Prenatal opioid exposure by likelihood of exposure and risk to prenatal development: Medicaid-covered births in Wisconsin, 2010-2019.

Prenatal opioid exposure is an established public health problem, in particular among Medicaid-covered births. Yet, existing prevalence rates are plausibly underestimated. We leverage extensive linked longitudinal administrative data for all Medicaid-covered live births in Wisconsin from 2010 to 2019 to estimate a range of prevalence rates using an innovative strategy that jointly accounts for both likelihood of exposure and potential risk to prenatal development. We find that 20.8% of infants may have been prenatally exposed to opioids, with 1.7% diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome and an additional 1.2% having a high combined likelihood of exposure and potential risk to prenatal development, 2.6% a moderate combined likelihood and risk, and 15.3% a low or uncertain combined likelihood and risk. We assess improvements in prevalence estimates based on our nuanced classification relative to those of prior studies. Our strategy could be broadly used to quantify the scope of the opioid crisis for pregnant populations, target interventions, and promote child health and development.

Maternal opioid use disorder and infant mortality in Wisconsin, United States, 2010-2018.

OBJECTIVE: The difference in infant health outcomes by maternal opioid use disorder (OUD) status is understudied. We measured the association between maternal OUD during pregnancy and infant mortality and investigated whether this association differs by infant neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) or maternal receipt of medication for OUD (MOUD) during pregnancy. METHODS: We sampled 204,543 Medicaid-paid births from Wisconsin, United States (2010-2018). The primary exposure was any maternal OUD during pregnancy. We also stratified this exposure on NOWS diagnosis (no OUD; OUD without NOWS; OUD with NOWS) and on maternal MOUD receipt (no OUD; OUD without MOUD; OUD with <90 consecutive days of MOUD; OUD with 90+ consecutive days of MOUD). Our outcome was infant mortality (death at age <365 days). Demographic-adjusted logistic regressions measured associations with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Maternal OUD was associated with increased odds of infant mortality (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.02). After excluding infants who died <5 days post-birth (i.e., before the clinical presentation of NOWS), regression estimates of infant mortality did not significantly differ by NOWS diagnosis. Likewise, regression estimates did not significantly differ by maternal MOUD receipt in the full sample. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal OUD is associated with an elevated risk of infant mortality without evidence of modification by NOWS nor by maternal MOUD treatment. Future research should investigate potential mechanisms linking maternal OUD, NOWS, MOUD treatment, and infant mortality to better inform clinical intervention.

Fertility rates in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Wisconsin Medicaid.

BACKGROUND: Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) face stigma and inequity surrounding opportunity and care during pregnancy. Little work has quantified fertility rates among women with IDD which prevents proper allocation of care. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to cross-sectionally describe fertility patterns among women with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in 10-years of Medicaid-linked birth records. STUDY DESIGN: Our sample was Medicaid-enrolled women with live births in Wisconsin from 2007 to 2016. We identified IDD through prepregnancy Medicaid claims. We calculated general fertility-, age-specific-, and the total fertility-rates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for women with and without IDD and generated estimates by year and IDD-type. RESULTS: General fertility rate in women with IDD was 62.1 births per 1000 women with IDD (95% CI 59.2, 64.9 per 1000 women) and 77.1 per 1000 for women without IDD (95% CI: 76.8, 77.4 per 1000 women). General fertility rate ratio was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.7, 0.9). Total fertility was 1.80 births per woman with IDD and 2.05 births per woman without IDD (rate ratio: 0.89 95% CI: 0.5, 1.5). Peak fertility occurred later for autistic women (30-34 years), compared with women with other IDD (20-24 years). CONCLUSION: In Wisconsin Medicaid, general fertility rate of women with IDD was lower than women without IDD: the difference was attenuated when accounting for differing age distributions. Results highlight the disparities women with IDD face and the importance of allocating pregnancy care within Medicaid.

