Anatomic Monopolar Press-fit Radial Head Arthroplasty; High Rate of Loosening at Mid-Term Follow Up.

Introduction: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is used for the management of unstable or unreconstructable injuries of the radial head. Our aim was to investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with the Acumed anatomic radial head press-fit system for trauma. Methods: Clinical and radiographic assessment of RHAs undertaken for trauma with minimum 2-year follow-up. Results: 16 consecutive patients, mean age 53 (21-82) and 66 month ± 27 (26-122) clinical follow-up were included. There were marked radiographic changes with 11/16 showing periprosthetic lucent lines and 13/16 showing subcollar osteolysis. Radiographic changes occurred early post-surgery. Stem loosening was associated with larger cantilever quotients (0.47 vs 0.38, p = 0.004). Overall survivability was 81.2%, with 3 RHAs removed. Clinical outcomes for the retained RHAs were acceptable with mean flexion 134°, extension deficit of 10°, pronation of 82°, and supination of 73°. Mean VAS scores were 8.5 ± 14.4, QuickDASH 13.8 ± 18.9, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were 91.5 ± 12.5 with no poor scores. Conclusion: Mid-term clinical functional outcomes following the Acumed anatomic RHA are acceptable in most cases. However, in view of the extensive periprosthetic lucencies and surgical removal due to loosening, patients should be cautioned when consented for implantation of the prosthesis, especially if a large collar is anticipated.

Rate of Insufficient Ipsilateral Hamstring Graft Harvesting in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, using an ipsilateral hamstring graft, may necessitate an alternative graft source if the obtained graft is insufficient with regards to length or diameter. The study aims to determine the rate of insufficient ipsilateral hamstring graft harvesting in primary ACL reconstruction. Retrospective review of 50 consecutive primary ACL reconstructions performed by a single surgeon in the United Kingdom. In 3 of 50 cases, there was insufficient ipsilateral hamstring graft harvesting and a contralateral hamstring graft was used. In two cases, this was due to premature division of the ipsilateral hamstring tendons (3/100 harvested tendons). In one case, an adequate length of semitendinosus was obtained, but its central portion was too thin. Retrospective review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging identified the thin part of the tendon in the latter case. Insufficient ipsilateral hamstring graft harvesting is a recognized, yet unusual intraoperative complication in primary ACL reconstruction. Presurgical planning as to how to manage such complications is essential.

Surgical vs. Nonsurgical Management for Humeral Shaft Fractures; Preference Among Orthopaedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Determining trends in managing humeral shaft fractures may help identify variation in practice which might benefit design of clinical guidance. We aimed to determine the practice of members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) in managing humeral shaft fractures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An electronic survey was sent to members of BESS. Questions related to preferred surgical and nonsurgical approaches for management of humeral shaft fractures. This was divided into management of proximal, middle and distal third diaphyseal fractures. RESULTS: 91 fully completed responses were analysed. Nonsurgical management was preferred by 90.1% (n=82) for middle-third and 80.2 % (n=73) for proximal third fractures, however 52.7% (n=48) favoured surgical treatment for distal third fractures. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The management preference for humeral shaft fractures amongst surgeons is highly variable. 2. This may be partly attributed to the sparsity of high-quality evidence. 3. Well-designed randomised trials or pro-spective cohort studies may help further guide management of these injuries.

Outcome of revision surgery for bisphosphonate related subtrochanteric fracture non-union following failed intramedullary nailing.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates use is a recognised cause of atypical femur fractures. Intramedullary nailing is the first line of treatment for these fractures, but failure is a common problem due to altered biology, resulting in a non-union and a challenging problem. PURPOSE: There is lack of evidence in the literature on revision surgery for the management of non-union after failed nailing in atypical femur fracture. We present our experience of treating this complex problem. PATIENT AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all consecutive cases of revision surgery for non-union of bisphosphonate related subtrochanteric fractures was undertaken. All procedures were performed between 2012 and 2017 by a single surgeon. Revision surgery included removal of failed metalwork, resection of non-union, bone grafting and double plating with a lateral DCS plate and anterior locking compression plate. RESULTS: Ten patients (9 females, 1 male) were included with a mean age of 71.5 years and mean BMI of 34 at the time of revision. All patients received previous Bisphosphonate treatment on average for 6.2 years. One patient was lost to follow up. Mean time for non-weight bearing (NWB) mobilization was 7 months and mean time for union was 14 months. CONCLUSIONS: Fracture healing can be achieved with bone grafting and compression plating in all patients. However, a prolonged time to achieve union and a long follow-up duration should be expected.

Cementation technique for elbow arthroplasty; an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Modern cementation techniques have markedly improved survivorship in lower limb arthroplasty, which have been heavily researched in the hip and knee but less so for upper limb procedures. Aseptic loosening is a leading cause of failure in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) which could be related to the quality of cementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the cementation techniques used for TEA among practicing elbow surgeons. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was emailed to members of the British elbow and shoulder society (BESS) and PubMed identified experts. Questions focused on the type of prosthesis, operative rates for elective and trauma cases, nature of cement used, canal preparation and cement insertion. Opinions regarding satisfaction with current techniques and mantle quality were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 26 surgeons completed the questionnaire. The Coonrad-Moorey was the most popular device amongst respondents. Most cemented both components, used antibiotic loaded cement, washed the canal with saline and inserted the cement retrograde. There was wide variation in cementation techniques used for the humerus and ulna, particularly regarding cement preparation, insertion, and use of a restrictor and pressurisation. CONCLUSION: Modern cementation techniques are not being utilised in TEA which could be contributing to implant loosening rates and longevity.

