Postoperative Radiation Therapy Is Indicated for "Low-Risk" Pathologic Stage I Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Region but Not for Other Locations.

Purpose: The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in early stage Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is controversial. We analyzed the role of PORT in preventing local recurrences (LR) among patients with low-risk, pathologic stage I MCC based on the location of the primary tumors: head/neck (HN) versus non-HN sites. Methods and Materials: One hundred forty-seven patients with MCC were identified that had "low risk" disease (pathologic T1 primary tumor, negative microscopic margins, negative pathologic node status, no immunosuppression or prior systemic therapy). LR was defined as tumor recurrence within 2 cm of the primary surgical bed, and its frequency was estimated with the cumulative incidence method. Results: Seventy-nine patients received PORT (30 HN, 49 non-HN) with a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 8-64 Gy) and 68 patients were treated with surgery alone (30 HN, 38 non-HN). Overall, PORT was associated with a decreased risk of LR (5-year rate: 0% vs 9.5%; P = .004) with 6 LRs observed in the surgery alone group. Although the addition of PORT significantly reduced LR rates among patients with HN MCC (0% vs. 21%; P = .034), no LRs were observed in patients with non-HN MCC managed with surgery alone. There was no significant difference in MCC-specific survival comparing HN versus non-HN groups, with or without PORT. Conclusions: For low-risk, pathologic stage I MCC of the extremities and trunk, excellent local control rates were achieved with surgery, and PORT is not indicated. However, PORT was associated with a significant reduction in LRs among low-risk MCC of the HN.

Genetic Risk Factors for Early-Onset Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Importance: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. Of the patients who develop MCC annually, only 4% are younger than 50 years. Objective: To identify genetic risk factors for early-onset MCC via genomic sequencing. Design, Setting, and Participants: The study represents a multicenter collaboration between the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the University of Washington. Participants with early-onset and later-onset MCC were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study at the University of Washington between January 2003 and May 2019. Unrelated controls were enrolled in the NIAID Centralized Sequencing Program (CSP) between September 2017 and September 2021. Analysis was performed from September 2021 and March 2023. Early-onset MCC was defined as disease occurrence in individuals younger than 50 years. Later-onset MCC was defined as disease occurrence at age 50 years or older. Unrelated controls were evaluated by the NIAID CSP for reasons other than familial cancer syndromes, including immunological, neurological, and psychiatric disorders. Results: This case-control analysis included 1012 participants: 37 with early-onset MCC, 45 with later-onset MCC, and 930 unrelated controls. Among 37 patients with early-onset MCC, 7 (19%) had well-described variants in genes associated with cancer predisposition. Six patients had variants associated with hereditary cancer syndromes (ATM = 2, BRCA1 = 2, BRCA2 = 1, and TP53 = 1) and 1 patient had a variant associated with immunodeficiency and lymphoma (MAGT1). Compared with 930 unrelated controls, the early-onset MCC cohort was significantly enriched for cancer-predisposing pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in these 5 genes (odds ratio, 30.35; 95% CI, 8.89-106.30; P < .001). No germline disease variants in these genes were identified in 45 patients with later-onset MCC. Additional variants in DNA repair genes were also identified among patients with MCC. Conclusions and Relevance: Because variants in certain DNA repair and cancer predisposition genes are associated with early-onset MCC, genetic counseling and testing should be considered for patients presenting at younger than 50 years.

Enhancing immunogenic responses through CDK4/6 and HIF2α inhibition in Merkel cell carcinoma.

Approximately 50% of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients facing this highly aggressive skin cancer initially respond positively to PD-1-based immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the recurrence of MCC post-immunotherapy emphasizes the pressing need for more effective treatments. Recent research has highlighted Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) as pivotal cell cycle regulators gaining prominence in cancer studies. This study reveals that the CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib can enhance PD-L1 gene transcription and surface expression in MCC cells by activating HIF2α. Inhibiting HIF2α with TC-S7009 effectively counteracts palbociclib-induced PD-L1 transcription and significantly intensifies cell death in MCC. Simultaneously, co-targeting CDK4/6 and HIF2α boosts ROS levels while suppressing SLC7A11, a key regulator of cellular redox balance, promoting ferroptosis- a form of immunogenic cell death linked to iron. Considering the rising importance of immunogenic cell death in immunotherapy, this strategy holds promise for improving future MCC treatments, markedly increasing immunogenic cell death various across various MCC cell lines, thus advancing cancer immunotherapy.

