RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of an eight-week cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program on cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) and key cardiopulmonary exercise test measures, quality of life, and symptom burden in individuals with Long COVID. DESIGN: Forty individuals with Long COVID (mean age 53 ± 11 years), were randomized into 2 groups: 1/ Rehabilitation group: centre-based individualized clinical rehabilitation program (8 weeks, 3 sessions per week of aerobic and resistance exercises, and daily inspiratory muscle training) and 2/ Control group: individuals maintained their daily habits during an eight-week period. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between groups in mean VO2peak improvement (p = 0.003). VO2peak improved significantly in the rehab group (+2.7 mL.kg.min 95%IC:+1.6 to +3.8 p < 0.001) compared to the control group (+0.3 mL.kg.min 95%IC:-0.8 to +1.3 p = 0.596), along withVE/VCO2 slope (p = 0.032) (-2.4 95%IC:-4.8 to +0.01 p = 0.049 and + 1.3 95%IC:-1.0 to +3.6 p = 0.272 respectively) and VO2 at first ventilatory threshold (p = 0.045). Furthermore, all symptom impact scales improved significantly in the rehabilitation group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An individualized and supervised cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program was effective in improving cardiorespiratory fitness, ventilatory efficiency, and symptom burden in individuals with Long COVID. Careful monitoring of symptoms is important to appropriately tailor and adjust rehabilitation sessions.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The cardiovascular benefits of low-dose colchicine have been demonstrated in patients with coronary disease. Its effects were evaluated in this prespecified analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: COLCOT was a randomized, double-blinded trial of colchicine, 0.5 mg daily, versus placebo initiated within 30 days after a myocardial infarction. RESULTS: There were 959 patients with T2D enrolled and monitored for a median of 22.6 months. A primary end point event occurred in 8.7% of patients in the colchicine group and in 13.1% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.44-0.96; P = 0.03). Nausea was reported in 2.7% and 0.8% in the study groups (P = 0.03), and pneumonia occurred in 2.4% and 0.4% (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with T2D and a recent myocardial infarction, colchicine, 0.5 mg daily, leads to a large reduction of cardiovascular events. These results support the conduct of the COLCOT-T2D trial in primary prevention.
Assuntos
Sistema Cardiovascular , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Infarto do Miocárdio , Humanos , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Colchicina/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/induzido quimicamente , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite proven programmes, implementing lifestyle interventions for pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes is challenging. Cardiac rehabilitation, provide a valuable opportunity to promote the adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviours for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, only a limited number of studies have explored the potential for reversing the underlying causes of ASCVD in this setting. OBJECTIVES: The DIABEPIC1 study is an ongoing single-arm lifestyle clinical trial to assess the feasibility of an upgraded 6-month intensive cardiac rehabilitation programme combining an innovative diet assignment with exercise training to reverse newly onset pre-diabetes (glycated haemoglobin 5.7%-6.4%) to normal glucose concentrations in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 36 patients referred from the Montreal Heart Institute for cardiac rehabilitation, aged ≥40 years with a recent diagnosis of pre-diabetes in the last 6 months, will be offered to participate in the upgraded programme. Interventions will include four sessions of nutritional counselling on ultra-processed foods intake reduction and a moderate-carbohydrate (<40%) ad libitum Mediterranean diet coupled with 36 1-hour sessions of supervised exercise training (continuous and interval aerobic training, and resistance training) and educational intervention. Phase 2 will continue the same interventions adding 8:16 hour time-restricting eating (TRE) at least 5 days per week. During this second phase, exercise training will be performed with autonomy. The primary objectives will be to evaluate the recruitment rate, the completion rates at 3 and 6 months, and the compliance of participants. The secondary objectives will be to assess the proportion of prediabetic participants in remission of pre-diabetes at the programme's end and to characterise the factors associated with remission. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The DIABEPIC1 feasibility study is approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Montreal Heart Institute (Project Number ICM 2022-3005). Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant prior to inclusion. Results will be available through research articles and conferences. CONCLUSIONS: The DIABEPIC1 trial will examine the feasibility and effectiveness of an enhanced cardiac rehabilitation programme combining exercise training with an ultra-processed food reduction intervention, a Mediterranean diet, and TRE counselling to remit pre-diabetes to normal glucose concentrations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05459987.
Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca , Doença das Coronárias , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Dieta Mediterrânea , Estado Pré-Diabético , Humanos , Reabilitação Cardíaca/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , GlucoseRESUMO
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality with both monogenic and polygenic components. We here report results from the largest HCM genome-wide association study (GWAS) and multi-trait analysis (MTAG) including 5,900 HCM cases, 68,359 controls, and 36,083 UK Biobank (UKB) participants with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. We identified a total of 70 loci (50 novel) associated with HCM, and 62 loci (32 novel) associated with relevant left ventricular (LV) structural or functional traits. Amongst the common variant HCM loci, we identify a novel HCM disease gene, SVIL, which encodes the actin-binding protein supervillin, showing that rare truncating SVIL variants cause HCM. Mendelian randomization analyses support a causal role of increased LV contractility in both obstructive and non-obstructive forms of HCM, suggesting common disease mechanisms and anticipating shared response to therapy. Taken together, the findings significantly increase our understanding of the genetic basis and molecular mechanisms of HCM, with potential implications for disease management.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Although lifestyle interventions are first-line treatment for individuals living with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D), they are rarely implemented effectively in routine clinical care. METHODS: We present a retrospective analysis of a 12-month, single-centre, structured multidomain lifestyle intervention clinic offered to individuals living with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. The intervention consisted of expert-guided educational and nutritional counselling combined with a personalized physical exercise prescription, with the main goal of improving metabolic health and reaching remission. Anthropometric parameters, glucose, basal insulin, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), and lipid levels were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the lifestyle intervention initiation. Remission of prediabetes and T2D were defined as a return of A1C at 6 months to <6.5% (or <5.7% for prediabetes) and persisting for at least 3 months in the absence of glucose-lowering pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: After a multidomain, expert-guided lifestyle intervention, 117 individuals living with prediabetes and T2D had significantly improved metabolic profiles: Mean weight change at 12 months was -4.9 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.0 to -5.7; p<0.001), and mean change in A1C at 12 months was -0.6% (95% CI, -0.4 to -0.7; p<0.001). A substantial proportion of individuals reached the criteria for remission (20% among participants with prediabetes and 12% among those with T2D). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that prioritizing lifestyle changes in a multifaceted, progressive, 12-month intervention in this population improves anthropometric and insulin resistance measures, and has the potential to normalize metabolic values, even to the point of reaching the criteria of remission.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Estado Pré-Diabético , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Estilo de Vida , GlucoseRESUMO
AIMS: In a retrospective analysis of dal-Outcomes, the effect of dalcetrapib on cardiovascular events was influenced by an adenylate cyclase type 9 (ADCY9) gene polymorphism. The dal-GenE study was conducted to test this pharmacogenetic hypothesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: dal-GenE was a double-blind trial in patients with an acute coronary syndrome within 1-3 months and the AA genotype at variant rs1967309 in the ADCY9 gene. A total of 6147 patients were randomly assigned to receive dalcetrapib 600â mg or placebo daily. The primary endpoint was the time from randomization to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. After a median follow-up of 39.9 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 292 (9.5%) of 3071 patients in the dalcetrapib group and 327 (10.6%) of 3076 patients in the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.03; P = 0.12]. The hazard ratios for the components of the primary endpoint were 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.96) for myocardial infarction, 0.92 (95% CI 0.64-1.33) for stroke, 1.21 (95% CI 0.91-1.60) for death from cardiovascular causes, and 2.33 (95% CI 0.60-9.02) for resuscitated cardiac arrest. In a pre-specified on-treatment sensitivity analysis, the primary endpoint event rate was 7.8% (236/3015) in the dalcetrapib group and 9.3% (282/3031) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.98). CONCLUSION: Dalcetrapib did not significantly reduce the risk of occurrence of the primary endpoint of ischaemic cardiovascular events at end of study. A new trial would be needed to test the pharmacogenetic hypothesis that dalcetrapib improves the prognosis of patients with the AA genotype. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration dal-GenE ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02525939.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Anticolesterolemiantes , Parada Cardíaca , Infarto do Miocárdio , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/genética , Adenilil Ciclases/genética , Adenilil Ciclases/uso terapêutico , Amidas , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Ésteres , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/genética , Farmacogenética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de SulfidrilaRESUMO
(1) Background: Cardiopulmonary and brain functions are frequently impaired after COVID-19 infection. Exercise rehabilitation could have a major impact on the healing process of patients affected by long COVID-19. (2) Methods: The COVID-Rehab study will investigate the effectiveness of an eight-week cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program on cardiorespiratory fitness (VËO2max) in long-COVID-19 individuals. Secondary objectives will include functional capacity, quality of life, perceived stress, sleep quality (questionnaires), respiratory capacity (spirometry test), coagulation, inflammatory and oxidative-stress profile (blood draw), cognition (neuropsychological tests), neurovascular coupling and pulsatility (fNIRS). The COVID-Rehab project was a randomised clinical trial with two intervention arms (1:1 ratio) that will be blindly evaluated. It will recruit a total of 40 individuals: (1) rehabilitation: centre-based exercise-training program (eight weeks, three times per week); (2) control: individuals will have to maintain their daily habits. (3) Conclusions: Currently, there are no specific rehabilitation guidelines for long-COVID-19 patients, but preliminary studies show encouraging results. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05035628).
Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicações , Dispneia/etiologia , Fadiga , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-AgudaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important predictor of neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) and adverse clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). LABR-312, a novel intravenous formulation of liposomal alendronate, has been shown in animal models to decrease NIH at vascular injury sites and around stent struts. The aim of the Biorest Liposomal Alendronate Administration for Diabetic Patients Undergoing Drug-Eluting Stent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention trial was to assess the safety, effectiveness, and dose response of LABR-312 administered intravenously at the time of PCI withDES in reducing NIH as measured by optical coherence tomography postprocedure in patients with DM. METHODS: Patients with DM were randomized to a bolus infusion of LABR-312 vs placebo at the time of PCI. Dose escalation of LABR-312 in the study arm was given: 0.01 mg, 0.03 mg, and 0.08 mg. The primary endpoint was the in-stent %NIH volume at 9 months as measured by optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: From September 2016 to December 2017, 271 patients with DM undergoing PCI were enrolled; 136 patients were randomized to LABR-312 infusion and 135 patients were randomized to placebo. At 9-month follow-up, no difference was seen in the primary endpoint of %NIH between LABR-312 and placebo (13.3% ± 9.2 vs 14.6% ± 8.5, P = .35). No differences were present with the varying LABR-312 doses. Clinical outcomes at 9 months were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with DM undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents, a bolus of LABR-312 injected systematically at the time of intervention did not result in a lower rate in-stent %NIH volume at 9-month follow-up.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Diabetes Mellitus , Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Alendronato , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Humanos , Neointima/etiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Intravascular catheter positioning is done with radiography imaging. Increasing evidence indicates excessive ionizing radiation exposure for patients and physicians during catheterization procedures, making solutions to reduce radiation exposure a priority. This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of using sensor-based magnetic navigation on (i) fluoroscopy time and (ii) positioning accuracy and safety of a peripheral angioplasty balloon catheter. METHODS: All patients (n = 10) underwent a balloon-positioning protocol using 2 navigation methods sequentially: (i) magnetic navigation with minimal fluoroscopy; (ii) fluoroscopic navigation. The navigation method order was randomized, and 4 consecutive placements per method were performed. A target vascular bifurcation was used as a fiduciary landmark for both methods to determine accuracy. RESULTS: Balloon placements were successful with both navigation methods in all subjects, and no adverse events occurred. Magnetic guidance led to significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (0.37 ± 1.5 vs 15.0 ± 8.1 seconds, P < 0.001) and dose (0.3 ± 1.2 vs 24.1 ± 23.8 µGy.m2, P < 0.01). The time duration for balloon alignment was similar for the 2 navigation methods (4.8 ± 1.4 vs 4.8 ± 2.3 seconds, P = 0.89), and the accuracy was almost identical (0.51 ± 0.41 vs 0.51 ± 0.32 mm, P = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility of using sensor-based magnetic guidance during simple peripheral interventional procedures; a significant reduction in ionizing radiation was achieved, with excellent positioning accuracy and safety. The clinical applications of magnetic guidance for device navigation during more complex percutaneous procedures should be evaluated.
