Comprehensive anatomy of the foramen ovale critical to percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency rhizotomy: cadaveric study of dry skulls.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency rhizotomy (PSR) is often used to treat trigeminal neuralgia, a serious condition that results in lancinating, episodic facial pain. Thorough understanding of the microsurgical anatomy of the foramen ovale (FO) and its surrounding structures is required for efficient, effective, and safe use of this technique. This morphometric study compares anatomical and surgical orientations to identify the variations of the FO and assess cannulation difficulty. METHODS: Bilateral foramina from 174 adult human dry skulls (348 foramina) were analyzed using anatomical and surgical orientations in photographs from standardized projections. Measurements were obtained for shape, size, adjacent structures, and morphometric variability effect on cannulation. The risk of potential injury to surrounding structures was also assessed. RESULTS: The authors identified 6 distinctive shapes of the FO and 5 anomalous variants from the anatomical view, and 6 shapes from the surgical view. In measurements of surface area of this foramen obtained using the surgical view, loss (average 18.5% ± 5.7%) was significant compared with the anatomical view. Morphometrically, foramen size varied significantly and obstruction from a calcified pterygoalar ligament occurred in 7.8% of specimens. Importantly, 8% of foramina were difficult to cannulate, thus posing a 12% risk of inadvertent cannulation of the foramen lacerum. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in the FO's shape and size probably affected its safe and effective cannulation. Preoperative imaging by 3D head CT may be helpful in predicting ease of cannulation and in guiding treatment decisions, such as a percutaneous approach over microvascular decompression or radiosurgery.

Paratrigeminal, Paraclival, Precavernous, or All of the Above? A Circumferential Anatomical Study of the C3-C4 Transitional Segment of the Internal Carotid Artery.

BACKGROUND: Although the term paraclival carotid pervades recent skull base literature, no clear consensus exists regarding boundaries or anatomical segments. OBJECTIVE: To reconcile various internal carotid artery (ICA) nomenclatures for transcranial and endoscopic-endonasal perspectives, we reexamined the transition between lacerum (C3) and cavernous (C4) segments using a C1-C7 segments schema. In this cadaveric study, we obtained a 360°-circumferential view integrating histological, microsurgical, endoscopic, and neuroradiological analyses of this C3-C4 region and identified a distinct transitional segment. METHODS: In 13 adult, silicone-injected, formalin-fixed cadaveric heads (26 sides), transcranial-extradural-subtemporal and endoscopic-endonasal CT-guided dissections were performed. A quadrilateral area was noted medial to Meckel's cave between cranial nerve VI, anterolateral and posterolateral borders of the lateral-paratrigeminal aspect of the precavernous ICA, and posterior longitudinal ligament. Endoscopically, a medial-paraclival aspect was defined. Anatomical correlations were made with histological and neuroradiological slides. RESULTS: We identified a distinct precavernous C3-C4 transitional segment. In 18 (69%) specimens, venous channels were absent at the quadrilateral area, on the paratrigeminal border of the precavernous ICA. A trigeminal membrane, seen consistently on the superior border of V2, defined the lateral aspect of the cavernous sinus floor. The medial aspect of the precavernous ICA corresponded with the paraclival ICA. CONCLUSION: Our study revealing the juncture of 2 complementary borders of the ICA, endoscopic endonasal (paraclival) and transcranial (paratrigeminal), reconciles various nomenclature. A precavernous segment may clarify controversies about the paraclival ICA and support the concept of a "safe door" for lesions involving Meckel's cave, cavernous sinus, and petrous apex.

The Interlenticulostriate Approach to Very High-Riding Distal Basilar Trunk Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Most high-riding distal basilar trunk aneurysms can be surgically approached via the transsylvian route and its orbitozygomatic variant. However, on rare occasions, the basilar bifurcation may be unusually high and an approach above the carotid terminus may be required. OBJECTIVE: In this cadaveric study, we sought to determine the feasibility and exposure limits of the interlenticulostriate approach (ILSA). METHODS: A standard transsylvian approach was performed in 10 cerebral hemispheres of 5 formalin-fixed, silicone-injected cadaver heads. The interpeduncular cistern was exposed via the opticocarotid window, carotid-oculomotor window, and supracarotid ILSA window. The latter was measured and an aneurysm clip or ventriculostomy stylet was placed as high as possible through each corridor. Using noncontrast 3-D rotational angiography, clip/stylet positions were measured relative to the dorsum sellae. RESULTS: ILSA provided a 9.4 × 4.6 mm mean surgical corridor, just enough room for a standard clip applier. This space was limited by the carotid bifurcation inferiorly, the lenticulostriate arteries medially and laterally, and the optic tract superiorly. There was no difference between opticocarotid and carotid-oculomotor windows, in terms of clip position (+8.9 vs +8.6 mm, respectively; P = .78). In contrast, ILSA provided significantly improved superior exposure, compared with either approaches (mean stylet position: +14.3 mm; P = .005). The exposure benefit afforded by ILSA was consistent across all 10 hemispheres, ranging from +2.5 to +8 mm. CONCLUSION: For high-riding distal basilar trunk aneurysms that cannot be reached via the frontotemporal orbitozygomatic approach, ILSA can provide a viable route of access. Vascular neurosurgeons should be familiarized with this approach.

