RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Depression affects approximately 280 million individuals globally and it is a leading cause of disability. Despite effective medication options, 50% of patients prematurely discontinue antidepressants within 6 months. We sought to understand patients' perspectives regarding their needs and expectations related to antidepressants. OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe enablers and barriers that influence adult patients' medication adherence in depression treatment and to explore patients' educational needs on initiating or continuing antidepressant therapy. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study was conducted using individual, semi-structured interviews of adult patients with depression who were prescribed an antidepressant within 3 months of study recruitment at an urban primary care clinic in Toronto, Canada. Thirteen participants were interviewed. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Six themes emerged: safety and effectiveness of antidepressant, understanding of depression and its management, medication administration, healthcare experiences in the treatment of depression, and social influences and relationships. Barriers to adherence included adverse effects of antidepressants, preference for non-pharmacological therapies, uncertainty about therapeutic effects, and social stigma. In contrast, enablers were positive responses from antidepressants, fear of relapse, reminder aids, established routine, and a trusting patient-provider relationship. Participants desired access to reliable, evidence-based, and personalized educational information delivered through verbal, written, and digital formats to support antidepressant adherence. CONCLUSION: To overcome the identified barriers, educational strategies should involve both patients and their prescribers to identify patient-specific needs and treatment goals, engage in shared decision-making, and maintain consistent follow-up to support antidepressant adherence.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos , Adesão à Medicação , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Estigma Social , Entrevistas como Assunto , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
Background: Continuing professional development (CPD) and faculty development (FD) are not traditionally combined, although there is evidence that integrating them enhances knowledge acquisition. Objective: To explore preceptors' perceptions and the effectiveness of CATE (Clinical And Teaching Education), an education model that blends clinical content with the application of that clinical knowledge through a specified teaching technique. Methods: Thirty-five hospital and community pharmacy preceptors from the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, participated in CATE, which consisted of a 2-hour synchronous, online workshop integrating clinical content about depression with the "One-Minute Preceptor" (OMP) teaching skill. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected longitudinally using surveys and semistructured interviews. Participant and process outcomes were explored through descriptive and thematic analysis using a modified Kirkpatrick framework. Results: Participants valued the incorporation of educational theory and opportunities to practise the OMP using scripted role plays based on the depression-related content. The combination of FD and CPD was appealing, although participants wanted more clarity about their integration. The CATE model positively influenced their approaches to serving as preceptors, and using the OMP helped to reveal learners' knowledge gaps. There was a desire to share the teaching technique with colleagues to provide a more cohesive approach to teaching. Conclusions: Integrating CPD and FD in a synchronous, online environment was feasible and well received, and it helped to solidify preceptors' roles as educators. Combining CPD and FD represents an effective strategy to build the clinical and educational expertise of preceptors, which in turn has the potential to improve the quality of experiential learning for pharmacy students. This novel method of fostering the pedagogical growth of preceptors could be a model for other health professions.
Contexte: Le développement professionnel continu (DPC) et le développement professoral (DP) ne sont pas traditionnellement combinés, même s'il existe des éléments probants indiquant que leur intégration renforce l'acquisition des connaissances. Objectif: Examiner les perceptions des précepteurs et l'efficacité du CATE (Clinical And Teaching Education): un modèle pédagogique qui allie le contenu clinique à l'application de ces connaissances cliniques grâce à une technique d'enseignement spécifiée. Méthodologie: Trente-cinq précepteurs de pharmacies d'hôpitaux et communautaires de la Faculté de pharmacie Leslie Dan de l'Université de Toronto ont participé au CATE, qui consistait en un atelier en ligne synchrone de deux heures intégrant un contenu clinique sur la dépression avec la compétence pédagogique « précepteur-minute ¼. Les données qualitatives et quantitatives ont été recueillies longitudinalement à l'aide d'enquêtes et d'entretiens semi-structurés. Les résultats des participants et du processus ont été étudiés au moyen d'une analyse descriptive et thématique utilisant un cadre de Kirkpatrick modifié. Résultats: Les participants ont apprécié l'intégration de la théorie pédagogique et des occasions de pratiquer la compétence du précepteur-minute à l'aide de jeux de rôle scénarisés basés sur le contenu lié à la dépression. La combinaison du DP et du DPC était attrayante, même si les participants souhaitaient plus de clarté sur leur intégration. Le modèle CATE a influencé positivement leurs approches en matière de préceptorat, et l'utilisation de la technique précepteur-minute a contribué à révéler les lacunes des connaissances des apprenants. Il y avait une volonté de partager la technique d'enseignement avec des collègues pour offrir une approche plus cohérente de l'enseignement. Conclusions: L'intégration du DPC et du DP dans un environnement en ligne synchrone était réalisable et a été bien accueillie; elle a contribué à consolider le rôle des précepteurs en tant qu'éducateurs. La combinaison du DPC et du DP constitue une stratégie efficace pour développer l'expertise clinique et pédagogique des précepteurs, ce qui, à son tour, a le potentiel d'améliorer la qualité de l'apprentissage expérientiel des étudiants en pharmacie. Cette nouvelle méthode visant à favoriser la croissance pédagogique des précepteurs pourrait constituer un modèle pour d'autres professions de la santé.
