting in the process their alignment with a change management framework. These included: urgency in adapting, with an obvious imperative for change; overcoming inconsistent involvement and support through the formation of self-organized frontline coalitions; attempts to develop strategy and vision via initially reactive but eventually consistent communication; empowering a volunteer army through co-creation and a flattened hierarchy; and efforts to sustain improvement and positive momentum with celebration of trial, error, and growth. The majority of participants found positive outcomes resulting from the tumultuous change process. Moreover, they were now more readily accepting of change, and tolerant of the ambiguous and iterative nature inherent in the education change process. Many anticipated that some innovation would, or would at least deserve to, continue post- crisis. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic afforded an opportunity to study the content and process of change during an active crisis. In this case of clinical education, our findings provide insight into the ways an academic medical system adapts to unanticipated circumstances. We found alignment with broader organizational change management models and that, compared with crisis management models (and their shorter term focus on resolving such crises), stakeholders self-organized in a reliable manner that carries the potential advantage of preserving such beneficial change.

The Student-Generated Reasoning Tool (SGRT): Linking medical knowledge and clinical reasoning in preclinical education.

INTRODUCTION: The simultaneous integration of knowledge acquisition and development of clinical reasoning in preclinical medical education remains a challenge. To help address this challenge, the authors developed and implemented the Student-Generated Reasoning Tool (SGRT)-a tool asking students to propose and justify pathophysiological hypotheses, generate findings, and critically appraise information. METHODS: In 2019, students in a first-year preclinical course (n = 171; SGRT group) were assigned to one of 20 teams. Students used the SGRT individually, then in teams, and faculty provided feedback. The control group (n = 168) consisted of students from 2018 who did not use SGRT. Outcomes included academic performance, effectiveness of collaborative environments using the SGRT, and student feedback. RESULTS: Students were five times more likely to get questions correct if they were in the SGRT group versus control group. Accuracy of pathophysiological hypotheses was significantly lower for individuals than teams. Qualitative analysis indicated students benefited from generating their own data, justifying their reasoning, and working individually as well as in teams. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces the SGRT as a potentially engaging, case-based, and collaborative learning method that may help preclinical medical students become aware of their knowledge gaps and integrate their knowledge in basic and clinical sciences in the context of clinical reasoning.

Association of Simulation Participation With Diagnostic Reasoning Scores in Preclinical Students.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate for an association between the number of voluntary mannequin simulation sessions completed during the school year with scores on a year-end diagnostic reasoning assessment among second-year medical students. METHOD: This is retrospective analysis of participation in 0 to 8 extracurricular mannequin simulation sessions on diagnostic reasoning assessed among 129 second-year medical students in an end-of-year evaluation. For the final skills assessment, 2 physicians measured students' ability to reason through a standardized case encounter using the Diagnostic Justification (DXJ) instrument (4 categories each scored 0-3 by raters reviewing students' postencounter written summaries). Rater scores were averaged for a total DXJ score (0-12). To provide additional baseline comparison, zero participation students were divided into 2 groups based on intent to participate: those who signed up for extracurricular sessions but never attended versus those who never expressed interest. Scores across the attendance groups were compared with an analysis of variance and trend analysis. RESULTS: The class DXJ mean equaled 7.56, with a standard deviation of 2.78 and range of 0 to 12. Post hoc analysis after a significant analysis of variance (F = 4.91, df = 8, 128, P < 0.001) showed those participating in 1 or more extracurricular sessions had significantly higher DXJ scores than those not participating. Students doing 7 extracurricular sessions had significantly higher DXJ scores than those doing 0 and 2 (P < 0.05). Zero attendance groups were not different. A significant linear trend (R = 0.48, F = 38.0, df = 1, 127, P < 0.001) was found with 9 groups. A significant quadratic effect, like a dose-response pattern, was found (F = 18.1, df = 2, 125, P < 0.001) in an analysis including both zero attendance groups, a low (1-4 extracurricular sessions) group and a high (5-8) group. CONCLUSIONS: Higher year-end diagnostic reasoning scores were associated with increased voluntary participation in extracurricular mannequin-based simulation exercises in an approximate dose-response pattern.

