The international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: The initial project survey.

OBJECTIVE: An international panel in the field of body fluid cytology, supported by the International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology, conducted a survey to identify opinions and explore existing practice patterns regarding body fluid cytopathology. METHODS: The study group, formed during the 2018 European Congress of Cytology in Madrid, generated a survey of 54 questions related to the practice and taxonomy of body fluid cytology. The survey was available online from 28 August 2018 until 10 December 2018. Participants were invited through the websites and listserves of the professional societies. RESULTS: The survey collected 593 international participant responses. Questions pertained to practice patterns and diagnostic language. Information was collected regarding credentials, work setting, work volume (4-10,000 samples) and years in practice (0-60 years). The responses revealed variations in diagnostic practice and sample management. Direct smears and ThinPrep® preparations are the most popular methods, followed by Cytospin® and SurePath®. Most (70%) respondents perform ancillary studies on their material, with over 50% preferring a cell block preparation. Approximately 32% indicated that they are capable of performing genetic studies on the samples. Nearly 78% of participants would accept a two-stage cytology report, with a preliminary assessment followed by a final diagnosis that accounts for ancillary studies to generate a more precise cytological interpretation. Approximately one-third (36%) never report adequacy on body fluid samples. Most (78%) report a general category result (negative, atypical, suspicious, or positive) and 22% provide a detailed surgical pathology type report. Most (73.6%) participants believe that both Papanicolaou stains and a modified Giemsa stain (eg Diff Quik) should be standard preparations for all serous fluid cytology. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the survey demonstrated strong support for the development of a unified system for reporting body fluid cytopathology among respondents.

Perceptions of Paris: an international survey in preparation for The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology 2.0 (TPS 2.0).

INTRODUCTION: An international panel of experts in the field of urinary cytopathology conducted a survey, supported by the American Society of Cytopathology, to seek opinions, gather evidence, and identify practice patterns regarding urinary cytology before and after the introduction of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology (TPS). Results from this survey were utilized in the development of the second edition of TPS (TPS-2.0). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group, originally formed during the 2013 International Congress of Cytology, reconvened at the 2019 annual meeting of the American Society of Cytopathology. To prepare for the second edition of TPS, the group generated a survey that included 43 questions related to the taxonomy and practice of urinary cytology. RESULTS: A total of 523 participant responses were collected, and 451 from 54 countries passed a qualifying screen. Three hundred ninety-four participants provided information about their work settings. Eighty-two percent (218/266) of responding participants use TPS. One hundred sixty-eight people who responded on their urinary cytology atypia rates reported an average decrease from 21.6% to 16%. Over three fourths of participants felt that the same criteria should be used for upper and lower tract interpretations and for instrumented and voided samples. There were varied opinions on addressing atypical squamous cells and suggestions for an expanded discussion of the issue to be included in TPS 2.0. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the survey demonstrate strong support for TPS and show a decreased self-reported atypia rate in the laboratories using TPS. The majority of participants related that the criteria put forth for the reporting categories were user-friendly and applied with relative ease. The comment section of the survey included suggestions from the participants for further improvement of TPS. Results of this survey have been useful in fine-tuning and advancing TPS. They were considered along with recent literature to generate the second edition of TPS.

Using American Type Culture Collection Cell Lines to Evaluate Interlaboratory Variables for Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunostaining.

CONTEXT.­: Most laboratories currently use patient tissues for validating immunohistochemical stains. OBJECTIVE.­: To explore advantages of using cell lines with known antigenicity as a validation method. DESIGN.­: Five American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) cell lines with known negative, low positive, and moderate to strong estrogen receptor (ER) expression as well as negative, equivocal, and positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were cultured and made into cell blocks. One block from each cell line was fixed in formalin and another in ethanol before cell block preparation. Two sets of paired unstained slides from each block were sent to 10 different laboratories for HER2 and ER staining to be stained on runs from different days according to each laboratory's defined protocol. RESULTS.­: The 10 study participants evaluated 40 slides in a blinded fashion. For ER expression, all 80 interpretations for the ER strong and moderate positive cell lines had the target ER-positive result, and 74 of 80 ER-negative cell lines (92.5%) had agreement with the intended negative result. The ER low positive cell line showed varied but positive expression among all observers. The HER2 (3+)-positive cell lines yielded a target interpretation of 3+ in 65 of 80 interpretations (81.2%). For the HER2-negative cell line 69 of 78 interpretations (88.5%) were consistent with the target response (0 or 1+). No significant variation was observed between the ethanol- and non-ethanol-exposed cell lines, or between runs by the same laboratory. Variation from target results clustered within laboratories. CONCLUSIONS.­: This study indicates that variability between laboratories can be identified by using cell lines for quantitative or semiquantitative immunohistochemistry when using cultured cell lines of known antigenicity. These cell lines could potentially play a role in aiding anatomic pathology laboratories in validating immunohistochemistry tests for formalin- and ethanol-fixed tissues.

