The state of the art in secondary pharmacology and its impact on the safety of new medicines.

Secondary pharmacology screening of investigational small-molecule drugs for potentially adverse off-target activities has become standard practice in pharmaceutical research and development, and regulatory agencies are increasingly requesting data on activity against targets with recognized adverse effect relationships. However, the screening strategies and target panels used by pharmaceutical companies may vary substantially. To help identify commonalities and differences, as well as to highlight opportunities for further optimization of secondary pharmacology assessment, we conducted a broad-ranging survey across 18 companies under the auspices of the DruSafe leadership group of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development. Based on our analysis of this survey and discussions and additional research within the group, we present here an overview of the current state of the art in secondary pharmacology screening. We discuss best practices, including additional safety-associated targets not covered by most current screening panels, and present approaches for interpreting and reporting off-target activities. We also provide an assessment of the safety impact of secondary pharmacology screening, and a perspective on opportunities and challenges in this rapidly developing field.

Structure-Activity Relationship and Voltage Dependence for the Drug-Drug Interaction between Amiodarone Analogs and MNI-1 at the L-type Cav Channel.

The drug-drug interaction (DDI) between amiodarone (AMIO) and sofosbuvir (SOF), a direct-acting hepatitis-C NS5B nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, has been associated with severe bradyarrhythmia in patients. Recent cryo-EM data has revealed that this DDI occurs at the α-subunit of L-type Cav channels, with AMIO binding at the fenestration site and SOF [or MSD nucleotide inhibitor #1 (MNI-1): analog of SOF] binding at the central cavity of the conductance pathway. In this study, we investigated the DDI between 21 AMIO analogs, including dronedarone (DRON) and MNI-1 (or SOF) in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) and hCav1.2 models. Our findings indicate that among the tested AMIO analogs in hiPSC-CMs at clinically relevant concentrations, only three analogs (AA-9, AA-10, and AA-17) were able to effectively substitute for AMIO in this DDI with 1 µM MNI-1. This highlights the importance of the diethyl amino group of AMIO for interacting with MNI-1. In the hCav1.2 model, desethylamiodarone (AA-12) demonstrated synergy with 90 µM MNI-1, while three other analogs with modifications to the position of the diethyl amino group or removal of iodo groups showed weaker synergy with 90 µM MNI-1. Interestingly, DRON did not exhibit any interaction with 270 µM SOF or 90 µM MNI-1, suggesting that it could safely replace AMIO in patients requiring SOF treatment, other clinically relevant differences considered. Overall, our functional data align with the cryo-EM data, highlighting that this DDI is dependent on the structure of AMIO and cardiomyocyte resting membrane potential. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our findings point to specific residues in the AMIO molecule playing a critical role in the DDI between AMIO and MNI-1 (SOF analog), confirming cryo-EM results. Applied at clinically relevant AMIO's concentrations or projected MNI-1's concentrations at the resting potentials mimicking the sinoatrial node, this DDI significantly slowed down or completely inhibited the beating of hiPSC-CMs. Finally, these in vitro results support the safe replacement of AMIO (Cordarone) with DRON (Multaq) for patients requiring SOF treatment, other clinical caveats considered.