Teaching evidence-based medicine with electronic databases for preclinical education.

To evaluate the efficacy of an educational module on evidence-based medicine (EBM) assisted with electronic medical databases (EMDs) for preclinical education, medical students (n = 111) were matriculated in a program consisted of 16 2-h sessions on EBM plus hands-on experience on EMDs in a problem-based learning-type format. Students were required to make an oral presentation on designated clinical scenarios before and after the sessions, without prior notice, as an indicator of performance. In addition, questionnaires focusing on behavioral changes, awareness, and confidence of mastering EBM were administered before and after the sessions to assess the attitudinal and behavioral impact of the intervention on the participants. We found evidence of better postprogram performance in utilizing EBM-relevant concepts and resources when the enrolled medical students were giving oral presentations. Moreover, the participants reported increased awareness of EBM and, behaviorally, increased utilization of EBM-relevant resources provided by libraries. Also, they reported improvement on appropriately using EBM-relevant resources, and 99% of the participants reported strong confidence in practicing EBM. In conclusion, modules on EBM implemented with EMDs benefitted medical students in scenario-oriented PBL tutorials. Improvements in awareness, behavior, confidence, and performance in mastering EBM were noted.

Warding off a tyranny of reliability and validity.

Researchers in the healthcare communication field come from many different educational backgrounds. Such diversity generally strengthens a field, but sometimes a set of beliefs or a particular orthodoxy may predominate in ways that are negative. We discuss one such example, noting how the research culture deriving from training in schools of education treats the concepts of reliability and validity. We note that some researchers working in fields such as medical education and healthcare communication use the terms "reliable" and "valid" loosely or even incorrectly, often referring to them as a single catch-phrase. More importantly, we caution healthcare communication researchers against a tyranny of reliability and validity in which researchers feel pressure to avoid creating unique instruments to study new questions, instead using instruments with previously demonstrated reliability and validity even when these may not directly capture the concept of interest. This practice is motivated by realistic fears that reviewers and editors will disapprove of their work because the instruments used are not known to be "reliable and valid." We encourage the research community to take a more balanced approach wherein originality is not stifled, and in which creativity and rigor exist side by side.

Building Longitudinal Relationships Into a Traditional Block Clerkship Model: A Mixed-Methods Study.

PURPOSE: The authors describe the implementation of the novel Longitudinal Clinical Experiences with Patients (LCEP) curriculum, designed to integrate continuity and longitudinal patient relationships into a traditional block clerkship (BC), and present a mixed-methods analysis evaluating program effectiveness to assess its feasibility, value, and impact. METHOD: This was a mixed-methods study of 54 Harvard Medical School students who participated in the LCEP during their core clerkship (third) year during the 2013-2014 academic year. Fifty-two students responded to an electronic survey about the patients they followed during the LCEP. Forty-two students completed confidential live interviews. Unique groups of 13-15 students were interviewed at 3 times during the year to assess students' perceptions of the LCEP over time. The data were analyzed using a content analysis framework. RESULTS: On average, students followed 3.3 LCEP patients over the clerkship year. Ninety-four percent (n = 49/52) of students were able to follow 2 or more patients longitudinally. Most students met their longitudinal patient in the inpatient setting (71%, n = 37/52). Subsequent encounters were most often in the ambulatory setting. Students described scheduling logistics as key to the success or failure of the program. Many students described the challenges of competing priorities between their BC responsibilities and longitudinal opportunities. Students found the LCEP deepened their understanding of the patient experience, the health care system, and disease progression. Over the course of an academic year, an increased proportion of students (60%) highlighted understanding the patient experience as a core value obtained through the LCEP. CONCLUSIONS: The LCEP was feasible and proved successful in promoting longitudinal patient relationships within a traditional BC model. Prioritizing the depth of experience with a smaller number of patients may reduce the barriers described by students. The results suggest that such a hybrid program promotes patient-centeredness.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the 4-Habits Coding Scheme into French to assess physician communication skills.

