A Real­World Pharmacovigilance Study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for Mavacamten.

BACKGROUND: Mavacamten is a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This pharmacovigilance study aimed to assess mavacamten-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the real world as reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: We conducted disproportionality analyses with four signal detection algorithms-reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker to identify mavacamten-related ADRs. RESULTS: Out of 4,500,131 reports from the FAERS database, 1004 mavacamten-related ADRs were identified from 1 January 2022 to 30 September 2023. A total of 26 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) conforming to the four signal detection algorithms were noted. Some of the statistically significant cardiac ADRs at PT level include decreased ejection fraction (EF) [ROR 33.60 (95% confidence interval, CI 21.79-51.82), PRR 32.86 (χ2 615.96), information component (IC) 5.03, IC025 4.61, empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) 32.77, EBGM05 21.25], cardiac failure [ROR 9.39 (95% CI 6.49-13.60), PRR 9.13 (χ2 202.42), IC 3.19, IC025 2.83, EBGM 9.12, EBGM05 6.30], and atrial fibrillation [ROR 16.63 (95% CI 12.72-21.75), PRR 15.66 (χ2 769.93), IC 3.97, IC025 3.71, EBGM 15.64, EBGM05 11.96]. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study were consistent with the safety data of clinical trials, including reduced ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, dyspnea, and syncope. We also found potential new and unexpected ADR signals, such as urinary tract infection, gout, and peripheral edema.

Catheter ablation versus medical therapy in atrial fibrillation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials.

This umbrella review synthesizes data from 17 meta-analyses investigating the comparative outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) and medical treatment (MT) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Outcomes assessed were mortality, risk of hospitalization, AF recurrence, cardiovascular events, pulmonary vein stenosis, major bleeding, and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and MLHFQ score. The findings indicate that CA significantly reduces overall mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization with high strength of evidence. The risk of AF recurrence was notably lower with CA, with moderate strength of evidence. Two associations reported an increased risk of pulmonary vein stenosis and major bleeding with CA, supported by high strength of evidence. Improved LVEF and a positive change in MLHFQ were also associated with CA. Among patients with AF and heart failure, CA appears superior to MT for reducing mortality, improving LVEF, and reducing cardiovascular rehospitalizations. In nonspecific populations, CA reduced mortality and improved LVEF but had higher complication rates. Our findings suggest that CA might offer significant benefits in managing AF, particularly in patients with heart failure. However, the risk of complications, including pulmonary vein stenosis and major bleeding, is notable. Further research in understudied populations may help refine these conclusions.

Neurosarcoidosis Presenting as Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in a Patient with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis.

A gentleman in his early 50's with past medical history significant for biopsy confirmed pulmonary sarcoidosis presented with acute onset confusion, gait disturbance and bowel/urinary incontinence. Brain imaging was consistent with normal pressure hydrocephalus and CSF studies supported the suspicion of neurosarcoidosis. He received treatment with a prolonged course of steroids with good effect. We discuss a rare case of normal pressure hydrocephalus as a presenting feature of neurosarcoidosis and the rationale of starting empiric treatment for probable diagnosis of the same.