We'll always have Paris The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology 2022.

Following the amazing acceptance of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), the second edition (TPS 2.0) was inevitable. Based on new studies since the publication of the first edition, diagnostic criteria are refined, and pitfalls discussed. In addition to reinforcing the mandate that the focus of diagnostic urinary cytology is the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, other issues are addressed. Low-grade lesions are included in the category of negative for high-grade urothelial cancer. The rationale for that decision is strongly supported by evidence from the authors' experiences as well as the recent literature. A new chapter on urine cytology of the upper tract, a rarely addressed topic, explores the challenges involved. Furthermore, the issue of cellular degeneration is discussed in the criteria of all diagnostic categories. Most importantly, data defining the risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) for each diagnostic category informs clinical management. The 65 authors are recognized authorities from 33 countries, attesting to the global impact of TPS 2.0.

Performance of specific morphologic features in distinguishing low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in borderline cases: a College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee multiobserver study.

INTRODUCTION: Distinguishing between low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) can be difficult on certain Papanicolaou (Pap) tests, hindering interobserver concordance. We investigated the variables influencing the interpretation of LSIL versus HSIL in Pap test slides rejected from the College of American Pathologists PAP education program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven cytologists, who were unaware of the reference interpretation, examined 21 Pap slides (11 submitted as LSIL and 10 as HSIL) rejected from the PAP education program and recorded the number of LSIL cells, HSIL cells, keratinized dysplastic cells, LSIL clusters with mixed HSIL cells, atypical squamous metaplasia, atypical glandular cells, the presence of inflammation or infectious organisms, and the overall interpretation (LSIL or HSIL). We evaluated the significance of these 11 variables using a nonlinear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: LSIL had greater concordance (92 of 121 responses; 76.0% concordance) than HSIL (68 of 110 responses; 61.8% concordance; P < 0.001). The only predictors of misclassified cases were the number of atypical squamous metaplastic cells and the number of HSIL cells (P < 0.001). The more of these cells identified, the more likely the reviewers were to classify the slide as HSIL. The reproducibility of the diagnosis was fair (Gwet's agreement coefficient, 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reproducibility is a challenge for a subset of cases with features intermediate between LSIL and HSIL. Atypical squamous metaplasia and dysplastic nuclei with a nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio greater than one half of the cell volume (HSIL) present on a Pap test influenced the likelihood that a reviewer would interpret the case as HSIL rather than LSIL.

The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology: Analysis and discussion of the response to a web-based survey.

BACKGROUND: A group of international experts in breast fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytopathology, supported by the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), drafted a comprehensive system for reporting breast FNAB cytopathology in 2017-2018. The editorial team produced a survey to assess the international response to the proposed category structure, definitions, and management recommendations in this draft. METHODS: A web-based survey of 186 questions was generated using the Qualtrics software package (Provo, Utah) supported by the Division of Information Technology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The survey was advertised widely-including through the IAC, American Society of Cytopathology, Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology, Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, and Australian Society of Cytology and to audiences at national and international meetings-and was available from April to June 2018. The data obtained from the 265 respondents was assessed by the editorial team. RESULTS: The survey provided a snapshot of the current role and use of breast FNAB and the international variations. Demographic questions were followed by specific questions based on the draft category definitions and statements and focused on issues that had generated discussion among the authors, including the FNAB diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. CONCLUSION: The survey results strongly supported the development of the IAC Yokohama System and informed subsequent discussions among the authors regarding the final text.

The Paris system of Reporting Urinary Cytology: Strengths and opportunities.

The Paris system for reporting urinary cytopathology (TPS) was created to address inherent weaknesses inherent in the practice of urinary cytopathology. While urothelial cytology has always performed well at finding high grade, genetically unstable urothelial carcinoma, it performs poorly when it comes to detecting low-grade urothelial neoplasia. TPS intends to improve the utility of urothelial cytology by focusing on what is important, high-grade urothelial carcinoma. This article is a snapshot of the current state of TPS as it heads into its second edition. Successes are described and further developments are considered.

Small core needle biopsies in cytology practice: a survey of members of the American Society of Cytopathology.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of a new generation of core needle biopsies (CNBs) for endoscopic procedures has prompted reconsideration of the role of cytopathologists in the handling of small biopsies. The American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) has therefore conducted a survey with the intention of elucidating current practices regarding the handling of small CNBs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The membership of the ASC was invited by email to participate in an online survey over a 2-month period. The survey consisted of 20 multiple choice questions with 2-8 possible responses per question. RESULTS: Of 2651 members contacted by e-mail, 282 (10.6%) responded to the survey questions, including 196 pathologists (69.5%) and 86 cytotechnologists (30.5%). Of these, 265 respondents were from the US/Canada (94.0%), with 156 from academic institutions (58.9%) and 109 from non-academic practices (41.1%); 17 were from other countries (6.0%). In 18.8% of all practices, cytopathologists sign out >90% of small CNBs from endoscopic and radiologically guided procedures; in 36.5% of practices >90% are signed out by surgical pathologists; the remainder have such cases divided more evenly between cytopathologists and surgical pathologists. Responses show that 78.0% of all respondents are interested in signing out more small biopsies in the future, and 80.5% desire increased small biopsy-related resources from the ASC. CONCLUSIONS: The survey responses indicate that practices currently vary widely across institutions. Most indicated an interest in greater incorporation of small biopsies into the practice of cytopathology.

The international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology-diagnostic categories and clinical management.

INTRODUCTION: Effusions can develop inside serous cavities in several pathologic states, both neoplastic and non-neoplastic. They are easy to drain and can provide useful diagnostic information. However, the reported diagnostic efficacy of these specimens has not been uniform across different laboratories. To standardize practices, the international system for reporting serous fluid cytology (TIS) was developed in accordance with the best international practices, the most up-to-date reported data, and expert consensus. RESULTS: TIS has set the basic principles for laboratory handling of serous effusion specimens, defined the adequacy criteria, and set a standardized reporting terminology with well-defined criteria for each diagnostic category. These include nondiagnostic, negative for malignancy, atypia of undetermined significance, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant. Each can provide useful inherent information for appropriate clinical management and follow-up, with a defined expected diagnostic category incidence and risk of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: TIS applies to serous fluids collected from the pleura, peritoneal, and pericardial cavities. Using TIS, indeterminate categories are presented as either preliminary or as options of last resource. TIS has emphasized the role of ancillary tests in arriving at the correct interpretation within each category. It also has emphasized the importance of a malignant diagnosis as a definitive diagnosis, comparable to histologic examinations. Because of the well-documented outcomes in the adoption of uniform cytology terminology for other organ systems, we recommend the use of the upcoming TIS and believe its use will be paramount to improving the diagnostic yield in this area of cytology.

Milan Interobserver Reproducibility Study (MIRST): Milan System 2018.

