Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 60(11): 5257-5270, 2021 11 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34086876

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Immunization is an essential component of RA care. Nevertheless, vaccine coverage in RA is suboptimal. Contextual, individual and vaccine-related factors influence vaccine acceptance. However, barriers and facilitators of vaccination in RA are not well defined. The aim of this study was to assess perspectives of RA patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in RA care of barriers and facilitators regarding influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. METHODS: Eight focus groups (four with RA patients and four with HCPs) and eight semi-structured open-ended individual interviews with vaccine-hesitant RA patients were conducted. Data were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and imported to MAXQDA software. Analysis using the framework of vaccine hesitancy proposed by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization was conducted. RESULTS: RA patients and HCPs reported common and specific barriers and facilitators to influenza vaccination that included contextual, individual and/or group and vaccine- and/or vaccination-specific factors. A key contextual influence on vaccination was patients' perception of the media, pharmaceutical industry, authorities, scientists and the medical community at large. Among the individual-related influences, experiences with vaccination, knowledge/awareness and beliefs about health and disease prevention were considered to impact vaccine acceptance. Vaccine-related factors including concerns about vaccine side effects such as RA flares, the safety of new formulations, the mechanism of action, access to vaccines and costs associated with vaccination were identified as actionable barriers. CONCLUSION: Acknowledging RA patients' perceived barriers to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination and implementing specific strategies to address them might increase vaccination coverage in this population.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Hesitação Vacinal , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Asthma ; 53(10): 1076-84, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27167629

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adherence to daily asthma controller medication has been shown to be the most effective component of asthma self-management; however, patient's adherence to asthma medication remains poor. This study aimed to understand how patients' long-term asthma controller medication adherence may be improved and facilitated by comparing key asthma stakeholders' perspectives. METHOD: Six focus group interviews including 38 asthma stakeholders (n = 13 patients, n = 13 pulmonologist physicians, and n = 12 allied healthcare professionals) were conducted. Interviews were qualitatively analysed. RESULTS: Although similar themes were brought up across different asthma stakeholders, the way in which they were framed differed across stakeholders. The most salient discussion revolved around the content and the moment in which asthma education should be approached to facilitate patients' adherence to asthma medication. CONCLUSION: Asthma medication adherence is a complex process and successful interventions aimed at its improvement would benefit from: (a) making an effort to understand patients' experiences and negotiate the treatment regimen, rather than imposing recommendations; (b) considering treatment as a shared responsibility involving the patient, the healthcare professional(s), and the patients' social networks; and,


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes , Adulto Jovem
3.
Can Respir J ; 21(4): 221-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24712015

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The recent literature has reported disparate views between patients and health care professionals regarding the roles of various factors affecting medication adherence. OBJECTIVE: To examine the perspectives of asthma patients, physicians and allied health professionals regarding adherence to asthma medication. METHODOLOGY: A qualitative, multiple, collective case study design with six focus-group interviews including 38 participants (13 asthma patients, 13 pulmonologist physicians and 12 allied health professionals involved in treating asthma patients) was conducted. RESULTS: Patients, physicians and allied health professionals understood adherence to be an active process. In addition, all participants believed they had a role in treatment adherence, and agreed that the cost of medication was high and that access to the health care system was restricted. Major disagreements regarding patient-related barriers to medication adherence were identified among the groups. For example, all groups referred to side effects; however, while patients expressed their legitimate concerns, health care professionals believed that patients' opinions of medication side effects were based on inadequate perceptions. CONCLUSION: Differences regarding medication adherence and barriers to adherence among the groups examined in the present study will provide insight into how disagreements may be translated to overcome barriers to optimal asthma adherence. Furthermore, when designing an intervention to enhance medication adherence, it is important to acknowledge that perceptual gaps exist and must be addressed.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Grupos Focais , Humanos
4.
Chest ; 132(1): 148-55, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17505033

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders are highly prevalent in patients with COPD. In general, psychiatric disorders are more common in women than in men. The extent to which women with COPD suffer from greater psychiatric and psychological morbidity is not known. The present cross-sectional study evaluated the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders, levels of psychological distress, and quality of life in 62 women and 54 men with documented, stable COPD. METHODS: All patients (n = 116) underwent a sociodemographic and medical history interview, followed by a structured psychiatric interview and standard spirometry. Patients also completed a battery of questionnaires measuring psychological distress and quality of life. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of psychiatric disorders was 49%. Significantly more women than men met the diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders (56% vs 35%), and a trend for greater levels of major depression in women was found (18% vs 7%). Women had significantly higher anxiety sensitivity and depressive symptoms compared to men but did not report more limitations in psychological functioning. Women also reported being less confident in their ability to control respiratory symptoms, and more daily physical limitations compared to men, despite having comparable COPD severity, dyspnea scores, and exacerbation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that psychiatric disorders are at least three times higher in COPD patients compared to the general population, and nearly two times higher in women than in men. Women also have greater psychological distress, worse perceived control of symptoms, and greater functional impairment. Greater efforts should be made to identify and treat psychiatric disorders in COPD patients, particularly in women.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Afeto/fisiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Autoimagem , Caracteres Sexuais
5.
Respir Med ; 99(10): 1249-57, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16140225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Achieving good asthma control has become the major goal of asthma treatment. Studies have reported a high rate of psychiatric disorders among asthma patients, though the impact of these disorders on asthma control and quality of life remains unexplored. This study evaluated the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 406 adult asthma patients, and associations between psychiatric status, levels of asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life. METHODS: Consecutive asthma patients presenting to the asthma clinic underwent a brief, structured psychiatric interview, completed the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and reported the frequency of bronchodilator use in the past week. All patients underwent standard pulmonary function testing. RESULTS: A total of 34% (n=136) of patients had one or more psychiatric diagnosis, including major depression (15%), minor depression (5%), dysthymia (4%), panic disorder (12%), generalized anxiety disorder (5%), and social phobia (4%). Though there were no differences in pulmonary function, patients with versus without psychiatric disorders had worse ACQ and AQLQ scores and reported greater bronchodilator use, independent age, sex and asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that psychiatric disorders are prevalent among asthmatics and are associated with worse asthma control and quality of life. Physicians should be aware of the potential risk of poorer asthma control and functional impairment in this population.


Assuntos
Asma/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Adulto , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatologia , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA