A phase 1 study of pegylated recombinant arginase (PEG-BCT-100) in combination with systemic chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)[PACOX] in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the safety and efficacy of a pegylated arginase (PEG-BCT-100) in combination with chemotherapy (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) [PACOX] in advanced HCC patients. METHODS: This was a single centre phase 1 trial to assess the safety and tolerability of PACOX. All the enrolled subjects received treatment in 3-weekly cycles: intravenous PEG-BCT-100 2.7 mg/kg on days 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle; oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on day 1-14 of each cycle and intravenous oxaliplatin on day 1. Three dose levels of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, 100 mg/m2 or 130 mg/m2) were studied to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adverse events (AEs), efficacy by RECIST v1.1, time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled at 3 dose levels of oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2 (8 patients), 100 mg/m2 (3 patients), and 130 mg/m2 (6 patients). The median age was 55 years; all had had locoregional chemotherapy or targeted therapy such as sorafenib, but no systemic chemotherapy. The most common AEs were nausea (82%), injection site reaction (76%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (59%), oral mucositis (53%) and vomiting (53%). There was no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Median duration on study was 8 weeks overall. In 14 evaluable cases, one achieved partial response (PR), 4 had stable disease (SD); disease control rate was 36%; most responses were observed in the 130 mg/m2 cohort with 1 PR and 2 SDs. Median TTP and PFS were both 7.0 weeks. Overall median OS was 10.7 months; the median OS was not reached at 19.4 months of follow-up in the 130 mg/m2 cohort. CONCLUSION: The PACOX regimen demonstrated good anti-cancer activity and survival advantage in advanced pre-treated HCC with favourable safety profile. It warrants further phase II/III studies.

The Outcomes of Systemic Treatment in Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinomas Following Liver Transplants.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrences following liver transplant (LT) is challenging. Most clinical trials of systemic therapies for advanced HCC excluded patients with any history of organ transplant. We aimed to assess the outcomes in using various systemic therapies in patients with post-LT recurrence. METHODS: Consecutive patients with HCC and recurrences following LT at a large tertiary centre from 2005 to 2018 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), response rates and adverse events (AEs) were analysed. RESULTS: Forty-three consecutive patients with a recurrence of HCC following LT were identified from 2005 to 2018. Median OS from diagnosis of recurrence was 17 months (CI 11.3, 22.7). Early recurrence within 12 months of transplant was associated with a significantly worse median survival of 10 months (CI 8.5, 11.4) compared to 26 months (CI 18.8, 33.2) when recurrences occurred after 12 months from transplant (p < 0.001) with a hazard ratio of 0.104 (log-rank test, p < 0.001). A total of 41 patients had received systemic therapies and 79.1% of them were on sorafenib as the first-line treatment. Among these patients treated with sorafenib, median OS from recurrence was 14 months (CI 7.3, 20.7). Hand-foot syndrome (34.7%) was most common among AEs followed by diarrhoea (26.7%). Overall, AEs led to dose interruptions in 8.8% of patients. Notably, 47.1% of patients received subsequent lines of systemic therapies after sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Early recurrence within 1 year from transplant was the most significant risk factor. Treatment efficacy and adverse events and tolerability of sorafenib were comparable with those in the setting of advanced HCC without transplant.

The Use of Cabozantinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hong Kong-A Territory-Wide Cohort Study.

(1) Background: Cabozantinib is approved in sorafenib-exposed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). We evaluated the real-life pattern of use, efficacy, and tolerability of cabozantinib in aHCC. (2) Methods: This territory-wide study included consecutive aHCC patients who received cabozantinib between February 2018 and September 2020 in Hong Kong. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE) were assessed. (3) Results: Overall, 42 patients were included. Approximately 83.3% had Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. About 64.3% received cabozantinib as a single agent, and the remaining 35.7% received cabozantinib as an add-on to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). For single-agent patients, the median follow-up was 6.7 months. The ORR was 3.7%, DCR was 44.4%, and the median OS was 8.28 months. About 74.1% of patients experienced any AEs with 7.4% having grade ≥3 AEs. Among patients who received prior ICIs (n = 16), the ORR was 6.3%, and the median OS was 8.28 months. An exploratory analysis of patients who received cabozantinib as an add-on to ICIs showed an ORR of 6.7% and a median OS of 15.1 months, with 73.3% having any AE and 13.3% having grade ≥3 AEs. (4) Conclusions: Cabozantinib had good anti-tumor activity, survival benefits, and acceptable tolerability in real-life aHCC patients.

