Comparative cardiovascular risk in users versus non-users of xanthine oxidase inhibitors and febuxostat versus allopurinol users.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality comparing between xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) and non-XOI users, and between allopurinol and febuxostat. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of gout patients prescribed anti-hyperuricemic medications between 2013 and 2017 using a territory-wide administrative database. XOI users were matched 1:1 to XOI non-users using propensity scores. Febuxostat users were matched 1:3 to allopurinol users. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on colchicine use. RESULTS: Of the 13 997 eligible participants, 3607 (25.8%) were XOI users and 10 390 (74.2%) were XOI non-users. After propensity score matching, compared with non-users (n = 3607), XOI users (n = 3607) showed similar incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.997, 95% CI, 0.879, 1.131; P>0.05) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.972, 95% CI 0.886, 1.065, P=0.539). Febuxostat (n = 276) users showed a similar risk of MACE compared with allopurinol users (n = 828; HR: 0.672, 95% CI, 0.416, 1.085; P=0.104) with a tendency towards a lower risk of heart failure-related hospitalizations (HR = 0.529, 95% CI 0.272, 1.029; P=0.061). Concurrent colchicine use reduced the risk for all-cause mortality amongst XOI users (HR = 0.671, 95% 0.586, 0.768; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In gout patients, XOI users showed similar risk of MACE and all-cause mortality compared with non-users. Compared with allopurinol users, febuxostat users showed similar MACE and all-cause mortality risks but lower heart failure-related hospitalizations.

Electrocardiographic conduction and repolarization markers associated with sudden cardiac death: moving along the electrocardiography waveform.

The QT interval along with its heart rate corrected form (QTc) are well-established ECG markers that have been found to be associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmogenesis. However, extensive preclinical and clinical investigations over the years have allowed for novel clinical ECG markers to be generated as predictors of arrhythmogenesis and sudden cardiac death. Repolarization markers include the older QTc, QT dispersion and newer Tpeak - Tend intervals, (Tpeak - Tend) / QT ratios, T-wave alternans (TWA), microvolt TWA and T-wave area dispersion. Meanwhile, conduction markers dissecting the QRS complex, such as QRS dispersion (QRSD) and fragmented QRS, were also found to correlate conduction velocity and unidirectional block with re-entrant substrates in various cardiac conditions. Both repolarization and conduction parameters can be combined into the excitation wavelength (λ). A surrogate marker for λ is the index of Cardiac Electrophysiological Balance (iCEB: QT / QRSd). Other markers based on conduction-repolarization are [QRSD x (Tpeak-Tend) / QRSd] and [QRSD x (Tpeak-Tend) / (QRSd x QT)]. Advancement in technology permitted sophisticated electrophysiological analyses such as principal component analysis and periodic repolarization dynamics to further improve risk stratification. This was closely followed by other novel indices including ventricular ectopic QRS interval, the f99 index and EntropyXQT, which integrates mathematical and physical calculations for determining the risk markers. Though proven to be effective in limited patient cohorts, more clinical studies across different cardiac pathologies are required to confirm their validity. As such, this review seeks to encapsulate the development of old and new ECG markers along with their associated utility and shortcomings in clinical practice.