Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 229: 63-68, 2024 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39168262

RESUMO

This study aimed to investigate the acute changes in proximal aortic distensibility, a measure of aortic stiffness, induced by acute exercise in participants with and without heart failure (HF). Participants with HF (n = 24) and without HF (n = 26) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) (1.5 T) imaging at rest and after submaximal supine bicycle ergometry. The participants were further categorized into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n = 14) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (n = 10) based on the left ventricular ejection fraction. At rest and immediately after exercise, cine CMR images of the cross-sectional ascending and descending aorta at the pulmonary artery bifurcation level were obtained to determine aortic distensibility (AoD), with lower AoD indicating greater aortic stiffness. Differences in means of values at rest and before and after exercise were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon sign test. There was no significant difference in AoD at rest between subjects with HF and controls. However, immediately after exercise, participants with HF but not controls exhibited a significant reduction in AoD, indicating higher aortic stiffness related to exercise (median [interquartile range] for the ascending aorta: 3.16 (1.26) × 10-3 mm Hg-1 to 2.39 (1.57) × 10-3 mm Hg-1 and the descending aorta: 4.19 (2.58) × 10-3 mm Hg-1 to 2.96 (1.79) × 10-3 mm Hg-1) (both p = 0.023). This decrease was particularly observed in participants with HFrEF but not in those with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Exercise-induced aortic stiffness, detectable by noninvasive CMR, may contribute to unfavorable ventricular-vascular interactions during exercise in participants with HF, especially HFrEF.


Assuntos
Teste de Esforço , Exercício Físico , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Volume Sistólico , Rigidez Vascular , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Rigidez Vascular/fisiologia , Masculino , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Idoso , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Torácica/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 12(10): e005691, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31607145

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies of sex-based differences in older adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have yielded mixed results. We, therefore, sought to evaluate sex-based differences in presentation characteristics, treatments, functional impairments, and in-hospital complications in a large, well-characterized population of older adults (≥75 years) hospitalized with AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from participants enrolled in SILVER-AMI (Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors in Older Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)-a prospective observational study consisting of 3041 older patients (44% women) hospitalized for AMI. Participants were stratified by AMI subtype (ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and non-STEMI [NSTEMI]) and subsequently evaluated for sex-based differences in clinical presentation, functional impairments, management, and in-hospital complications. Among the study sample, women were slightly older than men (NSTEMI: 82.1 versus 81.3, P<0.001; STEMI: 82.2 versus 80.6, P<0.001) and had lower rates of prior coronary disease. Women in the NSTEMI subgroup presented less frequently with chest pain as their primary symptom. Age-associated functional impairments at baseline were more common in women in both AMI subgroups (cognitive impairment, NSTEMI: 20.6% versus 14.3%, P<0.001; STEMI: 20.6% versus 12.4%, P=0.001; activities of daily living disability, NSTEMI: 19.7% versus 11.4%, P<0.001; STEMI: 14.8% versus 6.4%, P<0.001; impaired functional mobility, NSTEMI: 44.5% versus 30.7%, P<0.001; STEMI: 39.4% versus 22.0%, P<0.001). Women with AMI had lower rates of obstructive coronary disease (NSTEMI: P<0.001; STEMI: P=0.02), driven by lower rates of 3-vessel or left main disease than men (STEMI: 38.8% versus 58.7%; STEMI: 24.3% versus 32.1%), and underwent revascularization less commonly (NSTEMI: 55.6% versus 63.6%, P<0.001; STEMI: 87.3% versus 93.3%, P=0.01). Rates of bleeding were higher among women with STEMI (26.2% versus 15.6%, P<0.001) but not NSTEMI (17.8% versus 15.7%, P=0.21). Women had a higher frequency of bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention with both NSTEMI (11.0% versus 7.8%, P=0.04) and STEMI (22.6% versus 14.8%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults hospitalized with AMI, women had a higher prevalence of age-related functional impairments and, among the STEMI subgroup, a higher incidence of overall bleeding events, which was driven by higher rates of nonmajor bleeding events and bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention. These differences may have important implications for in-hospital and posthospitalization needs.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Revascularização Miocárdica , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Admissão do Paciente , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Revascularização Miocárdica/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Fatores Sexuais , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(7)2017 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28710178

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Albuminuria is a marker of inflammation and an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The current study evaluated whether eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation attenuates progression of albuminuria in subjects with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-hundred sixty-two subjects with stable coronary artery disease were randomized to either Lovaza (1.86 g of EPA and 1.5 g of DHA daily) or no Lovaza (control) for 1 year. Percent change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was compared. Mean (SD) age was 63.3 (7.6) years; 17% were women and 30% had type 2 diabetes mellitus. In nondiabetic subjects, no change in urine ACR occurred in either the Lovaza or control groups. In contrast, ACR increased 72.3% (P<0.001) in diabetic subjects not receiving Lovaza, whereas those receiving Lovaza had no change. In diabetic subjects on an angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker, those receiving Lovaza had no change in urine ACR, whereas those not receiving Lovaza had a 64.2% increase (P<0.001). Change in ACR was directly correlated with change in systolic blood pressure (r=0.394, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EPA and DHA supplementation attenuated progression of albuminuria in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, most of whom were on an angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker. Thus, EPA and DHA supplementation should be considered as additional therapy to an angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01624727.


Assuntos
Albuminúria/tratamento farmacológico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Albuminúria/diagnóstico , Albuminúria/etiologia , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Boston , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Nefropatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Clin Lipidol ; 10(5): 1266-71, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27678446

RESUMO

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an apolipoprotein(a) molecule bound to 1 apolipoprotein B-100. Elevated levels of Lp(a) are thought to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and to promote thrombosis through incompletely understood mechanisms. We report a 34-year-old man with an ischemic stroke in the setting of an extremely high Lp(a) level-212 mg/dL. He developed severe carotid artery stenosis over a 6-year period and had thrombus formation post-carotid endarterectomy. To our knowledge, this case is unique because the Lp(a) is the highest reported level in a patient without renal disease. Moreover, this is the first reported case of the youngest individual with a stroke presumably related to development of carotid plaque over a 6-year period. The thrombotic complication after endarterectomy may have been related to the prothrombotic properties of Lp(a). Of note, the Lp(a) level did not respond to atorvastatin but did decrease 15% after aspirin 325 mg was added although his Lp(a) levels were variable, and it is not clear that this was cause and effect. This case highlights the need to better understand the relation between Lp(a) and vascular disease and the need to screen family members for elevated Lp(a). We also review treatment options to lower Lp(a) and ongoing clinical trials of newer lipid-lowering drugs that can also lower Lp(a).


Assuntos
Lipoproteína(a)/sangue , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Atorvastatina/uso terapêutico , Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose das Carótidas/complicações , Estenose das Carótidas/patologia , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Endarterectomia , Humanos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Trombose/complicações , Trombose/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA