A Novel Tumor Staging System Incorporating Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) With Lymph Node Status (ypN-Category) Results in Better Prognostication Than ypTNM Stage Groups After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims at constructing a staging system incorporating tumor regression grade and ypN-category (TRG-N) in patients with neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy. It is hypothesized that this would prognosticate better than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups. BACKGROUND: Conventional pathological T-category is defined by the depth of invasion, and may lose prognostic relevance after neoadjuvant therapy. TRG defines treatment response by the degree of tumor regression, and when combined with ypN-category may be more prognostic than AJCC postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups. METHODS: A training cohort of 210 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and who had had neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy were studied. A validation cohort comprised 107 patients from another hospital. Resected esophagi were assessed by ypT-category and TRG, the latter assigned according to the Becker 4-tier system. These categories were grouped with ypN-category into a TRG-N system. Patients' survival was compared between the current AJCC postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups and this TRG-N system. RESULTS: In the training cohort, 5-year survival rates according to ypTNM stage I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA were 53%, 39.4%, 47%, 18.3%, and 0%, respectively. For TRG-N stages I, II, III, and IV, the respective figures were 59.6%, 43.5%, 23.8%, and 15.6%. TRG-N stage showed better fit in survival than ypTNM stage groups, indicated by lower Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion values. Similar results were found in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis showed that TRG-N stage ( P =0.02), age ( P =0.006), and sex ( P =0.005) were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: TRG-N stage shows better prognostication than the AJCC postneoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) stage groups.

Update on the Recommendations on Breast Cancer Screening by the Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women in Hong Kong. The Food and Health Bureau commissioned The University of Hong Kong (HKU) to conduct the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Study (HKBCS) with the aim of identifying relevant risk factors for BC in Hong Kong and developing a locally validated BC risk assessment tool for Hong Kong Chinese women. After consideration of the most recent international and local scientific evidence including findings of the HKBCS, the Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening (CEWG) has reviewed and updated its BC screening recommendations. Existing recommendations were preserved for women at high risk and slightly changed for women at moderate risk. The following major updates have been made concerning recommendations for other women in the general population: Women aged 44 to 69 with certain combinations of personalised risk factors (including presence of history of BC among first-degree relative, a prior diagnosis of benign breast disease, nulliparity and late age of first live birth, early age of menarche, high body mass index and physical inactivity) putting them at increased risk of BC are recommended to consider mammography screening every 2 years. They should discuss with their doctors on the potential benefits and harms before undergoing mammography screening. A risk assessment tool for local women (eg, one developed by HKU) is recommended to be used for estimating the risk of developing BC with regard to the personalised risk factors described above.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for High Risk Rectal Cancer in Western and Asian Populations - Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.

Recent data from several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) can improve the treatment outcome of patients with high-risk rectal cancer from Western and East Asian populations. Systemic intensification with chemotherapy administered before (induction) or after (consolidation) neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) prior to total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery has been shown to improve disease-free survival (DFS), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, treatment compliance and/or reduce the risk of disease-related treatment failure for high-risk rectal cancer. In this review we highlighted the key results of RCTs on different TNT approaches conducted in Western and Asian populations, and their impact on clinical practice and research direction. We discussed the salient issues and controversies arising from these studies such as the optimal duration of TNT, factors affecting patient selection and the feasibility of adopting a watch-and-wait approach in complete responders to TNT. There are considerable variations between treatment guidelines from Western and East Asian regions on adopting TNT in the management of high-risk rectal cancer, therefore reflecting regional differences in oncologist's preferences and feasibility in implementing TNT. The review concluded by providing an update on some of the key ongoing RCTs into a risk-adapted approach to incorporating TNT in clinical practice, and also translational research into predictive and prognostic biomarkers of response to TNT for high risk rectal cancer.

