A population pharmacokinetic model of polymyxin B based on prospective clinical data to inform dosing in hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model with data from the largest polymyxin B-treated patient population studied to date to optimize its dosing in hospitalized patients. METHODS: Hospitalized patients receiving intravenous polymyxin B for ≥48 hours were enrolled. Blood samples were collected at steady state and drug concentrations were analysed by liquid chromotography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Population PK analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA). RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients received intravenous polymyxin B (1.33-6 mg/kg/day), providing 681 plasma samples. Twenty-four patients were on renal replacement therapy, including 13 on continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). A 2-compartment model adequately described the PK with body weight as a covariate on the volume of distribution that affected Cmax, but it did not impact clearance or exposure. Creatinine clearance was a statistically significant covariate on clearance, although clinically relevant variations of dose-normalized drug exposure were not observed across a wide creatinine clearance range. The model described higher clearance in CVVHDF patients than in non-CVVHDF patients. Maintenance doses of ≥2.5 mg/kg/day or ≥150 mg/day had a PTA ≥90% (for non-pulmonary infections target) at a steady state for minimum inhibitory concentrations ≤2 mg/L. The PTA at a steady state for CVVHDF patients was lower. DISCUSSION: Fixed loading and maintenance doses of polymyxin B seemed to be more appropriate than weight-based dosing regimens in patients weighing 45-90 kg. Higher doses may be needed in patients on CVVHDF. Substantial variability in polymyxin B clearance and volume of distribution was found, suggesting that therapeutic drug monitoring may be indicated.

Outcomes Associated with De-escalation of Antibiotics to Target Positive Cultures when Treating Febrile Neutropenia.

Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies frequently develop febrile neutropenia (FN) and subsequently receive long courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Limited data is available on de-escalation strategies. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of adult patients with a hematologic malignancy, FN, and positive culture results from June 2017 to June 2020. A conventional group (patients who remained on empiric, broad-spectrum agents) was compared to a de-escalation group (patients whose antibiotic therapy was de-escalated based on culture results). The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent fever or antibiotic escalation due to infection while neutropenic. Results: Of the 123 patients included, the composite primary outcome occurred in 35.3% in the de-escalation group and 39.3% in the conventional group (P = .83). For secondary outcomes, median time to recurrent fever was 7 days in the de-escalation group and 7 days in the conventional group (P = .73). Incidence of Clostridioides difficile was 5.9% in the de-escalation group and 6.7% in the conventional group (P = 1.00). Development of multidrug resistant pathogens during hospital admission was 20.6% in the de-escalation group and 14.6% in the conventional group (P = .59). Median length of broad-spectrum antibiotics was 3 days in the de-escalation group and 8 days in the conventional group (P < .001). All-cause mortality within 30 days was 0 in the de-escalation group and 5.6% in the conventional group (P = .32). Conclusion: In a small sample of patients with a hematologic malignancy and FN, de-escalating antibiotics based on positive cultures decreased the duration of antibiotic therapy without increasing the rate of antibiotic failure.

Characteristics of procalcitonin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and clinical outcomes of antibiotic use stratified by procalcitonin levels.