Recent Advances and Future Prospects in Immune Checkpoint (ICI)-Based Combination Therapy for Advanced HCC.

Advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma has a dismal outcome. Multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed-cell death 1 pathway (PD-1/L1) have been approved for the treatment of advanced HCC. However, outcomes remain undesirable and unpredictable on a patient-to-patient basis. The combination of anti-PD-1/L1 with alternative agents, chiefly cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs or agents targeting other oncogenic pathways such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway and the c-MET pathway, has, in addition to the benefit of directly targeting alterative oncogenic pathways, in vitro evidence of synergism through altering the genomic and function signatures of T cells and expression of immune checkpoints. Several trials have been completed or are underway evaluating such combinations. Finally, studies utilizing transcriptomics and organoids are underway to establish biomarkers to predict ICI response. This review aims to discuss the biological rationale and clinical advances in ICI-based combinations in HCCs, as well as the progress and prospects of the search for the aforementioned biomarkers in ICI treatment of HCC.

Nivolumab + Ipilimumab for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with Sorafenib.

INTRODUCTION: The systemic treatment of advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has undergone an evolution in recent years. In March 2020, a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was approved by the FDA for treatment of patients with advanced HCC who received prior sorafenib. This was based on the results of the phase I/II CheckMate-040 cohort 4 trials, which showed a promising overall response rate and encouraging overall survival with a manageable safety profile. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of nivolumab-ipilimumab in advanced HCC with prior sorafenib. Other existing systemic treatment options for advanced HCC will be described and compared to nivolumab-ipilimumab. Impact of different dose regimes, ongoing research and future developments of nivolumab-ipilimumab will be discussed. We focus on the analysis from the aforementioned CheckMate-040 cohort 4 registration trial. EXPERT OPINION: The approval of nivolumab-ipilimumab in the second-line treatment of advanced HCC by the FDA is an important development for treatment of advanced HCC. However, further investigations are needed to optimize dosing regimens and explore the use of nivolumab-ipilimumab in other combinations and settings.

Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to prior immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in patients with advanced HCC with progression on prior ICIs. METHODS: Patients with advanced HCC with documented tumor progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analyzed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range: 51-83). About 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) Grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range: 2.76-30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% CI: 1.61 to 4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 3.99 to 17.8) and the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6%, respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI Grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively). Overall, 52% of patients experienced TRAEs and 12% experienced Grade 3 or above TRAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab can achieve durable antitumor activity and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC who had prior treatment with ICIs.

Thyroid Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Treated with anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination: Clinical Course and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported to have prognostic significance among patients with cancer treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD1) and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 monotherapies. We evaluated the clinical course and predictors of thyroid irAEs in relation to outcomes of patients with advanced cancer treated with combination anti-PD1/anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4). METHODS: We conducted a regional study and identified patients with advanced cancer who received ≥1 cycle of combination anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 between 2015 and 2019 in Hong Kong. Thyroid function tests (TFTs) were monitored every 3 weeks. Thyroid irAE was defined by ≥2 abnormal TFTs after initiation of combination anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 in the absence of other causes. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were included (median age: 59 years; 71.8% men). About 45% had prior anti-PD1 exposure. Upon median follow-up of 6.8 months, 17 patients (16.5%) developed thyroid irAEs, where 6 initially presented with thyrotoxicosis (overt, n = 4; subclinical, n = 2) and 11 with hypothyroidism (overt, n = 2; subclinical, n = 9). Eventually, 10 patients (58.8%) required continuous thyroxine replacement. Systemic steroid was not required in all cases. Prior anti-PD1 exposure (odds ratio, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.19-11.4; P = .024) independently predicted thyroid irAEs. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that occurrence of thyroid irAEs was independently associated with better overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.71; P = .004). CONCLUSION: Thyroid irAEs are common in routine clinical practice among patients with advanced cancer treated with anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 combination and might have potential prognostic significance. Regular TFT monitoring is advised for timely treatment of thyroid irAEs to prevent potential morbidities.