CONTEXTE: Le positionnement d'un cathéter intravasculaire fait appel à l'imagerie radiographique. De plus en plus de données probantes indiquent que les patients et les médecins subissent une surexposition aux rayonnements ionisants pendant le cathétérisme, ce qui fait des solutions de réduction de l'irradiation une priorité. Cette étude a permis d'évaluer la faisabilité du guidage magnétique par capteur et son effet sur (i) la durée de la fluoroscopie et (ii) la précision et la sécurité du positionnement d'un cathéter d'angioplastie périphérique à ballonnet. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Chez tous les patients (n = 10), le positionnement du ballonnet a été effectué en fonction d'un protocole fondé sur deux méthodes de guidage mises en Åuvre séquentiellement : (i) guidage magnétique avec fluoroscopie minimale; (ii) guidage fluoroscopique. L'ordre dans lequel les méthodes de guidage ont été mises en Åuvre a été randomisé, et quatre positionnements consécutifs par méthode ont été effectués. Une bifurcation vasculaire cible a servi de repère de fond de chambre afin de déterminer la précision des deux méthodes. RÉSULTATS: Les deux méthodes de guidage ont permis un positionnement adéquat du ballonnet chez tous les patients, et aucun événement indésirable n'est survenu. Le guidage magnétique a entraîné des réductions significatives de la durée de la fluoroscopie (0,37 ± 1,5 vs 15,0 ± 8,1 secondes, p < 0,001) et de la dose de rayonnement (0,3 ± 1,2 vs 24,1 ± 23,8 µGy.m2, p < 0,01). La durée de l'alignement du ballonnet était similaire lors de la mise en Åuvre des deux méthodes de guidage (4,8 ± 1,4 vs 4,8 ± 2,3 secondes, p = 0,89), et la précision était presque identique (0,51 ± 0,41 vs 0,51 ± 0,32 mm, p = 0,97). CONCLUSIONS: Ces résultats démontrent la faisabilité du guidage magnétique par capteur dans le cadre d'angioplasties périphériques simples. L'exposition aux rayonnements ionisants a été réduite de façon significative, et la précision ainsi que la sécurité du positionnement se sont avérées excellentes. Les applications cliniques du guidage magnétique dans le contexte d'interventions percutanées plus complexes représentent une avenue de recherche à explorer.
