RESUMO
Chest tightness variant asthma (CTVA) is an atypical form of asthma with chest tightness as the sole or predominant symptom. The underlying receptors for chest tightness are bronchial C-fibers or rapidly adapting receptors. The nerve impulses are transmitted via the vagus nerve and processed in different regions of the cerebral cortex. Chest tightness is associated with sensory perception, and CTVA patients may have heightened ability to detect subtle changes in lung function, but such sensory perception is unrelated to respiratory muscle activity, lung hyperinflation, or mechanical loading of the respiratory system. Airway inflammation, pulmonary ventilation dysfunction (especially involving small airways), and airway hyperresponsiveness may underlie the sensation of chest tightness. CTVA patients are prone to comorbid anxiety and depression, which share similar central nervous system processing pathways with dyspnea, suggesting a possible neurological basis for the development of CTVA. This article examines the recognition and mechanisms of chest tightness, and explores the pathogenesis of CTVA, focusing on its association with airway inflammation, ventilation dysfunction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and psychosocial factors.
Assuntos
Asma , Humanos , Asma/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are perceived to facilitate the diagnosis of fungal infections. However, due to lack of standardization, the value of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid PCR in diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of BAL fluid PCR in IPA diagnosis among high-risk patients. All studies involving patients at risk for IPA were included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of BAL fluid PCR were summarized for diagnosis of proven/probable IPA, or proven IPA only. Potential heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup analyses and meta-regression. RESULTS: Forty-one studies involving 5668 patients were analyzed. The summary sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of BAL fluid PCR for proven/probable IPA were 0.75 (95% CI = 0.67-0.81), 0.94 (95% CI = 0.90-0.96), 11.8 (95% CI = 7.7-18.1) and 0.27 (95% CI = 0.20-0.36), respectively. Whereas for proven IPA only, sensitivity and specificity were 0.91 (95% CI = 0.68-0.98) and 0.80 (95% CI = 0.74-0.85) in fourteen studies involving 2061 patients. Significant heterogeneity was present due to the underlying disease, antifungal treatment and differences in DNA extraction techniques and choice of PCR assay. Compared to patients with hematological malignancies (HM) and hematopoietic stem cell/solid organ transplantation (HSCT/SOT), sensitivity was higher in the population with disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, solid tumor, autoimmune disease with prolonged use of corticosteroids, etc. (0.88 vs. 0.68, P < 0.001), which was related to the concurrent use of antifungal prophylaxis among patients with HM and HSCT/SOT. CONCLUSION: BAL fluid PCR is a useful diagnostic tool for IPA in immunocompromised patients and is also effective for diagnosing IPA in patients without HM and HSCT/SOT. Furthermore, standard protocols for DNA extraction and PCR assays should be focused on to improve the diagnostic accuracy. Trial registration PROSPERO, registration number CRD42021239028.