Consideration on size, velocity and path of droplets emitted during running.

BACKGROUND: People began to wear face masks during physical activities due to spread of COVID-19. There are no previous studies about the need for wearing masks while running. METHODS: Assuming a citizen runner who runs full marathon in 4 hours, we verified the path and the amount of droplet dispersal, setting a humanoid mannequin with a mask in simulated running environment (Experiment 1). We also had six adults exercise in the same environment to examine droplet behaviors when not wearing a face mask (Experiment 2). Average droplet size was determined, and repeated measures ANOVA was carried out to examine statistical significance. To evaluate observed droplet behaviors, theoretical solutions of the downfall motion of large droplets were then derived, taking air resistance into consideration. RESULTS: Experiment 1: wearing a face mask caused more droplets to adhere to the face; Experiment 2: droplets were emitted in conversation, coughing or sneezing, and they fell within social distancing. Average droplet size was not sensitive to the wind velocity. It could vary with a significant difference for time and wind velocity. Observed velocity and path of droplet can be expressed by the theoretical solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Velocity and path of large droplets can be expressed by the theoretical solution of particles in downfall motion under air resistance. We therefore conclude that wearing a mask while running gives adverse effects in preventing infection. Possibility of droplet transmission while running is considered low even when not wearing a face mask, as long as social distancing is ensured.

Hydration status and running performance during cool and hot training sessions in rugby union forwards and backs.

BACKGROUND: Rugby showed a high incidence of exertional heatstroke. Different physiques and running performances between the forward and back players (FW and BK) may result in different heatstroke risks. This study aimed to compare the hydration status, running performance, and perceived heatstroke symptoms (PHS) between cool and hot environment training (HT and CT) in university rugby union FW and BK. METHODS: Thirteen university rugby players (seven forwards and six backs) participated in this study. During both conditions, players were allowed to drink water and sports drink, and the amount of fluid intake was recorded. Body mass was measured pre- and post-training, and weight loss was calculated. Sweat loss was calculated based on body mass and fluid intake. During training, running performance was measured using GPS. The presence of PHS was assessed using a questionnaire administered after training. RESULTS: Fluid intake and sweat loss were higher in the HT as opposed to the CT, and FW showed higher fluid intake and dehydration than BK. However, there were no significant differences in weight loss observed during data collection. Running distance per minute and maximum speed were higher in BK than in FW, but there was no significant difference between conditions. Although a significant weight loss was not observed between conditions, the number of PHS was higher in the HT. CONCLUSIONS: Although BK had a higher running distance and maximum speed than FW during training, a higher cycle of fluid intake and sweat loss was observed in the FW than that in the BK.