RESUMO
A better understanding of the central role of inflammation in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been the impetus for the evaluation of therapeutic strategies targeting the interleukin-1ß/interleukin-6 cytokine signaling pathway, involved in both chronic atherogenesis and in triggering of atherosclerotic plaque rupture. As an inexpensive pharmacologic agent with relatively few adverse effects that tend to be mild and tolerable, the role of colchicine in secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events has been the focus of multiple recent large-scale randomized controlled trials involving patients with stable CAD (Low-Dose Colchicine [LoDoCo] and LoDoCo2 trials), a recent myocardial infarction (Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcome Trial [COLCOT], Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [COPS], and Colchicine and Spironolactone in Patients With Myocardial Infarction/Synergy Stent Registry [CLEAR SYNERGY] trials), and undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (Colchicine in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [COLCHICINE-PCI] trial). Based on this evidence, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) should be considered in patients with recent myocardial infarctions-within 30 days and, ideally, within 3 days-or with stable CAD to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Colchicine should not be used in patients with severe renal or hepatic disease because of the risk of severe toxicity. No serious adverse effect was associated with the combined use of colchicine and high-intensity statin therapy in large trials. The impact of colchicine in high-risk populations of patients with peripheral arterial disease and in those with diabetes for the primary prevention of CAD remains to be established.
Assuntos
Colchicina/farmacologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/prevenção & controle , Doença Arterial Periférica/prevenção & controle , Placa Aterosclerótica/prevenção & controle , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Supressores da Gota/farmacologia , Humanos , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicaçõesRESUMO
Coronary artery fistula are anomalous connections with coronary vessels or cardiac chambers, potentially resulting in coronary dilatation and pseudoaneurysm formation. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman referred to our institution for a voluminous coronary pseudoaneurysm secondary to coronary artery fistula presenting as a nearly completely obstructive left atrial mass. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
RESUMO
We conducted a genome-wide association study of time to remission of COVID-19 symptoms in 1723 outpatients with at least one risk factor for disease severity from the COLCORONA clinical trial. We found a significant association at 5p13.3 (rs1173773; P = 4.94 × 10-8) near the natriuretic peptide receptor 3 gene (NPR3). By day 15 of the study, 44%, 54% and 59% of participants with 0, 1, or 2 copies of the effect allele respectively, had symptom remission. In 851 participants not treated with colchicine (placebo), there was a significant association at 9q33.1 (rs62575331; P = 2.95 × 10-8) in interaction with colchicine (P = 1.19 × 10-5) without impact on risk of hospitalisations, highlighting a possibly shared mechanistic pathway. By day 15 of the study, 46%, 62% and 64% of those with 0, 1, or 2 copies of the effect allele respectively, had symptom remission. The findings need to be replicated and could contribute to the biological understanding of COVID-19 symptom remission.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Adulto , COVID-19/genética , COVID-19/patologia , COVID-19/virologia , Cromossomos Humanos Par 5/genética , Cromossomos Humanos Par 9/genética , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Frequência do Gene , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Efeito Placebo , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a role for excessive inflammation in COVID-19 complications. Colchicine is an oral anti-inflammatory medication beneficial in gout, pericarditis, and coronary disease. We aimed to investigate the effect of colchicine on the composite of COVID-19-related death or hospital admission. METHODS: The present study is a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, adaptive, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The study was done in Brazil, Canada, Greece, South Africa, Spain, and the USA, and was led by the Montreal Heart Institute. Patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by PCR testing or clinical criteria who were not being treated in hospital were eligible if they were at least 40 years old and had at least one high-risk characteristic. The randomisation list was computer-generated by an unmasked biostatistician, and masked randomisation was centralised and done electronically through an automated interactive web-response system. The allocation sequence was unstratified and used a 1:1 ratio with a blocking schema and block sizes of six. Patients were randomly assigned to receive orally administered colchicine (0·5 mg twice per day for 3 days and then once per day for 27 days thereafter) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death