Machine Learning Differentiates Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Mortality Risk Profiles Among Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is resource intensive with high mortality. Identifying trauma patients most likely to derive a survival benefit remains elusive despite current ECMO guidelines. Our objective was to identify unique patient risk profiles using the largest database of trauma patients available. METHODS: ECMO patients ≥16 years were identified using Trauma Quality Improvement Program data (2010-2019). Machine learning K-median clustering (ML) utilized 101 variables including injury severity, demographics, comorbidities, and hospital stay information to generate unique patient risk profiles. Mortality and patient and center characteristics were evaluated across profiles. RESULTS: A total of 1037 patients were included with 33% overall mortality, mean age 32 years, and median ISS = 26. The ML identified 3 unique patient risk profile groups. Although mortality rates were equivalent across the 3 groups, groups were distinguished by (Group 1) young (median 25 years), severely injured (ISS = 34) patients with thoracic and head injuries (99%) via blunt mechanism (93%), and a high prevalence of ARDS (77%); (Group 2) relatively young (median 30 years) and moderately injured (ISS = 22) patients with exposure-related injuries (11%); and (Group 3) older (median 46 years) patients with a high proportion of comorbidities (69%) and extremity injuries (100%). There were no differences based on center ECMO volume, teaching status, or ACS-Level across all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Machine learning compliments traditional analyses by identifying unique mortality risk profiles for trauma patients receiving ECMO. These details can further inform treatment guidelines, clinical decision making, and institutional criteria for ECMO usage.

Two-center analysis of cannabis on venous thromboembolism risk after traumatic injury: A matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists evaluating associations between cannabis (THC) and post-traumatic DVT. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (2014-2023) of patients ≥15yrs from two Level I trauma centers with robust VTE surveillance and prophylaxis protocols. Multivariable hierarchical regression assessed the association between THC and DVT risk. THC â€‹+ â€‹patients were direct matched to other drug use categories on VTE risk markers and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Of 7365 patients, 3719 were drug-, 575 were THC â€‹+ â€‹only, 2583 were other drug+, and 488 were TCH+/other drug+. DVT rates by exposure group did not differ. TCH â€‹+ â€‹only patients had higher GCS scores, shorter hospital length of stay, and the lowest pelvic fracture and mortality rates. A total of 458 drug-, 453 other drug+, and 232 THC+/other drug â€‹+ â€‹patients were matched to 458, 453, and 232 THC â€‹+ â€‹only patients. There were no differences in DVT event rates in any paired sub-cohort set. Additionally, iteratively adjusted paired models did not show an association between THC and DVT. CONCLUSIONS: THC does not appear to be associated with increased DVT risk in patients with strict trauma chemoprophylaxis. Toxicology testing is useful for identifying substance abuse intervention opportunities, but not for DVT risk stratification in THC â€‹+ â€‹patients.

Effect of Early vs Late Inguinal Hernia Repair on Serious Adverse Event Rates in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants is common and is associated with considerable morbidity. Whether the inguinal hernia should be repaired prior to or after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit is controversial. Objective: To evaluate the safety of early vs late surgical repair for preterm infants with an inguinal hernia. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter randomized clinical trial including preterm infants with inguinal hernia diagnosed during initial hospitalization was conducted between September 2013 and April 2021 at 39 US hospitals. Follow-up was completed on January 3, 2023. Interventions: In the early repair strategy, infants underwent inguinal hernia repair before neonatal intensive care unit discharge. In the late repair strategy, hernia repair was planned after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit and when the infants were older than 55 weeks' postmenstrual age. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was occurrence of any prespecified serious adverse event during the 10-month observation period (determined by a blinded adjudication committee). The secondary outcomes included the total number of days in the hospital during the 10-month observation period. Results: Among the 338 randomized infants (172 in the early repair group and 166 in the late repair group), 320 underwent operative repair (86% were male; 2% were Asian, 30% were Black, 16% were Hispanic, 59% were White, and race and ethnicity were unknown in 9% and 4%, respectively; the mean gestational age at birth was 26.6 weeks [SD, 2.8 weeks]; the mean postnatal age at enrollment was 12 weeks [SD, 5 weeks]). Among 308 infants (91%) with complete data (159 in the early repair group and 149 in the late repair group), 44 (28%) in the early repair group vs 27 (18%) in the late repair group had at least 1 serious adverse event (risk difference, -7.9% [95% credible interval, -16.9% to 0%]; 97% bayesian posterior probability of benefit with late repair). The median number of days in the hospital during the 10-month observation period was 19.0 days (IQR, 9.8 to 35.0 days) in the early repair group vs 16.0 days (IQR, 7.0 to 38.0 days) in the late repair group (82% posterior probability of benefit with late repair). In the prespecified subgroup analyses, the probability that late repair reduced the number of infants with at least 1 serious adverse event was higher in infants with a gestational age younger than 28 weeks and in those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (99% probability of benefit in each subgroup). Conclusions and Relevance: Among preterm infants with inguinal hernia, the late repair strategy resulted in fewer infants having at least 1 serious adverse event. These findings support delaying inguinal hernia repair until after initial discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01678638.