INTRODUCTION: Prior to the 2018 publication of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC), a Web-based interobserver study was performed to evaluate MSRSGC reporting categories, identify cytomorphologic features that represent poor sources of agreement, and establish a baseline for future studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Study participants evaluated 75 images chosen from the MSRSGC image set, prior to the release of the Milan Atlas. Images spanned all diagnostic categories including typical and borderline cytomorphology. Participant demographics were collected on level of training, practice patterns, and experience. RESULTS: A total of 647 persons attempted access to the survey. Of these, 555 correctly answered the qualifying questions. Participants included: 16.5% ASCP Certified Cytotechnologists, 2.8% Specialist Cytotechnologists, 5.8% IAC Certified individuals, 14.3% Anatomic (AP) Certified Pathologists, 38.9% AP and Cytopathology Certified Pathologists, and 15.3% pathology trainees. Length of participant practice varied from 0 to 54 years. In our sample, 43.4% of participants came from academic centers, 17.6% from private hospitals; and 13.3% from commercial/private laboratories. Overall, 42% of respondents agreed with the reference interpretations of salivary gland lesions. The best agreement was seen in cytopathology certified pathologists. Among the MSRSGC categories, best agreement was found in Neoplasm-Benign (58.9%) and Non-Diagnostic (49.2%) categories, followed by Malignant (48.4%). The agreement rates for Salivary Gland Lesion of Uncertain Malignant Potential (SUMP) and Suspicious For Malignancy (SFM) were 23.6% and 22.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to the reproducibility studies conducted for gynecologic and urinary cytopathology, the most important factor in diagnostic reproducibility was a priori classification of image difficulty, although people with higher certifications performed better.

Practice Patterns in Urinary Cytopathology Prior to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.

CONTEXT.­: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology has been disseminated since its inception in 2013; however, the daily practice patterns of urinary tract cytopathology are not well known. OBJECTIVE.­: To assess urinary tract cytopathology practice patterns across a variety of pathology laboratories to aid in the implementation and future update of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology. DESIGN.­: A questionnaire was designed to gather information about urinary tract cytopathology practices and mailed in July 2014 to 2116 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program. The participating laboratories' answers were summarized. RESULTS.­: Of the 879 of 2116 laboratories (41%) that participated, 745 (84.8%) reported processing urinary tract specimens in house. The laboratories reported processing various specimen types: voided urine, 735 of 738 (99.6%); bladder washing/barbotage, 639 of 738 (86.6%); and catheterized urine specimens, 653 of 738 (88.5%). Some laboratories used multiple preparation methods, but the most commonly used preparation techniques for urinary tract specimens were ThinPrep (57.4%) and Cytospin (45.5%). Eighty-eight of 197 laboratories (44.7%) reported preparing a cell block, but with a low frequency. Adequacy criteria were used by 295 of 707 laboratories (41.7%) for voided urine, and 244 of 707 (34.5%) assessed adequacy for bladder washing/barbotage. More than 95% of the laboratories reported the use of general categories: negative, atypical, suspicious, and positive. Polyomavirus was classified as negative in 408 of 642 laboratories (63.6%) and atypical in 189 of 642 (29.4%). One hundred twenty-eight of 708 laboratories (18.1%) performed ancillary testing, and of these, 102 of 122 (83.6%) reported performing UroVysion. CONCLUSIONS.­: Most laboratories use the ThinPrep method followed by the Cytospin technique; therefore, the criteria published in The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology, based mostly on ThinPrep and SurePath, should be validated for Cytospin, and relevant information should be included in the revised edition of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.

The Differential Diagnosis of Reparative Changes and Malignancy: Performance in the College of American Pathologists Pap Education and Proficiency Testing Programs.

CONTEXT.­: Repair is a challenging diagnosis and a significant source of false-positive (FP) interpretations in cervical cytology. No large-scale study of performance of repair in the liquid-based era has been performed. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate the performance of repair in the College of American Pathologists Pap Education and Proficiency Testing (PT) programs. DESIGN.­: The FP rate for slides classified as repair was evaluated by preparation type, participant type (cytotechnologist, pathologist, or laboratory), and program. The specific misdiagnosis category and individual slide performance were also evaluated. The rate of misclassification of slides as repair by participants for other diagnostic categories in the Pap Education program was assessed. RESULTS.­: The overall FP rate was 1700 of 12 715 (13.4%). There was no significant difference by program or preparation type. Within the Education program there was no difference by participant type, but pathologists' FP rate in the PT program (47 of 514, 9.1%) was significantly better than cytotechnologists in the PT program (51 of 380, 13.4%) and pathologists in the Education program (690 of 4900, 14.1%). High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions/cancers (HSIL+) accounted for 1380 of 1602 FP interpretations (86%) in Education, but 43 of 98 (43.9%) in PT. Most slides had a low rate of misclassification, but a small number were poor performers. False-negative diagnosis of HSIL+ as repair was less common, ranging from 0.7% to 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS.­: Despite initial indications that liquid-based cytology might reduce the rate of misclassification of repair, FP interpretations remain common and are no different by preparation type. Misclassification is most commonly as HSIL or carcinoma, potentially resulting in significant patient harm.