or hospital admission for COVID-19. Vital status at the end of the study was available for 97·9% of patients. The analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The COLCORONA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04322682) and is now closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Trial enrolment began in March 23, 2020, and was completed in Dec 22, 2020. A total of 4488 patients (53·9% women; median age 54·0 years, IQR 47·0-61·0) were enrolled and 2235 patients were randomly assigned to colchicine and 2253 to placebo. The primary endpoint occurred in 104 (4·7%) of 2235 patients in the colchicine group and 131 (5·8%) of 2253 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 0·79, 95·1% CI 0·61-1·03; p=0·081). Among the 4159 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the primary endpoint occurred in 96 (4·6%) of 2075 patients in the colchicine group and 126 (6·0%) of 2084 patients in the placebo group (OR 0·75, 0·57-0·99; p=0·042). Serious adverse events were reported in 108 (4·9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 139 (6·3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0·051); pneumonia occurred in 63 (2·9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 92 (4·1%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0·021). Diarrhoea was reported in 300 (13·7%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 161 (7·3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: In community-treated patients including those without a mandatory diagnostic test, the effect of colchicine on COVID-19-related clinical events was not statistically significant. Among patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, colchicine led to a lower rate of the composite of death or hospital admission than placebo. Given the absence of orally administered therapies to prevent COVID-19 complications in community-treated patients and the benefit of colchicine in patients with PCR-proven COVID-19, this safe and inexpensive anti-inflammatory agent could be considered for use in those at risk of complications. Notwithstanding these considerations, replication in other studies of PCR-positive community-treated patients is recommended. FUNDING: The Government of Quebec, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health, the Montreal Heart Institute Foundation, the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, the Rudin Family Foundation, and philanthropist Sophie Desmarais.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Colchicina , Administração Oral , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Colchicina/administração & dosagem , Colchicina/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is one of the most common genetic cardiac diseases and encompasses an array of clinical presentations. Little is known about the impact of genetic background on outcomes after septal myectomy (SM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of specific genetic mutations on midterm outcomes in adults undergoing SM for HOCM. METHODS: From 2003 to 2020, a total of 59 patients (male = 66%, mean age = 52 ± 13) underwent SM after a preoperative genetic test. Patients were divided into two groups according to their test result (positive or negative). Preoperative echocardiograms were examined to identify phenotypical characteristics of each mutation. RESULTS: A total of thirty-one patients (53%) had a positive genetic test. MYBPC3 was the most common mutation (15/31 patients). Four different phenotypes were identified on preoperative echocardiograms. Overall, Type 1 phenotype was the most common (37% of the cohort). Type 3 was found exclusively in patients with a positive genetic test. Following SM, none of the patients required a redo myectomy or septal ablation. At 10 years, the survival was 97 ± 3% and 100% in patients with a positive and negative genetic test (p = .33), respectively. CONCLUSION: Although our results suggest that the multiple gene mutations present with different characteristics and phenotypes, midterm results of SM appear to be good regardless of genetic mutation presence.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica , Ablação por Cateter , Testes Genéticos , Adulto , Idoso , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/genética , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/cirurgia , Septos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Septos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The randomized, placebo-controlled COLCOT (Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial) has shown the benefits of colchicine 0.5 mg daily to lower the rate of ischemic cardiovascular events in patients with a recent myocardial infarction. Here, we conducted a post hoc pharmacogenomic study of COLCOT with the aim to identify genetic predictors of the efficacy and safety of treatment with colchicine. METHODS: There were 1522 participants of European ancestry from the COLCOT trial available for the pharmacogenomic study of COLCOT trial. The pharmacogenomic study's primary cardiovascular end point was defined as for the main trial, as time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina requiring coronary revascularization. The safety end point was time to the first report of gastrointestinal events. Patients' DNA