Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: There is a large body of evidence evaluating quality improvement (QI) programmes to improve care for adults living with diabetes. These programmes are often comprised of multiple QI strategies, which may be implemented in various combinations. Decision-makers planning to implement or evaluate a new QI programme, or both, need reliable evidence on the relative effectiveness of different QI strategies (individually and in combination) for different patient populations. OBJECTIVES: To update existing systematic reviews of diabetes QI programmes and apply novel meta-analytical techniques to estimate the effectiveness of QI strategies (individually and in combination) on diabetes quality of care. SEARCH METHODS: We searched databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL) and trials registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP) to 4 June 2019. We conducted a top-up search to 23 September 2021; we screened these search results and 42 studies meeting our eligibility criteria are available in the awaiting classification section. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials that assessed a QI programme to improve care in outpatient settings for people living with diabetes. QI programmes needed to evaluate at least one system- or provider-targeted QI strategy alone or in combination with a patient-targeted strategy. - System-targeted: case management (CM); team changes (TC); electronic patient registry (EPR); facilitated relay of clinical information (FR); continuous quality improvement (CQI). - Provider-targeted: audit and feedback (AF); clinician education (CE); clinician reminders (CR); financial incentives (FI). - Patient-targeted: patient education (PE); promotion of self-management (PSM); patient reminders (PR). Patient-targeted QI strategies needed to occur with a minimum of one provider or system-targeted strategy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We dual-screened search results and abstracted data on study design, study population and QI strategies. We assessed the impact of the programmes on 13 measures of diabetes care, including: glycaemic control (e.g. mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)); cardiovascular risk factor management (e.g. mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), proportion of people living with diabetes that quit smoking or receiving cardiovascular medications); and screening/prevention of microvascular complications (e.g. proportion of patients receiving retinopathy or foot screening); and harms (e.g. proportion of patients experiencing adverse hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia). We modelled the association of each QI strategy with outcomes using a series of hierarchical multivariable meta-regression models in a Bayesian framework. The previous version of this review identified that different strategies were more or less effective depending on baseline levels of outcomes. To explore this further, we extended the main additive model for continuous outcomes (HbA1c, SBP and LDL-C) to include an interaction term between each strategy and average baseline risk for each study (baseline thresholds were based on a data-driven approach; we used the median of all baseline values reported in the trials). Based on model diagnostics, the baseline interaction models for HbA1c, SBP and LDL-C performed better than the main model and are therefore presented as the primary analyses for these outcomes. Based on the model results, we qualitatively ordered each QI strategy within three tiers (Top, Middle, Bottom) based on its magnitude of effect relative to the other QI strategies, where 'Top' indicates that the QI strategy was likely one of the most effective strategies for that specific outcome. Secondary analyses explored the sensitivity of results to choices in model specification and priors.  Additional information about the methods and results of the review are available as Appendices in an online repository. This review will be maintained as a living systematic review; we will update our syntheses as more data become available. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 553 trials (428 patient-randomised and 125 cluster-randomised trials), including a total of 412,161 participants. Of the included studies, 66% involved people living with type 2 diabetes only. Participants were 50% female and the median age of participants was 58.4 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.5 months. HbA1c was the commonest reported outcome; screening outcomes and outcomes related to cardiovascular medications, smoking and harms were reported infrequently. The most frequently evaluated QI strategies across all study arms were PE, PSM and CM, while the least frequently evaluated QI strategies included AF, FI and CQI. Our confidence in the evidence is limited due to a lack of information on how studies were conducted.  Four QI strategies (CM, TC, PE, PSM) were consistently identified as 'Top' across the majority of outcomes. All QI strategies were ranked as 'Top' for at least one key outcome. The majority of effects of individual QI strategies were modest, but when used in combination could result in meaningful population-level improvements across the majority of outcomes. The median number of QI strategies in multicomponent QI programmes was three.  Combinations of the three most effective QI strategies were estimated to lead to the below effects:  - PR + PSM + CE: decrease in HbA1c by 0.41% (credibility interval (CrI) -0.61 to -0.22) when baseline HbA1c < 8.3%; - CM + PE + EPR: decrease in HbA1c by 0.62% (CrI -0.84 to -0.39) when baseline HbA1c > 8.3%;  - PE + TC + PSM: reduction in SBP by 2.14 mmHg (CrI -3.80 to -0.52) when baseline SBP < 136 mmHg; - CM + TC + PSM: reduction in SBP by 4.39 mmHg (CrI -6.20 to -2.56) when baseline SBP > 136 mmHg;  - TC + PE + CM: LDL-C lowering of 5.73 mg/dL (CrI -7.93 to -3.61) when baseline LDL < 107 mg/dL; - TC + CM + CR: LDL-C lowering by 5.52 mg/dL (CrI -9.24 to -1.89) when baseline LDL > 107 mg/dL. Assuming a baseline screening rate of 50%, the three most effective QI strategies were estimated to lead to an absolute improvement of 33% in retinopathy screening (PE + PR + TC) and 38% absolute increase in foot screening (PE + TC + Other). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant body of evidence about QI programmes to improve the management of diabetes. Multicomponent QI programmes for diabetes care (comprised of effective QI strategies) may achieve meaningful population-level improvements across the majority of outcomes. For health system decision-makers, the evidence summarised in this review can be used to identify strategies to include in QI programmes. For researchers, this synthesis identifies higher-priority QI strategies to examine in further research regarding how to optimise their evaluation and effects. We will maintain this as a living systematic review.