Increased risk of recurrence and disease-specific death following delayed postoperative radiation for Merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is often treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). The optimal time to initiate PORT (Time-to-PORT [ttPORT]) is unknown. PURPOSE: We assessed if delays in ttPORT were associated with inferior outcomes. METHODS: Competing risk regression was used to evaluate associations between ttPORT and locoregional recurrence (LRR) for patients with stage I/II MCC in a prospective registry and adjust for covariates. Distant metastasis and death were competing risks. RESULTS: The cohort included 124 patients with median ttPORT of 41 days (range: 8-125 days). Median follow-up was 55 months. 17 (14%) patients experienced a LRR, 14 (82%) of which arose outside the radiation field. LRR at 5 years was increased for ttPORT >8 weeks vs ≤ 8 weeks, 28.0% vs 9.2%, P = .006. There was an increase in the cumulative incidence of MCC-specific death with increasing ttPORT (HR = 1.14 per 1-week increase, P = .016). LIMITATIONS: The relatively low number of LRRs limited the extent of our multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Delay of PORT was associated with increased LRR, usually beyond the radiation field. This is consistent with the tendency of MCC to spread quickly via lymphatics. Initiation of PORT within 8 weeks was associated with improved locoregional control and MCC-specific survival.

Merkel cell carcinoma recurrence risk estimation is improved by integrating factors beyond cancer stage: A multivariable model and web-based calculator.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) recurs in 40% of patients. In addition to stage, factors known to affect recurrence risk include: sex, immunosuppression, unknown primary status, age, site of primary tumor, and time since diagnosis. PURPOSE: Create a multivariable model and web-based calculator to predict MCC recurrence risk more accurately than stage alone. METHODS: Data from 618 patients in a prospective cohort were used in a competing risk regression model to estimate recurrence risk using stage and other factors. RESULTS: In this multivariable model, the most impactful recurrence risk factors were: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (P < .001), immunosuppression (hazard ratio 2.05; P < .001), male sex (1.59; P = .003) and unknown primary (0.65; P = .064). Compared to stage alone, the model improved prognostic accuracy (concordance index for 2-year risk, 0.66 vs 0.70; P < .001), and modified estimated recurrence risk by up to 4-fold (18% for low-risk stage IIIA vs 78% for high-risk IIIA over 5 years). LIMITATIONS: Lack of an external data set for model validation. CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE: As demonstrated by this multivariable model, accurate recurrence risk prediction requires integration of factors beyond stage. An online calculator based on this model (at merkelcell.org/recur) integrates time since diagnosis and provides new data for optimizing surveillance for MCC patients.

Real-world clinical outcomes with avelumab in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma treated in the USA: a multicenter chart review study.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive, cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm with annual incidence rates of 0.13-1.6 cases/100,000/year worldwide as of 2018. Chemotherapy for metastatic MCC (mMCC) has high objective response rates (ORRs), but responses are not durable and overall survival (OS) is poor. Avelumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) has demonstrated meaningful survival benefit and durable responses in clinical trials for mMCC. This study investigated real-world clinical outcomes in avelumab-treated patients with advanced (stage IIIB/IV) MCC in US academic medical centers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with advanced MCC who initiated avelumab between March 1, 2017, and July 31, 2019, at six US academic centers. Data were requested for eligible patients from index date through December 31, 2020. Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess demographic and clinical characteristics, real-world ORR (rwORR), real-world duration of response, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and OS. RESULTS: Ninety patients with advanced MCC (82%, stage IV; 18%, stage IIIB) received avelumab. Median follow-up was 20.8 months (95% CI: 19.1 to 24.2). Median age was 68 years (range, 48-83), and the majority of patients were men (58%) and white (93%). The primary tumor was most commonly located on the lower limb (38%), with metastases mostly located in lymph nodes (68%), lung (52%), and viscera (52%). Approximately 42% and 26% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 and 3, respectively. Seventy-three patients (81%) received avelumab as first-line treatment of advanced MCC, while 17 (19%) received avelumab as second-line or later treatment. The median duration of avelumab treatment was 13.5 months (95% CI: 6.4 to 30.6), with 42% of patients still receiving avelumab by the end of follow-up. Patients with avelumab treatment had an rwORR of 73% (95% CI: 64 to 83), median rwPFS of 24.4 months (95% CI: 8.31 to not estimable (NE)), and median OS of 30.7 months (95% CI: 11.2 to NE). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study of patients with advanced MCC demonstrated that avelumab treatment resulted in a high response rate with durable responses and prolonged survival. The study findings validate the results demonstrated in prospective clinical trials and other observational studies.