was genotyped using the Illumina Global Screening array followed by imputation. We performed a genome-wide association study in colchicine-treated patients. RESULTS: None of the genetic variants passed the genome-wide association study significance threshold for the primary cardiovascular end point conducted in 702 patients in the colchicine arm who were compliant to medication. The genome-wide association study for gastrointestinal events was conducted in all 767 patients in the colchicine arm and found 2 significant association signals, one with lead variant rs6916345 (hazard ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.52-2.35], P=7.41×10-9) in a locus which colocalizes with Crohn disease, and one with lead variant rs74795203 (hazard ratio, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.82-3.47]; P=2.70×10-8), an intronic variant in gene SEPHS1. The interaction terms between the genetic variants and treatment with colchicine versus placebo were significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found 2 genomic regions associated with gastrointestinal events in patients treated with colchicine. Those findings will benefit from replication to confirm that some patients may have genetic predispositions to lower tolerability of treatment with colchicine.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Farmacogenética , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/patologia , Colchicina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fosfotransferases/genética , Efeito Placebo , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The heart muscle diseases hypertrophic (HCM) and dilated (DCM) cardiomyopathies are leading causes of sudden death and heart failure in young, otherwise healthy, individuals. We conducted genome-wide association studies and multi-trait analyses in HCM (1,733 cases), DCM (5,521 cases) and nine left ventricular (LV) traits (19,260 UK Biobank participants with structurally normal hearts). We identified 16 loci associated with HCM, 13 with DCM and 23 with LV traits. We show strong genetic correlations between LV traits and cardiomyopathies, with opposing effects in HCM and DCM. Two-sample Mendelian randomization supports a causal association linking increased LV contractility with HCM risk. A polygenic risk score explains a significant portion of phenotypic variability in carriers of HCM-causing rare variants. Our findings thus provide evidence that polygenic risk score may account for variability in Mendelian diseases. More broadly, we provide insights into how genetic pathways may lead to distinct disorders through opposing genetic effects.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/genética , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/genética , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/mortalidade , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/fisiopatologia , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/mortalidade , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Frequência do Gene , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Ventrículos do Coração/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Desequilíbrio de Ligação , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Locos de Características Quantitativas , Função Ventricular Esquerda/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although prior studies have demonstrated racial disparities regarding acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care within private or mixed healthcare systems, few researchers have explored such disparities within universal healthcare systems. We aimed to evaluate the quality and outcomes of in-hospital ACS management for White patients vs patients of colour, within a universal healthcare context. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Acute Myocardial Infarction - Knowledge Translation to Optimize Adherence to Evidence-Based Therapy study, a cluster-randomized trial evaluating a knowledge-translation intervention at 24 hospitals in Quebec, Canada (years: 2009 and 2012). The primary endpoint was coronary catheterization. The secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization, major bleeding, total stroke, and discharge prescription of evidence-based medical therapy. RESULTS: Of 3444 included patients, 2738 were White, and 706 were people of colour. The mean age was 68.2 years (33.3% women) among White patients and 69.5 years (36.0% women) among patients of colour. Patients of colour were less likely to undergo in-hospital coronary catheterization than were White patients (74.5% vs 80.3%, P = 0.001). This difference was attenuated after adjusting for patient-level characteristics (odds ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.09), and it was eliminated after adjusting for hospital-level characteristics (odds ratio 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparity in coronary catheterization for ACS persists within a universal healthcare context. Patients' comorbidities and hospital-level factors may be partially responsible for this inequality. Future research on cardiovascular healthcare in patients with diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds in universal healthcare systems is needed to remediate racial inequality in ACS management.