Strategies to engage family physicians in primary care research: A systematic review.

RATIONALE: Moving towards high quality primary health care, involving family physicians in primary care research becomes an essential prerequisite to ensures a better adoption and routinization of patient-centred, evidence-based practices. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of strategies to engage family physicians in primary care research. METHODS: We systematically reviewed evidence for strategies used to engage family physicians in primary care research. We included any study design that reported at least one quantitative outcome. Searches were carried out on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Pairs of reviewers independently screened for publications in two stages using standardized forms. We performed data analysis through a narrative synthesis approach, using the Reasoned-action approach as framework. RESULTS: A total of 4859 deduped records were identified of which 41 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The majority of studies (n = 35) investigated family physician's participation in a research project. They aimed to influence family physicians' intention (n = 7) or their ability (n = 3) to participate in a research project. Three types of strategies (compensation/incentive, recruitment by a peer and support from a research network or an academic institution) demonstrated a significant increase in participation rate. Methodological quality of the studies evaluating these strategies was relatively low. Few studies (n = 6) targeted research capacity-building programmes with no significant impact noted. CONCLUSION: Numerous strategies have been used to engage family physicians in primary care research, but few studies evaluated their effectiveness in a rigorous way. REGISTRATION: The protocol of this review was registered with the SPOR Evidence Alliance and on the PROSPERO platform (registration number: CRD42020189322).

Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making Training Programs for Health Care Professionals Using Reflexivity Strategies: Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) leads to better health care processes through collaboration between health care professionals and patients. Training is recognized as a promising intervention to foster SDM by health care professionals. However, the most effective training type is still unclear. Reflexivity is an exercise that leads health care professionals to question their own values to better consider patient values and support patients while least influencing their decisions. Training that uses reflexivity strategies could motivate them to engage in SDM and be more open to diversity. OBJECTIVE: In this secondary analysis of a 2018 Cochrane review of interventions for improving SDM by health care professionals, we aimed to identify SDM training programs that included reflexivity strategies and were assessed as effective. In addition, we aimed to explore whether further factors can be associated with or enhance their effectiveness. METHODS: From the Cochrane review, we first extracted training programs targeting health care professionals. Second, we developed a grid to help identify training programs that used reflexivity strategies. Third, those identified were further categorized according to the type of strategy used. At each step, we identified the proportion of programs that were classified as effective by the Cochrane review (2018) so that we could compare their effectiveness. In addition, we wanted to see whether effectiveness was similar between programs using peer-to-peer group learning and those with an interprofessional orientation. Finally, the Cochrane review selected programs that were evaluated using patient-reported or observer-reported outcome measurements. We examined which of these measurements was most often used in effective training programs. RESULTS: Of the 31 training programs extracted, 24 (77%) were interactive, among which 10 (42%) were considered effective. Of these 31 programs, 7 (23%) were unidirectional, among which 1 (14%) was considered effective. Of the 24 interactive programs, 7 (29%) included reflexivity strategies. Of the 7 training programs with reflexivity strategies, 5 (71%) used a peer-to-peer group learning strategy, among which 3 (60%) were effective; the other 2 (29%) used a self-appraisal individual learning strategy, neither of which was effective. Of the 31 training programs extracted, 5 (16%) programs had an interprofessional orientation, among which 3 (60%) were effective; the remaining 26 (84%) of the 31 programs were without interprofessional orientation, among which 8 (31%) were effective. Finally, 12 (39%) of 31 programs used observer-based measurements, among which more than half (7/12, 58%) were effective. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of SDM training programs that include reflexivity strategies. Its conclusions open avenues for enriching future SDM training programs with reflexivity strategies. The grid developed to identify training programs that used reflexivity strategies, when further tested and validated, can guide future assessments of reflexivity components in SDM training.

