Mechanisms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes: Current perspectives and future challenges.

The evidence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) without asthma (EIBwA ) occurring in athletes led to speculate about different endotypes inducing respiratory symptoms within athletes. Classical postulated mechanisms for bronchial obstruction in this population include the osmotic and the thermal hypotheses. More recently, the presence of epithelial injury and inflammation in the airways of athletes was demonstrated. In addition, neuronal activation has been suggested as a potential modulator of bronchoconstriction. Investigation of these emerging mechanisms is of major importance as EIB is a significant problem for both recreational and competitive athletes and is the most common chronic condition among Olympic athletes, with obvious implications for their competing performance, health and quality of life. Hereby, we summarize the latest achievements in this area and identify the current gaps of knowledge so that future research heads toward better defining the etiologic factors and mechanisms involved in development of EIB in elite athletes as well as essential aspects to ultimately propose preventive and therapeutic measures.

Pathophysiological mechanisms of exercise-induced anaphylaxis: an EAACI position statement.

This document is the result of a consensus on the mechanisms of exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIAn), an unpredictable and potentially fatal syndrome. A multidisciplinary panel of experts including exercise physiologists, allergists, lung physicians, paediatricians and a biostatistician reached the given consensus. Exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIAn) describes a rare and potentially fatal syndrome in which anaphylaxis occurs in conjunction with exercise. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying EIAn have not yet been elucidated although a number of hypotheses have been proposed. This review evaluates the validity of each of the popular theories in relation to exercise physiology and immunology. On the basis of this evidence, it is concluded that proposed mechanisms lack validity, and it is recommended that a global research network is developed with a common approach to the diagnosis and treatment of EIAn in order to gain sufficient power for scientific evaluation.

Immune activation despite suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy is associated with higher risk of viral blips in HIV-1-infected individuals.

OBJECTIVES: Viral blips are thought to represent random biological variations around a steady state of residual HIV viraemia and to lack clinical significance. We aimed to assess the association of immune activation and the occurrence of blips. METHODS: HIV-infected patients from our out-patient cohort who developed a blip after having been on fully suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for at least 180 days were matched with patients without blips according to duration of complete viral suppression (CVS), age, sex and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stage. Frequencies of CD3(+), CD3(+) CD4(+), CD3(+) CD8(+), CD3(+) HLA-DR(+), CD4(+) CD45RA(+), CD16(+) CD56(+) CD3(-) and CD19(+) cells, as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and clinical parameters, were included in conditional logistic regression models. Adherence to HAART was assessed by measuring prescribed nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) plasma levels in a sample of 57 patients. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients with viral blip were matched with 82 controls from the same cohort. The mean age was 47.2 years [standard deviation (SD) 12.1 years], 80.5% of patients were male and 42.7% had CDC stage C disease. Viral blips occurred after a median of 14 months [interquartile range (IQR) 8-34 months] of CVS. In the logistic regression, activated CD3(+) HLA-DR(+) lymphocytes [odds ratio (OR) 1.25 per 100 cells/µL; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.54; P = 0.03] were significantly associated with blips and there was a trend for an association of longer time on HAART with blips (OR 1.31 per year; 95% CI 0.96-1.78; P = 0.09). No between-group difference regarding subtherapeutic drug levels was found (P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of viral blips after suppressive HAART was associated with elevated markers of T-cell activation. Blips may identify a subset of patients with higher immune activation and increased risk for HIV disease progression.

Pharmacokinetic profile in late pregnancy and cord blood concentration of tipranavir and enfuvirtide.

The data on the use of tipranavir and enfuvirtide in pregnancy are very limited. We performed a pharmacokinetic profile in a pregnant woman with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection at 37 weeks gestation. Tipranavir levels were in the therapeutic range and the cord blood concentration at delivery was relatively high when compared with other protease inhibitors. No enfuvirtide was detected in the fetal compartment. Tipranavir and enfuvirtide were successfully used in pregnancy, but possible toxicities must be kept in mind.

Therapy failure following selection of enfuvirtide-resistant HIV-1 in cerebrospinal fluid.

