Suitability of Slaughterhouse-Acquired Pig Eyes as Model Systems for Refractive Ultraviolet and Infrared Femtosecond Laser Research.

PURPOSE: To elucidate whether it is feasible to use porcine eyes from scalded, abattoir-acquired animals for refractive femtosecond laser research. METHODS: An infrared laser (FS 200) and an ultraviolet laser (prototype version) were tested for their applicability on scalded pig eyes. Fifty porcine eyes were divided into two equally-sized groups and assigned to either the infrared or the ultraviolet laser. Both laser groups were comprised of five subgroups of n = 5 eyes each. Group A: non-scalded eyes (negative control); group B: eyes taken from tunnel-scalded animals; group C1: eyes taken from tank-scalded animals without opaque corneal lesion; group C2: eyes taken from animals with opaque corneal lesion; group D: eyes scalded in toto in the laboratory (positive control). In each group the lasers were employed to create a stromal flap. The quality of the laser cuts and the resulting flap beds, as well as of the porcine corneas themselves, was examined by anterior segment optical coherence tomography and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: All scalded specimens exhibited substantial corneal swelling, most pronounced in group C2. After ultraviolet laser application, the tank- and tunnel-scalded samples displayed marked irregularities and an increased degree of surface roughness in the flap beds. After infrared laser application, this was only the case in the tank-scalded specimens. CONCLUSION: It is not recommended to use eyes taken from scalded pigs for ultraviolet femtosecond laser experiments. For infrared femtosecond lasers, eyes taken from tunnel-scalded animals may represent an acceptable alternative, if non-scalded eyes are not available.

Usability of abattoir-acquired pig eyes for refractive excimer laser research.

The purpose of this study was to elucidate, under which conditions abattoir-acquired pig eyes are suitable for refractive excimer laser experiments. Porcine eyes from tunnel-scalded (n = 5) and tank-scalded (n = 10) pigs were compared to unscalded eyes (n = 5) and to eyes scalded in the laboratory (n = 5). The corneal epithelium was removed before an excimer laser was used to perform a - 8.0 D photoablation. Corneal thickness was measured by optical coherence topography before and after photoablation. The ablation depth was determined with a contour measuring station, the morphology of the ablated areas was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and white-light profilometry. The scalded eyes showed an increase in corneal swelling which gained statistical significance in tank-scalded eyes showing a wedge-shaped opaque stromal lesion in the nasal corneal quadrant. A measurable deterioration of photoablation was only found in tank-scalded eyes that exhibited the opaque lesion. Ablated area morphology was smooth and regular in the unscalded and tunnel-scalded eyes. The tank-scalded eyes showed conspicuous wrinkles. While unscalded eyes should always be preferred for excimer laser laboratory experiments, the data suggest that the use of tunnel-scalded eyes may also be acceptable and should be chosen over tank-scalded eyes.

Interface morphology and gas production by a refractive 347 nm ultraviolet femtosecond laser: Comparison with established laser systems.

PURPOSE: To evaluate gas production and interface quality after refractive lenticule creation. A new ultraviolet (UV) 347 nm femtosecond laser was compared with the FS200 and the Visumax lasers. SETTING: Department of Anatomy II, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Refractive lenticules were created in 52 porcine corneas with the UV laser (n = 20), the Visumax laser (n = 20), and a modified FS200 laser (n = 12). Twelve corneas in each laser group were fixed immediately after lenticule creation to entrap the gas produced. Lenticule extraction was omitted. From 16 other corneas (UV and Visumax lasers; n = 8 each) -5.0 diopter (D) and -10.0 D lenticules were extracted. On lenticule extraction, a flap was created and lifted. In 12 additional corneas, a flap was cut using the FS200 laser and lifted afterward; laser in situ keratomileusis was performed on 8 of these samples. The corneas were processed for light microscopy (gas bubble 2-dimensional morphometry) and scanning electron microscopy (interface quality). RESULTS: The Visumax generated approximately one half as much gas as the FS200. The UV laser undercut the Visumax by another 50%. The interfaces created by the FS200 appeared smooth and without irregularities. The optical zone margin was always conspicuous in the Visumax samples but hardly discernible in the UV specimens. Slight irregularities and very small lenticule pieces were found occasionally in both groups. The UV interfaces appeared slightly rougher than the Visumax interfaces. CONCLUSIONS: Ultraviolet laser lenticule extraction seems promising. The interface quality was similar to that of the clinical Visumax system while gas production was reduced significantly.