Global prevalence of antidepressant drug utilization in the community: protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Antidepressant drugs are the most frequently prescribed medication for mental disorders. They are also used off-label and for non-psychiatric indications. Prescriptions of antidepressants have increased in the last decades, but no systematic review exists on the extent of their use in the community. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of antidepressant use in the community. We will search for studies published from 1 January 2010 in the Embase and MEDLINE databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary and keywords adjusted for each database without any language restriction. The main inclusion criterion is the presence of prevalence data of antidepressant utilization. Thus, we will include all studies with a descriptive observational design reporting the prevalence of antidepressant use in the community. Study selection (by title/abstract and full-text screening) and data extraction for included studies will be independently conducted by pairs of reviewers. We will then synthesize the data on the prevalence of antidepressant use in individuals living in the community. If possible, we will perform a meta-analysis to generate prevalence-pooled estimates. If the data allows it, we will conduct subgroup analyses by antidepressant class, age, sex, country and other sociodemographic categories. We will evaluate the risk of bias for each included study through a quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool: Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. DistillerSR software will be used for the management of this review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review as it will not directly involve human or animal subjects. The findings of our systematic review will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, the Qualaxia Network (https://qualaxia.org), presentations at international conferences on mental health and pharmacoepidemiology, as well as general public events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021247423.

Psychosocial Factors of Health Professionals' Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome are difficult for women, as they entail risk, potential loss, and regret. Shared decision making increases women's knowledge of their choices and better aligns decisions with their values. Patient decision aids foster shared decision making but are rarely used in this context. OBJECTIVE: One of the most promising strategies for implementing shared decision making is distribution of decision aids by health professionals. We aimed to identify factors influencing their intention to use a DA during prenatal visit for decisions about Down syndrome screening. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative study. Using a Web panel, we conducted a theory-based survey of health professionals in Quebec province (Canada). Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) family physicians, midwives, obstetrician-gynecologists, or trainees in these professions; (2) involved in prenatal care; and (3) working in Quebec province. Participants watched a video depicting a health professional using a decision aid during a prenatal consultation with a woman and her partner, and then answered a questionnaire based on an extended version of the theory of planned behavior, including some of the constructs of the theoretical domains framework. The questionnaire assessed 8 psychosocial constructs (attitude, anticipated regret, subjective norm, self-identity, moral norm, descriptive norm, self-efficacy, and perceived control), 7 related sets of behavioral beliefs (advantages, disadvantages, emotions, sources of encouragement or discouragement, incentives, facilitators, and barriers), and sociodemographic data. We performed descriptive, bivariate, and multiple linear regression analyses to identify factors influencing health professionals' intention to use a decision aid. RESULTS: Among 330 health professionals who completed the survey, 310 met the inclusion criteria: family physicians, 55.2% (171/310); obstetrician-gynecologists, 33.8% (105/310); and midwives, 11.0% (34/310). Of these, 80.9% were female (251/310). Mean age was 39.6 (SD 11.5) years. Less than half were aware of any decision aids at all. In decreasing order of importance, factors influencing their intention to use a decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening were as follows: self-identity (beta=.325, P<.001), attitude (beta=.297, P<.001), moral norm (beta=.288, P<.001), descriptive norm (beta=.166, P<.001), and anticipated regret (beta=.099, P=.003). Underlying behavioral beliefs significantly related to intention were that the use of a decision aid would promote decision making (beta=.117, 95% CI 0.043-0.190), would reassure health professionals (beta=.100, 95% CI 0.024-0.175), and might require more time than planned for the consultation (beta=-.077, 95% CI -0.124 to -0.031). CONCLUSIONS: We identified psychosocial factors that could influence health professionals' intention to use a decision aid about Down syndrome screening. Strategies should remind them of the following: (1) using a decision aid for this purpose should be a common practice, (2) it would be expected of someone in their societal role, (3) the experience of using it will be satisfying and reassuring, and (4) it is likely to be compatible with their moral values.

Use of a patient decision aid for prenatal screening for Down syndrome: what do pregnant women say?

BACKGROUND: Patient decision aids (PtDAs) help people make difficult, values-sensitive decisions. Prenatal screening for assessing the risk of genetic conditions in the fetus is one such decision and patient decision aids are rarely used in this clinical context. We sought to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a patient decision aid for deciding about prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS). METHODS: This qualitative study was embedded in a sequential mixed-methods research program whose main aim is to implement shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of prenatal screening for DS in the province of Quebec, Canada. We planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancy consulting for prenatal care at three clinical sites. Participating women watched a video depicting a prenatal care follow-up during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA to decide about prenatal screening for DS. The women were then interviewed about factors that would influence the use of this PtDA using questions based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We performed content analysis of transcribed verbatim interviews. RESULTS: Out of 216 eligible women, 100 agreed to participate (46% response rate) and 46 were interviewed. Regarding the type of health professional responsible for their prenatal care, 19 participants (41%) reported having made a decision about prenatal screening for DS with an obstetrician-gynecologist, 13 (28%) with a midwife, 12 (26%) with a family physician, and two (4%) decided on their own. We identified 54 factors that were mapped onto nine of the 12 TDF domains. The three most frequently-mentioned were: opinion of the pregnant woman's partner (n = 33, 72%), presentation of the PtDA by health professional and a discussion (n = 27, 72%), and not having encountered a PtDA (n = 26, 57%). CONCLUSION: This study allowed us to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a PtDA for prenatal screening for DS. Use of a PtDA by health professionals and patients is one step in providing the needed decision support and our study results will allow us to design an effective implementation strategy for PtDAs for prenatal screening for DS.

Role of Psychosocial Factors and Health Literacy in Pregnant Women's Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: A Theory-Based Web Survey.

BACKGROUND: Deciding about undergoing prenatal screening is difficult, as it entails risks, potential loss and regrets, and challenges to personal values. Shared decision making and decision aids (DAs) can help pregnant women give informed and values-based consent or refusal to prenatal screening, but little is known about factors influencing the use of DAs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the influence of psychosocial factors on pregnant women's intention to use a DA for prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS). We also added health literacy variables to explore their influence on pregnant women's intention. METHODS: We conducted a survey of pregnant women in the province of Quebec (Canada) using a Web panel. Eligibility criteria included age >18 years, >16 weeks pregnant, low-risk pregnancy, and having decided about prenatal screening for the current pregnancy. We collected data based on an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behavior assessing 7 psychosocial constructs (intention, attitude, anticipated regret, subjective norm, descriptive norm, moral norm, and perceived control), 3 related sets of beliefs (behavioral, normative, and control beliefs), 4 health literacy variables, and sociodemographics. Eligible women watched a video depicting the behavior of interest before completing a Web-based questionnaire. We performed descriptive, bivariate, and ordinal logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 383 eligible pregnant women who agreed to participate, 350 pregnant women completed the Web-based questionnaire and 346 were retained for analysis (completion rate 350/383, 91.4%; mean age 30.1, SD 4.3, years). In order of importance, factors influencing intention to use a DA for prenatal screening for DS were attitude (odds ratio, OR, 9.16, 95% CI 4.02-20.85), moral norm (OR 7.97, 95% CI 4.49-14.14), descriptive norm (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.63-4.92), and anticipated regret (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.71-3.46). Specific attitudinal beliefs significantly related to intention were that using a DA would reassure them (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.73-4.01), facilitate their reflections with their spouse (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.05-2.29), and let them know about the advantages of doing or not doing the test (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.05-2.24). Health literacy did not add to the predictive power of our model (P values range .43-.92). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation interventions targeting the use of a DA for prenatal screening for DS by pregnant women should address a number of modifiable factors, especially by introducing the advantages of using the DA (attitude), informing pregnant women that they might regret not using it (anticipated regret), and presenting the use of DAs as a common practice (descriptive norm). However, interventions on moral norms related to the use of DA should be treated with caution. Further studies that include populations with low health literacy are needed before decisive claims can be made.

What factors influence health professionals to use decision aids for Down syndrome prenatal screening?

