Supercharged End-to-Side Nerve Transfer for Ulnar Neuropathy: Redefining Nomenclature and Recommendations for Standardisation of Surgical Technique Description.

Supercharged end-to-side (SETS) nerve transfers have been described as a treatment option for ulnar neuropathy, however, there is inconsistency in the nomenclature used to describe the microsurgical technique. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the available literature on the SETS nerve transfer technique and to provide an overview of the technical variations to facilitate standardisation of surgical method. A literature review was performed through PubMed, MEDLINE, and Ovid databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that reported surgical technique of anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve SETS transfer were included. Studies were excluded when not referencing SETS/reverse end-to-side (RETS) nerve transfers, studies referencing nerve transfers other than AIN to motor fascicle bundle of the ulnar nerve (MUN), animal studies, and studies not reporting technique. Of the 168 studies found, 14 articles were included. In five articles, distal visualisation of the MUN in Guyon's canal was specifically cited. In the four studies that commented on donor preparation, sharp neurectomy proximal to the AIN branching point was undertaken. Recipient preparation was commented on in seven of the included studies. Two studies referred to an epineurial window only while five specifically recommended a perineurial window. Coaptation site was specified in four studies and all studies used sutures for coaptation, with four articles stipulating that 9-0 nylon was used. Additionally, fibrin glue was used in conjunction with suture technique in four studies. Consistency in nomenclature used to describe SETS microsurgical technique is needed before case series measuring outcome can be reliably interpreted. This review allowed for the development of suggestions for standardisation of nomenclature and minimal reporting requirements when describing SETS technique. Standardisation of technique will allow for reproducibility and facilitate future evaluations of outcome in prospective randomised control trials.

The Double-Opposing Adipofascial Interposition Flap: A Novel Technique to Prevent Scar Tethering and Symptomatic Neuroma of the Superficial Radial Nerve After Trauma.

The superficial radial nerve (SRN) is vulnerable to injury following trauma with a high incidence of resultant nerve tether and neuroma formation. The SRN has an anatomical predisposition to neuroma formation, with research indicating that its propensity to neuroma development is out of proportion with its likelihood for injury. In addition, SRN neuromas have been described as one of the more painful and difficult neuromas to manage. Despite this, the published literature to date is chiefly focused on neuroma and scar tether treatment options rather than more impactful work on neuroma prevention, which can be safely delivered at the time of primary surgery. Treatment of established neuroma or nerve tether is notoriously difficult, and existing techniques have inconsistent outcomes, with patients often requiring multiple trips to the theatre. The authors present a novel technique for neuroma and scar tether prevention using an adipofascial flap accompanied by patient examples of our experience using this approach as an adjunct during the primary SRN repair, creating a gliding, interposing layer to prevent subsequent nerve traction pain and symptomatic neuroma. We identified five patients presenting with dorsal wrist injuries involving the SRN and one or more tendons. Patients' follow-up duration was a mean of 3.5 months (one to eight months). All follow-up patients showed no symptoms of a neuroma or nerve tether pain. All patients were discharged without re-referral or further surgery. Our patient sample demonstrates promising results using an adipofascial interposition flap as a prophylactic measure in traumatic injuries to reduce nerve tether pain and symptomatic neuroma formation in the SRN.

Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.

Introduction: Reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis is a prevalent concomitant infection and cause for mortality in burns patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. First line laboratory diagnostic studies for pulmonary tuberculosis are often negative in these patients and if relied on, result in high mortality. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with a novel protocol of empiric treatment of clinically suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients with negative GeneXpert tests in a tertiary burns centre and to present a brief literature review on the topic. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients, who sustained thermal injury with an inhalation component, with negative GeneXpert tests who were treated empirically for pulmonary tuberculosis over a five-year period (2015-2020) was performed. Additionally, a literature search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane and Google Scholar databases. Results: Over the five-year period, 20 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns requiring ventilation were managed according to the protocol and all survived to discharge. The literature search identified six factors that explain the consequence of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients and provide a hypothesis for the negative laboratory studies encountered. Conclusion: There was an improved outcome for patients with the clinical diagnosis of reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis when they were started on empirical pulmonary tuberculosis treatment. There are several potential mechanisms that can contribute to reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in susceptible severely burned patients. The GeneXpert test should not be relied upon in these patients for a diagnosis, but rather all other clinical evidence should inform management. Lay Summary: From the current literature evidence most patients who have severe burns complicated by a secondary infection known as pulmonary (lung) tuberculosis, die as a result. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis during a five-year period, from 2015 to 2020, in a specialized adult tertiary burn center. Severely burned patients who were suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis and received treatment despite having negative laboratory tests for pulmonary tuberculosis, had a better survival rate than expected. A brief literature review on the topic of pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns was done to investigate causes for reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis and negative laboratory studies in these patients.The literature search identified the following factors that can potentially affect the reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: decreased immune system; secondary infections; low blood albumin(protein) levels; decreased clearance of bacteria from the airways, the development of pulmonary tuberculosis biofilms (capsules that protect the bacteria from chemicals and antibiotics) and the role of a fat molecule called phosphatidylinositol mannoside in pulmonary tuberculosis.In conclusion, the pulmonary tuberculosis test should not be relied upon in these patients, but rather all the clinical evidence such X-ray changes in association with difficulty to wean the patient off the ventilator should be used to inform treatment choice.

Distal Entrapment of Regenerating Peripheral Nerves After a Proximal Injury: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

A complication of peripheral nerve injuries, of which there exists limited discourse, is the entrapment of the nerve as it regenerates from the site of injury to its end target, resulting in the arrest of axon regeneration and a consequent reduction of functional recovery. This proof-of-concept paper reports a review of the relevant literature alongside a case series of patients who presented with this phenomenon and who were treated with targeted peripheral nerve decompression. Three cases were identified prospectively. The baseline function was recorded pre-and post-operatively. Recovery was assessed using various tools, including the Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading, ten-test sensory testing, Tinel's sign progression, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and the Impact of Hand Nerve Disorders (I-HaND) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The first case sustained a brachial plexus injury and received decompression at the pronator fascia, carpal tunnel, cubital tunnel, and Guyon's canal. The second case sustained a sciatic nerve injury and was managed with peroneal and tarsal tunnel decompressions. The final case sustained a suprascapular nerve injury and underwent decompression at the suprascapular ligament. In all these cases, motor function, sensory function, and pain (depending on the nerve's original components) improved following decompression. A literature review revealed seven relevant studies, including four case reports, two cohort studies, and a pre-clinical animal study. These cases, and those identified in our review of the literature, suggest that targeted decompressive surgery can be an appropriate treatment for patients who display signs of stalled neural regeneration. This study adds to the limited evidence of this phenomenon and highlights the challenges in proving the efficacy of decompressive surgery for this specific complication. This study is limited by the number of cases included, the heterogeneity of nerve injuries presented, and its observational nature. There is a clear need for further research into this phenomenon, and the authors are working towards developing a prospective study that will investigate the indications, value, predictors of success, and practicality of decompression surgery for this complication of peripheral nerve injury.