The Trop-2 signalling network in cancer growth.

Our findings show that upregulation of a wild-type Trop-2 has a key controlling role in human cancer growth, and that tumour development is quantitatively driven by Trop-2 expression levels. However, little is known about the regulation of expression of the TROP2 gene. Hence, we investigated the TROP2 transcription control network. TROP2 expression was shown to depend on a highly interconnected web of transcription factors: TP63/TP53L, ERG, GRHL1/Get-1 (grainyhead-like epithelial transactivator), HNF1A/TCF-1 (T-cell factor), SPI1/PU.1, WT (Wilms' tumour)1, GLIS2, AIRE (autoimmune regulator), FOXM1 (forkhead box M1) and FOXP3, with HNF4A as the major network hub. TROP2 upregulation was shown to subsequently drive the expression and activation of CREB1 (cyclic AMP-responsive-element binding protein), Jun, NF-κB, Rb, STAT1 and STAT3 through induction of the cyclin D1 and ERK (extracellular signal regulated kinase)/MEK (MAPK/ERK kinase) pathways. Growth-stimulatory signalling through NF-κB, cyclin D1 and ERK was shown to require an intact Trop-2 cytoplasmic tail. Network hubs and interacting partners are co-expressed with Trop-2 in primary human tumours, supporting a role of this signalling network in cancer growth.

An immunohistochemically positive E-cadherin status is not always predictive for a good prognosis in human breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: in primary breast cancers dichotomic classification of E-cadherin expression, according to an arbitrary cutoff, may be inadequate and lead to loss of prognostic significance or contrasting prognostic indications. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of high and low E-cadherin levels in a consecutive case series (204 cases) of unilateral node-negative non-lobular breast cancer patients with a 8-year median follow-up and that did not receive any adjuvant therapy after surgery. METHODS: expression of E-cadherin was investigated by immunohistochemistry and assessed according to conventional score (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). Multiple correspondence analysis was used to visualise associations of both categorical and continuous variables. The impact of E-cadherin expression on patients outcome was evaluated in terms of event-free survival curves by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional hazard Cox model. RESULTS: respect to intermediate E-cadherin expression values (2+), high (3+) or low (0 to 1+) E-cadherin expression levels had a negative prognostic impact. In fact, both patients with a low-to-nil (score 0 to 1+) expression level of E-cadherin and patients with a high E-cadherin expression level (score 3+) demonstrated an increased risk of failure (respectively, hazard ratio (HR)=1.71, confidence interval (CI)=0.72-4.06 and HR=4.22, CI=1.406-12.66) and an interesting association with young age. CONCLUSIONS: the findings support the evidence that high expression values of E-cadherin are not predictive for a good prognosis and may help to explain conflicting evidence on the prognostic impact of E-cadherin in breast cancer when assessed on dichotomic basis.

Relations between strain and gender dependencies of irinotecan toxicity and UGT1A1, CES2 and TOP1 expressions in mice.

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) can display severe toxicities in individual cancer patients. CPT-11 is bio-activated through CES, detoxified through UGT1A1 and inhibits TOP1. CPT-11 toxicity and UGT1A1, CES2 and TOP1 mRNAs and UGT1A1 protein were determined in male and female C57BL/6, B6D2F1 and B6CBAF1, as potential models for tailoring CPT-11 delivery. CPT-11 was administered intravenously (40-90 mg/kg/day for 4 days at 7h after light onset). The relations between dose and lethal toxicity or body weight loss were steep and similar in C57BL/6 (lethality, p=0.001; weight loss, p=0.002) and B6D2F1 (p=0.01; p=0.03, respectively), but weak in B6CBAF1. Females displayed less toxicity than males (p<0.001). Mean mRNA expression of UGT1A1 was highest in B6CBAF1 (p=0.039) and in females (p<0.001). Both CES2 and TOP1 varied according to strain and gender (p<0.001). The three gene expression data explained the most severe toxicity of CPT-11 in male B6D2F1, but displayed inconsistent relations with toxicity in the other groups. Mean UGT1A1 protein expression was highest in males as compared to females, and so by approximately 8-fold in C57BL/6 as compared to B6D2F1 (p<0.0001). Genetic background and gender significantly altered the molecular prediction of irinotecan toxicity by UGT1A1, CES2 and TOP1 mRNA expressions.