Advancements and Future Outlook of PET/CT-Guided Interventions.

Advancements in minimally invasive technology, coupled with imaging breakthroughs, have empowered the field of interventional radiology to achieve unparalleled precision in image-guided diagnosis and treatment while simultaneously reducing periprocedural morbidity. Molecular imaging, which provides valuable physiological and metabolic information alongside anatomical localization, can expand the capabilities of image-guided interventions. Among various molecular imaging techniques, positron emission tomography (PET) stands out for its superior spatial resolution and ability to acquire quantitative data. PET has emerged as a crucial tool for oncologic imaging and plays a pivotal role in both staging and the assessment of treatment responses. Typically used in combination with computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) and occasionally with magnetic resonance imaging MRI (PET/MRI), PET as a hybrid imaging approach offers enhanced insights into disease progression and response. In recent years, PET has also found its way into image-guided interventions, especially within the rapidly expanding field of interventional oncology. This review aims to explore the current and evolving role of metabolic imaging, specifically PET, in interventional oncology. By delving into the unique advantages and applications of PET in guiding oncological interventions and assessing response, we seek to highlight the increasing significance of this modality in the realm of interventional radiology.

Gradient-based Volumetric PET Parameters on Immediate Pre-ablation FDG-PET Predict Local Tumor Progression in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis Treated by Microwave Ablation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the optimal method of segmentation of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) on immediate pre-ablation PET scans and assess the prognostic value of quantitative pre-ablation PET parameters with regards to local tumor control. A secondary objective was to correlate the target tumor size estimation by PET methods with the tumor measurements on anatomical imaging. METHODOLOGY: A prospectively accrued cohort of 55 CLMs (46 patients) treated with real-time 18F-FDG-PET/CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation was followed-up for a median of 10.8 months (interquartile: 5.5-20.2). Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) values of each CLM were derived from pre-ablation 18F-FDG-PET with gradient and threshold PET segmentation methodologies. The event was defined as local tumor progression (LTP). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess area under the curves (AUCs). Intraclass correlation (ICC) and 95.0% confidence interval (CI) were performed to measure the linear relationships between the continuous variables. RESULTS: AUCs for prediction of LTP obtained from time-dependent ROC analysis for the gradient technique were higher in comparison to the threshold methodologies (AUCs for TLG and volume were: 0.790 and 0.807, respectively). ICC between PET gradient-based and anatomical measurements were higher in comparison to threshold methodologies (ICC for the longest diameter: 733 (95.0% CI 0.538-0.846), ICC for the shortest diameter: .747 (95.0% CI 0.546-0.859), p-values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The gradient-based technique had a higher AUC for prediction of LTP after microwave ablation of CLM and showed the highest correlation with anatomical imaging tumor measurements.

Real-Time Split-Dose PET/CT-Guided Ablation Improves Colorectal Liver Metastasis Detection and Ablation Zone Margin Assessments without the Need for Repeated Contrast Injection.

BACKGROUND: Real-time split-dose PET can identify the targeted colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) and eliminate the need for repeated contrast administration before and during thermal ablation (TA). This study aimed to assess the added value of pre-ablation real-time split-dose PET when combined with non-contract CT in the detection of CLM for ablation and the evaluation of the ablation zone and margins. METHODS: A total of 190 CLMs/125 participants from two IRB-approved prospective clinical trials using PET/CT-guided TA were analyzed. Based on detection on pre-TA imaging, CLMs were categorized as detectable, non-detectable, and of poor conspicuity on CT alone, and detectable, non-detectable, and low FDG-avidity on PET/CT after the initial dose. Ablation margins around the targeted CLM were evaluated using a 3D volumetric approach. RESULTS: We found that 129/190 (67.9%) CLMs were detectable on CT alone, and 61/190 CLMs (32.1%) were undetectable or of poor conspicuity, not allowing accurate depiction and targeting by CT alone. Thus, the theoretical 5- and 10-mm margins could not be defined in these tumors (32.1%) using CT alone. When TA intraprocedural PET/CT images are obtained and inspected (fused PET/CT), only 4 CLM (2.1%) remained undetectable or had a low FDG avidity. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PET to non-contrast CT improved CLM detection for ablation targeting, margin assessments, and continuous depiction of the FDG avid CLMs during the ablation without the need for multiple intravenous contrast injections pre- and intra-procedurally.

PET/CT Imaging Characteristics After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To define positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging characteristics during follow-up of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization (RE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to October 2017, 30 MBC patients underwent 38 Y90 glass or resin RE treatments. Pre-RE PET/CT was performed on average 51 days before RE. There were 68 PET/CTs performed after treatment. Response was assessed using modified PERCIST criteria focusing on the hepatic territory treated with RE, normalizing SUVpeak to the mean SUV of liver uninvolved by tumor. An objective response (OR) was defined as a decrease in SUVpeak by at least 30%. RESULTS: Of the 68 post-RE scans, 6 were performed at 0-30 days, 15 at 31-60 days, 9 at 61-90 days, 13 at 91-120 days, 14 scans at 121-180 days, and 11 scans at > 180 days after RE. Of the 30 patients, 25 (83%) achieved OR on at least one follow-up. Median survival was 15 months after the first RE administration. Highest response rates occurred at 30-90 days, with over 75% of cases demonstrating OR at that time. After 180 days, OR was seen in only 25%. There was a median TTP of 169 days among responders. CONCLUSION: In MBC, follow-up PET/CT after RE demonstrates optimal response rates at 30-90 days, with progression noted after 180 days. These results help to guide the timing of imaging and also to inform patients of expected outcomes after RE.