Practical Requirements for the Development of an Advanced Cardiorenal Unit.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is frequently associated with kidney disease, and patients with kidney disease are at increased risk of heart failure. The co-occurrence of both entities not only significantly increases morbidity and mortality but also complicates therapy. SUMMARY: Cardiorenal syndrome often requires a broad, comprehensive, and multidisciplinary approach. As a result, a need has arisen to create specialized cardiorenal units that allow for rigorous and personalized management of this condition. Moreover, in some cases, cardiorenal syndrome is more complex, owing to an acute and critical situation that requires the concept of the cardiorenal unit to be extended toward advanced diagnostic and therapeutic positions, thus confirming the need for an advanced cardiorenal unit. The creation of these units constitutes a real challenge, necessitating a specific multilevel action plan, covering governance and management, type of patient, personnel requirements, service portfolio, care process, information systems, and other resources. Specific lines of action must be proposed for each of the relevant points in order to facilitate development of these units, together with continuous evaluation of unit activity through specific indicators, and to detect areas for improvement. KEY MESSAGES: This study addresses the conditions and organizational characteristics that enable the creation, development, and continuous improvement of advanced cardiorenal units.

Annual evolution of the prescription of drugs with prognostic implications in acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Quadruple therapy (renin angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium/glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors [SGLT2i]) has become the current prognostic modifying treatment for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to analyse the prescription´s evolution of this combination therapy, the analysis of each pharmacological group and the differences according to HF subgroups. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted for cardiac decompensation. Inclusion period: from 1-1-2020 to 12-31-2022. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction > 40% and deceased during admission were excluded. Finally, 602 patients were included. These were divided into: (a) de novo HF without previous heart disease (n:108), (b) de novo with previous heart disease (n:107), and (c) non-de novo (n:387). RESULTS: Over the study time, all pharmacological groups experienced an increase in drugs prescription (p < 0.001). The group with the largest prescription rate increase was SGLT2i (2020:20%, 2021:42.9%, 2022:70.4%; mean increase 47.2%). The discharge rate prescription of quadruple therapy increased progressively (2020:7.4%, 2021:21.1%, 2022:32.5%; mean increase 21.9%). The subgroup with the highest combined prescription in 2022 was de novo with previous heart disease (43.9%). CONCLUSION: The pharmacological group with the largest prescription´s rate increase was SGLT2i. The percentage of patients discharged on quadruple therapy has progressed significantly in recent years, although it remains low. The most optimised subgroup at discharge was that of de novo HF with previous heart disease.

What motivates heart transplantation patients to exercise and engage in physical activity? A network analysis.

AIMS: After heart transplantation (HTx), increments in physical activity (PA) are strongly recommended. However, participation rates in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation and engagement in PA are insufficient in many patients. Hence, this study aimed to explore the central factors and the interconnections among distinct types of motivation to exercise, PA, sedentary time, psychosomatic, diet, and activity limitation characteristics in post-HTx patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a cross-sectional study involving 133 post-HTx patients (79 men, mean age 57 ± 13 years, mean time from transplantation 55 ± 42 months) recruited from an outpatient clinic in Spain. The patients were asked to fill in questionnaires measuring self-reported PA, motivation to exercise, kinesiophobia, musculoskeletal pain, quality of sleep, depression, functional capacity, frailty, sarcopenia risk, and diet quality. Two network structures were estimated: one network including PA and one network including sedentary time as nodes. The relative importance of each node in the network structures was determined using centrality analyses. According to the strength centrality index, functional capacity and identified regulation (subtypes of motivation to exercise) are the two most central nodes of the network (strength: z-score = 1.35-1.51). Strong and direct connections emerged between frailty and PA and between sarcopenia risk and sedentary time. CONCLUSION: Functional capacity and autonomous motivation to exercise are the most promising targets of interventions to improve PA levels and sedentary time in post-HTx patients. Furthermore, frailty and sarcopenia risk were found to mediate the effects of several other factors on PA and sedentary time.