We examined the characteristics of pro-calcitonin (PCT) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (cohort 1) and clinical outcomes of antibiotic use stratified by PCT in non-critically ill patients without bacterial co-infection (cohort 2). Retrospective reviews were performed in adult, hospitalized COVID-19 patients during March-May 2020. For cohort 1, we excluded hospital transfers, renal disease and extra-pulmonary infection without isolated pathogen(s). For cohort 2, we further excluded microbiologically confirmed infection, 'do not resuscitate ± do not intubate' status, and intensive care unit (ICU). For cohort 1, PCT was compared between absent/low-suspicion and proven bacterial co-infections. Factors associated with elevated PCT and sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of PCT cutoffs for identifying bacterial co-infections were explored. For cohort 2, clinical outcomes including mechanical ventilation within 5 days (MV5) were compared between the antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups stratified by PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L. Nine hundred and twenty four non-ICU and 103 ICU patients were included (cohort 1). The median PCT was higher in proven vs. absent/low-suspicion of bacterial co-infection. Elevated PCT was significantly associated with proven bacterial co-infection, ICU status and oxygen requirement. For PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L, sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV were 69/65/6.5/98% (non-ICU) and 75/33/8.6/94% (ICU). For cohort 2, 756/1305 (58%) patients were included. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups except PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L (antibiotic:non-antibiotic = 59%:24%) and tocilizumab use (antibiotic:non-antibiotic = 5%:2%). 23% (PCT < 0.25 µg/L) and 58% (PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L) received antibiotics. Antibiotic group had significantly higher rates of MV5. COVID-19 severity inferred from ICU status and oxygen requirement as well as the presence of bacterial co-infections were associated with elevated PCT. PCT showed poor PPV and high NPV for proven bacterial co-infections. The use of antibiotics did not show improved clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L outside of ICU when bacterial co-infections are of low suspicion.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Clinical Correlates of MRSA Bacteremia.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. MRSA secretes a number of virulence factors and pore-forming toxins that enable tissue invasion. Prior studies have found associations between decreased toxin production and poor outcomes in invasive MRSA infection, particularly in pneumonia. In this retrospective observational cohort study of MRSA bacteremia in adult patients from 2007 to 2015, we examined whether cytotoxicity was associated with 30-day mortality. Isolates were obtained from 776 patients and screened for cytotoxicity in a human HL-60 cell model, antimicrobial susceptibility, and spa type, and clinical data were abstracted from charts. We did not find an association between low cytotoxic activity and 30-day mortality in univariate logistic regression analyses. There was a difference in distribution of the genotypes across cytotoxicity phenotypes, with spa-CC008 accounting for a larger proportion of isolates in the high cytotoxicity group. Isolates with a skin and soft tissue primary infective site had a higher median cytotoxicity. There was no association between cytotoxicity and host factors such as age or comorbidity burden. The isolates in our study came from heterogeneous primary sites of infection and were predominantly from spa-CC002 and spa-CC008 lineages, so it is possible that findings in prior studies reflect a different distribution in genotypes and clinical syndromes. Overall, in this large study of cytotoxicity of MRSA bloodstream isolates, we did not find the low cytotoxicity phenotype to be predictive of poor outcomes in MRSA bacteremia.

Assessing the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models for intravenous polymyxin B in critically ill patients.

Polymyxin B (PMB) has reemerged as a last-line therapy for infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens, but dosing is challenging because of its narrow therapeutic window and pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Population PK (POPPK) models based on suitably powered clinical studies with appropriate sampling strategies that take variability into consideration can inform PMB dosing to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity and resistance. Here we reviewed published PMB POPPK models and evaluated them using an external validation data set (EVD) of patients who are critically ill and enrolled in an ongoing clinical study to assess their utility. Seven published POPPK models were employed using the reported model equations, parameter values, covariate relationships, interpatient variability, parameter covariance, and unexplained residual variability in NONMEM (Version 7.4.3). The predictive ability of the models was assessed using prediction-based and simulation-based diagnostics. Patient characteristics and treatment information were comparable across studies and with the EVD (n = 40), but the sampling strategy was a main source of PK variability across studies. All models visually and statistically underpredicted EVD plasma concentrations, but the two-compartment models more accurately described the external data set. As current POPPK models were inadequately predictive of the EVD, creation of a new POPPK model based on an appropriately powered clinical study with an informed PK sampling strategy would be expected to improve characterization of PMB PK and identify covariates to explain interpatient variability. Such a model would support model-informed precision dosing frameworks, which are urgently needed to improve PMB treatment efficacy, limit resistance, and reduce toxicity in patients who are critically ill.

Characterization of Bacterial and Fungal Infections in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Factors Associated With Health Care-Associated Infections.

