Radiation treatment of benign tumors in NF2-related-schwannomatosis: A national study of 266 irradiated patients showing a significant increase in malignancy/malignant progression.

Background: Radiation treatment of benign tumors in tumor predisposition syndromes is controversial, but short-term studies from treatment centers suggest safety despite apparent radiation-associated malignancy being reported. We determined whether radiation treatment in NF2-related schwannomatosis patients is associated with increased rates of subsequent malignancy (M)/malignant progression (MP). Methods: All UK patients with NF2 were eligible if they had a clinical/molecular diagnosis. Cases were NF2 patients treated with radiation for benign tumors. Controls were matched for treatment location with surgical/medical treatments based on age and year of treatment. Prospective data collection began in 1990 with addition of retrospective cases in 1969. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for malignancy incidence and survival. Outcomes were central nervous system (CNS) M/MP (2cm annualized diameter growth) and survival from index tumor treatment. Results: In total, 1345 NF2 patients, 266 (133-Male) underwent radiation treatments between 1969 and 2021 with median first radiotherapy age of 32.9 (IQR = 22.4-46.0). Nine subsequent CNS malignancies/MPs were identified in cases with only 4 in 1079 untreated (P < .001). Lifetime and 20-year CNS M/MP was ~6% in all irradiated patients-(4.9% for vestibular schwannomas [VS] radiotherapy) versus <1% in the non-irradiated population (P < .001/.01). Controls were well matched for age at NF2 diagnosis and treatment (Males = 133%-50%) and had no M/MP in the CNS post-index tumor treatment (P = .0016). Thirty-year survival from index tumor treatment was 45.62% (95% CI = 34.0-56.5) for cases and 66.4% (57.3-74.0) for controls (P = .02), but was nonsignificantly worse for VS radiotherapy. Conclusion: NF2 patients should not be offered radiotherapy as first-line treatment of benign tumors and should be given a frank discussion of the potential 5% excess absolute risk of M/MP.

Intraoperative diagnosis of facial schwannomas: a multicenter summation of clinical experience, preoperative avoidance, and intraoperative management protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative differentiation of facial nerve schwannoma (FNS) from vestibular schwannoma (VS) can be challenging, and failure to differentiate between these two pathologies can result in potentially avoidable facial nerve injury. This study presents the combined experience of two high-volume centers in the management of intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs. The authors highlight clinical and imaging features that can distinguish FNS from VS and provide an algorithm to help manage intraoperatively diagnosed FNS. METHODS: Operative records of 1484 presumed sporadic VS resections between January 2012 and December 2021 were reviewed, and patients with intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs were identified. Clinical data and preoperative imaging were retrospectively reviewed for features suggestive of FNS, and factors associated with good postoperative facial nerve function (House-Brackmann [HB] grade ≤ 2) were identified. A preoperative imaging protocol for suspected VS and recommendations for surgical decision-making following an intraoperative FNS diagnosis were created. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (1.3%) with FNSs were identified. All patients had normal facial motor function preoperatively. In 12 patients (63%), preoperative imaging demonstrated no features suggestive of FNS, with the remainder showing subtle enhancement of the geniculate/labyrinthine facial segment, widening/erosion of the fallopian canal, or multiple tumor nodules in retrospect. Eleven (57.9%) of the 19 patients underwent a retrosigmoid craniotomy, and in the remaining patients, a translabyrinthine (n = 6) or transotic (n = 2) approach was used. Following FNS diagnosis, 6 (32%) of the tumors underwent gross-total resection (GTR) and cable nerve grafting, 6 (32%) underwent subtotal resection (STR) and bony decompression of the meatal facial nerve segment, and 7 (36%) underwent bony decompression only. All patients undergoing subtotal debulking or bony decompression exhibited normal postoperative facial function (HB grade I). At the last clinical follow-up, patients who underwent GTR with a facial nerve graft had HB grade III (3 of 6 patients) or IV facial function. Tumor recurrence/regrowth occurred in 3 patients (16%), all of whom had been treated with either bony decompression or STR. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative diagnosis of an FNS during a presumed VS resection is rare, but its incidence can be reduced further by maintaining a high index of suspicion and undertaking further imaging in patients with atypical clinical or imaging features. If an intraoperative diagnosis does occur, conservative surgical management with bony decompression of the facial nerve only is recommended, unless there is significant mass effect on surrounding structures.

Disease course of neurofibromatosis type 2: a 30-year follow-up study of 353 patients seen at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the disease course of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) to guide clinical trial design. METHODS: A prospective database of patients meeting NF2 diagnostic criteria, reviewed between 1990 and 2020, was evaluated. Follow-up to first vestibular schwannoma (VS) intervention and death was assessed by univariate analysis and stratified by age at onset, era referred, and inheritance type. Interventions for NF2-related tumors were assessed. Cox regression was performed to determine the relationship between individual factors from time of diagnosis to NF2-related death. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-three patients were evaluated. During 4643.1 follow-up years from diagnosis to censoring, 60 patients (17.0%) died. The annual mean number of patients undergoing VS surgery or radiotherapy declined, from 4.66 and 1.65, respectively, per 100 NF2 patients in 1990-1999 to 2.11 and 1.01 in 2010-2020, as the number receiving bevacizumab increased (2.51 per 100 NF2 patients in 2010-2020). Five patients stopped bevacizumab to remove growing meningioma or spinal schwannoma. 153/353 (43.3%) had at least one neurosurgical intervention/radiation treatment within 5 years of diagnosis. Patients asymptomatic at diagnosis had longer time to intervention and better survival compared to those presenting with symptoms. Those symptomatically presenting <16 and >40 years had poorer overall survival than those presenting at 26-39 years (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively) but those presenting between 16 and 39 had shorter time to VS intervention. Individuals with de novo constitutional variants had worse survival than those with de novo mosaic or inherited disease (P = .004). CONCLUSION: Understanding disease course improves prognostication, allowing for better-informed decisions about care.