To the point: Utility of laparoscopy for operative management of stabbing abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Algorithms for managing penetrating abdominal trauma are conflicting or vague regarding the role of laparoscopy. We hypothesized that laparoscopy is underutilized among hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds. METHODS: Trauma Quality Improvement Program data (2016-2019) were used to identify stable (SBP ≥110 and GCS ≥13) patients ≥16yrs with stab wounds and an abdominal procedure within 24hr of admission. Patients with a non-abdominal AIS ≥3 or missing outcome information were excluded. Patients were analyzed based on index procedure approach: open, therapeutic laparoscopy (LAP), or LAP-conversion to open (LCO). Center, clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared according to surgical approach and abdominal AIS using non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: 5984 patients met inclusion criteria with 7 â€‹% and 8 â€‹% receiving therapeutic LAP and LCO, respectively. The conversion rate for patients initially treated with LAP was 54 â€‹%. Compared to conversion or open, therapeutic LAP patients had better outcomes including shorter ICU and hospital stays and less infection complications, but were younger and less injured. Assessing by abdominal AIS eliminated ISS differences, meanwhile LAP patients still had shorter hospital stays. At time of admission, 45 â€‹% of open patients met criteria for initial LAP opportunity as indicated by comparable clinical presentation as therapeutic laparoscopy patients. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopy remains infrequently utilized despite its increasing inclusion in current guidelines. Additional opportunity exists for therapeutic laparoscopy in trauma, which appears to be a viable alternative to open surgery for select injuries from abdominal stab wounds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Lessons for the next pandemic: analysis of the timing and outcomes including post-discharge decannulation rates for tracheostomy in severe COVID-19 respiratory failure.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure frequently require prolonged ventilatory support that would typically warrant early tracheostomy. There has been significant debate on timing, outcomes, and safety of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiological, hospital, and post-discharge outcomes of this cohort, based on early (ET) versus late (LT) tracheostomy. METHODS: Retrospective review (March 2020-January 2021) in a 5-hospital system of ventilated patients who underwent tracheostomy. Demographics, hospital/ICU length of stay (LOS), procedural characteristics, APACHE II scores at ICU admission, stabilization markers, and discharge outcomes were analyzed. Long-term decannulation rates were obtained from long-term acute care facility (LTAC) data. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients underwent tracheostomy (mean 61 years, 62% male, 64% Hispanic). Despite ET being frequently performed during active COVID infection (85% vs. 64%), there were no differences in complication types or rates versus LT. APACHE II scores at ICU admission were comparable for both groups; however, > 50% of LT patients met PEEP stability at tracheostomy. ET was associated with significantly shorter ICU and hospital LOS, ventilator days, and higher decannulation rates. Of the cohort discharged to an LTAC, 59% were ultimately decannulated, 36% were discharged home, and 41% were discharged to a skilled nursing facility. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first comprehensive analysis of ET and LT that includes LTAC outcomes and stabilization markers in relation to the tracheostomy. ET was associated with improved clinical outcomes and a short LOS, specifically on days of pre-tracheostomy ventilation and in-hospital decannulation rates.