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of health care-associated infections (HAIs), especially with prolonged hospital stays. We sought to identify incidence, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and outcomes associated with bacterial/fungal secondary infections in a large cohort of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We evaluated adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 2 March and 31 May 2020 and hospitalized >24 hours. Data extracted from medical records included diagnoses, vital signs, laboratory results, microbiological data, and antibiotic use. Microbiologically confirmed bacterial and fungal pathogens from clinical cultures were evaluated to characterize community- and health care-associated infections, including describing temporal changes in predominant organisms on presentation and throughout hospitalization. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate risk factors for HAIs. RESULTS: A total of 3028 patients were included and accounted for 899 positive clinical cultures. Overall, 516 (17%) patients with positive cultures met criteria for infection. Community-associated coinfections were identified in 183 (6%) patients, whereas HAIs occurred in 350 (12%) patients. Fifty-seven percent of HAIs were caused by gram-negative bacteria and 19% by fungi. Antibiotic resistance increased with longer hospital stays, with incremental increases in the proportion of vancomycin resistance among enterococci and ceftriaxone and carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales. Intensive care unit stay, invasive mechanical ventilation, and steroids were associated with HAIs. CONCLUSIONS: HAIs occur in a small proportion of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and are most often caused by gram-negative and fungal pathogens. Antibiotic resistance is more prevalent with prolonged hospital stays. Antimicrobial stewardship is imperative in this population to minimize unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use.

Cardiac Corrected QT Interval Changes Among Patients Treated for COVID-19 Infection During the Early Phase of the Pandemic.

Importance: Critical illness, a marked inflammatory response, and viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 may prolong corrected QT interval (QTc). Objective: To evaluate baseline QTc interval on 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) and ensuing changes among patients with and without COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 3050 patients aged 18 years and older who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing and had ECGs at Columbia University Irving Medical Center from March 1 through May 1, 2020. Patients were analyzed by treatment group over 5 days, as follows: hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine alone, azithromycin alone, and neither hydroxychloroquine nor azithromycin. ECGs were manually analyzed by electrophysiologists masked to COVID-19 status. Multivariable modeling evaluated clinical associations with QTc prolongation from baseline. Exposures: COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean QTc prolongation, percentage of patients with QTc of 500 milliseconds or greater. Results: A total of 965 patients had more than 2 ECGs and were included in the study, with 561 (58.1%) men, 198 (26.2%) Black patients, and 191 (19.8%) aged 80 years and older. There were 733 patients (76.0%) with COVID-19 and 232 patients (24.0%) without COVID-19. COVID-19 infection was associated with significant mean QTc prolongation from baseline by both 5-day and 2-day multivariable models (5-day, patients with COVID-19: 20.81 [95% CI, 15.29 to 26.33] milliseconds; P < .001; patients without COVID-19: -2.01 [95% CI, -17.31 to 21.32] milliseconds; P = .93; 2-day, patients with COVID-19: 17.40 [95% CI, 12.65 to 22.16] milliseconds; P < .001; patients without COVID-19: 0.11 [95% CI, -12.60 to 12.81] milliseconds; P = .99). COVID-19 infection was independently associated with a modeled mean 27.32 (95% CI, 4.63-43.21) millisecond increase in QTc at 5 days compared with COVID-19-negative status (mean QTc, with COVID-19: 450.45 [95% CI, 441.6 to 459.3] milliseconds; without COVID-19: 423.13 [95% CI, 403.25 to 443.01] milliseconds; P = .01). More patients with COVID-19 not receiving hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin had QTc of 500 milliseconds or greater compared with patients without COVID-19 (34 of 136 [25.0%] vs 17 of 158 [10.8%], P = .002). Multivariable analysis revealed that age 80 years and older compared with those younger than 50 years (mean difference in QTc, 11.91 [SE, 4.69; 95% CI, 2.73 to 21.09]; P = .01), severe chronic kidney disease compared with no chronic kidney disease (mean difference in QTc, 12.20 [SE, 5.26; 95% CI, 1.89 to 22.51; P = .02]), elevated high-sensitivity troponin levels (mean difference in QTc, 5.05 [SE, 1.19; 95% CI, 2.72 to 7.38]; P < .001), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels (mean difference in QTc, 5.31 [SE, 2.68; 95% CI, 0.06 to 10.57]; P = .04) were associated with QTc prolongation. Torsades de pointes occurred in 1 patient (0.1%) with COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, COVID-19 infection was independently associated with significant mean QTc prolongation at days 5 and 2 of hospitalization compared with day 0. More patients with COVID-19 had QTc of 500 milliseconds or greater compared with patients without COVID-19.