A Taxonomic Index for Retrieval of Digitized Whole Slide Images from an Electronic Database for Medical School and Pathology Residency Education.

Since the advent of whole slide imaging, the utility of digitized slides for education in medical school and residency has been amply documented. Pathology departments at most major academic medical centers have made digitized slides available to pathology residents for study, even before the use of digitized slides for clinical purposes (i.e., primary diagnosis) has become commonplace. This article describes the experience of one academic medical center with the storage and indexing of large volumes of digitized slides. Our goal was to be able to retrieve scanned slides for a variety of educational applications and thereby maximize the heuristic value of the slides. This posed a formidable challenge in terms of development and deployment of an index system that would allow exemplary slides to be identified and retrieved irrespective of the purpose for which the slide was scanned. We used the structure inherent in Aperio's image management software (eSlide Manager) to build an educational database that allowed each image to be appended with a unique taxonomic identifier so that the individual files could be retrieved in a flexible and utilitarian manner.

The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology.

The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) gathered together a group of cytopathologists expert in breast cytology who, working with clinicians expert in breast diagnostics and management, have developed the IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Cytology. The project was initiated with the first cytopathology group meeting in Yokohama at the 2016 International Congress of Cytology. This IAC Yokohama System defines five categories for reporting breast cytology, each with a clear descriptive term for the category, a definition, a risk of malignancy (ROM) and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathology features of each of the lesions within each category will be presented more fully in a subsequent atlas. The System emphasizes that the crucial requirements for diagnostic breast FNAB cytology are a high standard for the performance of the FNAB and for the making of direct smears, and well-trained experienced cytopathologists to interpret the material. The performance indicators of breast FNAB, including specificity and sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and ROM stated in this article have been derived from the recent literature. The current practice of breast FNAB has evolved with the increasing use of ultrasound guidance and rapid on-site evaluation. Two recent publications have shown a range of ROM for the insufficient/inadequate category of 2.6-4.8%, benign 1.4-2.3%, atypical 13-15.7%, suspicious of malignancy 84.6-97.1%, and malignant 99.0-100%. The management algorithm in the System provides options because there are variations in the management of breast lesions using FNAB and core-needle biopsy in those countries utilizing the "triple test" of clinical, imaging, and FNAB assessment, and also variations in the availability of CNB and imaging in low- and middle-income countries. The System will stimulate further discussion and research, particularly in the cytological diagnostic features of specific lesions within each category and in management recommendations. This will lead to continuing improvements in the care of patients with breast lesions and possible modifications to the IAC Yokohama System.

Standardized terminology systems in cytopathology.

There has been increasing pressure for systemization in cytopathology. Lack of uniformity in categorization, variation in opinion based regional practice, and technologic advancement have created an environment disposed toward creation of more consistent evidence-based approaches to diagnostic problems. This review provides an overview of the major standardized terminology systems in cytology, with historical perspectives and commentary on current uses of these systems. These systems now include gynecologic, thyroid, pancreaticobiliary, urinary, salivary gland, and breast cytology. We summarize major classification systems supported by national and international professional organizations, outlining the structure and goals of each system. Specific benefits and potential pitfalls in the implementation of each system are given. Finally, we address potential criticisms of standardized terminology systems and proposed future directions to continue the evolution of standardized terminology to improve clinical practice.

Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion? Concordance Between the Interpretation of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Papanicolaou Tests: Results From the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.