Recurrence and Mortality Risk of Merkel Cell Carcinoma by Cancer Stage and Time From Diagnosis.

IMPORTANCE: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) often behaves aggressively; however, disease-recurrence data are not captured in national databases, and it is unclear what proportion of patients with MCC experience a recurrence (estimates vary from 27%-77%). Stage-specific recurrence data that includes time from diagnosis would provide more precise prognostic information and contribute to risk-appropriate clinical surveillance. OBJECTIVE: To estimate risk of stage-specific MCC recurrence and mortality over time since diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study included 618 patients with MCC who were prospectively enrolled in a Seattle-based data repository between 2003 and 2019. Of these patients, 223 experienced a recurrence of MCC. Data analysis was performed July 2019 to November 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Stage-specific recurrence and survival, as well as cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Among the 618 patients included in the analysis (median [range] age, 69 [11-98] years; 227 [37%] female), the 5-year recurrence rate for MCC was 40%. Risk of recurrence in the first year was high (11% for patients with pathologic stage I, 33% for pathologic stage IIA/IIB, 30% for pathologic stage IIIA, 45% for pathologic stage IIIB, and 58% for pathologic stage IV), with 95% of recurrences occurring within the first 3 years. Median follow-up among living patients was 4.3 years. Beyond stage, 4 factors were associated with increased recurrence risk in univariable analyses: immunosuppression (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.3; P < .001), male sex (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.5; P < .001), known primary lesion among patients with clinically detectable nodal disease (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-4.0; P = .001), and older age (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; P = .06 for each 10-year increase). Among 187 deaths in the cohort, 121 (65%) were due to MCC. The MCC-specific survival rate was strongly stage dependent (95% at 5 years for patients with pathologic stage I vs 41% for pathologic stage IV). Among patients presenting with stage I to II MCC, a local recurrence (17 arising within/adjacent to the primary tumor scar) did not appreciably diminish survival compared with patients who had no recurrence (85% vs 88% MCC-specific survival at 5 years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, the MCC recurrence rate (approximately 40%) was notably different than that reported for invasive melanoma (approximately 19%), squamous cell carcinoma (approximately 5%-9%), or basal cell carcinoma (approximately 1%-2%) following definitive therapy. Because more than 90% of MCC recurrences arise within 3 years, it is appropriate to adjust surveillance intensity accordingly. Stage- and time-specific recurrence data can assist in appropriately focusing surveillance resources on patients and time intervals in which recurrence risk is highest.

Prevalence of sexual harassment and sexual assault from patient to provider among women in dermatology and across specialties.