Repetitive ambulatory levosimendan as a bridge to heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Repetitive ambulatory doses of levosimendan are an option as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT), but evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment is scarce. The objective of the LEVO-T Registry is to describe the profile of patients on the HT list receiving levosimendan, prescription patterns, and clinical outcomes compared with patients not on levosimendan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients listed for elective HT from 2015 to 2020 from 14 centers in Spain. RESULTS: A total of 1015 consecutive patients were included, of whom 238 patients (23.4%) received levosimendan. Patients treated with levosimendan had more heart failure (HF) admissions in the previous year and a worse clinical profile. The most frequent prescription pattern were fixed doses triggered by the patients' clinical needs. Nonfatal ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 2 patients (0.8%). No differences in HF hospitalizations were found between patients who started levosimendan in the first 30 days after listing and those who did not (33.6% vs 34.5%; P=.848). Among those who did not, 102 patients (32.9%) crossed over to levosimendan after an HF admission. These patients had a rate of 0.57 HF admissions per month before starting levosimendan and 0.21 afterwards. Propensity score matching analysis showed no differences in survival at 1 year after listing between patients receiving levosimendan and those who did not (HR, 1.03; 95%CI, 0.36-2.97; P=.958) or in survival after HT (HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.60-1.56; P=.958). CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive levosimendan in an ambulatory setting as a bridge to heart transplantation is commonly used, is safe, and may reduce HF hospitalizations.

Kinesiophobia and associated variables in patients with heart failure.

AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) can exhibit kinesiophobia, an excessive, debilitating, and irrational fear of movement. This study aimed to enhance the understanding of kinesiophobia in patients with HF by analysing associations with the following variables: musculoskeletal pain, quality of life, quality of sleep, functional capacity, disability, frailty, sex, and age. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, 107 participants were included, with ages ranging from 28 to 97 years (57% men, mean age 73.18 ± 12.68 years). Multiple regression analyses were performed with all variables, including polynomial regressions for variables with a non-linear relationship. Kinesiophobia was significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with musculoskeletal pain, quality of life, quality of sleep, functional capacity, disability, and being at risk of frailty, while age and sex were not statistically significant. Frailty disability and musculoskeletal pain intensity were variables linearly associated with kinesiophobia, while quality of sleep and disability had a non-linear relationship with kinesiophobia. CONCLUSION: Kinesiophobia needs to be evaluated and better understood in patients with HF to improve physical activity and exercise adherence. This study found that musculoskeletal pain intensity, quality of sleep, disability, and frailty risk have a significant association with kinesiophobia in patients with HF. Our results suggest multi-dimensional associations of kinesiophobia in patients with HF, which require further examination and understanding.

Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on Heart Failure Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 lockdown has been associated with reduced levels of physical activity, quality of life, and sleep quality, but limited evidence exists for its impact on heart failure patients. This study examined the influence of the COVID-19 lockdown on these aspects in heart failure patients, with specific comparisons by age and sex. METHODS: A quasi-experimental cross-sectional study of patients with heart failure was conducted. The assessment involved two time points: during the COVID-19 lockdown (March to June 2020) and post-lockdown (July to October 2020). A total of 107 HF patients participated, with assessments of overall PA (using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), QoL (employing the Cantril Ladder of Life), and sleep quality (utilizing the Minimal Insomnia Symptom Scale) conducted during and after the COVID-19 lockdown. RESULTS: HF patients reported lower levels of total PA (p = 0.001) and walking PA (p < 0.0001) during lockdown than after lockdown, whilst no differences were observed in QoL nor sleep quality. In addition, both younger and older patients reported lower walking PA and total PA during lockdown than after lockdown, while older patients reported lower QoL during lockdown than after lockdown. Moreover, both men and women reported lower walking PA and total PA during lockdown than after lockdown, whilst women reported lower QoL. CONCLUSIONS: HF patients need improved PA programs during lockdowns, as these programs can elevate PA levels and enhance QoL, especially when faced with the risk of decompensation during health crises.

Technology Usage, Physical Activity, and Motivation in Patients With Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation.