CONTEXT.­: Obtaining diagnostic concordance for squamous intraepithelial lesions in cytology can be challenging. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine diagnostic concordance for biopsy-proven low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) Papanicolaou test slides in the College of American Pathologists PAP Education program. DESIGN.­: We analyzed 121 059 responses from 4251 LSIL and HSIL slides for the interval 2004 to 2013 using a nonlinear mixed-model fit for reference diagnosis, preparation type, and participant type. We evaluated interactions between the reference diagnosis and the other 2 factors in addition to a repeated-measures component to adjust for slide-specific performance. RESULTS.­: There was a statistically significant difference between misclassification of LSIL (2.4%; 1384 of 57 664) and HSIL (4.4%; 2762 of 63 395). There was no performance difference between pathologists and cytotechnologists for LSIL, but cytotechnologists had a significantly higher HSIL misclassification rate than pathologists (5.5%; 1437 of 27 534 versus 4.0%; 1032 of 25 630; P = .01), and both were more likely to misrepresent HSIL as LSIL ( P < .001) than the reverse. ThinPrep LSIL slides were more likely to be misclassified as HSIL (2.4%; 920 of 38 582) than SurePath LSIL slides (1.5%; 198 of 13 196), but conventional slides were the most likely to be misclassified in both categories (4.5%; 266 of 5886 for LSIL, and 6.5%; 573 of 8825 for HSIL). CONCLUSIONS.­: More participants undercalled HSIL as LSIL (false-negative) than overcalled LSIL as HSIL (false-positive) in the PAP Education program, with conventional slides more likely to be misclassified than ThinPrep or SurePath slides. Pathologists and cytotechnologists classify LSIL equally well, but cytotechnologists are significantly more likely to undercall HSIL as LSIL than are pathologists.

Paris Interobserver Reproducibility Study (PIRST).

OBJECTIVES: In concert with the 2015 publication of The Paris System for Urinary Cytopathology (TPS), a Web-based interobserver study, co-sponsored by the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) and International Academy of Cytology (IAC), was performed to determine diagnostic agreement among volunteer participants and with the TPS author consensus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants at various levels of training and certification were recruited through national and international cytopathology professional societies. Although the survey was open to all comers, potential participants were screened by two basic cytopathology questions. Information was collected on the level of training, practice patterns, and experience. Study participants evaluated 85 images (previously unpublished) chosen from the TPS atlas. These images spanned all diagnostic categories. RESULTS: Of the 1993 attempts to access the survey, 1313 participants correctly answered the qualifying questions and were included in the survey. Respondents were concentrated in the United States, although many participants came from other countries. The majority of respondents were board-certified in anatomic pathology with cytopathology certification. A smaller number were cytotechnologists. Board-certified cytopathologists and specialist cytotechnologists outperformed other certifications. Practice type (academics versus non-academic), and country (US versus international) were not major factors in concordance. Diagnostic categories with the best agreement were Negative for High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (NHGUC; 71%), Low-Grade Urothelial Neoplasm (LGUN; 62%), and High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (HGUC; 57%). Indeterminate categories showed low concordance. CONCLUSIONS: The NHGUC, LGUN, and HGUC were most correlated with diagnostic agreement among observers. This study can serve as a baseline for future comparisons.

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Analysis and suggestions of initial survey.

BACKGROUND: An international panel of experts in the field of salivary gland cytology (SGC), supported by the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) and the International Academy of Cytology, conducted a survey to seek evidence and practice patterns regarding SGC. Results were used to provide focus for the proposed Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. METHODS: The study group, formed during the 2015 European Congress of Cytology held in Milan, Italy, generated a survey that included 49 specific questions related to the taxonomies, practices, and diagnostic entities of salivary cytology. Qualtrics software was used as the study platform. Software and server support were provided by the division of information technology at the University of Wisconsin. The survey was available online from November 2015 until February 2016. Participants were invited through the Web sites of the ASC, the International Academy of Cytology, and the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology as well as by the ASC e-mail "ListServe"; responses were evaluated by the Milan System editors. RESULTS: Responses from a total of 515 participants were collected and reviewed. A total of 347 participants provided demographic data information. Responses revealed variations in diagnostic practice and subsequent management. Participants believed that the acceptable rate for nondiagnostic samples should not be higher than 10%. There were varied opinions regarding the approach to neoplastic lesions of uncertain malignant potential, those that may or may have not local invasion and distant spread. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the survey demonstrated strong support for the development of a unified system for reporting SGC. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:757-66. © 2017 American Cancer Society.