Antimicrobial stewardship perspectives from a New York City hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities.

PURPOSE: To share challenges and opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship programs based on one center's experience during the early weeks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. SUMMARY: In the spring of 2020, New York City quickly became a hotspot for the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, putting a strain on local healthcare systems. Antimicrobial stewardship programs faced diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties as well as healthcare resource challenges. With the lack of effective antivirals, antibiotic use in critically ill patients was difficult to avoid. Uncertainty drove antimicrobial use and thus antimicrobial stewardship principles were paramount. The dramatic influx of patients, drug and equipment shortages, and the need for prescribers to practice in alternative roles only compounded the situation. Establishing enhanced communication, education, and inventory control while leveraging the capabilities of the electronic medical record were some of the tools used to optimize existing resources. CONCLUSION: New York City was a unique and challenging environment during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Antimicrobial stewardship programs can learn from each other by sharing lessons learned and practice opportunities to better prepare other programs facing COVID-19 case surges.

Guideline-Discordant Preoperative Gentamicin Dosing and the Risk of Gentamicin Associated Nephrotoxicity in Urologic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of and predictors for guideline-discordant preoperative gentamicin dosing in urologic surgery and to assess the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients who receive the recommended high-dose prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients who received preoperative gentamicin for urologic surgery from January 1, 2017 - October 3, 2019. Doses were categorized as guideline-concordant or -discordant using a cutoff of 4.5 mg/kg dosing weight. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors for guideline-discordant dosing. Postoperative kidney injury was assessed using RIFLE criteria. RESULTS: Among 2134 patients, 89% received a preoperative dose ≤ 4.5 mg/kg. Older age (70+ years) and endoscopic surgery were significant risk factors for guideline-discordant dosing (OR 2.54, P< 0.001; OR 6.21, P<0.001). Among 735 patients with complete data, there was no significant difference in the risk of kidney injury between those who received a dose less than 4.5 mg/kg and those who received a higher dose (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.26 - 2.99, P = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Preoperative gentamicin is commonly administered at lower than recommended doses for urologic surgery. Older age and endoscopic surgery are significant predictors of guideline-discordant dosing. The risk of kidney injury following high-dose preoperative gentamicin for urologic procedures is likely comparable to the risk at lower doses.

Limited Utility of Procalcitonin in Identifying Community-Associated Bacterial Infections in Patients Presenting with Coronavirus Disease 2019.

The role of procalcitonin in identifying community-associated bacterial infections among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is not yet established. In 2,443 patients of whom 148 had bacterial coinfections, mean procalcitonin levels were significantly higher with any bacterial infection (13.16 ± 51.19 ng/ml; P = 0.0091) and with bacteremia (34.25 ± 85.01 ng/ml; P = 0.0125) than without infection (2.00 ± 15.26 ng/ml). Procalcitonin (cutoff, 0.25 or 0.50 ng/ml) did not reliably identify bacterial coinfections but may be useful in excluding bacterial infection.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Methylprednisolone in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome resulting from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the association between use of methylprednisolone and key clinical outcomes. METHODS: Clinical outcomes associated with the use of methylprednisolone were assessed in an unmatched, case-control study; a subset of patients also underwent propensity-score matching. Patients were admitted between 1 March and 12 April, 2020. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days by 28 days after admission. Secondary outcomes included extubation, mortality, discharge, positive cultures, and hyperglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients met inclusion criteria. Propensity matching yielded a cohort of 42 well-matched pairs. Groups were similar except for hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin use, which were more common in patients who did not receive methylprednisolone. Mean ventilator-free days were significantly higher in patients treated with methylprednisolone (6.21 ±â€…7.45 vs 3.14 ±â€…6.22; P = .044). The probability of extubation was also increased in patients receiving methylprednisolone (45% vs 21%; P = .021), and there were no significant differences in mortality (19% vs 36%; P = .087). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, only methylprednisolone use was associated with a higher number of ventilator-free days (P = .045). The incidence of positive cultures and hyperglycemia were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Methylprednisolone was associated with increased ventilator-free days and higher probability of extubation in a propensity-score matched cohort. Randomized, controlled studies are needed to further define methylprednisolone use in patients with COVID-19.