RESUMO
Introduction The Routine Opioid Outcome Monitoring (ROOM) Tool was developed for use in community pharmacies in Australia. It facilitates pharmacists' screening and brief interventions regarding an individual's opioid use for chronic pain. At our academic teaching hospital, the ROOM Tool was adapted to incorporate a communication tool that includes a pharmacist's assessment and recommendations for primary care providers. This modified ROOM Tool was implemented as part of usual care in our outpatient pharmacies; however, the value to primary care providers is unknown. Aim The aim of this study was to determine primary care provider perspectives on the modified ROOM Tool. Methods Focus groups were conducted with primary care providers from an Academic Family Health Team. The focus group encompassed topics related to the positive and negative aspects of the modified ROOM Tool in supporting the care of patients using opioids for chronic pain. Qualitative content analysis of transcripts was performed to identify themes. Results Three focus groups were conducted with a total of six participants. Four themes emerged: (i) Facilitators to using the tool, (ii) Barriers to using the tool, (iii) Recommendations for improvement, (iv) Impact of the tool on patient care and safety. Discussion The ROOM Tool paired with the communication tool supports collaboration between pharmacists and primary care providers. The communication tool standardises the approach for communicating the pharmacist's assessment and recommendations. Recommendations to refine this modified ROOM Tool may increase its utility to primary care providers and enhance the impact on patient care and safety.
RESUMO
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background and Rationale: Numerous calls have been made for faculty development programming to better address faculty members' ongoing needs, to situate training strategies within the workplace and to utilize social learning perspectives, communities of practice in particular. Reviews have pointed to a paucity of published qualitative research on faculty development communities of practice and, more generally, on the processes of change and the organizational contexts in which interventions are implemented. Intervention: An initiative was started to instigate education scholarship communities of practice in three highly distinct academic health care settings, to address faculty members' ongoing needs for community and, ultimately, to serve as a source of support for the application of new knowledge to routine education activities. A research project was launched jointly to describe the process and progress of attempting to develop communities of practice at the three sites and to identify common and unique influences on sites' progress. Data Collection: Phone interviews were conducted with group facilitators from each site following group meetings, for the duration of the initiative. Analysis: Multiple case study methodology was employed to describe and compare the processes and progress of attempting to initiate communities of practice at the three sites and to identify obstacles related to organizational context. Findings: All three sites made limited progress in developing a shared domain of interest and a shared history of regular interaction (i.e. regular meetings). Participants identified different professional backgrounds and different education practices as challenges to establishing shared interest. More prominently, they identified busy schedules, geographic barriers, and absence of protected time as obstacles to regular and consistent meetings. Discussion: Difficulty establishing shared interest and shared history are considered in light of the unclear meaning of "education scholarship", cognitive and ethical boundaries between professions, and time constraints within modern, highly complex academic healthcare settings. Conclusions: While CoPs may appeal as self-sustaining, low-cost alternatives to formal programming, limited progress is possible without institutional investment and allowance commensurate with the implied scope and challenges.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often used inappropriately, without an indication, or for longer durations than recommended. Few tools exist to guide reassessment of their continued use and deprescribing if required. We aimed to reduce inappropriate drug use by developing and implementing a PPI deprescribing tool and process in a family medicine unit. ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM Primary care providers of adults taking a PPI for 8 weeks with an upcoming periodic health examination were reminded to reassess therapy via electronic medical record (EMR) messaging. A PPI Deprescribing Tool was uploaded into the EMR as a second reminder and to guide reassessment and deprescribing where indicated. Ten weeks after the examination a chart review assessed changes to PPI use. A follow up survey of providers assessed the utility and barriers to implementing the Deprescribing Tool. RESULTS Forty-three of 46 patients on PPIs (93%) had their PPI reassessed, resulting in 11 patients (26%) having their PPI deprescribed. Strategies for Improvement Routine reassessment of long-term medications is often overlooked because of extensive demands on primary care providers' time. Deprescribing likely improved because potentially eligible patients were identified to the provider and a tool was provided at the time of the encounter to guide the deprescribing process. LESSONS Reassessment and deprescribing of PPIs can be supported by implementing a standardised process and use of guidance tools for clinicians. Providers found the timely and selective reminder message to deprescribe the most useful component of the intervention. KEYWORDS proton pump inhibitor; deprescribing; reassessment; primary care; medication therapy management; gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Assuntos