Modified Brain Injury Guidelines for preinjury anticoagulation in traumatic brain injury: An opportunity to reduce health care resource utilization.

INTRODUCTION: The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) stratify patients by traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity to provide management recommendations to reduce health care resource burden but mandates that patients on anticoagulation (AC) are allocated to the most severe tertile (BIG 3). We sought to analyze TBI patients on AC therapy using a modified BIG model to determine if this population can offer further opportunity for safe reductions in health care resource utilization. METHODS: Patients 55 years or older on AC with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) from two centers were retrospectively stratified into BIG 1 to 3 risk groups using modified BIG criteria excluding AC as a criterion. Intracranial hemorrhage progression, neurosurgical intervention (NSI), death, and worsened discharge status were compared. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were included, with 23%, 29%, and 48% classified as BIG 1, BIG 2, and BIG 3, respectively. The BIG 3 cohort had a higher rate of AC reversal agents administered (66%) compared with the BIG 1 (40%) and BIG 2 (54%) cohorts ( p < 0.01), as well as ICH progression discovered on repeat head computed tomography (56% vs. 38% vs. 26%, respectively; p < 0.001). No patients in the BIG 1 and 2 cohorts required NSI. No patients in BIG 1 and 3% of patients in BIG 2 died secondary to the ICH. In the BIG 3 cohort, 16% of patients required NSI and 26% died. Brain Injury Guidelines 3 patients had 15 times the odds of mortality compared with BIG 1 patients ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The AC population had higher rates of ICH progression than the BIG literature, but this did not lead to more NSI or mortality in the lower tertiles of our modified BIG protocol. If the modified BIG used the original tertile management on our population, then NS consultation may have been reduced by up to 52%. These modified criteria may be a safe opportunity for further health care resource and cost savings in the TBI population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

A Window of Opportunity: Understanding Pediatric Falls Using Area Deprivation Index.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of our study is to assess neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (NSD) as a risk factor for window falls (WF) in children. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review was performed of patients ≤18 years old with fall injuries treated at a Level I trauma center between 2018 and 2021. Demographic, injury, and NSD characteristics which were collected from a trauma registry were analyzed and compared between WF versus non-window falls. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to measure NSD levels based on patients' home address 9-digit zip code, with greater NSD being defined as ADI quintiles 4 and 5. Property type was used to compare falls that took place at single-family homes versus apartment buildings. RESULTS: Among 1545 pediatric fall injuries, 194 were WF, of which 60 % were male and 46 % were Hispanic. WF patients were younger than NWF patients (median age WF 3.2 vs. age 4.3, p<0.047). WF patients were more likely to have a depressed Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS score ≤12, WF 9 % vs. 3 %) and sustain greater head/neck injuries (median AIS 3vs. AIS 2, p<0.001) when compared to NWF. WF patients had longer hospital and ICU lengths of stay than NWF patients (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). WF patients were more likely to live in areas of greater NSD than NWF patients (53 % vs. 35 %, p<0.001), and 73 % of all WF patients lived in apartments or condominiums. CONCLUSIONS: Window fall injuries were associated with lower GCS, greater severity of head/neck injuries, and longer hospital and ICU length of stay than non-window falls. ADI research can provide meaningful data for targeted injury prevention programs in areas where children are at higher risk of window falls. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Firearm Assaults in Communities: The Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown.

BACKGROUND: Firearm violence has increased nationwide, with recent surges linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured traumatic assault trends at our urban Level I trauma center and assessed rates of firearm violence over time and pre/post local COVID-19 lockdown based on levels of socioeconomic disadvantage. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review (2016-2022) of assault patients 16 years and older. Demographics and hospital outcomes were assessed by assault mechanism (firearm, knife, blunt). Patient address was correlated to Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a measure of socioeconomic disadvantage. COVID-19 lockdown onset was defined as initial date of lockdown (3/19/2020). Trend and time-series analyses compared all assault mechanisms and firearm-specific assaults pre/post-lockdown. Poisson regression assessed firearm assault risk. RESULTS: Of the 1583 total assaults, firearm patients (n = 335) were younger (median 29 years), had longer hospital stays (median 2 days), and greater mortality (12%) than other mechanisms. The 2 years post-lockdown had significantly more firearm assaults (27% vs 15% pre-lockdown, P < .001) and time-series analysis found this abrupt and significant increase in firearm assaults occurred at lockdown onset (P = .01). Also post-lockdown, the rate of firearm assaults increased by 10% for every unit increase in socioeconomic deprivation (P < .01). There was no change in assault type by race/ethnicity. DISCUSSION: Firearm assaults increased dramatically immediately post-COVID lockdown at our center and have maintained higher rates through 2022. Greater ADI was associated with increasing firearm assaults and has magnified post-lockdown, demonstrating lower socioeconomic groups are disproportionately and increasingly affected by firearm violence.