BACKGROUND: Health professionals are expected to engage pregnant women in shared decision making to help them make informed values-based decisions about prenatal screening. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) foster shared decision-making, but are rarely used in this context. Our objective was to identify factors that could influence health professionals to use a PtDA for decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome during a clinical pregnancy follow-up. METHODS: We planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 health professionals (obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians and midwives) involved in the care of pregnant women in three clinical sites (15 per site). Participating health professionals first watched a video showing two simulated consecutive prenatal follow-up consultations during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA about Down syndrome prenatal screening. Participants were then interviewed about factors that would influence their use of the PtDA. Questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. We performed content analyses of transcribed verbatim interviews. RESULTS: Out of 42 eligible health professionals approached, 36 agreed to be interviewed (86 % response rate). Of these, 27 were female (75 %), nine were obstetrician-gynecologists (25 %), 15 were family physicians (42 %), and 12 were midwives (33 %), with a mean age of 42.1 ± 11.6 years old. We identified 35 distinct factors reported by 20 % or more participants that were mapped onto 10 of the 12 of the Theoretical Domains Framework domains. The six most frequently mentioned factors influencing use of the PtDA were: 1) a positive appraisal (n = 29, 81 %, beliefs about consequences domain); 2) its availability in the office (n = 27, 75 %, environmental context and resources domain); 3) colleagues' approval (n = 27, 75 %, social influences domain); 4) time constraints (n = 26, 72 %, environmental context and resources domain); 5) finding it a relevant source of information (n = 24, 67 %, motivation and goals domain); and 6) not knowing any PtDAs (n = 23, 64 %, knowledge domain). CONCLUSIONS: Appraisal, PtDA availability, peer approval, time concerns, evidence and PtDA awareness all affect whether health professionals are likely to use a PtDA to help pregnant women make informed decision about Down syndrome screening. Implementation strategies will need to address these factors.

Health literacy in pregnant women facing prenatal screening may explain their intention to use a patient decision aid: a short report.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that health literacy may impact the use of decision aids (DAs) among patients facing difficult decisions. Embedded in the pilot test of a questionnaire, this study aimed to measure the association between health literacy and pregnant women's intention to use a DA to decide about prenatal screening. We recruited a convenience sample of 45 pregnant women in three clinical sites (family practice teaching unit, birthing center and obstetrical ambulatory care clinic). We asked participating women to complete a self-administered questionnaire assessing their intention to use a DA to decide about prenatal screening and assessed their health literacy levels using one subjective and two objective scales. RESULTS: Two of the three scales discriminated between levels of health literacy (three numeracy questions and three health literacy questions). We found a positive correlation between pregnant women's intention to use a DA and subjective health literacy (Spearman coefficient, Rho 0.32, P = 0.04) but not objective health literacy (Spearman coefficient, Rho 0.07, P = 0.65). Hence subjective health literacy may affect the intention to use a DA among pregnant women facing a decision about prenatal screening. CONCLUSION: Special attention should be given to pregnant women with lower health literacy levels to increase their intention to use a DA and ensure that every pregnant women can give informed and value-based consent to prenatal screening.

Profiling of endogenous estrogens, their precursors, and metabolites in endometrial cancer patients: association with risk and relationship to clinical characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) predominantly occurs after menopause and is strongly related to steroid hormones, particularly estrogens. However, the relationship between these hormones and clinical characteristics remains unaddressed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed the circulating levels of 18 steroids including adrenal precursors, androgens, estrogens, and their glucuronide metabolites, using specific and validated methods based on tandem mass spectrometry. Our goals were to compare circulating levels in postmenopausal women with EC (n = 126) with those of healthy postmenopausal women (n = 110) and to investigate how these hormonal levels relate to clinical characteristics. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, most hormones were significantly elevated in EC patients compared with healthy controls. In women with type I cancer, estrogen levels were up to 3-fold those of healthy women (P < 0.05). These higher levels were associated with an increased risk of cancer, particularly estrogens and their direct precursors, testosterone and androstenedione (odds ratios ranging from 4.4 to 13.3; P ≤ 0.0003). Elevated circulating levels of estrogens and their metabolites were found in cancer cases with type I endometrioid cancer and low-grade and noninvasive tumor, suggesting an association between these hormones and the tumoral estrogenic activity. In addition, levels of estrone-sulfate in EC patients with relapse were 2-fold over levels of EC patients without relapse (P < 0.05), and 4.5-fold over those of healthy women (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Circulating levels of steroids were associated with increased risk of EC. Estrogens may represent novel biomarkers predictive of clinical characteristics, including evidence for an increased risk of relapse.