Can the use of proprioceptive knee braces have implications in the management of osteoarthritic knees: An exploratory study.

BACKGROUND:: Use of proprioceptive knee braces to control symptomology by altering neuromuscular control mechanisms has been shown in patellofemoral pain. Although their potential in patients with knee osteoarthritis is vast, little research has examined their efficacy. OBJECTIVES:: This study examines the effect of a proprioceptive knee brace on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in healthy participants and in participants with OA. METHODS:: Thirteen healthy participants were asked to perform a 10-cm step-down task with and without a proprioceptive brace. Data were collected using a 10-camera Qualisys system. Individuals with osteoarthritis completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score before and after 4 weeks of intervention. RESULTS:: During step-down reductions in knee maximum internal rotation, transverse range of movement, transverse plane angular velocity and maximum internal rotation angular velocity was seen. Ankle plantar flexion and inversion angular velocity decreased while inversion and maximum supination angular velocity increased. Improvements in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were noted across all parameters with brace use. CONCLUSION:: Positive changes in kinematic variables in multiple planes can be achieved with proprioceptive bracing alongside improved patient outcome. These changes occur at the knee but analysis of other weight bearing joints should not be overlooked in future studies. This study supports the concept of neuromuscular reinforcement and re-education through proprioceptive bracing and its application in the management in knee osteoarthritis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Proprioception can alter symptoms and biomechanics embraced and adjacent lower limb joints. The results of this study highlights the potential uses of non-mechanical bracing in the treatment of osteoarthritis and other potential to bridge the osteoarthritis treatment gap. Furthermore, large-scale research is needed to match disease subset to brace type.

Rates of surgery for frozen shoulder: an experience in England.

AIM: the aim of this study was to identify the incidence of surgical treatment for frozen shoulder in a western population. METHODS: patients included in this study all resided within a well-defined area in the North West of England, all had surgery for frozen shoulder over a 3-year period and were identified from theatre logbooks of two local hospitals. Cases having surgery for shoulder stiffness other than frozen shoulder were excluded. Local and national population size estimates were based on data obtained from the UK Office for National Statistics. RESULTS: 117 patients underwent surgery for frozen shoulder during the period examined; of these 101 had arthroscopic arthrolysis and 16 had manipulation under anaesthesia. The overall incidence of frozen shoulder surgery was calculated at 2.67 procedures per 10,000 general population per year, and at 7.55 for those aged 40-60. CONCLUSION: surgical intervention for frozen shoulder is common, estimated at over 14,180 cases per year in England. Given the variation in costs associated with arthroscopic arthrolysis and manipulation under anaesthesia, comparative studies of the cost effectiveness of the two procedures would be of great value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2C (outcome research).

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty--minimum age for surgery, postoperative rehabilitation and long term restrictions. A delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if agreement could be obtained on guidelines regarding the ideal minimum age for a reverse shoulder replacement, as well as on post-operative rehabilitation and restrictions imposed on patients having undergone this procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A two-round Web-based Delphi consensus study was undertaken. An international group of experts in the field of reverse shoulder replacement were asked to complete the questionnaire. Consensus was considered as agreement of 60% or higher. RESULTS: There was substantial disagreement in most parameters examined amongst the 10 participants of the first round. Agreement was achieved for most parameters examined amongst three of the four respondents of the second round. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Amongst respondents of the second round a minimum age of 65 years for reverse shoulder arthroplasty was considered acceptable for most areas examined. 2. Controversial management areas in reverse shoulder arthroplasty have been highlighted and require exploration by further clinical studies.

Tardy posterior interosseous nerve palsy following total elbow arthroplasty: report of a case, literature review and a classification system.

We present an unusual case of tardy posterior interosseous nerve palsy in a female patient following total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. The patient was neurologically intact immediately following surgery but developed loss of active finger and thumb extension within 12 hours following surgery. Expectant management was adapted. The palsy recovered fully without the need of surgical intervention. A literature review is presented and a classification system proposed.

Do intra-articular steroid injections increase infection rates in subsequent arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Intra-articular steroid injections are widely used in joint arthritis. The safety of such injections has been questioned as they may increase infection rates in subsequent arthroplasty. We carried out a meta-analysis of studies examining the relation between intra-articular steroid injections and infection rates in subsequent joint arthroplasty. A literature search was undertaken. Eight studies looking at hip and knee arthroplasties were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed that steroid injection had no significant effect on either deep (risk ratio = 1.87; 95% CI 0.80-4.35; P = 0.15) or superficial infection rates (risk ratio = 1.75; 95% CI 0.76-4.04; P = 0.19) of subsequent arthroplasty. Further large cohort studies would be of value in further examining whether steroid injections close to the time of arthroplasty are safe.