BACKGROUND: The Four Habits Coding Scheme (4-HCS) is a standardized instrument designed to assess physicians' communication skills from an external rater's perspective, based on video-recorded consultations. OBJECTIVE: To perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the 4-HCS into French and to assess its psychometric properties. METHODS: The 4-HCS was cross-culturally adapted by conducting forward and backward translations with independent translators, following international guidelines. Four raters rated 200 video-recorded medical student consultations with standardized patients, using the French version of the 4-HCS. We examined the internal consistency, factor structure, construct validity, and reliability of the 4-HCS. RESULTS: The mean overall 4-HCS score was 76.44 (standard deviation, 12.34), with no floor or ceiling effects across subscales. The median rating duration of rating was 8 min (range, 4-19). Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 for the overall 4-HCS, ranging from 0.72 to 0.88 across subscales. In confirmatory factor analysis, goodness-of-fit statistics did not corroborate the hypothesized 4-habit structure. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in two dimensions, with the merging of three conceptually related habits into a single dimension and substantial cross-loading for 15 out of 23 items. Median average absolute-agreement intra-class correlation coefficient estimates were 0.74 (range, 0.68-0.84) and 0.85 (range, 0.76-0.91) for inter- and intra-rater reliability of habit subscales, respectively. CONCLUSION: The French version of the 4-HCS demonstrates satisfactory internal consistency but requires the use of two independent raters to achieve acceptable reliability. The underlying factor structure of the original US version and cross-cultural adaptations of the 4-HCS deserve further investigation.

Preferences for patient-centered care among cancer survivors 5 years post-diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to identify predictors associated with preferences for patient-centered care among cancer survivors and the association between cancer health literacy and patient-centered care preferences. METHODS: Cross sectional analyses of N = 345 adult cancer survivors (5 years post cancer diagnosis) attending follow-ups at University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. Face-to face-interviews were conducted using the 30-item Cancer Health Literacy Test and the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale to determine preference for patient-centered care. RESULTS: Cancer survivors' preference for patient-centered care was associated with a higher cancer health literacy score, higher educational level, being employed, breast cancer diagnosis, and not desiring psychological support [F (14, 327) = 11.25, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.325]. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study provide insights into preferences for patient-centered care among cancer survivors during receipt of follow-up care, which remains an understudied phase of cancer care delivery. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts are needed to ensure different preferences for care are taken into account particularly in the setting of variable cancer health literacy.

A snapshot of underrepresented physicians 15 years after medical school.

We conducted a study to compare medical school experiences, values, career paths, and career satisfaction of under-represented in medicine (URiM) and non-URiM physicians approximately 15 years after medical school, guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and the concept of stereotype threat. The sample consisted of four graduating classes, 1996-1999, of Harvard Medical School, 20% of whom were URiM. URiM respondents came from families of lower educational attainment and graduated with more debt. As students, they reported a greater experience of stereotype threat and, and at graduation they showed a tendency to place a higher value on avoiding a career that places them under constant pressure. Concerning their current status, URiM respondents expressed a lower level of satisfaction with their career progress. Multivariable analyses indicated that across the entire sample, URiM status was not a significant predictor of employment in academic medicine, but that being in academic medicine was predicted by mentors' encouragement for a research career, greater intention to pursue research, and a lower value on having a financially rewarding career. Lower career satisfaction was predicted by one's status as URiM, employment in academic medicine, greater involvement in research, and a greater value on avoiding constant pressure. The data suggest that negative student experiences in medical school, combined with the lack of mentor encouragement and financial pressures may discourage URiM medical students from pursuing academic careers, and that pressures for productivity and working in academic medicine may degrade the satisfaction derived by physicians in general.

Do Professionalism Lapses in Medical School Predict Problems in Residency and Clinical Practice?