We report the selection of enfuvirtide-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in cerebrospinal fluid, resulting in subsequent loss of viral suppression in the plasma. This case report emphasizes the potential danger of low-level penetration of entry inhibitors into the central nervous system.

Once-daily treatment with saquinavir mesylate (2000 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) together with a fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine (600/300 mg) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (245/200 mg) in HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of a once-daily regimen of 2000 mg saquinavir mesylate boosted with 100 mg ritonavir. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients successfully treated with 1000 mg saquinavir boosted with 100 mg ritonavir twice daily together with two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [N(t)RTIs] who were switched to 2000 mg saquinavir with 100 mg ritonavir once daily with unchanged N(t)RTI therapy were analysed. CD4 cells, HIV-RNA PCR and metabolic parameters were compared between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the switch. Saquinavir and ritonavir drug levels were measured before and a median of 3 weeks after switching from twice to once daily at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h after intake of the medication. The area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (16 males, median age of 41 years) with a median CD4 cell count of 464 cells/mm(3) were analysed. HIV-RNA PCR remained <500 copies/mL for all patients. After switching from 100 mg twice daily to 100 mg once daily, the AUC(0-24) for ritonavir decreased significantly [21 874 to 10 267 ng.h/mL, geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 0.47; P < 0.001], whereas the AUC(0-24) for saquinavir decreased only marginally from 35 000 to 34 490 ng.h/mL (GMR = 0.99; P = 0.426). The CD4 cell count and the fasting metabolic parameters remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily treatment with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir was well tolerated and resulted in similar saquinavir drug exposure despite much lower ritonavir concentrations when compared with a twice-daily dosing schedule.

Increased responsiveness to toll-like receptor 4 stimulation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Cell signaling via Toll-like receptors (TLRs) leads to synovial inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to assess effects of TLR2 and TLR4 stimulation on proinflammatory cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with recent-onset RA, osteoarthrosis (OA), and healthy control (HC). METHODS: PBMCs were stimulated with LPS, biglycan and cytokine mix. Cytokines were analyzed in supernatants with ELISA. Expression of toll-like receptors mRNA in leukocytes was analyzed using real-time qPCR. RESULTS: PBMCs from RA patients spontaneously produced less IL-6 and TNFalpha than cells from OA and HC subjects. LPS increased cytokines' production in all groups. In RA patients increase was dramatic (30 to 48-fold and 17 to 31-fold, for respective cytokines) compared to moderate (2 to 8-fold) in other groups. LPS induced 15-HETE generation in PBMCs from RA (mean 251%) and OA patients (mean 43%), although only in OA group, the increase was significant. TLR2 and TLR4 gene expressions decreased in response to cytokine mix, while LPS enhanced TLR2 expression in HC and depressed TLR4 expression in OA patients. CONCLUSION: PBMCs from recent-onset RA patients are overresponsive to stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. TLR expression is differentially regulated in healthy and arthritic subjects.

Antiviral efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in an unselected cohort of HIV-infected children.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain data on the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in children in clinical practice. METHODS: HIV-1-infected children received efavirenz capsules or tablets in accordance with manufacturer's dosing recommendations. Plasma was collected at regular visits and analysed by HPLC. The therapeutic range of efavirenz was defined as 1.0-4.0 mg/L. RESULTS: Thirty-three children were included. Median (range) age, body weight, dose and dose/kg were 8.2 (2.1-16.7) years, 24 (12-62) kg, 300 (200-800) mg and 13.3 (9.7-22.5) mg/kg, respectively. Median (range) efavirenz plasma concentration at first sampling was 2.8 (0.13-11.6) mg/L. Plasma concentrations were not dependent on age (P = 0.97) or dose/kg (P = 0.87). A total of 307 efavirenz plasma concentrations were determined. Forty-five samples (14.7%) contained >4.0 mg/L, and 27 samples (8.8%) contained <1.0 mg/L. Eight children (24%) reported persistent adverse events probably caused by efavirenz [concentration problems (5), sleep disorder (1), psychotic reaction (1) and seizure (1)]; six discontinued efavirenz for this reason. A non-significant trend existed towards a higher proportion of toxic efavirenz plasma concentrations (>4.0 mg/L) in subjects who reported efavirenz adverse events: 25.9% versus 12.8% (P = 0.23; t-test). Viral load was <50 copies/mL in all 27 subjects who continued efavirenz, despite occasional subtherapeutic efavirenz plasma concentrations in 12 children. The occasional subtherapeutic levels suggest that temporal non-adherence was present. CONCLUSIONS: Efavirenz as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy was highly effective in children able to tolerate the drug. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as part of toxicity management may prevent discontinuation in a subset of patients. Temporal non-adherence occurs frequently. TDM may allow initiation of adherence interventions before viral load becomes detectable.