Combination atezolizumab, bevacizumab, pemetrexed and carboplatin for metastatic EGFR mutated NSCLC after TKI failure.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired resistance to TKI is an important unmet need in the management of EGFR mutated lung cancer. Recent clinical trial IMPower150 suggested that combination approach with VEGF inhibitor, check point inhibitor immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy was effective in oncogene driven lung cancer. The current trial examined the efficacy of a modified regimen in an EGFR mutated cohort. METHODS: An open-labelled, single arm, phase II study was conducted in patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC who had progressed on at least one EGFR TKI. For those with T790M mutation, radiological progression on osimertinib was required for enrolment. Patients were treated with combination atezolizumab (1200 mg), bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) given once every 3 weeks until progression. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. Median age was 62 (range 45-76) years. More than one half (23/40, 57.5%) had progressed on osimertinib. PD-L1 expression was < 1% in 52.5%. Median follow-up time was 17.8 months. ORR was 62.5%. Median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI: 7.6 - 12.1). One year OS was 72.5% (95% CI: 0.56-0.83). Treatment related grade 3 or above adverse events (AE) occurred in 37.5% (15/40). Immune-related AE occurred in 32.5% (13/40) patients. Quality of life measures of function and symptoms did not change significantly throughout the course of treatments. Post-trial rechallenge with EGFR TKI containing regimen resulted in PFS of 5.8 months (95% CI 3.9-10.0 months). CONCLUSION: Combination approach of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, pemetrexed and carboplatin achieved promising efficacy in metastatic EGFR mutated NSCLC after TKI failure. The results were comparable with taxane based regimen of IMPower150 while toxicity profile was improved.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Using Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (PF) Versus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel (CROSS Regimen) for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC): A Propensity Score-matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy of PF-based and CROSS-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for ESCC. BACKGROUND: PF-based regimen has been a standard regimen for ESCC, but it has been replaced by the CROSS regimen in the past few years, despite no prospective head-to-head comparative study has been performed. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective study. Records of all ESCC patients who have received neoadjuvant PF with 40 Gy radiotherapy in 20 daily fractions (PFRT Group) or CROSS with 41.4 Gy radiotherapy in 23 daily fractions (CROSS Group) during the period 2002 to 2019 were retrieved. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to minimize baseline differences. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival and clinicopathological response. Subgroup analysis ("CROSS Eligibility") was performed based on tumor length, cT-stage, cM-stage, age, and performance status. RESULTS: One hundred (out of 109) patients (CROSS group) and propensity score matched 100 (out of 210) patients (PFRT group) were included. Esophagectomy rates in CROSS and PFRT group were 69% and 76%, respectively (P = 0.268). R0 resection rates were 85.5% and 81.6% (P = 0.525) and the pathological complete remission rates were 24.6% and 35.5% (P = 0.154). By intention-to-treat, the median survival was 16.7 and 32.7 months (P = 0.083). For "CROSS Eligible subgroup," the median survival of the CROSS and PFRT group was 21.6 versus 44.9 months (P = 0.093). CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically difference in survival or clinicopathological outcome between both groups, but the trend favors PFRT. Prospective head-to-head comparison and novel strategies to improve the outcomes in resectable ESCC are warranted.

Toxicity outcome of endorectal brachytherapy boost in medically inoperable patients.

AIM: This communication reviews results and toxicity of image-guided high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) boost after external beam radiotherapy (ERT) in medically inoperable patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 patients with rectal cancer and clinical stage T2-4N0­2 treated with HDREBT boost after ERT were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Following treatment with a median total dose (EQD2, α/ß = 10) of 66 Gy (range 48-92 Gy), the incidence of early and late rectal grade 3 toxicity was 11% and 19%, respectively. There was no correlation between the occurrence of acute and late toxicity. CONCLUSION: With proper technique, a combined approach using EBRT and HDREBT was associated with acceptable toxicity in medically inoperable rectal cancer patients.

Gastric Cancer - From Aetiology to Management: Differences Between the East and the West.

Gastric cancers are highly prevalent in both the East and the West, although they differ in aetiology and prognostic outcome. Management of gastric cancer from screening to definitive treatment varies substantially between Eastern and Western countries and regions, owing to numerous factors, including government incentives to carry out population-wide screening programmes to detect early disease, differences in clinical and biological tumour behaviours and responsiveness to treatment, patient accessibility to effective treatment, etc. This review highlights and contrasts the differences in tumour aetiology and histology, as well as the management approaches between the East and the West, which gives important insights and inspirations on future international multicentre research collaboration to combat this dreadful malignancy.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