The Medial Extra-Sellar Corridor to the Cavernous Sinus: Anatomic Description and Clinical Correlation.

OBJECTIVE: The zenith of surgical interest in the cavernous sinus peaked in the 1980s, as evidenced by reports of 10 surgical triangles that could access the contents of the lateral sellar compartment (LSC). However, these transcranial approaches later became marginalized, first by radiosurgery's popularity and lower morbidity, and then by clinical potential of endoscopic corridors noted in several qualitative studies. Our anatomic study, taking a contemporary look at the medial extra-sellar corridor, gives a detailed qualitative-quantitative analysis for its use with increasingly popular endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cavernous sinus. METHODS: In 20 cadaveric specimens, we re-examined the anatomic landmarks of the medial corridor into the LSC with qualitative descriptions and measurements. An illustrative case highlights a recurrent symptomatic pituitary adenoma that invaded the cavernous sinus approached through the medial corridor. RESULTS: The corridor's shape varied from tetrahedron to hexahedron. Comparing right and left sides, width averaged 3.6 ± 4.5 mm and 4.0 ± 4.4 mm, and height averaged 2.3 mm and 2.1 mm, respectively. About 35% of sides showed ample space for access into the cavernous sinus. Our case report of successful outcome lends support for the safety and efficacy of this endoscopic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Our re-examination of this particular surgical access into the LSC refines the understanding of the medial extra-sellar corridor as a main endoscopic access route to this compartment. Achieving safe access to the contents of the LSC, this 11th triangle is clinically relevant and potentially superior for select lesions in this region.

Medial and Superior Orbital Decompression: Improving Access for Endonasal Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Visualization by Draf I-III endoscopic access to the frontal sinus via drainage pathways is sometimes inadequate. We compare lateral frontal sinus exposures by Draf approaches versus our modification of removing the medial-superior wall of the orbit while preserving the periorbita. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric heads dissected using Draf IIB, III, and modified Draf III with medial and superior orbital decompression (MSOD) underwent thin-cut computed tomography (CT) scanning. Under image guidance, measurements extended from the midline crista gali to the most lateral point of the frontal sinus. A case report shows the modified Draf III improved frontal sinus access. RESULTS: Comparing Draf IIB and III with Draf III with MSOD, respectively, distances between midline and most lateral point averaged 19.1 mm, 23.7 mm, and 30.4 mm (left) and 18.7 mm, 25.1 mm, and 32.2 mm (right). Differences between Draf III with/without MSOD were 6.65 mm (left) and 7.09 mm (right); 12 heads were excluded because of under-pneumatization of the sinuses. CONCLUSIONS: Draf III with MSOD extended surgical access to lateral regions of the frontal sinus. This extension achieved better visualization and instrumentation with minimal removal of the frontal bone's orbital segment anterior and superior to the anterior ethmoidal artery while preserving the periorbita.

The extended transorbital craniotomy: an anatomic study.

BACKGROUND: Supra-/transorbital approaches are mostly limited to suprasellar and anterior fossa pathologies, whereas lateral supraorbital approaches provide less retrosellar exposure and less overall operative volume, especially in the temporal region. OBJECTIVE: Our cadaveric study proposes removal of the lesser and greater wings of the sphenoid bone to increase both the lateral angle typically achieved with pterional approaches and exposure to the temporal lobe and perisellar region. METHODS: In 5 cadaveric specimens, our 3 steps to expand transorbital exposures included the following: step 1, standard transorbital craniotomy via a 3-cm supra-eyebrow incision; step 2, removal of the lesser sphenoid wing completed extradurally; and step 3, partial removal of the greater sphenoid wing. Operative extension in sylvian, parasellar, and anterolateral temporal exposures were quantified for each step (t test). RESULTS: Step 2 provided the greatest increased exposure in the sylvian and parasellar regions compared with step 3, whereas step 3 provided a significant proportion of the exposure in the lateral temporal region. Finally, the lateral view progressively increased with each subsequent step. CONCLUSION: Our 3-step removal of the lesser and greater wings of the sphenoid bone quantified increased sylvian, anterior temporal, and parasellar exposures for this minimally invasive approach with excellent cosmesis. Its increases the anterolateral view (similar to a subfrontal pterional approach) and offers potential applications to vascular and neoplastic (ie, sphenoid meningiomas) pathologies classically treated via a pterional or frontotemporal orbitozygomatic approach.

Comparing operative exposures of the le fort I osteotomy and the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach to the clivus.

