The Value of Advance Care Planning for Spokespersons of Patients With Advanced Illness.

CONTEXT: Advance Care Planning (ACP) has fallen under scrutiny primarily because research has not consistently demonstrated patient-focused benefits. OBJECTIVES: To better understand how spokespersons regard, engage with, and find value in ACP during decision-making for their loved ones. METHODS: This qualitative analysis was part of a randomized controlled trial involving spokespersons of patients with advanced illness who had completed ACP. After making a medical decision on behalf of their loved one (or that loved one's death), semi-structured interviews explored spokespersons' experience of decision-making and if (and how) ACP played a role. Thematic analysis was conducted on interview transcripts. RESULTS: From 120 interviews, five themes emerged: 1) Written advance directives (ADs) helped increase spokespersons' confidence that decisions were aligned with patient wishes (serving as a physical reminder of previous discussions and increasing clarity during decision-making and family conflict); 2) Iterative discussions involving ACP facilitated "In the moment" decision-making; 3) ADs and ACP conversations helped spokespersons feel more prepared for future decisions; 4) Spokespersons sometimes felt there was "no choice" regarding their loved one's medical care; and 5) Regrets and second-guessing were the most common negative emotions experienced by spokespersons. CONCLUSION: Considering the recent debate about the utility of ACP and ADs, this analysis highlights the value of ACP for spokespersons involved in surrogate decision-making. Reframing the goals of ACP in terms of their benefit for spokespersons (and identifying appropriate outcome measures) may provide additional perspective on the utility of ACP.

Does Caregiver Participation in Advance Care Planning Using a Decision Support Tool Together With Patients Reduce Caregiver Strain, Burden and Anxiety Over Time? A Post-Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

CONTEXT: Surrogate decision makers experience significant amounts of anxiety, burden, and strain in their role as caregivers and decision makers for loved ones. OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinally whether surrogate decision makers engaging in ACP together with their loved one reduces perceived anxiety, burden, and strain felt by surrogate decision makers. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating caregivers' perceived self-efficacy to serve as surrogate decision makers. The trial employed a 2×2 study design of patient/caregiver dyads who engaged in advance care planning (ACP) using a standard living will form vs "Making Your Wishes Known" (MYWK), and having the patient engage in ACP alone vs together with the family caregiver. Surrogates completed validated survey instruments surveys longitudinally to compare levels of anxiety, burden, and strain. RESULTS: 246 of 285 dyads completed the measures. No significant reductions in anxiety, burden, or strain were found longitudinally in surrogate decision makers using MYWK together with loved one's vs other control groups. Increases in strain and anxiety were seen across all study groups and increases in burden across 2/4 study groups. Strain and burden increased most in the MYWK Together arm (▴ = +2.22 and ▴ = +1.91 respectively). CONCLUSION: Family caregivers who engaged in ACP together with patients using the decision support tool MYWK did not experience less strain, burden, or anxiety longitudinally compared to other study arms. These results may help inform the design of future studies and interventions that promote caregivers' involvement in ACP interventions.