Integrated analysis of next generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) and PET scan in transplant eligible myeloma patients.

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assays allow response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and negativity is associated with improved survival outcomes. The role of highly sensitive next generation sequencing (NGS) MRD in combination with functional imaging remains to be validated. We performed a retrospective analysis on MM patients who underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients were evaluated at day 100 post-ASCT with NGS-MRD and positron emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients with ≥ 2 MRD measurements were included in a secondary analysis for sequential measurements. 186 patients were included. At day 100, 45 (24.2%) patients achieved MRD negativity at a sensitivity threshold of 10-6. MRD negativity was the most predictive factor for longer time to next treatment (TTNT). Negativity rates did not differ according to MM subtype, R-ISS Stage nor cytogenetic risk. PET-CT and MRD had poor agreement, with high rates of PET-CT negativity in MRD-positive patients. Patients with sustained MRD negativity had longer TTNT, regardless of baseline risk characteristics. Our results show that the ability to measure deeper and sustainable responses distinguishes patients with better outcomes. Achieving MRD negativity was the strongest prognostic marker and could help guide therapy-related decisions and serve as a response marker for clinical trials.

Implications of neuroendocrine tumor and diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes and care: a matched case-control study.

AIM: We aimed to determine the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and of NETs on glycemic control. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed NETs with/without DM were matched 1:1 by age, sex and diagnosis year (2005-2017), and survival compared (Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards). Mixed models compared hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose during the year after cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Three-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI: 60-86%) for DM patients versus 80% (95% CI: 70-92%) for non-DM patients (p = 0.82). Hazard ratio was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.56-3.16; p = 0.51); mean DM HbA1c, 7.3%. CONCLUSION: DM did not adversely affect survival of patients with NET. NET and its treatment did not affect glycemic control.

Racial/ethnic differences in patients with anemia and folate deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence of racial/ethnic differences in patients with anemia and serum folate deficiency. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patient samples collected from January 2010 to October 2018. Reference laboratory ranges were determined by Mayo Clinic Reference Laboratories. Race and ethnicity were classified according to National Institutes of Health categories. RESULTS: The analysis comprised 197 974 samples. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, and SF results were available for 173 337, 173 056, and 129 760 samples, respectively. Of the samples, 46 505 (26.8%) showed anemia, with a higher prevalence among American Indian/Alaskan Natives (AI/AN) 42.9% and African Americans (AA) 47.2% (P < .001). SF deficiency was present in 897 (0.7%), with a higher prevalence among AI/AN (9, [1.4%]) and AA (78, [1.2%]) and a lower prevalence in non-Hispanic whites (NHW) (758, [0.7%]), Hispanics (40, [0.6%]), and Asians (8, [0.3%]). In multivariable analysis, the prevalence of anemia was higher in all non-NHW racial/ethnic groups: AA (OR, 3.67, [95%CI: 3.47-3.88, P < .001]), AI/AN (OR, 3.25, [95%CI: 2.71-3.90, P < .001]), Asians (OR, 1.62, [95%CI: 1.47-1.77, P < .001]), and Hispanics (OR, 1.41, [95%CI: 1.32-1.50, P < .001]). SF deficiency was more common in AA (OR, 1.48, [95%CI: 1.17-1.88, P.001]) and less common in Asians (OR, 0.35, [95%CI: 0.17-0.70, P = .003]), compared with NHW. CONCLUSIONS: We showed significant racial/ethnic differences in anemia and SF deficiency. Differences were observed especially among NHW, AA, and Asians. We believe that these differences may be explained by social determinants of health. More research is needed regarding the causes of these differences and their clinical implications at a population level.

Mortality and glycemic control among patients with diabetes mellitus and uterine or ovarian cancer.

AIM: To evaluate associations between survival and glycemic control in age-matched patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer, with/without diabetes mellitus (DM). PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed ovarian or endometrial cancer with and without DM were compared. RESULTS: The study included 84 patients with ovarian cancer (28, DM); 96 with endometrial cancer (48 with, 48 without DM). DM patients did not have worse overall or progression-free survival than non-DM patients. Glycemic control was not associated with either cancer. CONCLUSION: There was no association between DM and survival for patients with uterine or ovarian cancer. In addition, there was no association between uterine and ovarian cancer and glycemic control. Additional studies to confirm these observations in larger populations are required.