Polymyxin B Pharmacokinetics in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Polymyxin B pharmacokinetics (PK) in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) are not well described. The goals of this pilot study were to identify a PK model for patients with CF receiving polymyxin B with exploration of covariate relationships of the PK parameters, to compare polymyxin B PK parameters in adults without CF, and to probe exposures associated with different dosing schemes through simulation. METHODS: Adult patients with CF treated with polymyxin B at New York-Presbyterian Hospital had PK samples measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS. Multiple PK models were fit utilizing Pmetrics for R. Model covariates considered included: age, total body weight, creatinine clearance, albumin, and body mass index. PK parameters in CF patients were compared with PK parameters for 53 adults without CF who were receiving polymyxin B from the same institution. Simulations with target exposure (area under the curve)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 20 mg*L/h were conducted for different dosing schemes and MIC ranges. MAIN RESULTS: Nine patients with CF received between 58 and 240 mg of polymyxin B (median 1.47 mg/kg/dose [IQR (1.43-1.65)]). A two-compartment model adjusting polymyxin B clearance for patient CrCl was better than a standard two-compartment model (p=0.004) in CF patients. When compared to PK parameters for patients without CF, PK parameters of polymyxin B in CF were similar (p>0.05). Simulations for plasma concentrations showed all regimens performed adequately at MICs between 0.03125 and 0.125 mg/L but not at increasing MICs of 1 and 2 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study of polymyxin B PK in adults with CF, the PK parameters of polymyxin B were mostly similar to adults without CF. We observed a potential association between CrCl and polymyxin B clearance, which stands in contrast to the general adult population. However, this observation requires further study. Additional studies focusing on optimal and safe polymyxin B dosing in CF are needed.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship Among Prescribers at Acute-Care Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE To assess antimicrobial prescriber knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) and associated barriers to optimal prescribing. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING Online survey. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of 2,900 US antimicrobial prescribers at 5 acute-care hospitals within a hospital network. INTERVENTION The following characteristics were assessed with an anonymous, online survey in February 2015: attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial resistance, AS programs, and institutional AS resources; antimicrobial prescribing and AS knowledge; and practices and confidence related to antimicrobial prescribing. RESULTS In total, 402 respondents completed the survey. Knowledge gaps were identified through case-based questions. Some respondents sometimes selected overly broad therapy for the susceptibilities given (29%) and some "usually" or "always" preferred using the most broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials possible (32%). Nearly all (99%) reported reviewing antimicrobial appropriateness at 48-72 hours, but only 55% reported "always" doing so. Furthermore, 45% of respondents felt that they had not received adequate training regarding antimicrobial prescribing. Some respondents lacked confidence selecting empiric therapy using antibiograms (30%), interpreting susceptibility results (24%), de-escalating therapy (18%), and determining duration of therapy (31%). Postprescription review and feedback (PPRF) was the most commonly cited AS intervention (79%) with potential to improve patient care. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to appropriate antimicrobial selection and de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy were identified among front-line prescribers in acute-care hospitals. Prescribers desired more AS-related education and identified PPRF as the most helpful AS intervention to improve patient care. Educational interventions should be preceded by and tailored to local assessment of educational needs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:316-322.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Polymyxin B from Clinical Samples.