Circulating estrogens in endometrial cancer cases and their relationship with tissular expression of key estrogen biosynthesis and metabolic pathways.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy. Estrogen exposure is strongly associated with endometrial cancer. Whereas this cancer occurs predominantly in postmenopausal women lacking estrogen production by ovaries, the conversion of adrenal androgen-estrogen precursors to estradiol (E(2)), estrone (E(1)), and its sulfate (E(1)-S) has been well documented in peripheral tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We initially explored whether circulating levels of estrogens, measured by validated mass spectrometry assays, differ in women with endometrial cancer (n = 126) compared with healthy women (n = 110). We then evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR from purified RNA whether the expression profile of 19 estrogen-related synthesis and metabolic genes is modified in peritumoral normal endometrium (n = 36) compared with tumoral (n = 49) tissues. RESULTS: In endometrial cancer cases, circulating levels of E(1), E(2), and E(1)-S were significantly higher compared with unaffected controls. In agreement with plasma levels, findings support an enhanced biosynthesis of E(2) in tumors. The expression of E(2) biosynthesis pathways [E(1)-S (sulfatase) --> E(1) (17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase) --> E(2)] was shown to predominate in peritumoral normal endometrium and was significantly increased in tumors. In addition, the inactivation pathways mediated by several uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases were also enhanced in endometrial tumors compared with peritumoral normal endometrium. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the higher levels of circulating estrogens in women with endometrial cancer are likely associated with an imbalance of multiple biotransformation pathways in endometrial tumor tissues.

Profiling endogenous serum estrogen and estrogen-glucuronides by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Estrogens, namely, 17beta-estradiol (E(2)), are conjugated to glucuronides (G), and this metabolic conversion is part of their tissular-concentration control-mechanism. This inactivation process has been observed, in addition to the liver, in several estrogen-dependent tissues and the resulting polar metabolites are detected in circulation. We developed and validated a highly sensitive and specific mass spectrometry-based method to directly measure estrogen-G serum levels. The method uses deuterated standards but does not involve enzymatic hydrolysis, a major improvement over previous techniques. Estrone (E(1)), E(1)-sulfate, E(2), the 3-G of E(1), E(2), 2-methoxy-E(1) (2-MeOE(1)) and 2-methoxy-E(2) (2-MeOE(2)), and the 17-G of E(2) were measured in serum of 19 premenopausal and 10 postmenopausal healthy women. Two extractions, solid-phase and liquid-liquid, were performed to isolate the estrogens. Estrogens were then quantified by mass spectrometry in the negative MRM ion mode using an API3200 spectrometer with a turbo ionspray source. The method selectively measured estrogen glucuronides with sensitivity > or = 5 pg/mL, accuracy 90-111%, and reproducibility (CV = 1.4-13.3%). The method is applicable between 5 and 1000 pg/mL. For the ovarian follicular phase, the major metabolite found was E(1)-3G, with E(2)-3G and 2-MeOE(1)-3G found in lesser amounts (54, 10.4, and 7.8 pg/mL, respectively) These concentrations are 2.6- to 3-fold greater than found for luteal-phase estrogens. The concentrations of E(2)-17G and 2-MeOE(2)-3G were usually less than the limit of quantification. In serum of postmenopausal women, E(1)-3G was the most abundant estrogen found (30.9 pg/mL). Our method profiles estrogens and estrogen-glucuronides and may represent a new tool to identify biomarkers in hormone-dependent diseases.

Genetic variations in UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 and endometrial cancer risk.

Uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are a family of phase II-metabolizing enzymes involved in glucuronic acid conjugation of sex steroid hormones. UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 are expressed in the uterus and involved in the conjugation and elimination of estrogens. Chronic exposure to estrogens is associated with endometrial cancer. Functional polymorphisms have been identified in UGT1A1 and UGT2B7. We hypothesized that these variants may be associated with endometrial cancer risk. We conducted a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study and the Women's Health Study to investigate the associations between five polymorphisms and endometrial cancer risk using 593 invasive endometrial cancer cases and 1545 controls. We did observe the suggestion of an inverse association with homozygote variant carriers of UGT1A1*28 and endometrial cancer risk. We did not observe significant associations between individual single nucleotide polymorphisms and UGT1A1 haplotypes and endometrial cancer risk. Our data suggest that these UGT polymorphisms do not contribute significantly to endometrial cancer risk.

A pharmacogenomics study of the human estrogen glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A3.