Differences of nine drug resistance interpretation systems in predicting short-term therapy outcomes of treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients: a retrospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Drug resistance interpretation systems are used to select the optimal antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. It is unclear how the systems perform in predicting therapy success and failure and in how far the interpretations are affected by insufficient drug levels. METHODS: The accuracy of nine different interpretation systems in predicting therapy outcomes was evaluated using virological, immunological, pharmacological, and clinical data of 130 patients treated at 13 outpatient centers. Individual susceptibility scores of the interpretation systems were converted into active drug scores (ADS) and correlated with therapy success and failure, defined as viral load reduction of equal to or more (n=66) and less than 1 log10 copies/ml (n=64) at three months after drug resistance testing. RESULTS: Three interpretation systems considered the respective therapies as more active compared to the other interpretation systems (p<0.01). These systems predicted therapy success better than the other systems, while the others performed better in predicting therapy failure. Thus, the overall rate of correctly predicted treatment outcomes was comparable between the different systems (73.1-80.0 %). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis revealed significant correlations between the ADS of all interpretation systems and virological therapy outcomes (p<0.0001). In contrast, only three interpretation systems were significantly correlated with immunological therapy outcomes in univariate and just one in multivariate models (p<0.05). Among 128 determinations of drug levels in 64 patient samples, 19.4 % revealed no detectable drug levels. The consideration of insufficient drug levels significantly improved the prediction accuracy of all interpretation systems (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: Differences between interpretation systems in predicting therapy failures and success need to be considered for future consensus algorithms. The prediction accuracy of interpretation systems can be improved by consideration of plasma drug levels.

Kaletra single agent HAART after intolerance of NRTI- and NNRTI-containing regimens following kidney transplantation.

We report on a patient who received a diagnosis of HIV infection following kidney transplantation some years earlier. As a result of intolerance and failure of nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI and NNRTI)-containing regimens, he was started on Kaletra single agent HAART. Kaletra was well tolerated and resulted in sustained viral load suppression below the limit of detection for at least 36 months.

Alternative splicing of cyclooxygenase-1 gene: altered expression in leucocytes from patients with bronchial asthma and association with aspirin-induced 15-HETE release.

BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) is a key enzyme involved in generation of prostanoids, important mediators and modulators of asthmatic inflammation. In a subpopulation of aspirin-sensitive asthmatics (ASA) inhibition of COX-1 by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs results in activation of inflammatory cells and development of symptoms. Alternatively spliced variants of COX-1 lacking 111 bp from exon 9 were described previously but have never been identified in human leucocytes peripheral blood leucocytes (PBL) or upper airway epithelial cells. We aimed to assess the expression of spliced variants of COX-1 mRNA in PBLs from patients with asthma and in healthy subjects (HS) referring the expression to patients characteristics (including ASA-sensitivity) and to aspirin-triggered 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15-HETE) generation. METHODS: The study included 30 patients with ASA, 30 patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) and 30 HS serving as controls. Nasal polyps for epithelial cell cultures were obtained from 10 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Expression of full length and spliced variants of COX-1 enzyme was detected by RT-PCR and presented as the ratio of full-length COX-1 to alternatively spliced COX-1 mRNA [COX-1 alternative splicing index (COX-1 AS index)]. Release of eicosanoids (PGE(2) and 15-HETE) by PBLs was measured with enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: In both PBLs and airway epithelial cells the expression of full-length product prevailed over spliced variants of COX-1 enzyme. Cyclooxygenase-1 AS index was significantly lower in asthmatics as compared to HS (1.96 +/- 0.71 vs 2.41 +/- 0.99, P < 0.05) indicating the relatively higher expression of the alternative transcript in asthmatic patients. Cyclooxygenase-1 AS index was not different between ASA and ATA groups (mean 1.90 +/- 0.66 vs 2.02 +/- 0.76, respectively, P = 0.39). There was no significant association between COX-1 AS index and mean daily dose of inhaled glucocorticosteroids or pulmonary function tests (FEV(1), FVC) but in ASA group a weak correlation with daily dose of oral glucocorticosteroids was found (r = 0.39; P = 0.03). In ASA patients there was a significant positive correlation between the COX-1 AS index and the percentage of aspirin-triggered increase in 15-HETE generation (r = 0.51; P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Alternatively spliced variants of COX-1 mRNA are differently expressed in patients with bronchial asthma and may be associated with aspirin-triggered 15-HETE generation.

Dose reduction effective in alleviating symptoms of saquinavir toxicity.

Gastrointestinal intolerance is a limitation of boosted saquinavir antiretroviral treatment. We present three HIV-infected individuals whose severe toxicity symptoms started directly after initiation of a standard dose saquinavir hard-gel capsule-containing regimen (saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg). All patients underwent immediate 12 h pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment and showed extraordinarily high saquinavir plasma exposure. All three patients did not recover until the saquinavir exposure was decreased. This pilot case study anticipates a new concept of 'direct PK'-guided individual dose interventions under close viral load monitoring. Two major reasons for symptomatic saquinavir overexposure were defined: impaired liver function in a chronic hepatitis C virus co-infected individual at normal liver performance parameters and a delayed cytochrome p450 enzyme autoinduction. Overexposure seems to be an independent intolerance factor. Although delayed autoinduction is not well established as a reason for adverse events in saquinavir therapy, this observation may be confirmed in the near future by increased use.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a combination of indinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir in multiply pretreated HIV-1 infected adults.

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir in a protease inhibitor only combination. METHODS: Plasma drug levels of patients taking indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 800/400/100mg twice daily (n = 24, group 1) were compared to patients taking either lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (n = 35, group2) or indinavir/ritonavir 800/100mg (n = 33, group3) twice daily plus nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). Steady-state drug concentrations were measured by LC/MS/MS. Minimum and maximum concentrations (C subsetmin, C subsetmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC subset0-12h), total clearance (CL subsettot) and half-life (t1/2) were calculated. HIV viral load, CD4 cell count and adverse events causing early termination of therapy were correlated over a period of 48 weeks. RESULTS: Plasma levels of lopinavir/ritonavir were significantly enhanced when combined with indinavir compared to a regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir+NRTI: Mean lopinavir AUC subset(0-12h) 80,912 ng*h/mL vs. 60,548 ng*h/mL; C subsetmin 4,633 ng/mL vs. 3,258 ng/mL; C subsetmax 8,023 ng/mL vs. 6,710 ng/mL. Mean ritonavir AUC(0-12h) 6,907 ng*h/mL vs. 3,467 ng*h/mL; Cmin 220 ng/mL vs. 125 ng/mL; C subsetmax 1,059 ng/mL vs. 522 ng/mL. Indinavir levels were comparable for both indinavir containing regimen. A significantly smaller number of patients stopped indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir therapy (group1: 16.7%) than indinavir/ritonavir + NRTI treatment (group3: 45.5%) due to adverse events. Virological failure was the main reason for early termination of treatment with indinavir/lopinavir/ ritonavir before week 48 (group1: 50%). CONCLUSIONS: indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 800/400/ 100mg twice daily represents a therapy option with an adequate safety but only short term efficacy for extensively pretreated patients.