CONTEXTE: Bien que des études antérieures aient démontré l'existence de disparités raciales dans la prise en charge du syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) au sein de systèmes de santé privés ou mixtes, peu de chercheurs ont étudié ces disparités au sein de systèmes universels de soins de santé. Nous avons cherché à évaluer la qualité et les résultats de la prise en charge du SCA à l'hôpital pour les patients blancs par rapport aux patients de couleur, dans un contexte de soins de santé universels. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons effectué une analyse a posteriori de l'étude AMI-OPTIMA, un essai sur échantillon en grappes aléatoire évaluant une intervention d'application des connaissances dans 24 hôpitaux du Québec, au Canada (années : 2009 et 2012). Le paramètre d'évaluation principal était le cathétérisme coronaire. Les paramètres d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la mortalité à l'hôpital, la revascularisation coronaire percutanée et chirurgicale, l'hémorragie majeure, l'accident vasculaire cérébral et la prescription au congé d'un traitement médical fondé sur des données probantes. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 3444 patients étudiés, 2738 étaient blancs et 706 étaient des personnes de couleur. L'âge moyen était de 68,2 ans (33,3 % de femmes) chez les patients blancs, et de 69,5 ans (36,0 % de femmes) chez les patients de couleur. Les patients de couleur étaient moins susceptibles de subir un cathétérisme coronaire à l'hôpital que les patients blancs (74,5 % contre 80,3 %, p = 0,001). Cette différence a été atténuée après ajustement pour tenir compte des caractéristiques des patients (rapport de cotes : 0,89; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 0,73-1,09), et éliminée après ajustement pour tenir compte des caractéristiques des hôpitaux (rapport de cotes : 1,04; IC à 95 % : 0,73-1,49). CONCLUSIONS: La disparité raciale en ce qui a trait au cathétérisme coronaire pour un SCA persiste dans un contexte de soins de santé universels. Les comorbidités des patients et des facteurs liés à l'hôpital peuvent être partiellement responsables de cette inégalité. De plus amples recherches sur les soins cardiovasculaires chez les patients de diverses origines raciales ou ethniques dans les systèmes universels de soins de santé sont nécessaires pour remédier aux inégalités raciales dans la prise en charge du SCA.
RESUMO
AIMS: In the randomized, placebo-controlled Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT) of 4745 patients enrolled within 30 days after myocardial infarction (MI), low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduced the incidence of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, MI, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina leading to coronary revascularization. To assess the in-trial period and lifetime cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine therapy compared to placebo in post-MI patients on standard-of-care therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multistate Markov model was developed incorporating the primary efficacy and safety results from COLCOT, as well as healthcare costs and utilities from the Canadian healthcare system perspective. All components of the primary outcome, non-cardiovascular deaths, and pneumonia were included as health states in the model as both primary and recurrent events. In the main analysis, a deterministic approach was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the trial period (24 months) and lifetime (20 years). Over the in-trial period, the addition of colchicine to post-MI standard-of-care treatment decreased the mean overall per-patient costs by 47%, from $502 to $265 Canadian dollar (CAD), and increased the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from 1.30 to 1.34. The lifetime per-patient costs were further reduced (69%) and QALYs increased with colchicine therapy (from 8.82 to 11.68). As a result, both in-trial and lifetime ICERs indicated colchicine therapy was a dominant strategy. CONCLUSION: Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that the addition of colchicine to standard-of-care therapy after MI is economically dominant and therefore generates cost savings.
Assuntos
Colchicina , Infarto do Miocárdio , Canadá/epidemiologia , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
AIMS: The COLchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT) demonstrated the benefits of targeting inflammation after myocardial infarction (MI). We aimed to determine whether time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) influences the beneficial impact of colchicine. METHODS AND RESULTS: In COLCOT, patients were randomly assigned to receive colchicine or placebo within 30 days post-MI. Time-to-treatment initiation was defined as the length of time between the index MI and the initiation of study medication. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, MI, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina requiring coronary revascularization. The relationship between endpoints and various TTI (<3, 4-7 and >8 days) was examined using multivariable Cox regression models. Amongst the 4661 patients included in this analysis, there were 1193, 720, and 2748 patients, respectively, in the three TTI strata. After a median follow-up of 22.7 months, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint for patients in whom colchicine was initiated < Day 3 compared with placebo [hazard ratios (HR) = 0.52, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.32-0.84], in contrast to patients in whom colchicine was initiated between Days 4 and 7 (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.53-1.75) or > Day 8 (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.11). The beneficial effects of early initiation of colchicine were also demonstrated for urgent hospitalization for angina requiring revascularization (HR = 0.35), all coronary revascularization (HR = 0.63), and the composite of cardiovascular death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, MI, or stroke (HR = 0.55, all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients benefit from early, in-hospital initiation of colchicine after MI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: COLCOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02551094.