Birth outcomes affecting infants of mothers with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) face increased risk of adverse maternal pregnancy outcomes, yet less is known about infant outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine birth outcomes of infants born to mothers with IDD and assess associations with demographics and IDD-type. METHODS: We used data from the Big Data for Little Kids project, which links Wisconsin birth records to Medicaid claims for live births covered by Medicaid from 2007 to 2016. We identified IDD using maternal prepregnancy Medicaid claims and ran Poisson regression (with a log link function) with robust variance clustered by mother to compare prevalence of outcomes between singleton births with and without mothers with IDD. We adjusted the associations for demographic factors and estimated prevalence ratios (PR) as the effect measure. We assessed outcomes by IDD-type (intellectual disability, genetic conditions, cerebral palsy, and autism spectrum disorder) to explore differences by categories of IDD. RESULTS: Of 267,395 infants, 1696 (0.6%) had mothers with IDD. A greater percentage of infants with mothers with IDD were born preterm (12.8% vs 7.8%; PR 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42, 1.89), small for gestational age (8.5% vs 5.4%; PR 1.42, 95% CI 1.25, 1.61), and died within 12 months of birth (3.2% vs 0.7%; PR 4.93, 95% CI 3.73, 6.43) compared to infants of mothers without IDD. Prevalence ratios were robust to adjustment for demographics factors. Estimates did not meaningfully differ when comparing different IDD-types. CONCLUSIONS: A greater porportion of infants born to mothers with IDD who were covered by Medicaid had poor outcomes compared to other infants. Prevalence of poor infant outcomes was greater for mothers with IDD even after accounting for demographic differences. It is imperative to understand why infants of mothers with IDD are at greater risk so interventions and management can be developed.

Infant Mortality in Rural and Nonrural Counties in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rural counties have the highest infant mortality rates across the United States when compared with rates in more urban counties. We use a social-ecological framework to explain infant mortality disparities across the rural-urban continuum. METHODS: We created a cohort of all births in the United States linked to infant death records for 2014 to 2016. Records were linked to county-level data from the Area Health Resources File and the American Community Survey and classified using the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. Using multilevel generalized linear models, we investigated the association of infant mortality with county urban-rural classification, considering county health system resources and measures of socioeconomic advantage, net of individual-level characteristics, and controlling for US region and county centroid. RESULTS: Infant mortality rates were highest in noncore (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-1.39) and micropolitan counties (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.20-1.32) when compared with large metropolitan fringe counties, controlling for geospatial measures. Inclusion of county health system characteristics did little to attenuate the greater odds of infant mortality in rural counties. Instead, a composite measure of county-level socioeconomic advantage was highly protective (adjusted OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.82-0.86) and eliminated any difference between the micropolitan and noncore counties and the large metropolitan fringe counties. CONCLUSIONS: Higher infant mortality rates in rural counties are best explained by their greater socioeconomic disadvantage than more-limited access to health care or the greater prevalence of mothers' individual health risks.

Peripartum Blood Transfusion Among Rural Women in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the peripartum transfusion rates for rural women compared with urban women in the United States. METHODS: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, geocoded birth records from 2014 to 2016 from the National Center for Health Statistics were used to examine the rural-urban differences in blood transfusion among nulliparous women delivering singleton, vertex pregnancies at term. We compared transfusion rates across the counties on a continuum from urban to rural. We generated a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for age, race, nativity, education, insurance, prenatal care, maternal health, gestational age, intrapartum care, mode of delivery, peripartum factors, and county of delivery. RESULTS: Among 3,346,816 births, the transfusion rates based on maternal county of residence increased as the counties became more rural: large metropolitan-center (1.9/1,000 live births); large metropolitan-fringe (2.4); medium metropolitan (2.6); small metropolitan (2.6); micropolitan (4.5); and noncore rural (5.3). Rural women living and delivering in a rural county had more transfusions (8.5/1,000 live births) than women in more urban counties (2.5/1,000). After adjusting for key covariates, the odds of transfusion were higher among women living in micropolitan (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25, 95% CI 2.09-2.43) and noncore rural (aOR 2.59, 95% CI 2.38-2.81) counties when compared with women living in large metropolitan counties. County of delivery had a higher association with transfusion than resident county. After adding delivery county to the regression model, the association of transfusion and living in a micropolitan (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.19-1.63) or noncore rural (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.55) county diminished. CONCLUSION: The odds of blood transfusion were higher for women in rural areas. The results indicate that the rurality of the county where the birth occurred was associated with more transfusion. This may reflect differences in maternity and blood banking services in rural hospitals and warrants further study to identify opportunities for intervention.

How to measure "what people do for a living" in research on the socioeconomic correlates of health.

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests that occupational standing is not independently associated with health outcomes when occupations are ranked using socioeconomic criteria. In this study we ask two questions. First, is occupational standing associated with health outcomes when health-related criteria are used to establish the relative standing of occupations? Second, are job characteristics more closely related to health outcomes than occupational characteristics? METHODS: We use data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study-that includes a unique combination of occupational, job, and health measures-and estimate a series of logistic regression models of the effects of education and job/occupational characteristics on several health outcomes. RESULTS: We find few independent relationships between occupational standing and health, using socioeconomic or health-related criteria. However, we do find some significant relationships between job characteristics and health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that what people do for a living does matter for their health, even beyond the effects of educational attainment, but that to assess the relationships between what people do for a living and their health outcomes we should measure the characteristics of their jobs, not of their occupations.