AIM: To investigate treatment patterns and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients beyond second progression (PD2) since regorafenib and TAS-102 became available in Hong Kong. METHODS: The clinical records of consecutive mCRC patients who were treated beyond PD2 at Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital between June 2013 and February 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of 176 PD2 patients (76.7% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 and a median follow-up time of 6.6 [range, 0.4-37.2] months), 104 (59%) underwent palliative care only and 72 (41%) received active third-line (3L) treatment: regorafenib (n = 22), TAS-102 (n = 6), chemotherapy + antiepidermal growth factor receptor (n = 12), chemotherapy + antivascular endothelial growth factor (n = 28) or clinical trials (n = 4). Patients on active 3L treatment had significantly longer OS than those on palliative care only: 11.7 versus 5.5 months (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.61, P < 0.001). For those on active treatment, OS was significantly associated with the time from diagnosis of metastasis to PD2 (P < 0.001) and post-3L treatments (P = 0.009). When analyzing treatment eligibility according to trial criteria, half of the eligible patients (54/109) did not receive active treatment, but both eligible and ineligible patients achieved better OS when receiving active 3L treatment versus palliative care only (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). No unexpected toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: Active 3L and beyond treatment significantly prolonged OS versus palliative care, even in selected "trial ineligible" patients. Given a high rate of palliation only care in eligible patients, improved patient access to medicine and counseling may be needed to maximize outcomes.

Recommendations on prevention and screening for colorectal cancer in Hong Kong.

Colorectal cancer is the commonest cancer in Hong Kong. The Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening was established in 2002 under the Cancer Coordinating Committee to review local and international scientific evidence, assess and formulate local recommendations on cancer prevention and screening. At present, the Cancer Expert Working Group recommends that average-risk individuals aged 50 to 75 years and without significant family history consult their doctors to consider screening by: (1) annual or biennial faecal occult blood test, (2) sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, or (3) colonoscopy every 10 years. Increased-risk individuals with significant family history such as those with a first-degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer at age ≤60 years; those who have more than one first-degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer irrespective of age at diagnosis; or carriers of genetic mutations associated with familial adenomatous polyposis or Lynch syndrome should start colonoscopy screening earlier in life and repeat it at shorter intervals.

Recommendations on prevention and screening for breast cancer in Hong Kong.

In Hong Kong, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and poses a significant health care burden. The Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening (CEWG) was set up in 2002 by the Cancer Coordinating Committee to review and assess local and international scientific evidence, and to formulate recommendations for cancer prevention and screening. After considering the local epidemiology, emerging scientific evidence, and local and overseas screening practices, the CEWG concluded that it was unclear whether population-based breast cancer screening did more harm than good in local asymptomatic women at average risk. The CEWG considers that there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against population-based mammography screening for such individuals. Women who consider breast cancer screening should be adequately informed about the benefits and harms. The CEWG recommends that all women adopt primary preventive measures, be breast aware, and seek timely medical attention for suspicious symptoms. For women at high risk of breast cancer, such as carriers of confirmed BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations and those with a family history of breast cancer, the CEWG recommends that they seek doctor's advice for annual mammography screening and the age at which the process should commence. Additional annual screening by magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation carriers or women who have undergone radiation therapy to the chest between the age of 10 and 30 years. Women at moderate risk of breast cancer should discuss with doctors the pros and cons of breast cancer screening before making an informed decision about mammography screening every 2 to 3 years.

Radiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinomas occur in distal esophagus and often involve esophagogastric junction. Radiotherapy plays a key role in treatment, often in combination with chemotherapy and surgery in multi-modalities management. For resectable esophageal primaries, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery can downstage disease and improve outcome over surgery alone. For patients with unresectable primaries or medically unfit for surgery, definitive chemoradiotherapy was found to improve survival over radiotherapy alone. For patients who had residual disease or involved margins after primary surgery, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in postoperative setting was shown to improve local control and survival. Palliative radiotherapy can also be used to relieve local symptoms like dysphagia or bleeding. Careful radiotherapy planning is required to ensure adequate dose to target volumes without overdose to normal organs.

Appropriate timing for surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Optimal interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery is not elucidated for esophageal squamous carcinoma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of this time interval on patient outcome. Patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery between 2002 and 2009 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the median interval to surgery (64 days): A  64 days (n = 53). A second analysis was performed by re-classifying patients into three interval groups: A* ≤ 40 days (n = 16); B* 41-80 days (n = 60); C* > 80 days (n = 31). Operative outcome, pathological data, and long-term survival were analyzed. One hundred and seven (n = 107) patients were analyzed. Five patients (9.4%) in group B had an anastomotic leak compared with no leakage from group A (P < 0.021). The complete pathological response was comparable in groups A and B (35% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.23). R0 was significantly lower in group A* (A*: 56.3%, B*: 90%, C*: 74.2%, P = 0.006). In patients with R0 resection, 5-year survival was significantly better in group A than B (71.7% vs. 51%, P = 0.032) and in group A* (A* 100% vs. B* 60.2% & C* 48.3%; A* vs. B*, P = 0.036; A* vs. C*, P = 0.019). Complete pathological response was an independent predictor of survival. Early surgery with R0 resection following neoadjuvant CRT may lead to a better outcome. Further prospective studies are still necessary to provide better insight into the issue. At present, timing of surgery should be individualized and performed at the earliest opportunity.

Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy after curative resection of gastric cancer in Chinese patients: assessment of treatment tolerability and associated risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium) has been shown to improve the outcome of patients with gastric cancer. There are limited data on the tolerability of S-1 in Chinese patients. In this multicentre retrospective study, we assessed the toxicity profile in local patients. METHODS: Patients with stage II-IIIC gastric adenocarcinoma who had undergone curative resection and who had received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the study. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, chemotherapy records, as well as biochemical, haematological, and other toxicity profiles were extracted from medical charts. Potential factors associated with grade 2-4 toxicities were identified. RESULTS: Adjuvant S-1 was administered to 30 patients. Overall, 19 (63%) patients completed eight cycles. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropaenia (10%), anaemia (6.7%), septic episode (16.7%), diarrhoea (6.7%), hyperbilirubinaemia (6.7%), and syncope (6.7%). Dose reductions were made in 22 (73.3%) patients and 12 (40.0%) patients had dose delays. Univariate analyses showed that patients who underwent total gastrectomy were more likely to experience adverse haematological events (P=0.034). Patients with nodal involvement were more likely to report adverse non-haematological events (P=0.031). Patients with a history of regular alcohol intake were more likely to have earlier treatment withdrawal (P=0.044). Lower body weight (P=0.007) and lower body surface area (P=0.017) were associated with dose interruptions. CONCLUSIONS: The tolerability of adjuvant S-1 in our patient population was similar to that in other Asian patient populations. The awareness of S-1-related toxicities and increasing knowledge of potential associated factors may enable optimisation of S-1 therapy.

Post-radiation Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA and Local Clinical Remission After Radical Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

AIMS: We studied if post-radiation plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA predicted local clinical remission after radical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma with baseline and serial plasma EBV DNA were treated with radical IMRT ± adjunct chemotherapy. Eight weeks after IMRT, they had plasma EBV DNA and routine six-site random nasopharyngeal biopsies on the same day. A repeat biopsy was carried out every 2 weeks if residual tumours were noted in previous biopsies until 12 weeks after IMRT when local persistence was defined. Correlation of undetectable plasma EBV DNA with local clinical remission was carried out. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty patients with serial plasma EBV DNA completed IMRT, after a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Only one (0.4%) suffered from local persistence. Area under the curve values of receiver operating characteristics of undetectable plasma EBV DNA for negative biopsy at 8 weeks and local persistence were 0.642 and 0.439, respectively. They increased to 0.856 (P = 0.007) and 0.952 (P = 0.119), respectively, when combined with age <65 years and T1/T2 stage. CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment plasma EBV DNA was not useful to predict local clinical remission in this study, probably because of excellent local control after IMRT. However, it may serve as a reference for high-risk patients treated with older radiation techniques.

Manual contouring based volumetric evaluation for colorectal cancer with liver limited metastases: a comparison with RECIST.

BACKGROUND: To compare response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) and volumetric evaluation (VE) for colorectal cancer with liver-limited metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VE of liver metastases was performed by manual contouring before and after chemotherapy on 45 pairs of computed tomography (CT) images in 36 patients who suffered from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with liver metastasis only. Cohen kappa was used to compare the agreement between VE and RECIST. Pearson correlation was performed for their comparison after cubic root transformation of the aggregate tumor volumes. Logistic regression was done to identify clinical and radiographic factors to account for the difference which may be predictive in overall response (OR). RESULTS: There were 16 partial response (PR), 23 stable disease (SD) and 6 progressive disease (PD) cases with VE, and 14 PR, 23 SD and 8 PD with RECIST. VE demonstrated good agreement with RECIST (κ=0.779). Discordant objective responses were noted in 6 pairs of comparisons (13.3%). Pearson correlation also showed excellent correlation between VE and RECIST (r2=0.966, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that VE was in slightly better agreement with RECIST for enlarging lesions than for shrinking lesions (r2=0.935 and r2=0.780 respectively). No factor was found predictive of the difference in OR between VE and RECIST. CONCLUSIONS: VE exhibited good agreement with RECIST. It might be more useful than RECIST in evaluation shrinking lesions in cases of numerous and conglomerate liver metastases.