Changing outlook for colorectal liver metastasis resection in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to evaluate the impact of the advancements in clinical care, obtained over the last 20 years, for patients aged 70 and older undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS: Consecutive patients age 70 or older who underwent liver resection for CRLM at Aintree University Hospital (Liverpool, UK) between May 2008 and May 2015 were compared to a dataset of consecutive patients, meeting the same criteria, between 1990 and 2007. An enhanced recovery programme after surgery (ERAS) combined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was introduced in January 2008. RESULTS: The proportion of patients over 70 years undergoing liver resection for CRLM increased over the study period (6% in 1990, 16.3% in 2000, 26.5% in 2005 and 25.8% in 2007). The patients in the later group were more often treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (58 vs 34, p = 0.006) and underwent parenchymal sparing surgery, resulting in fewer major hepatectomies (51 vs 111, p < 0.001) and less perioperative morbidity (49 vs 70, p = 0.043) and mortality (3 vs 9, p = 0.229). Although there was shorter disease free survival (DFS) in the later group (DFS at 1, 3 and 5 years was 52.1%, 31.6%, 29% vs. 71.8%, 49.1%, 44.0%)(p < 0.01), similar overall survival (OS) was achieved (OS at 1, 3 and 5 years was 85.4%, 51.6%, 32.8% vs. 81.7%, 42.1%, 27.3%)(p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, with modern management (ERAS, CPET, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and parenchymal sparing surgery), a greater number of patients with CRLM, over the age of seventy, can undergo liver resection, with improved perioperative outcomes.

Hepatectomy for octogenarians with colorectal liver metastasis in the era of enhanced recovery.

BACKGROUND: Concern exists regarding the use of hepatectomy to treat colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) in octogenarians due to prior studies suggesting elevated morbidity and mortality. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) within pre-operative assessment and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) have both been shown to be associated with low morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hepatectomy. This study sought to compare the outcomes of octogenarians with patients aged 70-79 undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM, within a center utilizing both CPET and ERAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients age 70 or older who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM at Aintree University Hospital (Liverpool,UK), between May 2008 and May 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained cancer database. Data were extracted and comparisons drawn. RESULTS: 127 patients aged 70-79 years and 34 octogenarians underwent respectively 137 and 35 hepatectomy for CRLM. There was no difference in hospital stay (6 days), morbidity and mortality between the groups. OS at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86.7%, 55% and 35.8% for those aged 70-79 compared to 79.4%, 37.3% and 20.4% for the octogenarians (p=0.127). DFS at 1,3 and 5 years was 52.5%, 31.7% and 31.7% for 70-79 group compared to 46.2%, 31.5% and 16.8% for the octogenarians (p=0.838). On multivariate analysis major hepatectomy was associated with an increased risk of post-operative complications, inferior OS and DFS. Chronological age was not a predictor of postoperative complications, poorer OS or DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately selected octogenarians can have similar postoperative outcomes to patients aged 70-79 when undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM using ERAS combined with CPET. This study advocates using CPET and ERAS in the selection and management of octogenarian patients with CRLM undergoing hepatectomy.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing before liver surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) assessed "poorer" fitness correlates with poorer outcomes in blinded studies. Whether this correlation will persist when CPET is utilized to stratify care as part of a multi-modal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is unclear. This study examined whether CPET variables were associated with postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing hepatectomy within an ERAS program. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing elective hepatectomy between October 2009 and April 2011. The relationships between CPET derived variables; postoperative complications and length of stay were investigated. RESULTS: Of 267 patients undergoing surgery, 197 had undergone standard cycle ergometer CPET. The relative oxygen uptake [VO2 (ml kg(-1) min(-1))] and ventilatory equivalent of CO2 (VE/VCO2) at the anaerobic threshold (AT) were not associated with complications or length of stay. Greater absolute oxygen uptake at AT [VO2 at AT (L min(-1) )] was associated with early hospital discharge [OR 2.16 (95% CI 1.18-3.96), P = 0.013] on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: When CPET is used to delineate perioperative management a low relative oxygen uptake [VO2 (ml kg(-1) min(-1) )] at the AT does not place patients at significantly higher risk of postoperative complications. This suggests CPET assessed "poor" fitness should not be used as a barrier to surgical intervention.

Liver resection with concomitant inferior vena cava resection: experiences without veno-venous bypass.

PURPOSE: Liver resection offers the chance of a cure for liver cancer. However, when extended hepatectomies were performed in combination with resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC), the procedures were reported to have a surgical mortality rate in excess of 5 %. While most of these operations were performed with the use of veno-venous bypass, this study presents our experience performing the procedure without the bypass. METHODS: Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. A retrospective evaluation of a consecutive series of concomitant IVC and liver resections was performed. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-five liver resections were performed between June 2008 and November 2011. Eleven patients (1.9 %) underwent concomitant IVC and liver resections. One patient required segmental IVC replacement, and four IVC defects were closed using a bovine pericardial patch without bypass. Only one patient had histologically confirmed IVC invasion. There was no postoperative mortality. Nine postoperative complications occurred in five patients. No complications in terms of IVC patency were seen. Five patients had disease recurrence, one of whom died within 12 months of surgery. CONCLUSION: Concomitant liver and IVC resection is safe without using a bypass procedure, with acceptable short-term results. Meticulous technique, careful patient selection and a specialized anesthetic team are key to obtaining low postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and an acceptable oncological outcome.

Obstructive sleep apnea can be safely managed in a level 2 critical care setting after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, demand for intensive care beds (level 3 critical care) often outstrips supply, leading to frequent and frustrating cancellation of complex elective surgery. It has been suggested that patients with obstructive sleep apnea who undergo bariatric surgery should be admitted to a level 3 facility for routine postoperative management. We have questioned the validity of this dogma in the era of laparoscopic bariatric surgery by using a simple easily applicable algorithm. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) without admission to the intensive care unit after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: For the first 24 hours after surgery, all patients were admitted to a level 2 (high-dependency) area on a general surgical ward with experience of bariatric surgery. They received supplemental oxygen, continuous pulse oximetry, and judicious analgesic administration using a combination of small boluses of i.v. morphine together with i.v. paracetamol. Perioperative continuous positive airway pressure support was not routinely given, unless patients with OSA had oxygen saturation below their recorded preoperative level on 2 consecutive readings. RESULTS: A total of 1623 patients underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery over a 12-year period. Of those, 192 had OSA with a median operative body mass index of 52 kg/m(2) (range 34-78 kg/m(2)). The incidence of respiratory complications and the median length of stay (3 nights) were identical in patients with OSA and those without OSA. Four patients self-administered perioperative continuous positive airway pressure, but none required transfer to intensive care or mechanical ventilation. There were no in-hospital deaths. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in patients with OSA is well tolerated and does not require the routine use of level 3 critical care facilities.