UGT1A3 is one of the most efficient at conjugating estrone, a precursor for biosynthesis of estradiol in peripheral tissues. We established the genetic mechanisms that might contribute to individual variation in UGT1A3 expression and activity. UGT1A3 first exon and 5'-flanking regions were sequenced in 249 Caucasians. We identified 17 polymorphisms, among them seven regulatory and 10 exonic polymorphisms with six leading to amino-acid changes. Luciferase reporter assays, site-directed mutagenesis and electrophoretic mobility shift assays using hepatoma HepG2 cells were carried out to show functionality of variant promoters. Reduced transcriptional activity was associated with all six variant promoters (two-fold; P<0.001). One of the potential mechanisms would involve the -148 T>C and -581 C>T variations that modulate gene function by affecting hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha and hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha binding, respectively. Then, estrone-conjugating activity was assessed with 11 heterologously expressed allozymes. Three phenotypes were observed; UGT1A3*1, *2 (WR, VA) and *3 (WR) with high intrinsic clearance values; UGT1A3*5 (QR, WR), *7 (FI), *9 (WR, ML), *10 (VA) and *11 (WR, VA and MI) had intermediate CLint (2X-10X lower vs. *1), whereas UGT1A3*4 (RW), *6 (WR, VA, MV) and *8 (AV) had low CLint (>10X lower vs. *1). Diplotype analyses indicate that 20.1% of individuals carry two alleles affecting UGT1A3 expression and/or activity. This study did not investigate genotype-phenotype association, but raise the possibility that genetically determined variation might contribute to variability in the inactivation of estrone by UGT1A3 and subsequent changes in lifetime exposure to estrogens potentially modifying risk of cancer.

Regulation of the UGT1A1 bilirubin-conjugating pathway: role of a new splicing event at the UGT1A locus.

UNLABELLED: UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) is involved in a wide range of biological and pharmacological processes because of its critical role in the conjugation of a diverse array of endogenous and exogenous compounds. We now describe a new UGT1A1 isoform, referred to as isoform 2 (UGT1A1_i2), encoded by a 1495-bp complementary DNA isolated from human liver and generated by an alternative splicing event involving an additional exon found at the 3' end of the UGT1A locus. The N-terminal portion of the 45-kd UGT1A1_i2 protein is identical to UGT1A1 (55 kd, UGT1A1_i1); however, UGT1A1_i2 contains a unique 10-residue sequence instead of the 99-amino acid C-terminal domain of UGT1A1_i1. RT-PCR and Western blot analyses with a specific antibody against UGT1A1 indicate that isoform 2 is differentially expressed in liver, kidney, colon, and small intestine at levels that reach or exceed, for some tissues, those of isoform 1. Western blots of different cell fractions and immunofluorescence experiments indicate that UGT1A1_i1 and UGT1A1_i2 colocalize in microsomes. Functional enzymatic data indicate that UGT1A1_i2, which lacks transferase activity when stably expressed alone in HEK293 cells, acts as a negative modulator of UGT1A1_i1, decreasing its activity by up to 78%. Coimmunoprecipitation of UGT1A1_i1 and UGT1A1_i2 suggests that this repression may occur via direct protein-protein interactions. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that this newly discovered alternative splicing mechanism at the UGT1A locus amplifies the structural diversity of human UGT proteins and describes the identification of an additional posttranscriptional regulatory mechanism of the glucuronidation pathway.

Characterization of common UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 variants with different capacities to inactivate mutagenic 4-hydroxylated metabolites of estradiol and estrone.

The oxidative metabolism of estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) to form carcinogenic 4-hydroxy-catecholestrogens (4-OHCE) is associated with uterine and breast carcinogenesis. In this study, we conducted functional analyses of genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 enzymes primarily involved in the inactivation of 4-OHCEs. Compared with UGT2B7*2 (H268Y), UGT2B7*1 exhibited a 2-fold lower efficiency (intrinsic clearance) at conjugating 4-hydroxyestrone and 4-hydroxyestradiol at positions 3 and 4 caused by altered capacities (Vmax) and affinities (Km). The -79 G>A promoter variation, characterizing the UGT2B7*2g haplotype, leads to a 50% reduction of transcription (P < 0.001) in human endometrial carcinoma-1B cells. Furthermore, a >12-fold decreased intrinsic clearance of the *1 proteins was induced by selected amino acid substitutions in UGT1A8 (*3 C277Y) and UGT1A9 (*3 M33T). Frequencies of the low-activity alleles in Caucasians were 45% for UGT2B7*1, 5% for the -79A promoter variant, 1.2% for UGT1A8*3, and 2.2% for UGT1A9*3. Supporting a protective role in two organs sensitive to 4-OHCE-induced damages, the expression of UGT enzymes was shown by immunohistochemistry in normal breast and endometrial tissues and confirmed by Western blotting in a subset of samples. Altogether, findings suggest that specific polymorphisms in UGT genes may modulate the exposure to carcinogenic metabolites of E2 and potentially lead to an altered risk of breast and endometrial cancers in women carrying the variant alleles.

Metabolic inactivation of estrogens in breast tissue by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes: an overview.

The breast tissue is the site of major metabolic conversions of estradiol (E2) mediated by specific cytochromes P450 hydroxylations and methylation by catechol-O-methytransferase. In addition to E2 itself, recent findings highlight the significance of 4-hydroxylated estrogen metabolites as chemical mediators and their link to breast cancer development and progression, whereas, in opposition, 2-methoxylated estrogens appear to be protective. Recent data also indicate that breast tissue possesses enzymatic machinery to inactivate and eliminate E2 and its oxidized and methoxylated metabolites through conjugation catalyzed by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), which involves the covalent addition of glucuronic acid. In opposition to other metabolic pathways of estrogen, the UGT-mediated process leads to the formation of glucuronides that are devoid of biologic activity and are readily excreted from the tissue into the circulation. This review addresses the most recent findings on the identification of UGT enzymes that are responsible for the glucuronidation of E2 and its metabolites, and evidence regarding their potential role in breast cancer.

Specificity and regioselectivity of the conjugation of estradiol, estrone, and their catecholestrogen and methoxyestrogen metabolites by human uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases expressed in endometrium.

Uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) inactivate and facilitate the excretion of estrogens to glucuronides (-G), the most abundant circulating estrogen conjugates. The identity of the conjugated estrogens formed by all known overexpressed UGTs (n = 16) was analyzed by comparison with retention time and mass fragmentation of authentic standards by HPLC tandem mass spectrometry methods. Six UGTs, namely 1A1, 1A3, 1A8, 1A9, 1A10, and 2B7, were found to glucuronidate estradiol (E(2)) and estrone (E(1)), their hydroxyls (OH), and their methoxy derivatives (MeO). Addition of glucuronic acid was catalyzed by specific UGTs at positions 2, 3, and 4 of the estrogens, whereas only E(2) was conjugated at position 17 by UGT2B7. Kinetic parameters indicate that the conjugation of E(2) at position 3 was predominantly catalyzed by 1A1, 1A3, and 1A8 and by 1A8 for E(1). Conjugation of 2-OHE(1)/E(2) and 2- and 4-MeOE(1)/E(2) was selective at position 3, mostly catalyzed by 1A1 and 1A8. Of all UGTs, UGT2B7 demonstrated the highest catalytic activities for estrogens and at least 10- to 50-fold higher activity for the conjugation of genotoxic 4-hydroxycatecholestrogens at position 4, compared with the conjugation of E(2), E(1), and 2-hydroxycatecholestrogens. Its presence was further shown in the endometrium by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry, localizing in the same cells expressing CYP1B1, involved locally in the formation of 4-hydroxycatecholestrogens. Data show that several UGT enzymes detected in the endometrium are involved in the glucuronidation of E(2) and its 2-OH, 4-OH, and 2-MeO metabolites that exert various biological effects in the tissue.

The functional UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism decreases endometrial cancer risk.

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 is involved in the inactivation of estradiol (E(2)) and its oxidized metabolites. These metabolites have been shown to contribute to the development of endometrial cancer in animal studies. Thus UGT1A1 represents a candidate gene in endometrial carcinogenesis. In this study, we established the substrate specificity of UGT1A1 for E(2) and its 2- and 4-hydroxylated metabolites. Intrinsic clearances indicated that UGT1A1 had a preference for the glucuronidation of 2-hydroxyestradiol, a metabolite associated with antiproliferative activity. Expression analysis demonstrated that UGT1A1 is present in the nonmalignant endometrium. Subsequently, we sought to determine whether the common UGT1A1 promoter allele, UGT1A1*28 [A(TA)(7)TAA], which decreases gene transcription, was associated with endometrial cancer risk in a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study (222 cases, 666 matched controls). Conditional logistic regression demonstrated a significant inverse association with the UGT1A1*28 allele and endometrial cancer risk. Compared with women homozygous for the UGT1A1*1 [A(TA)(6)TAA] allele, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-1.16] for the UGT1A1*1/*28 genotype and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.21-0.75) for the homozygous UGT1A1*28 genotype (P(trend) = 0.007). There was a suggestion of an interaction by menopausal status [OR = 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18-0.85) for premenopausal women and OR = 0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.13) for postmenopausal women who carry the UGT1A1*28 allele (P(interaction) = 0.05)]. These observations suggest that lower expression of UGT1A1 decreases the risk of endometrial cancer by reducing the excretion of 2-hydroxyestradiol, the antiproliferative metabolite of E(2), in the endometrium.