A retrospective study was conducted in hospitalized patients receiving intravenous polymyxin B who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring during treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous polymyxin B in patients with variable total body weights and create a population model for clinical use. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling analyses were performed. A total of 43 patients were included, and 70% of these patients were male. The median age was 58 years, and the median weight was 78 kg. The median polymyxin B dose was 180 mg/day or 2.8 mg/kg/day. A one-compartment model described the polymyxin B PK well with conditional mean parameter estimates of a clearance (CL) of 2.37 liters/h and a volume of distribution of 34.4 liters and can be employed for clinical population modeling. Total body weight was not significantly associated with CL (Akaike information criterion, 361.6 for the weight-based model versus 359.5 for the non-weight-based model). These data suggest that dosing according to patient body weight requires further exploration. Greater study is needed to assess the relationships between polymyxin B exposures and efficacy and toxicity.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Polymyxin B in Acutely Ill Adult Patients.

Polymyxin B (PB) has reemerged as a common treatment against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. However, nephrotoxicity remains a significant dose-limiting side effect, and contemporary pharmacokinetic (PK) data are limited. This study sought to evaluate PB exposure differences in various loading and nonloading strategies according to total body weight (TBW) and adjusted body weight (ABW). Patients treated with PB had plasma samples obtained for clinical care and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Compartmental PK models with linear and allometric scaling of TBW were explored. Semiparametric Monte Carlo simulation evaluated the total (i.e., protein bound plus unbound) area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCtotal) during the first 24 h of therapy and at 96 h posttherapy for each regimen at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of TBW and ABW in the derivation cohort. Literature-based values of the 24-h total AUC/MIC ratio (AUC/MICtotal) of ≥50 defined efficacy, and literature-based values of the 72- to 96-h AUCtotal of ≥100 µg · h/ml defined toxicity. Fifty-two patients contributed 156 PB plasma samples. A two-compartment model with allometric scaling of TBW produced a comparable fit (Akaike information criterion [AIC] = 376.7) to that achieved with linear scaling (AIC = 378). The regimen of a loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg of body weight plus a fixed dose of 100 mg every 12 h had the highest probability of achieving a 24-h AUC/MICtotal of ≥50 with the lowest probability of toxicity in all groups at 24 h, aside from those with the lowest 10th percentile of body weight. This is the first study to suggest that a weight-based loading and fixed maintenance (i.e., weight-independent) dosing strategy for polymyxin B may maximize efficacy while balancing toxicity concerns for most patients.

Clinical outcomes associated with polymyxin B dose in patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative rods.

There is significant variation in the use of polymyxin B (PMB), and optimal dosing has not been defined. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between PMB dose and clinical outcomes. We included patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative rods who received ≥48 h of intravenous PMB. The objective was to evaluate the association between PMB dose and 30-day mortality, clinical cure at day 7, and development of acute kidney injury (AKI). A total of 151 BSIs were included. The overall 30-day mortality was 37.8% (54 of 151), and the median PMB dosage was 1.3 mg/kg (of total body weight)/day. Receipt of PMB dosages of <1.3 mg/kg/day was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (46.5% versus 26.3%; P = 0.02), and this association persisted in multivariable analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.81; P = 0.04). Eighty-two percent of patients who received PMB dosages of <1.3 mg/kg/day had baseline renal impairment. Clinical cure at day 7 was not significantly different between dosing groups. AKI was more common in patients receiving PMB dosages of ≥250 mg/day (66.7% versus 32.0%; P = 0.03), and this association persisted in multivariable analysis (OR = 4.32; 95% CI = 1.15 to 16.25; P = 0.03). PMB dosages of <1.3 mg/kg/day were administered primarily to patients with renal impairment, and this dosing was independently associated with 30-day mortality. However, dosages of ≥250 mg/day were independently associated with AKI. These data support the use of PMB without dose reduction in the setting of renal impairment.

Appropriateness of gram-negative agent use at a tertiary care hospital in the setting of significant antimicrobial resistance.