Up and over: Consequences of raising the United States-Mexico border wall height.

OBJECTIVES: San Diego County's geographic location lends a unique demographic of migrant patients injured by falls at the United States-Mexico border. To prevent migrant crossings, a 2017 Executive Order allocated funds to increase the southern California border wall height from 10 ft to 30 ft, which was completed in December 2019. We hypothesized that the elevated border wall height is associated with increased major trauma, resource utilization, and health care costs. METHODS: Retrospective trauma registry review of border wall falls was performed by the two Level I trauma centers that admit border fall patients from the southern California border from January 2016 to June 2022. Patients were assigned to either "pre-2020" or "post-2020" subgroups based upon timing of completion of the heightened border wall. Total number of admissions, operating room utilization, hospital charges, and hospital costs were compared. RESULTS: Injuries from border wall falls grew 967% from 2016 to 2021 (39 vs. 377 admissions); this percentage is expected to be supplanted in 2022. When comparing the two subgroups, operating room utilization (175 vs. 734 total operations) and median hospital charges per patient ($95,229 vs. $168,795) have risen dramatically over the same time period. Hospital costs increased 636% in the post-2020 subgroup ($11,351,216 versus $72,172,123). The majority (97%) of these patients are uninsured at admission, with costs largely subsidized by federal government entities (57%) or through state Medicaid enrollment postadmission (31%). CONCLUSION: The increased height of the United States-Mexico border wall has resulted in record numbers of injured migrant patients, placing novel financial and resource burdens on already stressed trauma systems. To address this public health crisis, legislators and health care providers must conduct collaborative, apolitical discussions regarding the border wall's efficacy as a means of deterrence and its impact on traumatic injury and disability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Financial vulnerability of trauma centers: A national analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Trauma centers function as an essential safeguard in the United States health care system. However, there has been minimal study of their financial health or vulnerability. We sought to perform a nationwide analysis of trauma centers using detailed financial data and a recently developed Financial Vulnerability Score (FVS) metric. METHODS: The RAND Hospital Financial Database was used to evaluate all American College of Surgeons-verified trauma centers nationwide. The composite FVS was calculated for each center using six metrics. Financial Vulnerability Score tertiles were used to classify centers as high, medium, or low vulnerability, and hospital characteristics were analyzed and compared. Hospitals were also compared by US Census region and teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 311 American College of Surgeons-verified trauma centers were included in the analysis, with 100 (32%) Level I, 140 (45%) Level II, and 71 (23%) Level III. The largest share of the high FVS tier was consisted of Level III centers (62%), with the majority of Level I (40%) and Level II (42%) in the middle and low FVS tier, respectively. The most vulnerable centers had fewer beds, negative operating margins, and significantly less cash on hand. Lower FVS centers had greater asset/liability ratios, lower outpatient shares, and three times less uncompensated care. Nonteaching centers were statistically significantly more likely to have high vulnerability compared with teaching centers (46% vs. 29%). Statewide analysis showed high discrepancy among individual states. CONCLUSION: With approximately 25% of Levels I and II trauma centers at high risk for financial vulnerability, disparities in characteristics, including payer mix and outpatient status, should be targeted to reduce vulnerabilities and bolster the health care safety net. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Ballistic Facial Trauma Reconstruction: Incidence and Practice Patterns in the Civilian Population.

