Interstitial lung disease in patients treated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi): analysis of results from clinical trials and the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System database.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of interstitial lung disease associated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and characterize its clinical features. METHODS: We systematically reviewed phase III randomized clinical trials of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi and calculated Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pharmacovigilance studies were conducted by collecting cases of PARPi-related interstitial lung disease from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and assessing disproportionalities by reporting ORs and information components. RESULTS: A total of five randomized clinical trials involving 2980 patients were included. Although PARPi showed a tendency to increase the risk of interstitial lung disease compared with controls, this difference was not significant (Peto OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 0.92 to 26.35). A total of 170 cases of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi were included, with a median latency of 99 days. PARPi had a significantly increased reporting of interstitial lung disease (reporting OR: 2.86; 95% CI: 2.46 to 3.33; information component (IC): 1.49; 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.74). Our sensitivity analyses showed strong robustness of the disproportionalities between PARPi as a class, olaparib, and interstitial lung disease. Some 91.9% of patients experienced discontinuation, 51.6% achieved remission, and no deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Our pharmacovigilance study suggested increased reporting of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi particularly olaparib.

Thromboembolism profiles associated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors: a real-world pharmacovigilance study and a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis is the second leading cause of mortality in cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and thrombosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis based on real-world data combined with a systematic review was used to explore the thrombotic risk profiles of CDK4/6i. The study has been registered with Prospero (CRD42021284218). RESULT: In the pharmacovigilance analysis, CDK4/6i showed a higher rate of reported venous thromboembolism (VTE) (ROR = 2.78, 95% CI = 2.64-2.92), with the highest signal for trilaciclib (ROR = 27.55, 95% CI = 13.43-56.52) but only 9 cases, followed by abemaciclib (ROR = 3.73, 95% CI = 3.19-4.37). For arterial thromboembolism (ATE), only ribociclib increased the reporting rate (ROR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.91-2.41). In the meta-analysis, palbociclib, abemaciclib, and trilaciclib all increased the risk of VTE (OR = 2.23, 3.17, and 3.90). In the subgroup analysis, only abemaciclib increased the risk of ATE (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.12-3.99)    . CONCLUSIONS: CDK4/6i had different profiles of thromboembolism. Palbociclib, abemaciclib, or trilaciclib increased the risk of VTE. Ribociclib and abemaciclib showed a weak association with the risk of ATE.

SGLT-2 inhibitors and euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis/diabetic ketoacidosis in FAERS: a pharmacovigilance assessment.

AIMS: To investigate the main feature and the association between euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (euDKA) /diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and sodium-dependent glucose transporters 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS). METHODS: Cases of SGLT-2i-associated with euDKA/DKA were extracted from the FAERS database and compared with the reports for other hypoglycemia agents (ATC10 class). Disproportionality analyses used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC). The lower limit of the IC 95% credibility interval for IC > 0 is considered a reported signal, with at least 3 cases. RESULTS: A total of 10,195 cases of euDKA (n = 1680) and DKA (n = 8515) associated with SGLT-2i were identified from the FAERS. The SGLT-2i was associated with higher reporting of euDKA and DKA compared to other hypoglycemia agents (ROR = 16.69 [95% CI 14.89-18.70], IC = 3.27 [95% CI 2.91-3.66] for euDKA; ROR = 16.44 [95% CI 15.72-17.20], IC = 3.19 [95% CI 3.05-3.34] for DKA). In available data, the median onset time of euDKA/DKA was 31 days, and canagliflozin had the longest onset time (96.5 days for euDKA and 75 days for DKA) compared with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (p < 0.05). Male patients predominate in euDKA (51.9%), and female patients predominate in DKA (53.7%). Most patients discontinue the treatment (95.5% for euDKA, 93.9% for DKA), and approximately 49.0% (n = 3658) of patients had symptomatic remission after discontinuation of SGLT-2i, and 2.3% (n = 173) of patients had no remission. About 75.6% (n = 6126) of patients need hospitalization after euDKA/DKA. CONCLUSIONS: Post-marketing data showed that SGLT-2i was significantly associated with higher reporting of euDKA/DKA. Although euDKA/DKA is rare, clinicians should be aware of SGLT-2i-associated euDKA/DKA events.