The cross-sectional study enrolled 231 patients with heart failure (n = 115; 60.87% were men; mean age, 74.34 ± 12.70 years) and heart transplantation (n = 116; 72.41% were men; mean age, 56.85 ± 11.87 years) who self-reported their technology usage, physical activity, and source of motivation for exercise. Patients with heart failure were significantly older ( P = .0001) than patients with heart transplantation. Physical activity levels in patients with heart failure decreased as the New York Heart Association classification increased. Patients with heart failure reported significantly lower physical activity than patients with heart transplantation ( P = .0008). Smartphones were the most widely used electronic device to access the Internet in both groups. Patients with heart transplantation seemed to use more than one device to access the Internet. In both groups, patients reporting more technology usage also reported higher levels of physical activity. Patients who accessed the Internet daily reported lower levels of physical activity. Whereas patients with heart failure identified encouragement by family members as a source of motivation for exercise, patients with heart transplantation reported that they were likely to exercise if motivated by their healthcare provider. Patients with heart failure and heart transplantation have unique technological and motivational needs that need consideration for mobile health-driven interventions.

Correlates of musculoskeletal pain and kinesiophobia in older adults with heart failure: A structural equation model.

The study aimed to study the influence of musculoskeletal pain on kinesiophobia in patients with heart failure. This cross-sectional study recruited 107 heart failure patients aged 73.18±12.68 years (57% men) from an outpatient setting. Participants self-reported pain using the Musculoskeletal System Assessment Inventory and the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire. Kinesiophobia was assessed with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11. About 62% reported musculoskeletal pain, with knees (16.8%) and lower back (12.%) being the most painful locations. About 31% reported moderate levels and 24% indicated high levels of kinesiophobia. There were positive and significant associations between the indicators of pain and kinesiophobia. Results showed an adequate structural equation model fit to the data with musculoskeletal pain factors explaining 22.09% of the variance in kinesiophobia. Assessment of kinesiophobia in patients with heart failure with musculoskeletal pain is essential to improve self-care and overall quality of life.

Overview of the Treatment of Congestion in Heart Failure.

Heart failure is a major problem in developed countries, leading to a high number of hospitalizations and healthcare costs. The most common symptom of heart failure is congestion, which is also the primary reason for hospitalization. Diuretics, particularly loop diuretics, are the cornerstone of the treatment of congestion. Likewise, there are other types of diuretics with different pathways of action, bioavailability profiles, adverse reactions, and effects on the cardiovascular and renal systems. Moreover, in recent years, new therapeutic alternatives have been proposed for challenging cases of diuretic resistance, such as ultrafiltration through peripheral access or peritoneal dialysis. The main objective of this article is to provide a step-guided approach to the management of congestion in patients with heart failure in order to guide the medical practice. Despite the significant amount of research published in recent years, there are no clear algorithms for managing acute heart failure. Diuretics remain the primary treatment of acute heart failure, and nephron blockade is key, but new therapies are emerging, and ongoing research is needed to develop better strategies for managing this condition.

[Usefulness of short-term peripheral ambulatory ultrafiltration in heart failure refractory to diuretics. Initial experience]. / Utilidad de la ultrafiltración ambulatoria de corta duración por vía periférica en insuficiencia cardíaca refractaria a diuréticos. Experiencia inicial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In heart failure congestion is the most common symptom and diuretic resistance is frequent. This study aims to analyse whether short-term peripheral outpatient ultrafiltration (UF) is useful and safe in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first 5 patients ultrafiltrated for diuretic resistance in a fast-track unit of a referral hospital for 12hours were analysed. RESULTS: These patients were on treatment with at least 3 oral diuretics; UF made it possible to reduce and/or withdraw some of them. The volume extracted during the procedure was 1520±271ml. There were significant changes in diuresis (PreUF: 1360±164, PostUF: 1670±254ml; P=.035), weight (PreUF: 69.6±14, PostUF: 66.2±15kg; P=.0001) and creatinine (PreUF: 2.1±0.3, PostUF: 1.8±0.4mg; P= 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: In outpatients with heart failure and diuretic resistance, short-course peripheral UF was effective and safe.

Therapeutic approach in heart failure with poor diuretic response: peripheral ultrafiltration vs. conventional treatment.

AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) admitted for decompensation often require high doses of intravenous diuretics. This study aims to analyse whether the use of peripheral ultrafiltration (UF) in patients hospitalized for acute HF with systemic-predominant congestion results in better hydric control, renal protection, and reduction of hospital stay compared with conventional treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was a retrospective, comparative, single-centre study of 56 patients admitted for HF with systemic congestion with a poor diuretic response after diuretic escalation. One group underwent peripheral UF (35 patients) and others were maintained on intense diuretic treatment (control group, 21 patients). The diuretic response and days of hospital stay were compared between and within groups. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar: males with right ventricular failure and renal dysfunction. The inter-group analysis showed that patients who received UF had better glomerular filtration rate (GFR; UF: 39.2 ± 18.2 vs. control: 28.7 ± 13.4 mL/min; P = 0.031) and higher diuresis (UF: 2184 ± 735 vs. control: 1335 ± 297 mL; P = 0.0001) at hospital discharge despite less need for diuretic drugs. Days of hospital stay were shorter in the UF group (UF: 11.7 ± 10.1 vs. control: 19.1 ± 14.4 days; P = 0.027). Intra-group analysis showed that patients receiving UF improved GFR, increased diuresis, and reduced weight at discharge (P < 0.001), whereas patients on conventional treatment only experienced improved weight but worsening renal function at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute HF with systemic congestion and diuretic resistance, UF compared with conventional treatment produces greater decongestion and renal protection, reduces the total diuretic load, and shortens the length of hospital stay.

Clinical phenotypes according to diuretic combination in acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of congestion in heart failure (HF) is a challenge despite the therapeutic arsenal available. The aim of this study was to analyze different combinations of diuretics used to resolve congestion in patients admitted for decompensated HF and to define clinical profiles according to these treatments. METHODS: Single-center study of 1,559 patients admitted for decompensated HF was done between 2016 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to the diuretic combination that led to clinical stabilization and discharge from the hospital: (1) Loop diuretic. (2) Loop diuretic + distal tubule (antialdosterone ± thiazides). (3) Loop diuretic + distal + proximal tubule (acetazolamide ± SGLT2 inhibitor). (4) Loop diuretic + distal tubule + collecting duct (tolvaptan). (5) Loop diuretic + distal + proximal + collecting duct. Based on these diuretic combinations, profiles with clinical, analytical, and echocardiographic differences were established. RESULTS: There were more previous hospitalizations in groups 4 and 5 (p = 0.001) with a predominance of pulmonary congestion in profiles 1 and 2 and systemic congestion in 3, 4, and 5. Creatinine and CA125 were higher in profiles 4 and 5 (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0001), with no differences in NT-proBNP. Profiles 4 and 5 had a higher proportion of dilatation and depression of right ventricular (p = 0.0001) and left ventricular (p = 0.003) function. Diuretic therapy-defined groups showed difference in clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The diuretic treatment used identifies five clinical profiles according to the degree of congestion, renal function, CA125, and right ventricular functionality. These profiles would guide the best diuretic treatment on admission.

Is the Benefit of Treating Iron Deficiency Greater in Acute Heart Failure with Renal Dysfunction?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyse whether in acute heart failure (AHF) with iron deficiency (ID), the administration of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) produces a greater benefit in renal dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 812 consecutive patients admitted for AHF and ID were studied. Untreated (n:272) and treated (n:540) patients were compared. The six-month prevalence of a combined event (readmission for HF, all-cause death, and emergency department visit for decompensation) was analysed. Three grades of renal dysfunction (KDIGO) were compared, Group 1 (grades 1 and 2), Group 2 (grades 3a and 3b), and Group 3 (grades 4 and 5). RESULTS: There were differences in sex distribution (untreated group: males 39.7% vs. treated group: males 51.9%; p < 0.001). Sex-adjusted combined event analysis showed a greater benefit in Group 1 (OR: 0.31, 95% CI:0.19-0.5; p < 0.001) and Group 2 (OR: 0.23, 95% CI:0.14-0.38; p < 0.001), but not in Group 3 (OR: 0.51, 95% CI:0.17-0.55; p: 0.237). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of FCM in patients with AHF and ID reduces the combined event analysed. The benefit is greater when renal dysfunction is present, except in very advanced degrees where no significant benefit is obtained.