BACKGROUND: Management of nonfatal ballistic facial trauma is well described in the literature for wounds secondary to military combat. However, there is little literature describing such management in civilian practice. We aimed to describe nonmilitary patients with recent nonfatal facial injuries from ballistic trauma using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient database. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Ambulatory Surgery and Inpatient datasets. All adults with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes of severe nonfatal facial trauma from firearms requiring emergent surgery during 2016-2018 were included. Outcomes assessed include number and type of facial procedures performed, hospital length of stay, number of admissions, timing of definitive management, and lifetime hospitalization costs. RESULTS: A total of 331 traceable patients were identified over this 3-year period. The average age was 35.4 years (SD, 15.2), and 87% were male. The median index admission length of stay was 8 days (interquartile range, 3-15 days). Subsequent readmission was required for 123 (37.2%) patients with 10% mortality in the index admission. Total median charges per patient for all admissions were $257,804 (interquartile range, $105,601-$531,916). A total of 215 patients (65%) had at least 1 facial repair performed. Of all 331 patients, 64.3% underwent musculoskeletal repair (n = 213), 31.4% underwent digestive system repair (n = 104), and 29.6% underwent respiratory system repair (n = 98). The average number of repairs per patient was 2.52 (SD, 3.38), with 35% not having any of the specified International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision repair codes. A total of 27% of patients had 1 procedure performed, whereas 38% received 2 or more, for an average of 3.87 (SD, 3.5) repairs over the study duration. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first assessment of civilian characteristics of nonfatal ballistic facial trauma in California. Nonfatal facial ballistic trauma results in complex injuries to multiple body systems, requiring long admissions, costly hospital stays, and coordination of care across several surgical specialties. Many patients require a variety of procedures over multiple admissions, highlighting the overall morbidity of these injuries. Future studies will look at how care for these patients differs between various hospitals and geographic regions and whether current civilian management aligns with well-defined military reconstructive protocols for facial ballistic injuries.

Pediatric penetrating thoracic trauma: Examining the impact of trauma center designation and penetrating trauma volume on outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the impact of treating center designation and case volume of penetrating trauma on outcomes after pediatric penetrating thoracic injuries (PTI). METHODS: PTI patients <18 years were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2013-2016). Centers were categorized by type (Pediatric or Adult) and designation status (Level I, Level II, and other). Performance was calculated as the difference between observed and expected mortality and standardized using the total penetrating trauma volume per center. Expected mortality was calculated using the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model. Pearson correlation and linear mixed-effects models evaluated the association between variables and performance. RESULTS: We identified 4,134 PTI patients treated at 596 trauma centers: 879 (21%) at Adult Level I, 608 (15%) at Adult Level II, 531 (13%) at Pediatric Level I, 320 (8%) at Pediatric Level II, and 1,796 (43%) at other centers. Primary injury mechanisms were firearm-related (58%) and cut/piercing (42%). Overall mortality was 16% and median predicted mortality was 3.6% (IQR: 1.5% - 11.2%). Among patients with thoracic firearm-related injuries, centers with lower penetrating case volume and total trauma care demonstrated significantly worse outcomes. Multivariable analysis revealed Adult Level I centers had superior outcomes compared with all other non-Level I centers. There was no difference in mortality between Pediatric and Adult Level I centers. DISCUSSION: Adult Level I trauma center designation and annual case volume of penetrating thoracic trauma are associated with improved mortality after pediatric firearm-related thoracic injuries. Further study is needed to identify factors in higher volume centers that improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Evaluating pediatric car safety compliance in motor vehicle collisions: Identifying high-risk groups for improper restraint usage.