Impact of rosiglitazone treatment on the bioavailability of antiretroviral compounds in HIV-positive patients.

OBJECTIVES: The insulin-sensitizer rosiglitazone is under investigation for therapy of HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome (LDS). Little is known about pharmacological interactions with antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. METHODS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ARV drugs was performed in a prospective study before and at day 28 after start of treatment with 4 mg of rosiglitazone for combined LDS. Drug levels were measured in the morning fasting, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after standardized drug intake. Values were log-transformed for analysis. RESULTS: Twelve males and six females were assessed; mean age was 50.7 years and mean CD4 cell count was 496 cells/mm(3). All patients had a viral load below 50 copies/mL, and backbone ARV therapy consisted of two or three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in all cases. After administration of rosiglitazone, no significant differences in Cmax, Cmin and AUC were found in cases treated with efavirenz (n = 10) and lopinavir (n = 4). Mean Cmax of nevirapine (n = 4) was reduced significantly [-0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.86 to -0.01]. Furthermore, there was a consistent trend to a reduction in the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of Cmax, Cmin and AUC (GMR of Cmax 0.95; 95% CI 0.9-1.0; GMR of Cmin 0.89; 95% CI 0.65-1.13; GMR of AUC 0.96; 95% CI 0.91-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 4 mg of rosiglitazone for HIV-associated LDS is likely to reduce the bioavailability of nevirapine. Thus, routine TDM is recommended for patients treated with rosiglitazone and nevirapine. A therapy consisting of efavirenz or lopinavir seems to be without negative impact. Further studies on the interaction of rosiglitazone with ARV drugs are necessary.

Long-term pharmacokinetics of amprenavir in combination with delavirdine in HIV-infected children.

Five heavily pretreated HIV-infected children were put on amprenavir and delavirdine plus two nucleoside inhibitors to reverse transcriptase to boost amprenavir levels and to use the antiretroviral activity of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. No data are available about this combination in children. It w;as well tolerated, and the median reduction in viral load was 1.5 log after 18 months. Delavirdine boosted amprenavir trough levels more than 10-fold, and delavirdine trough levels remained i several fold above susceptible HIV strains.

Impact of amphotericin B on the cytochrome P450 system in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes are influenced by amphotericin B (Am-B) during the treatment of Candida oesophagitis in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Twelve HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients (CDC/WHO stage C3) with Candida oesophagitits were enrolled into a prospective clinical trial. The patients were treated with Am-B (0.4 mg/kg body weight) for two weeks. At baseline and after Am-B therapy the clearance of antipyrine and its metabolites were investigated by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, the urinary excretion of 6-beta-hydroxycortisol and 17-hydroxycorticosteroids was assessed by means of a radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The following significant changes were observed after Am-B treatment (P < 0.01): increase of antipyrine half-life (12.4 h vs 16.8 h) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (27.9 mg min/ml vs 38.1 mg min/ml); decrease of the total body clearance (61.2 ml/min vs 43.7 ml/min); decrease of the renal clearance of antipyrine metabolites - norantipyrine (7.45 ml/min vs 5.31 ml/min), 4-hydroxyantipyrine (15.4 ml/min vs 10.3 ml/min), hydroxymethylantipyrine (4.31 ml/min vs 3.65 ml/min); decrease of urinary 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion (453 microg/24h vs 298 microg/24h) and the ratio of 6-beta-hydroycortisol to 17-hydroxycorticosteroids (8.8% vs 6.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that Am-B therapy has an inhibitory effect on cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes in HIV-infected patients. These results are of particular significance for HIV-infected patients who are concomitantly treated with drugs that are predominantly metabolised in the liver. A careful drug monitoring system seems advisable, especially for proteinase inhibitor experienced HIV-1-infected subjects.