Background. Practicing antimicrobial stewardship in the setting of widespread antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacilli, particularly in urban areas, is challenging. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital with an established antimicrobial stewardship program in New York, New York to determine appropriateness of use of gram-negative antimicrobials and to identify factors associated with suboptimal antimicrobial use. Adult inpatients who received gram-negative agents on 2 dates, 1 June 2010 or 1 December 2010, were identified through pharmacy records. Clinical data were collected for each patient. Use of gram-negative agents was deemed optimal or suboptimal through chart review and according to hospital guidelines. Data were compared using χ(2) or Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Results. A total of 356 patients were included who received 422 gram-negative agents. Administration was deemed suboptimal in 26% of instances, with the most common reason being spectrum of activity too broad. In multivariable analysis, being in an intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], .49; 95% confidence interval [CI], .29-.84), having an infectious diseases consultation within the previous 7 days (aOR, .52; 95% CI, .28-.98), and having a history of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli within the past year (aOR, .24; 95% CI, .09-.65) were associated with optimal gram-negative agent use. Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination drug use (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.35-5.16) was associated with suboptimal use. Conclusions. Gram-negative agents were used too broadly despite numerous antimicrobial stewardship program activities.

Risk factors and outcomes of infections caused by extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli in patients hospitalized in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (XDR-GNB) increasingly cause health care-associated infections (HAIs) in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: A matched case-control (1:2) study was conducted from February 2007 to January 2010 in 16 ICUs. Case and control subjects had HAIs caused by GNB susceptible to ≤1 antibiotic versus ≥2 antibiotics, respectively. Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression assessed risk factors for HAIs and predictors of mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 103 case and 195 control subjects were enrolled. An immunocompromised state (odds ratio [OR], 1.55; P = .047) and exposure to amikacin (OR, 13.81; P < .001), levofloxacin (OR, 2.05; P = .005), or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (OR, 3.42; P = .009) were factors associated with XDR-GNB HAIs. Multiple factors in both case and control subjects significantly predicted increased mortality at different time intervals after HAI diagnosis. At 7 days, liver disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.52), immunocompromised state (HR, 3.41), and bloodstream infection (HR, 2.55) predicted mortality; at 15 days, age (HR, 1.02 per year increase), liver disease (HR, 3.34), and immunocompromised state (HR, 2.03) predicted mortality; and, at 30 days, age (HR, 1.02 per 1-year increase), liver disease (HR, 3.34), immunocompromised state (HR, 2.03), and hospitalization in a medical ICU (HR, 1.85) predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: HAIs caused by XDR-GNB were associated with potentially modifiable factors. Age, liver disease, and immunocompromised state, but not XDR-GNB HAIs, were associated with mortality.

Real-world experience with echinocandin MICs against Candida species in a multicenter study of hospitals that routinely perform susceptibility testing of bloodstream isolates.

Reference broth microdilution methods of Candida echinocandin susceptibility testing are limited by interlaboratory variability in caspofungin MICs. Recently revised Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoint MICs for echinocandin nonsusceptibility may not be valid for commercial tests employed in hospital laboratories. Indeed, there are limited echinocandin susceptibility testing data from hospital laboratories. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 9 U.S., Australian, and New Zealand hospitals that routinely tested Candida bloodstream isolates for echinocandin susceptibility from 2005 to 2013. Eight hospitals used Sensititre YeastOne assays. The Candida spp. were C. albicans (n=1,067), C. glabrata (n=911), C. parapsilosis (n=476), C. tropicalis (n=185), C. krusei (n=104), and others (n=154). Resistance and intermediate rates were ≤1.4% and ≤3%, respectively, for each echinocandin against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. Resistance rates among C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates were ≤7.5% and ≤5.6%, respectively. Caspofungin intermediate rates among C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates were 17.8% and 46.5%, respectively, compared to ≤4.3% and ≤4.4% for other echinocandins. Using CLSI breakpoints, 18% and 19% of C. glabrata isolates were anidulafungin susceptible/caspofungin nonsusceptible and micafungin susceptible/caspofungin nonsusceptible, respectively; similar discrepancies were observed for 38% and 39% of C. krusei isolates. If only YeastOne data were considered, interhospital modal MIC variability was low (within 2 doubling dilutions for each agent). In conclusion, YeastOne assays employed in hospitals may reduce the interlaboratory variability in caspofungin MICs against Candida species that are observed between reference laboratories using CLSI broth microdilution methods. The significance of classifying isolates as caspofungin intermediate and anidulafungin/micafungin susceptible will require clarification in future studies.