BACKGROUND: Sexual harassment (SH) includes unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and hostile conduct that targets someone based on gender and overlaps with some types of sexual assault (SA). SH/SA in health care can occur between providers or between patient and provider. Most studies of SH in medicine focus on SH perpetrated by one health care provider against another, with very few studies examining SH from patient to provider. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the prevalence and impact of SH/SA from patient to provider, with a particular focus on SH/SA experienced by dermatologists and trainees. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was sent to professional listservs and an online forum, which included representatives from multiple institutions, practice settings, and medical specialties. Trainees and dermatologists were targeted particularly. RESULTS: A total of 330 complete responses were included. In all, 83% of respondents reported experiencing SH from a patient. SH from a patient was more frequently reported by women compared with men (94% vs. 52%; p = .001). Behaviors consistent with SA were experienced by 31% of respondents and were more frequently experienced by women (35% vs. 15%; p = .001). Women were more likely to report that patient-to-provider SH contributed to burnout (33% of women vs. 9% of men; p = .002). Female trainees were significantly more likely to have experienced SH compared with female attendings within the past year (94 of 110 trainees [86%] vs. 83 of 127 attendings [65%]; p = .001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of women reporting ever experiencing SH when comparing dermatology and nondermatology specialties. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study include the relatively small sample size, oversampling of trainees, and a gender-biased sample. CONCLUSION: Patient-to-provider SH/SA is widespread, particularly among women and trainees, and may have a significant impact on burnout.

Integrative medicine use in patients with cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma: A cross-sectional survey study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize patterns of integrative medicine (IM) use and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, online survey, created in conjunction with the Cutaneous Lymphoma Foundation (CLF). SETTING: A link to the online survey was posted on the CLF Facebook page and emailed to the CLF listserv; 372 survey responses were received. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study outcomes were IM use, cancer symptoms, and HRQoL measured via the Skindex-16 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). RESULTS: A total of 292 patient responses (66 % female, median age 59y) were included in analysis. 87 % had mycosis fungoides and 12 % had Sézary syndrome. A majority (59 %) of patients reported using IM for their CTCL, with 48 % using IM to treat their disease and 47 % using IM to manage their symptoms. The most commonly used IM were vitamins/minerals (32 %), prayer/meditation (26 %), diet (24 %), and exercise/yoga (22 %). Higher itch scores were reported by patients using IM compared to non-users (31 (IQR 10-62) and 18 (IQR 3-46) respectively; p = 0.002). HRQoL was worse among patients who reported IM use; median Skindex-16 scores were 54 (IQR 28-72) among IM users compared to 33 (IQR 19-57) for non-IM users (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IM use is common among patients with CTCL, particularly those with worse itching and worse HRQoL. IM interventions require further study given use by CTCL patients to treat disease and ameliorate symptoms.

Narrow excision margins are appropriate for Merkel cell carcinoma when combined with adjuvant radiation: Analysis of 188 cases of localized disease and proposed management algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) management typically includes surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT). Major challenges include determining surgical margin size and whether aRT is indicated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of aRT, surgical margin size, and MCC local recurrence. METHODS: Analysis of 188 MCC cases presenting without clinical nodal involvement. RESULTS: aRT-treated patients tended to have higher-risk tumors (larger diameter, positive microscopic margins, immunosuppression) yet had fewer local recurrences (LRs) than patients treated with surgery only (1% vs 15%; P = .001). For patients who underwent surgery alone, 7 of 35 (20%) treated with narrow margins (defined as ≤1.0 cm) developed LR, whereas 0 of 13 patients treated with surgical margins greater than 1.0 cm developed LR (P = .049). For aRT-treated patients, local control was excellent regardless of surgical margin size; only 1% experienced recurrence in each group (1 of 70 with narrow margins ≤1 cm and 1 of 70 with margins >1 cm; P = .56). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with aRT, local control was superb even if significant risk factors were present and margins were narrow. We propose an algorithm for managing primary MCC that integrates risk factors and optimizes local control while minimizing morbidity.

