A comparison of chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine solutions in neonatal intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Povidone-iodine (10%; PI) and 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol (CHG-IA) solutions are among the most widely used disinfectants in the neonatal intensive care units. This study compares the use of these disinfectants and helps decide which is superior to the other for neonatal use. METHODS: All term and preterm infants born and hospitalized in Bursa Uludag University Hospital between July 2018-March 2020 were included. The infants were randomized into two disinfectant groups before birth. The application site was cleaned with the assigned disinfectant before intervention. The infants were screened for rates of neonatal sepsis, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels, free thyroxine (fT4) levels, skin reactions to the assigned solution, and acute neurological side effects. RESULTS: We enrolled 208 term and preterm infants (PI:104 vs. CHG-IA: 104) in the study. The prematurity rates were identical (PI: 74.0%; CHG-IA: 72.1%; p = 0.755). Neonatal sepsis rates among these groups were not statistically different (PI: 8.7%; CHG-IA: 4.8%; p = 0.406). The median TSH value of the PI group was high (4.05 mIU/L) in comparison with that of the CHG-IA group (3.09 mIU/L; p = 0.016). No cutaneous or neurological side effects were recorded in patients treated with CHG-IA solution. CONCLUSIONS: Although these two solutions were equally protective against infections, the CHG-IA solution was a better alternative to PI for neonatal use. Considering that the PI solution may be responsible for impaired thyroid function, the CHG-IA solution is a good alternative because it provides sufficient protection with a safer adverse effect profile.

The questioning for routine monthly monitoring of proteinuria in patients with ß-thalassemia on deferasirox chelation.

BACKGROUND: Iron chelation therapy is one of the mainstays of the management of the patients with ß-thalassemia (BT) major. Deferasirox is an oral active iron chelating agent. Proteinuria is one of the potential renal adverse effects of deferasirox, and monthly follow-up for proteinuria is suggested by Food and Drug Administration and European Medicine Agency. METHODS: We aimed to investigate the necessity for monthly monitoring for proteinuria among patients with BT on deferasirox. A retrospective laboratory and clinic data review was performed for patients with BT major or intermedia who were treated with deferasirox chelation therapy. All patients were monitored for proteinuria for every 3 or 4 weeks after the initiation of deferasirox with serum creatinine and spot urine protein/creatinine ratios. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the 37 (36 BT major and one BT intermedia) patients was 44 months. Seven patients (18.9%) developed significant proteinuria (ratio ≥0.8). Of the 1490 measurements, 12 tests (0.8%) were proteinuric. Urine proteinuria resolved in all of the patients during the follow-up. The risk of proteinuria was higher at ages below a cut-off point of 23 years (p = 0.019). Patients, who were on deferasirox at doses above a cut-off dose of 29 mg/kg/day, were found to have higher risk of proteinuria development (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Proteinuria resolves without any complication or major intervention according to our results. Potentially more risky groups (age below 23 years old and receivers above a dose of 29 mg/kg/day) might be suggested to be followed monthly, besides monitoring all of the patients.