PURPOSE: To identify patient factors associated with improper restraint usage and worse trauma outcomes for pediatric patients involved in motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). METHODS: Retrospective study performed at a Level I pediatric trauma center for patients (≤18 yr) evaluated after MVC between 2008 and 2018. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to measure neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (NSD) levels based on the patient's home address. Trauma registry data was correlated to ADI and used to analyze appropriate restraint usage by NSD. Proper restraint practices were defined based on national guidelines and state laws. Demographics and clinical outcomes were also analyzed. Chi-square analysis with Bonferroni corrections was used to assess the association of ADI, race, and ethnicity with proper restraint usage. RESULTS: Among 1152 patients included, approximately 50% were male, the median age was 7 years [IQR 4-10], and 53% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Hispanic patients comprised 73% of children in ADI quintile 5 (greatest NSD), yet only 26% of children in ADI quintile 1 (least NSD). No differences were observed across clinical data and outcomes. Hispanic children <8 yr were significantly less likely to be in a car seat/booster seat compared to non-Hispanic children (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p = 0.025). Furthermore, those with greatest NSD (ADI quintile 5) had the largest proportion of unrestrained patients (21%, see Fig. 1). CONCLUSION: Hispanic children, especially those who require infant or booster seats (<8 yr), and children living in areas with greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage demonstrated poorer restraint practices. ADI can successfully identify high-risk groups for targeted injury prevention programs and improved compliance in the most vulnerable neighborhoods. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Study.

Financial Vulnerability of American College of Surgeons-Verified Trauma Centers: A Statewide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although trauma centers represent an integral part of healthcare in the US, characterization of their financial vulnerability has not been reported. We sought to characterize the financial health and vulnerability among California trauma centers and identify factors associated with high and low vulnerability. STUDY DESIGN: The RAND Hospital Data financial dataset was used to evaluate all American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified trauma centers in California. Financial vulnerability of each center was calculated using 6 metrics to calculate a composite Financial Vulnerability Score (FVS). Tertiles of the FVS were generated to classify trauma centers as high, medium, or low financial vulnerability. Hospital characteristics were also analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Forty-seven ACS trauma centers were identified. Nine were Level I, 27 were Level II, and 8 were Level III. Level I centers encompassed the greatest proportion of the high FVS tier (44%), whereas Level II and III centers were the most likely to be in the middle and lower tiers, respectively (44%; 63%). Lower FVS centers had greater asset:liability ratios, operating margins, and days cash on hand compared with the 2 higher tiers, whereas high FVS centers showed a greater proportion of uncompensated care, outpatient share rates, outpatient surgeries, and longer days in net accounts. Lower FVS centers were more likely to be teaching hospitals and members of a larger corporate entity. CONCLUSION: Many ACS trauma centers are at moderate/high risk for financial vulnerability and disparate impacts of stressor events, and the FVS may represent a novel metric that could be used at the local or statewide level.

Why Trauma Care is Not Expensive: Detailed Analysis of Actual Costs and Cost Differences of Patient Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Trauma patients are resource intensive, requiring a variety of medical and procedural interventions during hospitalization. These expenses often label trauma care as "high cost" based on gross hospital charges. We hypothesized that a financial metric built on actual costs and clinically relevant trauma patient cohorts would demonstrate a lower true cost of trauma care than the standardly reported gross hospital charges. METHODS: We examined all trauma patients (≥16 yr) treated in 2017 from a single institution and matched them to the institution's detailed financial accounting data. The organization's Financial Operations Division is uniquely able to allocate total operating costs across patient encounters to include medications, procedures, and salaries/fees from medical professionals and administrators. Patient subgroups were identified by Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) criteria for cost comparisons. RESULTS: Overall median cost per patient was $6,544 [IQR $4,975-14,532] for 2,548 patients. The median cost per patient increased with Injury Severity Score (ISS) ranging from $5,457(ISS ≤ 7) to $34,898(ISS ≥ 21), each accompanied by an average 548% increase in gross charges. Costs also varied widely from $13,498 [IQR $8,247-26,254] to $45,759 [IQR $22,186-113,993] across TQIP patient cohorts. Of the total cost, 91% was attributed to personnel alone. DISCUSSION: Measuring the true cost of trauma care is feasible. As hypothesized, the true cost of trauma care is lower than charges. True cost increased with injury severity with variable cost across subgroups. Non-physician staff and administration are the largest component of the cost of trauma care.