Clinical benefit of baseline imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma: Analysis of 584 patients.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) guidelines derive from melanoma and do not recommend baseline cross-sectional imaging for most patients. However, MCC is more likely to have metastasized at diagnosis than melanoma. OBJECTIVE: To determine how often baseline imaging identifies clinically occult MCC in patients with newly diagnosed disease with and without palpable nodal involvement. METHODS: Analysis of 584 patients with MCC with a cutaneous primary tumor, baseline imaging, no evident distant metastases, and sufficient staging data. RESULTS: Among 492 patients with clinically uninvolved regional nodes, 13.2% had disease upstaged by imaging (8.9% in regional nodes, 4.3% in distant sites). Among 92 patients with clinically involved regional nodes, 10.8% had disease upstaged to distant metastatic disease. Large (>4 cm) and small (<1 cm) primary tumors were both frequently upstaged (29.4% and 7.8%, respectively). Patients who underwent positron emission tomography-computed tomography more often had disease upstaged (16.8% of 352), than those with computed tomography alone (6.9% of 231; P = .0006). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinically node-negative disease, baseline imaging showed occult metastatic MCC at a higher rate than reported for melanoma (13.2% vs <1%). Although imaging is already recommended for patients with clinically node-positive MCC, these data suggest that baseline imaging is also indicated for patients with clinically node-negative MCC because upstaging is frequent and markedly alters management and prognosis.

Should Margin Status of Biopsies Be Included in Dermatopathology Reports? Clinician Preferences and the Importance of Unambiguous Language.

Significant communication occurs between pathologists and clinicians through the dermatopathology report. Our objective was to describe clinician preference about reporting of the margin status of skin biopsies of nonmelanoma skin cancers. An anonymous survey was sent to 243 medical providers who submitted specimens to a single institution university medical center; 50 complete responses from attending-level providers and advance practice providers were received. The majority (96%) of those surveyed indicated margins should be reported on skin biopsies of neoplasms, particularly nonmelanoma skin cancers (basal cell carcinoma 96% and squamous cell carcinoma 92%) and atypical nevi (96%). When asked about particular language used to describe the margin status, some phrasing led to more variance in respondents' clinical management decisions, with 96%-98% of respondents making the same decision when presented with "unambiguous" terms and 58%-84% of respondents making the same decision when presented with "ambiguous" language (P < 0.001). Respondents generally preferred "unambiguous" margin descriptions when shown an involved margin (70% vs. 30%, P < 0.001) but accepted "ambiguous" language when the margin was clearly uninvolved (68% vs. 32%, P = 0.015). Most respondents (88%) desire inclusion of treatment recommendations in dermatopathology reports. Microscopic descriptions were highly utilized, particularly by nondermatology trained clinicians (97% vs. 80%, P = 0.09). Clinicians desire inclusion of margins for skin biopsies in dermatopathology reports, at least in some circumstances. The choice of language used to describe the margin status in dermatopathology reports has important implications for patient care. Margin descriptors that are unclear or ambiguous may lead to more variance in clinical management.

Patterns of distant metastases in 215 Merkel cell carcinoma patients: Implications for prognosis and surveillance.

Approximately one-third of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients eventually develop distant metastatic disease. Little is known about whether the location of the primary lesion is predictive of initial distant metastatic site, or if survival likelihood differs depending on the metastatic site. Such data could inform imaging/surveillance practices and improve prognostic accuracy. Multivariate and competing-risk analyses were performed on a cohort of 215 MCC patients with distant metastases, 31% of whom had two or more initial sites of distant metastasis. At time of initial distant metastasis in the 215 patients, metastatic sites (n = 305) included non-regional lymph nodes (present in 41% of patients), skin/body wall (25%), liver (23%), bone (21%), pancreas (8%), lung (7%), and brain (5%). Among the 194 patients who presented with MCC limited to local or regional sites (stage I-III) but who ultimately developed distant metastases, distant progression occurred in 49% by 1 year and in 80% by 2 years following initial diagnosis. Primary MCC locations differed in how likely they were to metastasize to specific organs/sites (P < .001). For example, liver metastases were far more likely from a head/neck primary (43% of 58 patients) versus a lower limb primary (5% of 39 patients; P < .0001). Skin-only distant metastasis was associated with lower MCC-specific mortality as compared to metastases in multiple organs/sites (HR 2.7; P = .003), in the liver (HR 2.1; P = .05), or in distant lymph nodes (HR 2.0; P = .045). These data reflect outcomes before PD1-pathway inhibitor availability, which may positively impact survival. In conclusion, primary MCC location is associated with a pattern of distant spread, which may assist in optimizing surveillance. Because it is linked to survival, the site of initial distant metastasis should be considered when assessing prognosis.

