Don't drink and chill: Effects of alcohol on subjective and physiological reactions during music listening and their relationships with personality and listening habits.

Recent research indicates that favorite music can induce chills and alters physiological reactions. People frequently listen to music when they drink alcohol, for example in bars or discotheques. Alcohol has numerous effects on emotions, peripheral physiological and neural reactions. We investigated whether alcohol intake influences chill experiences and physiological reactions during music listening. 39 participants took part in the study and were tested twice: Once in a sober condition and once when they had drunken alcohol. Participants listened to two pieces of music in each of the two conditions: A favorite self-selected song and a control-song that was selected by the research group. Participants had to indicate when they experienced a chill and electrodermal activity and heart rate were measured during music listening. In addition, participants filled out questionnaires concerning the big five personality dimensions, music listening habits and general chill experiences. Results indicate that participants experienced most chills when they were sober and listened to their self-selected song. Electrodermal activity was highest when participants were sober. In addition, alcohol intake led to a dedifferentiation in heart rate activity. After alcohol intake, participants had similar heart rates, no matter whether they listened to their self-selected song or to the control-song. Extraversion was negatively related with physiological reactions, while openness to experiences was positively related with physiological reactions. Music listening habits also showed various relationships with chill experiences and physiological reactions, while general chill experiences did not. We conclude that alcohol intake reduces subjective chill experiences during music listening and alters the physiological reactions to music. Music listening habits and personality seem to influence these effects.

Influence of different oxygenator types on changing frequency, infection incidence, and mortality in ARDS patients on veno-venous ECMO.

PURPOSE: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) is pivotal in the treatment of patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Comparative data with different oxygenator models have not yet been reported. The aim of this retrospective investigation was therefore to assess whether different oxygenator types might influence changing frequency, infection incidence, and mortality in patients on vv-ECMO. METHODS: 42 patients undergoing vv-ECMO between 1998 and 2009 were identified. In 20 out of these patients, a polypropylene (PP) microporous hollow fiber membrane oxygenator, and in 22 patients a nonmicroporous polymethylpentene (PMP) diffusion membrane oxygenator was used. Infection incidence, changing frequency, and mortality were documented. RESULTS: In the PMP group, an oxygenator change was necessary less often than in the PP group (p<0.001). The incidence of bacterial, viral, or fungal growth was similar in the groups, thus independent of the frequency of oxygenator change. Irrespective of the groups, the occurrence of Candida sp. tended to correlate with death (p = 0.06). In general, there was a trend towards a higher infection incidence in the subgroup with pulmonary ARDS (p = 0.07). Moreover, infection incidence was associated with a longer ICU stay (p = 0.03) and longer ECMO therapy (p = 0.03). ICU mortality was lower in the PMP group than in the PP group, although not statistically significant (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The PMP oxygenator membranes showed benefits with regards to changing frequency, but not infection incidence, length of ICU stay, and length of ECMO therapy. There was a trend towards a lower ICU mortality in patients with PMP oxygenators.