Montelukast plus cetirizine in the prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: influence on clinical symptoms and nasal allergic inflammation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate effects of 6-week pretreatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) with cetirizine, and montelukast, alone and in combination. Antihistamine/antileukotriene treatment is effective in AR. Antihistamines may prevent AR symptoms while prophylactic activity of antileukotrienes remains unclear. METHODS: Sixty AR patients, aged 18-35 years, were randomized to receive placebo, montelukast only, cetirizine only, or montelukast plus cetirizine, 6 weeks prior and 6 weeks after the beginning of grass pollen season. Mean self-recorded in-season symptom scores and mean weekly all-symptom scores were analyzed. In 31 patients, nasal lavages were performed before treatment, and at the end of the study, i.e. 12 weeks after the treatment initiation. Eosinophil and basophil counts, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and mast cell tryptase (MCT) levels were evaluated in lavage samples. RESULTS: Combined montelukast/cetirizine pretreatment significantly reduced in-season symptom score for sneezing, eye itching, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, and congestion. Montelukast plus cetirizine were more effective than cetirizine alone in preventing eye itching, rhinorrhea, and nasal itching. Moreover, combined pretreatment with montelukast and cetirizine delayed appearance of AR symptoms. Eosinophil nasal lavage fluid counts were significantly increased during pollen season in placebo and montelukast-only groups. No differences were observed in basophil counts. The in-season ECP level was significantly increased in all groups except montelukast-plus-cetirizine group. In-season MCT levels were not increased. CONCLUSION: Combined antihistamine and antileukotriene treatment started 6 weeks before the pollen season is effective in preventing AR symptoms and reduces allergic inflammation in nasal mucosa during natural allergen exposure.

A prospective, controlled study assessing the effect of lopinavir on amprenavir concentrations boosted by ritonavir.

In a controlled, prospective study, the efficacy of ritonavir 200 mg twice daily (bid) in inhibiting the decrease of amprenavir plasma concentrations caused by co-administration of lopinavir was assessed. Twelve HIV-seropositive patients were enrolled, and nine patients completed the 28-day study. At day 14, plasma concentrations of amprenavir 600 mg bid and ritonavir 200 mg bid were determined over 12 h. At day 15, lopinavir 400 mg bid was added. At day 28, plasma concentrations of amprenavir, ritonavir and lopinavir were assessed. Co-administration of lopinavir was found to decrease the amprenavir concentration, determined as the median area under the curve over 12 h (AUC12), by 25% (AUC12 24.9 microg/h/mL vs. 18.5 microg/h/mL; P<0.01), despite the presence of ritonavir 200 mg bid. Eight participants discontinued the study regimen during the first 6 weeks because of adverse gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, gastrointestinal tolerance of a regimen containing an increased dose of ritonavir 200 mg bid was low, while the regimen did not prevent a decrease of amprenavir and possibly lopinavir plasma concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic and tolerability profile of twice-daily saquinavir hard gelatin capsules and saquinavir soft gelatin capsules boosted with ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of a boosted saquinavir (SQV)/ritonavir (RTV) combination, administered as either the hard gelatin capsule (HGC) or soft gelatin capsule (SGC) formulation of SQV, in 24 healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, randomized, 2 x 2 crossover study. Twelve subjects were randomized to receive SQV/RTV 1000 mg/100 mg twice daily (BID) orally for 10 days, as either the HGC or SGC formulation. The pharmacokinetic profile of SQV was determined on day 10. Subjects then crossed over to the opposite SQV formulation, and the pharmacokinetic profile was determined again on day 20. The primary analysis was the assessment of bioequivalence based on logarithmically transformed values for AUC(0-24 h) and Cmax for the two formulations. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the geometric means of all the pharmacokinetic variables evaluated for SQV-HGC/RTV compared with SQV-SGC/RTV. A mean AUC0-24 h-value of 15.798 micro g/mL/h was reported for the HGC formulation compared with 11.655 micro g/mL/h for the SGC formulation (P = 0.0043). The SQV-HGC/RTV combination was better tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal system disorders. Furthermore, no elevations in triglycerides or total cholesterol were reported with SQV/RTV during the entire study period. CONCLUSION: In healthy volunteers, RTV boosting of SQV-HGC produces plasma exposures at least comparable to SQV-SGC, which is accompanied by an improvement in gastrointestinal system disorders.