High-Grade Glioma is not a Feature of Neurofibromatosis Type 2 in the Unirradiated Patient.

BACKGROUND: The Manchester criteria for neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) include a range of tumors, and gliomas were incorporated in the original description. The gliomas are now widely accepted to be predominantly spinal cord ependymomas. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether these gliomas include any cases of malignant glioma (WHO grade III and IV) through a database review. METHODS: The prospective database consists of 1253 patients with NF2. 1009 are known to be alive at last follow-up. RESULTS: There was a single case of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM; World Health Organization grade IV) in the series and no WHO grade III gliomas. The GBM was in a patient who had previously undergone stereotactic radiosurgery for a vestibular schwannoma. CONCLUSION: High-grade gliomas are not a feature of NF2 in the unirradiated patient and should be excluded from the diagnostic criteria.

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors are not a Feature of Neurofibromatosis Type 2 in the Unirradiated Patient.

BACKGROUND: The published literature suggests that malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) occur at increased frequency in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). A recent review based on incidence data in North America showed that 1 per 1000 cerebellopontine angle nerve sheath tumors were malignant. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether MPNST occurred spontaneously in NF2 by reviewing our NF2 database. METHODS: The prospective database consists of 1253 patients with NF2. One thousand and nine are known to be alive at last follow-up. The presence and laterality/pathology of vestibular schwannoma at diagnosis and last follow-up was sought. RESULTS: There were no cases of spontaneous MPNST with 2114 proven (n = 1150) and presumed benign (n = 964) vestibular schwannomas found. Two patients had developed MPNST (1 presumed) after having previously undergone stereotactic radiosurgery for a vestibular schwannoma. CONCLUSION: In this series, and from the literature, malignant transformation of a vestibular schwannoma was not a feature of NF2 in the unirradiated patient. NF2 patients should not be told that they have an increased risk of malignant change in a vestibular schwannoma unless they undergo radiation treatment. However, very much larger datasets are required before it can be determined whether there is any association between NF2 and MPNST in the unirradiated patient.

Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the maxilla presenting as a cicatricial ectropion.

CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old gentleman, who was being treated with bisphosphonates for multiple myeloma, presented with a cicatricial ectropion of the lower eyelid, without exposure keratopathy. A CT scan demonstrated extensive destruction of bone with an infraorbital fracture surrounded by sclerotic bony changes. The patient was managed conservatively with discontinuation of bisphosphonate therapy and topical ocular lubricants. The patient's condition remained unchanged a year after this initial management.

Visual pathway compromise after hydrocoil treatment of large ophthalmic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Hydrogel-coated coils (MicroVention, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) for endovascular aneurysm treatment offer the theoretical advantages of increased volumetric occlusion, thrombus stabilization, and improved neointimal healing. Reports of local inflammation and hydrocephalus after coiling of unruptured aneurysms have raised questions about the safety profile or appropriate usage of these new devices. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Two patients with large ophthalmic aneurysms underwent elective endovascular coiling with HydroCoils. Three to 4 weeks later, they developed profound, progressive bilateral visual loss. Magnetic resonance imaging scans demonstrated extensive enhancement of the coil ball, surrounding brain parenchyma, and optic chiasm, with perianeurysmal edema. INTERVENTION: Dexamethasone produced impressive but temporary improvement in vision in one patient; the other experienced only minor improvement. One patient also developed hydrocephalus; ventriculoperitoneal shunting reduced ventricular size but had no effect on vision. Follow-up imaging demonstrated persistent enhancement of the coil ball, as well as recurrence and extension of the abnormal signal in the parenchyma and along the optic tract. CONCLUSION: Both patients have been left with no functional vision in the eye ipsilateral to the aneurysm and have experienced marked visual field loss and reduced acuity in the contralateral eye. Ongoing international studies will provide more information on the rate of inflammatory complications. The biological mechanisms underlying the phenomenon also require investigation. Meanwhile, we caution against using HydroCoils in situations in which worsened mass effect or local inflammation would have highly deleterious consequences, such as in large aneurysms adjacent to the visual pathways or the brainstem.

Intracanalicular optic nerve meningioma: a serious diagnostic pitfall.

We describe six cases of cannalicular optic nerve meningioma in which the diagnosis was missed for more than 1 year after the onset of symptoms. Clinical features led to a misdiagnosis of optic neuritis in all cases. Although atypical clinical progression led to further imaging studies, they did not provide the diagnosis because of inappropriate imaging protocols. Diagnosis was eventually made on the basis of high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR findings. Radiologists should have a high suspicion for the diagnosis of optic canal meningioma in patients with unexplained visual loss, particularly when visual loss is progressive. Investigation in these cases should include high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of the orbit before and after contrast medium administration, and fat suppression should be used in combination with contrast enhancement whenever possible.