Objectives We compare surgical exposures to the clivus by Le Fort I osteotomy (LFO) and the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA). Methods Ten cadaveric specimens were imaged with 1.25-mm computed tomography. After stereotactic navigation, EEEA was performed followed by LFO. Clival measurements included lateral and vertical limits to the midline lower extent of exposure (t test). Results For EEFA and LFO, respectively, maximal lateral exposure in millimeters (mean ± standard deviation) was 24.5 ± 3.7 and 24.5 ± - 3.8 (p = 0.99) at the opticocarotid recess (OCR) and 25.1 ± - 4.1 and 24.1 ± - 3.0 (p = 0.53) at the foramen lacerum level; lateral reach at the hypoglossal canals was 39.0 ± - 5.88 and 56.1 ± - 5.3 (p = 0.0004); and vertical extension was 56.0 ± - 4.1 and 56.3 ± - 3.4 (p = 0.78). Conclusions For clival exposures, LFO and EEEA were similar craniocaudally and laterally at the levels of the OCR and foramen lacerum. LFO achieved greater exposure at the level of the hypoglossal canal.

Endoscopic, endonasal variability in the anatomy of the internal carotid artery.

BACKGROUND: Classic three-dimensional schemas of the internal carotid artery (ICA) for transcranial approaches do not necessarily apply to two-dimensional endoscopic views. Modifying an existing ICA segment classification, we define endoscopic orientation for the lacerum (C3) to clinoid (C5) segments through an endonasal approach. METHODS: In 20 cadaveric heads, we classified endoscopic appearance based on shape and angulation of C3 to C5 segments. Distances were measured between both arteries, and between the ICA and pituitary gland. RESULTS: We identified 4 common ICA patterns: types I through III matched side-to-side, whereas type IV was asymmetric. In 80% of specimens, the pituitary gland had direct contact with the ICA. In 20% of specimens, a space existed between the pituitary gland and the cavernous segment. Access to the posterior aspect of the cavernous sinus medial to the cavernous segment was possible without retraction of the artery or pituitary gland. Spaces between the lacerum and cavernous segments were trapezoid (80%) and hourglass (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing which ICA type courses between the lacerum and clinoid segments can help clarify the relationships between the artery and its surrounding structures during endoscopic approaches. Adapting the classic terminology of ICA segments provided consistency of endoscopic relevance, defined potential endoscopic corridors, and highlighted the critical step of arterial contact.

Endoscopic endonasal approach to the maxillary strut: anatomical review and case series.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The maxillary strut is the bone that separates the foramen rotundum and superior orbital fissure. Tumors involving the lateral wall of the sphenoid sinus, posterior ethmoid, or posterior maxillary sinus may invade this region. The authors detail the anatomy of the strut and present a case series that emphasizes the importance and utility of this useful landmark during an endoscopic endonasal approach to lesions in this region. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric dissections and retrospective case series. METHODS: Endoscopic endonasal dissections were performed on six formalin-fixed cadaver heads. Morphometric analyses of 100 skulls were conducted using CT scans and BrainLab. Four patients underwent procedures that exposed the maxillary strut. RESULTS: The maxillary strut was trapezoidal shaped with an average cross-sectional area of 15.25 ± 0.48 mm(2) and average thickness of 4.43 ± 0.10 mm. The maxillary strut was present bilaterally in all skulls examined. Anteroposterior length averaged 4.18 ± 0.15 mm on the right and 3.90 ± 0.14 mm on the left. Our patient series illustrated the clinical utility of the maxillary strut as a landmark during endoscopic approaches to the skull base. CONCLUSIONS: An endoscopic endonasal approach can be used to expose the maxillary strut. Improved understanding of this anatomy is important to achieving success when using this approach for the biopsy or resection of lesions in the lateral sellar compartment, pterygopalatine fossa, and aspects of the middle cranial fossa.

The carotid siphon: a historic radiographic sign, not an anatomic classification.

BACKGROUND: After the term carotid siphon was introduced by Moniz in 1927 to describe the radiographic appearance of the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), the concept gained popularity in decades following in both the anatomic and the medical literature. However, as conflicting definitions persist in the delineation of proximal and distal sites, does the term carotid siphon provide the precision needed for current anatomic and clinical studies? METHODS: A PubMed search of "carotid siphon" detected >400 articles from the anatomic and medical literature during the past 6 decades. Moniz's text and figures in his original Lancet article and a compilation of other seminal historical articles and references were reviewed to trace the use of the term carotid siphon during this period. RESULTS: Viewing the radiographic silhouette of a normal ICA, Moniz defined the carotid siphon as the series of bends and curves; an additional curvature was identified as a double siphon. Throughout Moniz's works, in text and figures, the boundaries of the carotid siphon were never delineated. Authors who followed attempted to correlate his original description of this two-dimensional radiographic projection with anatomic documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Tracing the origin and usage of the term carotid siphon during 6 decades in the medical literature shows continued discrepancy rather than consensus. The term carotid siphon is historically relevant but can now be supplanted by definitive ICA classification systems, which continue to evolve in contemporary medical and anatomic communications.