Imaging of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: What Imaging Experts Should Know.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor with a higher mortality rate than melanoma. Approximately 40% of MCC patients have nodal or distant metastasis at initial presentation, and one-third of patients will develop distant metastatic disease over their clinical course. Although MCC is rare, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Furthermore, the immunogenicity of MCC and its diagnostic and therapeutic application have made MCC one of the most rapidly developing topics in dermatology and oncology. Owing to the aggressive and complex nature of MCC, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for management of this tumor, including dermatologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians. Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis, planning for surgery or radiation therapy, and assessment of treatment response and surveillance. However, MCC is still not well recognized among radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians, likely owing to its rarity. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness of MCC among imaging experts by describing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of MCC and current clinical management with a focus on the role of imaging. The authors highlight imaging findings characteristic of MCC, as well as the clinical significance of CT, MRI, sentinel lymph node mapping, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and other nuclear medicine studies such as bone scintigraphy and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. ©RSNA, 2019.

Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the travel burden for cancer patients with rare tumor types, such as Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand the travel burden of MCC patients. METHODS: This study used data from an MCC registry at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA). All MCC patients enrolled at SCCA with a valid 3-digit ZIP code were included. Patients were followed up from January 1, 2012 until their last follow-up, death, or end of data (January 1, 2017). Travel burden was measured by one-way travel distance to SCCA from each patient's 3-digit ZIP code. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and follow-up visit were evaluated and stratified by one-way driving distance of ≤300 and >300 miles. RESULTS: A total of 391 MCC patients were included (68% men, mean age = 67 years [±SD = ±11 years], 67% residing in the West, and 70% white). At diagnosis, 53% of the patients had Stage III or IV MCC. Mean one-way distance traveled by patients was 1,137 (median: 813) miles, and 57% of patients traveled >300 miles. Compared to patients who traveled ≤300 miles, those who traveled >300 miles were more likely to be <70 years old (46% vs 65%; P < 0.001), were diagnosed with advanced stage (III or IV) MCC (46% vs 59%; P = 0.01), had shorter follow-up in the cancer registry (mean: 509 vs 212 days; P < 0.001), and had fewer visits during follow-up (mean: 5.2 vs 2.5; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this single cancer center study, the majority of MCC patients trav-eled long distances to receive expert care. Longer travel distances appeared to be associated with younger age, a more advanced stage of cancer at study entry and fewer in-clinic visits, suggesting that travel burden may impact timely and adequate patient care for this rare cancer.

Differential Outcomes Among Immunosuppressed Patients With Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Immunosuppression Type on Cancer-specific and Overall Survival.

OBJECTIVES: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer with higher incidence among whites, elderly, and immunosuppressed patients. Although immunosuppressed MCC patients are at higher risk of recurrence and MCC-related death, it is unknown whether immunosuppression type is associated with differential outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 89 nonmetastatic MCC patients with a diagnosis of chronic immunosuppression. Immunosuppression was categorized as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (31% of cohort), other hematologic malignancies (18%), solid organ transplant (21%), autoimmune disease (21%), and human immunodeficiency virus acquired deficiency syndrome (8%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and MCC-specific survival (MSS) were estimated with the cumulative incidence function. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 52 months, 53 deaths occurred (42 from MCC, 7 unknown, and 4 non-MCC). Two-year PFS, MSS, and OS were 30%, 55%, and 52%, respectively. Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired deficiency syndrome and solid organ transplant patients were diagnosed with MCC at a younger age (median 55 and 59 y, respectively) and with more advanced stage disease compared with other immunosuppressed subgroups. PFS did not significantly differ among the 5 immunosuppression subgroups (P=0.30), but significant differences were observed in MSS and OS (both P=0.01). Controlling for potential confounders for OS, including age and stage, immunosuppression type was still significantly associated with risk of death (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among immunosuppressed MCC patients, recurrent MCC is the major cause of mortality. The risk of death from MCC differs among immunosuppression types, suggesting important biological differences in host-tumor immune interactions.