Integrating traffic safety data with area deprivation index: A method to better understand the causes of pediatric pedestrian versus automobile collisions.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and traffic factors that influence pediatric pedestrian versus automobile collisions (P-ACs) with an emphasis on health care disparities. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of pediatric (18 years or younger) P-ACs treated at a Level I pediatric trauma center from 2008 to 2018. Demographic, clinical, and traffic scene data were analyzed. Area deprivation index (ADI) was used to measure neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (NSD) based on home addresses. Traffic scene data from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System were matched to clinical records. Traffic safety was assessed by the streetlight coverage, the proximity of the collision to home addresses, and sidewalk coverage. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis for key variables and outcomes were calculated using Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, χ 2 , or Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was attributed to p values of <0.05. RESULTS: Among 770 patients, the majority were male (65%) and Hispanic (54%), with a median age of 8 years (interquartile range, 4-12 years). Hispanic patients were more likely to live in more disadvantaged neighborhoods than non-Hispanic patients (67% vs. 45%, p < 0.01). There were no differences in clinical characteristics or outcomes across ADI quintiles. Using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (n = 272), patients with more NSD were more likely injured during dark streetlight conditions (15% vs. 4% least disadvantaged; p = 0.04) and within 0.5 miles from home ( p < 0.01). Pedestrian violations were common (65%). During after-school hours, 25% were pedestrian violations, compared with 12% driver violations ( p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A larger proportion of Hispanic children injured in P-ACs lived in neighborhoods with more socioeconomic disadvantage. Hispanic ethnicity and NSD are each independently associated with P-ACs. Poor streetlight conditions and close proximity to home were associated with the most socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. This research may support targeted prevention programs to improve pedestrian safety in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.

Reading the signs in penetrating cervical vascular injuries: Analysis of hard/soft signs and initial management from a nationwide vascular trauma database.

BACKGROUND: Algorithms for management of penetrating cervical vascular injuries (PCVIs) commonly call for immediate surgery with "hard signs" and imaging before intervention with "soft signs." We sought to analyze the association between initial examination and subsequent evaluation and management approaches. METHODS: Analysis of PCVIs from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment vascular injury registry from 25 US trauma centers was performed. Patients were categorized by initial examination findings of hard signs or soft signs, and subsequent imaging and surgical exploration/repair rates were compared. RESULTS: Of 232 PCVI patients, 110 (47%) had hard signs (hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, or ischemia) and 122 (53%) had soft signs. With hard signs, 61 (56%) had immediate operative exploration and 44% underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging. After CT, 20 (18%) required open surgical repair, and 7% had endovascular intervention. Of note, 21 (19%) required no operative intervention. A total of 122 patients (53%) had soft signs on initial examination; 37 (30%) had immediate surgery, and 85 (70%) underwent CT imaging. After CT, 9% had endovascular repair, 7% had open surgery, and 65 (53%) were observed. No difference in mortality was observed for hard signs patients undergoing operative management versus observation alone (23% vs. 17%, p = 0.6). Those with hemorrhage as the primary hard signs most often required surgery (76%), but no interventions were required in 19% of hemorrhage, 20% of ischemia, and 24% of expanding hematoma. CONCLUSION: Although hard signs in PCVIs are associated with the need for operative intervention, initial CT imaging can facilitate endovascular options or nonoperative management in a significant subgroup. Hard signs should not be considered an absolute indication for immediate surgical exploration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.

The where, when, and why of surgical rib fixation: Utilization patterns, outcomes, and readmissions.

INTRODUCTION: There has been increasing use of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), but most literature demonstrate outcomes of single centers during the index hospitalization. We sought to analyze statewide patterns and longer-term outcomes after SSRF. METHODS: Adult patients with >1 rib fracture in the 2016-2018 California Office of Statewide Health Planning Database were identified. SSRF and non-operatively managed (NO) patients were matched on clinical and demographic variables. Patterns and outcomes of SSRF were assessed with multivariate modeling. RESULTS: 599 SSRF patients were matched to 1191 NO patients. Readmission and readmission complication rates were similar between the groups. In a competing risks regression, admission to a high-volume SSRF center (SHR 4.6, CI95 4.0-5.4, p = 0.01) was the primary predictor of SSRF. 30-day mortality adjusted risk was lower for the SSRF vs. NO group (HR 0.47, CI 0.25-0.88, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Statewide utilization of SSRF varied widely and appears to be driven by center or surgeon characteristics rather than clinical factors. Efforts to expand access to SSRF based on clinical factors may be warranted.