Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of tadalafil when taken on demand by men with erectile dysfunction (ED) secondary to traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible dose-titration, parallel-group study in clinical practices in Europe. Patients Enrolled patients had ED secondary to SCI (all spinal levels) and sustained 6 months or longer before visit 1. INTERVENTIONS: After a 4-week run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to tadalafil, 10 mg, (n = 142) or placebo (n = 44) for a 12-week, on-demand treatment period with assessments at 4-week intervals. The dose of tadalafil was maintained or titrated (10 or 20 mg) at 4 and 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was measured using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and Global Assessment Question (GAQ). Treatment-emergent adverse events and vital signs were collected at each visit. RESULTS: Mean age was 38 years. Mean baseline IIEF erectile function domain score was 13.4, and following 12 weeks of treatment, 22.6 for tadalafil and 13.6 for placebo (P < .001). After treatment, the tadalafil group compared with the placebo group was significantly greater (P < .001) in mean per-patient percentage of successful penetration attempts (SEP question 2; 75.4% vs 41.1%) and intercourse attempts (SEP question 3; 47.6% vs 16.8%); percentage of improved erections (GAQ question 1; 84.6% vs 19.5%); and ejaculatory frequency (IIEF question 9; P = .03). The 2 most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the tadalafil group compared with placebo were headache (8.5% vs 4.5%) and urinary tract infection (7.7% vs 6.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil (10 mg and 20 mg) improved erectile function and was well tolerated by men with ED secondary to traumatic SCI.

Sperm retrieval procedures and intracytoplasmatic spermatozoa injection with epididymal and testicular sperms.

INTRODUCTION: Male infertility caused by azoospermia due to non-reconstructable obstruction or non-obstructive azoospermia can be treated by microsurgical epididymal aspiration (MESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) followed by an intracytoplasmatic spermatozoa injection (ICSI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 9/93 to 6/01, we carried out 1,025 ICSI procedures with aspirated epididymal or testicular sperms in 684 cases. 163 ICSI cycles were performed with epididymal sperms and 862 ICSI cycles with testicular sperms or spermatids. The TESE was carried out by open biopsy, frequently in a multilocular technique. The aspirated spermatozoas were used after cryopreservation (frozen) or immediately after aspiration (fresh). RESULTS: 538 patients had obstructive azoospermia or ejaculation failure. In 487 cases the underlying cause of azoospermia was an impaired spermatogenesis, following maldescensus testis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or caused by Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, a genetic disorder or an unknown etiology. The transfer rates, pregnancy rates and birth rates per ICSI cycle showed no statistically significant differences between testicular and epididymal sperms in the cases of seminal obstruction (28% average birth rates in both cases). However, highly significant was the difference in birth rates with regard to the underlying cause of infertility. In contrast, in treating non-obstructive azoospermia we observed a birth rate of 19% per cycle. In all patient groups the birth rate with fresh spermatozoas did not differ from those with cryopreserved spermatozoa. 40% of patients after multilocular TESE showed clinical signs of testicular lesion. CONCLUSION: The underlying cause of azoospermia is the most important factor for the outcome of ICSI using epididymal and testicular sperms. In cases of non-obstructive azoospermia, the pregnancy rate is low compared with the results in cases of obstructive azoospermia. There is no difference between fresh and cryopreserved sperms. TESE with ICSI is the most efficient treatment of azoospermia caused by hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. The morbidity of the TESE procedure is highly relevant and must be considered if this technique is indicated.