Virtual Physical Coupling of Two Lower-Limb Exoskeletons.

Physical interaction between individuals plays an important role in human motor learning and performance during shared tasks. Using robotic devices, researchers have studied the effects of dyadic haptic interaction mostly focusing on the upper-limb. Developing infrastructure that enables physical interactions between multiple individuals' lower limbs can extend the previous work and facilitate investigation of new dyadic lower-limb rehabilitation schemes. We designed a system to render haptic interactions between two users while they walk in multi-joint lower-limb exoskeletons. Specifically, we developed an infrastructure where desired interaction torques are commanded to the individual lower-limb exoskeletons based on the users' kinematics and the properties of the virtual coupling. In this pilot study, we demonstrated the capacity of the platform to render different haptic properties (e.g., soft and hard), different haptic connection types (e.g., bidirectional and unidirectional), and connections expressed in joint space and in task space. With haptic connection, dyads generated synchronized movement, and the difference between joint angles decreased as the virtual stiffness increased. This is the first study where multi-joint dyadic haptic interactions are created between lower-limb exoskeletons. This platform will be used to investigate effects of haptic interaction on motor learning and task performance during walking, a complex and meaningful task for gait rehabilitation.

Haptic Human-Human Interaction During an Ankle Tracking Task: Effects of Virtual Connection Stiffness.

While treating sensorimotor impairments, a therapist may provide physical assistance by guiding their patient's limb to teach a desired movement. In this scenario, a key aspect is the compliance of the interaction, as the therapist can provide subtle cues or impose a movement as demonstration. One approach to studying these interactions involves haptically connecting two individuals through robotic interfaces. Upper-limb studies have shown that pairs of connected individuals estimate one another's goals during tracking tasks by exchanging haptic information, resulting in improved performance dependent on the ability of one's partner and the stiffness of the virtual connection. In this study, our goal was to investigate whether these findings generalize to the lower limb during an ankle tracking task. Pairs of healthy participants (i.e., dyads) independently tracked target trajectories with and without connections rendered between two ankle robots. We tested the effects of connection stiffness as well as visual noise to manipulate the correlation of tracking errors between partners. In our analysis, we compared changes in task performance across conditions while tracking with and without the connection. We found that tracking improvements while connected increased with connection stiffness, favoring the worse partner in the dyad during hard connections. We modeled the interaction as three springs in series, considering the stiffness of the connection and each partners' ankle, to show that improvements were likely due to a cancellation of random tracking errors between partners. These results suggest a simplified mechanism of improvements compared to what has been reported during upper-limb dyadic tracking.

Effect of Dyadic Haptic Collaboration on Ankle Motor Learning and Task Performance.

Optimizing skill acquisition during novel motor tasks and regaining lost motor functions have been the interest of many researchers over the past few decades. One approach shown to accelerate motor learning involves haptically coupling two individuals through robotic interfaces. Studies have shown that an individual's solo performance during upper-limb tracking tasks may improve after haptically-coupled training with a partner. In this study, our goal was to investigate whether these findings can be translated to lower-limb motor tasks, more specifically, during an ankle position tracking task. Using one-degree-of-freedom ankle movements, pairs of participants (i.e., dyads) tracked target trajectories independently. Participants alternated between tracking trials with and without haptic coupling, achieved by rendering a virtual spring between two ankle rehabilitation robots. In our analysis, we compared changes in task performance across trials while training with and without haptic coupling. The tracking performance of both individuals (i.e., dyadic task performance) improved during haptic coupling, which was likely due to averaging of random errors of the dyadic pair during tracking. However, we found that dyadic haptic coupling did not lead to faster individual learning for the tracking task. These results suggest that haptic coupling between unimpaired individuals may not be an effective method of training ankle movements during a simple, one-degree-of-freedom task.

Digital Guinea Pig: Merits and Methods of Human-in-the-Loop Simulation for Upper-Limb Exoskeletons.

Exoskeletons operate in continuous haptic interaction with a human limb. Thus, this interaction is a key factor to consider during the development of hardware and control policies for these devices. Physics simulations can complement real-world experiments for prototype validation, leading to higher efficiency in hardware and software development iterations as well as increased safety for participants and robot hardware. Here, we present a simulation framework of the full rigid-body dynamics of a coupled human and exoskeleton arm built to validate the full software stack. We present a method to model the human-robot interaction dynamics as decoupled spring-damper systems based on anthropometric data. Further, we demonstrate the application of the simulation framework to predict the closed-loop haptic-rendering performance of a 9-DOF exoskeleton in interaction with a human. The simulation was capable of simulating the closed-loop system's reaction to an impact on a haptic wall. The intrusion into the compliant walls was predicted with a relative accuracy of 6% to 13%. Admissible control gains could be predicted with an accuracy of around 14%, and higher prediction accuracy is indicated when modeling the torque tracking bandwidth of the actuators. Hence, the simulation is valuable for validating prototype software, developing intuition, and a better understanding of the complex characteristics of the coupled system dynamics, even though the quantitative prediction is limited.

Human-machine-human interaction in motor control and rehabilitation: a review.

BACKGROUND: Human-human (HH) interaction mediated by machines (e.g., robots or passive sensorized devices), which we call human-machine-human (HMH) interaction, has been studied with increasing interest in the last decade. The use of machines allows the implementation of different forms of audiovisual and/or physical interaction in dyadic tasks. HMH interaction between two partners can improve the dyad's ability to accomplish a joint motor task (task performance) beyond either partner's ability to perform the task solo. It can also be used to more efficiently train an individual to improve their solo task performance (individual motor learning). We review recent research on the impact of HMH interaction on task performance and individual motor learning in the context of motor control and rehabilitation, and we propose future research directions in this area. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on the Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed databases. The search query was designed to find studies that involve HMH interaction in motor control and rehabilitation settings. Studies that do not investigate the effect of changing the interaction conditions were filtered out. Thirty-one studies met our inclusion criteria and were used in the qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: Studies are analyzed based on their results related to the effects of interaction type (e.g., audiovisual communication and/or physical interaction), interaction mode (collaborative, cooperative, co-active, and competitive), and partner characteristics. Visuo-physical interaction generally results in better dyadic task performance than visual interaction alone. In cases where the physical interaction between humans is described by a spring, there are conflicting results as to the effect of the stiffness of the spring. In terms of partner characteristics, having a more skilled partner improves dyadic task performance more than having a less skilled partner. However, conflicting results were observed in terms of individual motor learning. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is difficult to draw clear conclusions as to which interaction type, mode, or partner characteristic may lead to optimal task performance or individual motor learning, these results show the possibility for improved outcomes through HMH interaction. Future work that focuses on selecting the optimal personalized interaction conditions and exploring their impact on rehabilitation settings may facilitate the transition of HMH training protocols to clinical implementations.