PURPOSE: Recognizing that physicians must exhibit high levels of professionalism, researchers have attempted to identify the precursors of clinicians' professionalism difficulties, typically using retrospective designs that trace sanctioned physicians back to medical school. To better establish relative risk for professionalism lapses in practice, however, this relationship must also be studied prospectively. Therefore, this study investigated the sequelae of medical school professionalism lapses by following students with medical school professionalism problems into residency and practice. METHOD: Beginning in 2014, 108 graduates from Harvard Medical School and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine who appeared before their schools' review boards between 1993 and 2007 for professionalism-related reasons were identified, as well as 216 controls matched by sex, minority status, and graduation year. Prematriculation information and medical school performance data were collected for both groups. Outcomes for the groups were studied at 2 points in time: ratings by residency directors, and state medical board sanctions and malpractice suits during clinical practice. RESULTS: Compared with controls, students who appeared before their schools' review boards were over 5 times more likely to undergo disciplinary review during residency (16% vs 3%, respectively) and almost 4 times more likely to require remediation or counseling (35% vs 9%, respectively). During clinical practice, 10% of those who had made review board appearances were sued or sanctioned vs 5% of controls. Logistic regression for these outcomes indicated, however, that professional lapses in medical school were not the only, or even the most important, predictor of problems in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Students with professionalism lapses in medical school are significantly more likely to experience professionalism-related problems during residency and practice, although other factors may also play an important predictive role.

Assessing the Effectiveness of Using Mechanistic Concept Maps in Case-Based Collaborative Learning.

PROBLEM: Despite the advantages of using mechanistic concept maps (MCMs)-diagrams created individually or collaboratively by a team to foster inductive analysis of a clinical problem-in individual learning, very little is known about their benefits in collaborative learning. APPROACH: First-year medical and dental students (n = 170) were assigned to one of four learning groups in the Homeostasis I course, Harvard Medical School, February-March 2016. One group (n = 43) was randomly assigned to the MCM intervention; students in the remaining groups (n = 127) served as controls. Outcomes included pre- and postcourse surveys on, among other things, reasoning skills, attitudes toward teamwork, and tolerance of ambiguity; final exam scores; and qualitative responses to three open-ended questions on students' perceptions of the effects of MCMs on their learning. OUTCOMES: Response rates for pre- and postcourse surveys were 87/170 (51%) and 91/170 (54%). Compared with students in the control groups, students in the MCM group reported better reasoning skills (P = .01) and attitudes toward teamwork (P = .02). There were no significant differences in final exam scores between the groups. Students in the intervention group found MCMs more helpful in conceptual learning than their own notes and flashcards (P = .0001) or the readiness assessment quizzes (P = .0009). Qualitative analysis indicated MCM students routinely overcame team-learning obstacles through strategies aimed at prioritizing collaborative inductive reasoning. NEXT STEPS: Ongoing studies are evaluating the contextual elements and best practices for optimal employment of MCMs in promoting collaborative inductive reasoning.

Attitudes Toward Patient-Centered Care in the Mental Care Services in Isfahan, Iran.

Understanding patient-physician relationships in mental care services is an indispensable element to improve the quality of mental care, yet little is known about it in Iran. This study measured the attitudes of the patients' family and personal caregivers (FPCs) and psychiatrists toward patient-centered care. A sample of 88 FPCs of mental patients and 29 psychiatrists in four teaching hospitals of Isfahan city, Iran, providing mental care, were asked to complete the patient-practitioner orientation scale (PPOS). Results showed mean scores of PPOS, sharing and caring for the psychiatrists were 3.4, 3.8, and 3.1, compared to 3.9, 4.2, and 3.7 for the mental patients' FPCs. There was a significant difference between the PPOS mean scores of the FPC and psychiatrist groups (p < 0.05) indicating that psychiatrists' attitudes were less patient-centered. Developing medical training interventions, establishing communication skills workshops, and increasing patients' awareness are some approaches to address the low level of patient-centered care.