Mortality After the First Hospital Admission for Acute Heart Failure, De Novo Versus Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

It is not clear to date whether a first admission in heart failure (HF) marks a worse evolution in patients not previously diagnosed with HF ("de novo HF") than those already diagnosed as outpatients ("acutely decompensated HF"). The aim of the study was to analyze whether survival in patients admitted for de novo HF differs from the survival in those admitted for a first episode of decompensation but with a previous diagnosis of HF. This study includes an analysis of 1,728 patients admitted for decompensated HF during 9 years. Readmissions and patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were excluded (finally, 524 patients analyzed). We compared de novo HF (n = 186) in patients not diagnosed with HF, although their structural heart disease was defined, versus acutely decompensated HF (n = 338). The clinical profiles in both groups were similar. The de novo HF group more frequently presented with normal right ventricular function, with less presence of severe tricuspid regurgitation. The probability of survival was low in both groups. Thus, the median life in the de novo HF group was 2.1 years and in the acutely decompensated HF group, 3.5 years. There was a lower probability of long-term survival in the de novo HF group (p = 0.035). The variables associated with mortality were age (p <0.0001), ischemic heart disease (p <0.0001), hypertension (p = 0.009), obesity (p = 0.025), diabetes (p = 0.001), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide at admission (p <0.0001). A higher glomerular filtration rate was associated with better survival (p = 0.033). De novo HF was associated with a higher mortality than chronic HF with acute decompensation (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.27, p = 0.036). In conclusion, the first admission for HF decompensation in patients with no previous diagnosis of HF identifies a subgroup of patients with higher long-term mortality.

Physical Activity Readiness in Patients with Heart Failure.

The aim of this study was to explore the readiness for physical activity (PA) and its related factors in patients with heart failure. This cross-sectional study included 163 patients with heart failure (mean age 66 ± 16, 50% female). The ability to safely engage in PA was assessed with the PA Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Psychological readiness was measured using two questionnaires, namely: Exercise Self-efficacy Scale and the Motivation for PA and Exercise/Working Out. A multivariate analysis of covariance was conducted to test the effect of background variables on readiness for PA. 64% (n = 105) of patients reported not being able to safely engage in PA, 80% (n = 129) reported low self-efficacy, and 45% (n = 74) were extrinsically motivated indicating external factors drove their motivation. Factors that positively influenced the PA readiness included lower age (p < 0.01), being male (p < 0.01), being married (p < 0.01), having higher education (p < 0.01), being in NYHA-class I compared with II (p < 0.01), less time since diagnosis (p < 0.01), lower BMI (p = 0.02), and not suffering from COPD (p = 0.02). Prior to recommending exercise, assessment of safety to engage in PA along with self-efficacy and motivation in patients with heart failure is essential.

Prevalence of Tricuspid Regurgitation After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation and Its Evolution in the Follow-up Period: A Long-Term Study.

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after heart transplant (HT) can be an important complication depending on its etiology and severity. This study aims to analyze the prevalence of TR, the causes, and its evolution over time after HT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of transplants performed between 2000 and 2019 in 2 centers (1009 patients). TR was grouped according to etiology: primary graft dysfunction (PGD), acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), pulmonary hypertension, prolapse, endomyocardial biopsy complication (EMB), pacemaker (PM), and unclear etiology (TR not related to any process and for which no justification was found). RESULTS: The prevalence of TR after HT was 19.8% (moderate: 13.2%, severe: 6.6%). Significant TR was more prevalent in the first months (month 1: 51%, month 3: 40%, month 6: 29%, 1 year: 24%). These results were related to the etiologies. Thus, in the first month, TR due to PGD is frequent and it is the only time when TR due to pulmonary hypertension appears. During the first 6 months, TR of unclear cause gains relevance, which tends to decrease over time. After 1 year, TR due to rejection predominates. After 5 years, TR is less frequent (< 10%) and related to long-term complications of HT, such as CAV, EMB, and those associated with PM. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of TR after HT is 19.8%. Prevalence and etiology change over time. Initially it is usually related to PGD, in the medium-term to rejection and in the long-term to CAV and procedures such as EMB and PM.