Effect of Patient Immune Status on the Efficacy of Radiation Therapy and Recurrence-Free Survival Among 805 Patients With Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) with chronic immunosuppression (IS) have worse outcomes, but the mechanisms are not well understood. We hypothesized that these differences may be mediated in part by differential response to treatment, and we evaluated whether radiation therapy (RT) efficacy is altered among IS compared with immune-competent (IC) patients with MCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among 805 patients with MCC, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and patterns of first recurrence were compared between 89 IS and 716 IC patients with stage I to III MCC treated with curative intent. We used a Fine and Gray's competing risk multivariable analysis to estimate associations with RFS. RESULTS: IS and IC patients with MCC had similar demographic and disease characteristics. Most (77% IC, 86% IS) were irradiated (median, 50.4 Gy IC, 50.3 Gy IS), although more IS patients were irradiated to the primary site (97% vs 81%). With a median follow-up of 54.4 months, IS patients had inferior RFS (2-year: 30% vs 57%; P < .0001) and higher rates of local recurrence as the first site of relapse (25% vs 12%; P = .0002). The association between RT and RFS differed by immune status (interaction P = .01). Although RT was associated with significantly improved RFS among IC patients (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.72), no difference in RFS was observed with RT among IS patients (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.70-3.17). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy efficacy at current standard RT doses for MCC is impaired among immunosuppressed patients with MCC. Although a strong link between durability of RT response and immune function does not appear to be evident in most cancers, our results may reflect an especially dynamic interaction between immune status and RT efficacy in MCC.

Adaptation of commensal proliferating Escherichia coli to the intestinal tract of young children with cystic fibrosis.

The mature human gut microbiota is established during the first years of life, and altered intestinal microbiomes have been associated with several human health disorders. Escherichia coli usually represents less than 1% of the human intestinal microbiome, whereas in cystic fibrosis (CF), greater than 50% relative abundance is common and correlates with intestinal inflammation and fecal fat malabsorption. Despite the proliferation of E. coli and other Proteobacteria in conditions involving chronic gastrointestinal tract inflammation, little is known about adaptation of specific characteristics associated with microbiota clonal expansion. We show that E. coli isolated from fecal samples of young children with CF has adapted to growth on glycerol, a major component of fecal fat. E. coli isolates from different CF patients demonstrate an increased growth rate in the presence of glycerol compared with E. coli from healthy controls, and unrelated CF E. coli strains have independently acquired this growth trait. Furthermore, CF and control E. coli isolates have differential gene expression when grown in minimal media with glycerol as the sole carbon source. While CF isolates display a growth-promoting transcriptional profile, control isolates engage stress and stationary-phase programs, which likely results in slower growth rates. Our results indicate that there is selection of unique characteristics within the microbiome of individuals with CF, which could contribute to individual disease outcomes.

Merkel cell carcinoma: Current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) incidence rates are rising and strongly age-associated, relevant for an aging population. OBJECTIVE: Determine MCC incidence in the United States and project incident cases through the year 2025. METHODS: Registry data were obtained from the SEER-18 Database, containing 6600 MCC cases. Age- and sex-adjusted projections were generated using US census data. RESULTS: During 2000-2013, the number of reported solid cancer cases increased 15%, melanoma cases increased 57%, and MCC cases increased 95%. In 2013, the MCC incidence rate was 0.7 cases/100,000 person-years in the United States, corresponding to 2488 cases/year. MCC incidence increased exponentially with age, from 0.1 to 1.0 to 9.8 (per 100,000 person-years) among age groups 40-44 years, 60-64 years, and ≥85 years, respectively. Due to aging of the Baby Boomer generation, US MCC incident cases are predicted to climb to 2835 cases/year in 2020 and 3284 cases/year in 2025. LIMITATIONS: We assumed that the age-adjusted incidence rate would stabilize, and thus, the number of incident cases we projected might be an underestimate. CONCLUSION: An aging population is driving brisk increases in the number of new MCC cases in the United States. This growing impact combined with the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape warrants expanded awareness of MCC diagnosis and management.