Desprescrições , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/organização & administração , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Sistemas de AlertaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if a short screening questionnaire can identify patients at risk for drug therapy problems (DTPs) in a community pharmacy setting. DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaire. SETTING: Three community pharmacies in Saskatoon, Canada. PATIENTS: Forty-nine adults who were picking up a refill prescription for a medication that had remained stable over the past 6 months (i.e., no changes to drug, dose, or regimen) during 4 consecutive weeks at each of the three pharmacies between November 2013 and February 2014. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients completed a self-administered screening questionnaire and underwent a blinded comprehensive medication assessment with a clinical pharmacist. Agreement between the screening questionnaire responses and responses based on information from the medication assessment were assessed with Cohen's κ coefficient. The DTPs identified during the medication assessments were categorized in one of the eight standard DTP categories: unnecessary drug therapy, inappropriate drug, subtherapeutic dose, supratherapeutic dose, drug therapy required, adverse drug reaction, noncompliance, and other or unsure. The DTPs were also assigned a severity-mild, moderate, or severe-using adapted Schneider criteria. The number and severity of DTPs identified were compared among patients categorized as high versus low risk for DTPs as determined by the questionnaire responses. Of the 49 patients who completed the study, 18 (37%) were high risk and 31 (63%) low risk. The agreement between risk categorization based on the screening questionnaire and medication assessment was very good (κ = 0.91, p<0.01). Also, patients identified as high risk on the screening questionnaire had a mean of 3.7 (p<0.01) more DTPs than low-risk patients. Seventeen (94%) of the 18 high-risk patients had at least one moderate or severe DTP compared with 15 (48%) of the 31 low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: The screening questionnaire was a reliable method for identifying patients in community pharmacies who have a large number of DTPs.
Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Preparações Farmacêuticas/administração & dosagem , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Idoso , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Risco , Saskatchewan , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the demographic and health care characteristics of elderly family health team patients who are frequent emergency department (ED) users, focusing on potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and access to primary care services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic family medicine clinic in Toronto, Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 46 elderly patients (age >65 years) with 4 or more visits to a University Health Network-affiliated ED between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the validated STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) criteria, PIMs were identified. The primary objective was to determine whether PIMs were associated with more frequent ED use. The secondary objective was to determine whether patients who had previously undergone a clinic pharmacist-led medication review had fewer PIMs. We also determined the health characteristics of these patients at the time of their last ED visit of the study period. Utilization of primary care resources, both prior to and after ED visits, was determined. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of patients were taking at least 1 PIM. The total number of PIMs in the study population was 71. Having more PIMs was significantly correlated with a higher number of ED visits (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). Patients with a previous medication review had a similar number of PIMs compared with those without a review. The mean number of concurrent medications was 12.1 and the mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3.7. Significant delay between hospital discharge and primary care follow-up (median 13 days) was observed. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients who are more frequent ED users have a greater number of PIMs. Primary care resources appear to be underused in this population.
RESUMO
This article describes the development and implementation of an Interprofessional Falls Prevention Program (IFPP) designed for community-dwelling seniors. The program was a collaborative pilot research study conducted in a retirement home and an outpatient hospital setting. The pilot was successful and was positioned into a permanent falls prevention program. The IFPP aimed at improving physical function and balance and reducing the fear of falling in seniors with a history of falls. The pilot study included an interprofessional falls assessment followed by a 12-week program of once-weekly group education and exercise sessions, 3- and 6-month follow-up visits, and individual counseling. To measure program effectiveness, the Berg Balance Scale, the Timed Up and Go Test, the Falls Efficacy Scale, and the Morse Fall Risk Scale were used at baseline, upon program completion, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Process measures were also collected, including patient satisfaction. Persistent improvements were found in participants' balance, strength, functional mobility, and fear of falling. Patient satisfaction with the program was high. Challenges faced in program implementation are also highlighted.