Well-Being, Physical Activity, and Social Support in Octogenarians with Heart Failure during COVID-19 Confinement: A Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare well-being and physical activity (PA) before and during COVID-19 confinement in older adults with heart failure (HF), to compare well-being and PA during COVID-19 confinement in octogenarians and non-octogenarians, and to explore well-being, social support, attention to symptoms, and assistance needs during confinement in this population. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was performed. Well-being (Cantril Ladder of Life) and PA (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) were assessed. Semi-structured interviews were performed to assess the rest of the variables. RESULTS: 120 participants were evaluated (74.16 ± 12.90 years; octogenarians = 44.16%, non-octogenarians = 55.83%). Both groups showed lower well-being and performed less PA during confinement than before (p < 0.001). Octogenarians reported lower well-being (p = 0.02), higher sedentary time (p = 0.03), and lower levels of moderate PA (p = 0.04) during confinement. Most individuals in the sample considered their well-being to have decreased during confinement, 30% reported decreased social support, 50% increased their attention to symptoms, and 60% were not satisfied with the assistance received. Octogenarians were more severely impacted during confinement than non-octogenarians in terms of well-being, attention to symptoms, and assistance needs. CONCLUSIONS: Well-being and PA decreased during confinement, although octogenarians were more affected than non-octogenarians. Remote monitoring strategies are needed in elders with HF to control health outcomes in critical periods, especially in octogenarians.

Analysis of Heart Transplant Survival According to Difference in Age Between Donor and Recipient.

BACKGROUND: The age of heart transplant (HTx) donors and recipients is progressively increasing. The combination of donor-recipient ages has been shown to have prognostic implications. The objective of this study is to analyze survival in the first year and in the long-term based on the difference in age between donor and recipient of HTx. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive HTxs performed in 1 center from 1987 to December 2021. Patients younger than 16 years, retransplants, and combined transplants were excluded. Three groups were considered according to the age of the donor and recipient: group 1: recipient and donor of the same age ± 10 years; group 2: donor >10 years older than recipient; and group 3: donor >10 years younger than recipient. RESULTS: A total of 841 HTxs were included (81% men, 31% urgent HTxs, donor mean (standard deviation) age 38.5 [12.3] years and recipient age 51.2 [12]). The most frequent group was group 3 with 476 patients (56%) followed by group 1 with 305 patients (36%). Figure 1 shows that long-term survival is similar in groups 1 and 2, being worse in group 3, P = .026. Mortality at the end of follow-up is 38.7% in group 1, 34.9% in group 2, and 71.9% in group 3 (P < .0001). These differences occurred in the long-term without finding significant differences the first year after HTx. No differences were found in early graft failure between the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using donors of a different age from the recipient does not seem to have an impact on long-term survival, except when donors are used who are more than 10 years younger than the recipient, where survival is lower. This consolidates the concept that the use of elderly donors does not affect survival, allowing the pool of donors to be expanded.

Changes in the Treatment of Decompensated Advanced Heart Failure During Hospitalization and at Discharge.

BACKGROUND: In advanced heart failure (HF), each hospitalization for decompensation is a vulnerable moment, and it requires optimizing pharmacologic treatment. This study aimed to analyze changes in the pharmacologic treatment of HF before admission (P), during hospitalization (H), and at discharge (D) of patients with decompensated advanced HF. METHODS: We performed an ambispective, cross-sectional, noninterventional study conducted from January 2020 to June 2020. There were 252 consecutive patients admitted for decompensated advanced HF. The following were excluded: de novo HF cases, deceased patients, and scheduled admissions. Finally, 134 patients were analyzed, compared in 3 subgroups: pulmonary congestion (n = 90), systemic congestion (n = 31), and low output (n = 13). RESULTS: In the global analysis, an increase was detected in angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitors (P: 9.7%, H: 16.4, D: 22.4%; P < .02), beta blockers (P: 67.2%, H: 77.6%, D: 84.3%; P < .004), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (P: 29.9%, H: 44.4%, D: 46.3%; P < .01), loop diuretics (P: 70.1%, H: 99.3%, D: 95.5%; P < .001), and nitrates (P: 6.0%, H: 22.4%, D: 9.7%; P < .001). Pulmonary congestion was predominant with a significant increase in beta blockers (P: 61.1%, H: 77.8%, D: 88.9%; P < .001) and loop diuretics (P: 64.4%, H: 100%, D: 100%; P < .001); diuretics were increased in the systemic congestion group (P: 80.6%, H: 100%, D: 100%; P < .002), and 22.6% required 3% hypertonic saline solution. In patients with low output, beta blockers and diuretics were withdrawn (P: 84.6%, H: 76.9%, D: 46.1%; P < .08 and P: 84.6%, H: 92.3%, D: 61.5%; P < .1 respectively), without variation in the other pharmacologic groups. CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, HF drugs are increased and optimized in decompensated HF with a pulmonary or systemic congestion profile. When the profile is low output, beta blockers and diuretics are reduced.