Efficacy and safety of remote cardiac rehabilitation in the recovery phase of cardiovascular diseases (RecRCR study): A multicenter, nonrandomized, and interventional trial in Japan.

Backgrounds: Remote cardiac rehabilitation has proven useful in patients with cardiovascular disease; however, the methodology had not been fully validated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) with real-time monitoring and an ergometer using a bidirectional communication tool during the recovery phase of cardiovascular diseases. Methods: This multicenter, nonrandomized, interventional study was conducted at 29 institutions across Japan and enrolled patients with cardiovascular diseases who met indications for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after receiving in-hospital treatment. The RCR group exercised at home using an ergometer and was monitored in real-time using interactive video and monitoring tools for 2-3 months. Educational instructions were provided concurrently through e-learning approaches. The safety of the RCR protocol and the improvement in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) were compared with those of the historical control group that participated in center-based CR. Results: Fifty-three patients from the RCR group were compared with 103 historical controls having similar background characteristics. No patients in RCR experienced significant cardiovascular complications while engaging in exercise sessions. After 2-3 months of RCR, the peak VO2 improved significantly, and the increases in the RCR group did not exhibit any significant differences compared to those in the historical controls. During follow-up, the proportion of patients whose exercise capacity increased by 10% or more was also evaluated; this finding did not indicate a statistically significant distinction between the groups. Conclusions: RCR during the recovery phase of cardiovascular diseases proved equally efficient and safe as center-based CR.

Metabolic and ventilatory changes during postural change from the supine position to the reclining position in bedridden older patients.

The prevention of pneumonia in bedridden older patients is important, and its recurrence in these patients is a relevant issue. Patients who are bedridden and inactive, and have dysphagia are considered to be at risk for pneumonia. Efforts to reduce the bedridden state and low activity may be necessary to reduce the risk of developing pneumonia in bedridden older patients. This study aimed to clarify the effects of postural change from the supine position to the reclining position on metabolic and ventilatory parameters and on safety in bedridden older patients. Using a breath gas analyzer and other tools, we assessed the following 3 positions: lying on the back (supine), resting in the Fowler position (Fowler), and resting in an 80° recline wheelchair (80°). Measurements were oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide output, gas exchange ratio, tidal volume (VT), minute volume, respiratory rate, inspiratory time, expiratory time, total respiratory time, mean inspiratory flow, metabolic equivalents, end-expiratory oxygen, and end-expiratory carbon dioxide as well as various vital signs. The study analysis included 19 bedridden participants. The change in oxygen uptake driven by changing the posture from the supine position to the Fowler position was as small as 10.8 mL/minute. VT significantly increased from the supine position (398.4 ±â€…111.2 mL) to the Fowler position (426.9 ±â€…106.8 mL) (P  = .037) and then showed a decreasing trend in the 80° position (416.8 ±â€…92.5 mL). For bedridden older patients, sitting in a wheelchair is a very low-impact physical activity, similar to that in normal people. The VT of bedridden older patients was maximal in the Fowler position, and the ventilatory volume did not increase with an increasing reclining angle, unlike that in normal people. These findings suggest that appropriate reclining postures in clinical situations can promote an increase in the ventilatory rate in bedridden older patients.