High-resolution colonic manometry interobserver analysis trial.

INTRODUCTION: Colonic high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel, not widely used diagnostic method used in the final workup of chronic constipation before surgery. Since its introduction, different motor patterns have been defined. However, it remains to be established whether these patterns are easily and reproducibly identified by different investigators. METHODS: The primary aim of this study was to determine agreement for motor pattern identification with HRM. To calculate the interobserver agreement (IOA), the Fleiss's kappa statistic for multiple observers was used. Seven participants analyzed 106 one-min time frames, derived from five measurements in healthy volunteers and five in patients with chronic constipation. The time frames were chosen to show a variety and combination of motor patterns consisting of short antegrade, short retrograde, cyclic anterograde, cyclic retrograde, long antegrade, long retrograde, slow retrograde motor pattern, high-amplitude propagating motor patterns, and pancolonic pressurizations. All of the measurements were performed with a solid-state colonic HRM catheter, comprising 40 pressure sensors spaced 2.5 cm apart. RESULTS: A median of 10.25 h (range 6-20) were required to analyze all time frames. High-amplitude propagating contractions achieved an almost perfect level of agreement (k = 0.91). Several motor patterns achieved substantial agreement; these included the short antegrade (k = 0.63), long antegrade (k = 0.68), cyclic retrograde (k = 0.70), slow retrograde motor pattern (k = 0.80), and abdominal pressure or movement artifacts (k = 0.67). Moderate agreement was found for short retrograde (k = 0.57), cyclic anterograde (k = 0.59), long retrograde motor patterns (k = 0.59) and simultaneous pressure waves (k = 0.59). CONCLUSION: For the majority of motor patterns, the overall IOA for colonic manometry was substantial or high. This high level of agreement supports the use of colonic manometry application in clinical and research settings. Harmonization has the potential to improve agreement for long anterograde motor patterns with high amplitudes and for mixed direction patterns.

Temperature-Controlled Delivery of Radiofrequency Energy in Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Controlled delivery of radiofrequency energy has been suggested as treatment for fecal incontinence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the clinical response to the radiofrequency energy procedure is superior to sham in patients with fecal incontinence. DESIGN: This was a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial from 2008 to 2015. SETTING: This study was conducted in an outpatient clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with fecal incontinence in whom maximal conservative management had failed were randomly assigned to receiving either radiofrequency energy or sham procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fecal incontinence was measured using the Vaizey incontinence score (range, 0-24). The impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life was measured by using the fecal incontinence quality-of-life score (range, 1-4). Measurements were performed at baseline and at 6 months. Anorectal function was evaluated using anal manometry and anorectal endosonography at baseline and at 3 months. RESULTS: At baseline, Vaizey incontinence score was 16.8 (SD 2.9). At t = 6 months, the radiofrequency energy group improved by 2.5 points on the Vaizey incontinence score compared with the sham group (13.2 (SD 3.1), 15.6 (SD 3.3), p = 0.02). The fecal incontinence quality-of-life score at t = 6 months was not statistically different. Anorectal function did not show any alteration. LIMITATIONS: Patients with severe fecal incontinence were included in the study, thus making it difficult to generalize the results. CONCLUSIONS: Both radiofrequency energy and sham procedure improved the fecal incontinence score, the radiofrequency energy procedure more than sham. Although statistically significant, the clinical impact for most of the patients was negligible. Therefore, the radiofrequency energy procedure should not be recommended for patients with fecal incontinence until patient-related factors associated with treatment success are known. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A373.

Anorectal complications and function in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease: a series of patients with long-term follow-up.

AIM: The aim of this study is to describe the long-term course of anorectal complains and function in a single centre cohort patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with perianal lesions. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 56 IBD patients (43 Crohn's disease and 13 ulcerative colitis) with perianal complaints underwent anorectal function evaluation (AFE) (baseline). For follow-up, they were approached between 2010 and 2012 by sending questionnaires including Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (IBDQ), Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI), faecal incontinence scale (Vaizey) and an invitation for AFE. RESULTS: At follow-up, 46 patients (82 %) were available, 9 (16 %) were lost and 1 (2 %) had died. Thirty patients returned the questionnaires of which 17 also underwent AFE. The remaining 16 patients were interviewed by phone and were only willing to mention their anorectal complaints. Median follow-up was 14 year. In 25 of the 46 patients (54 %), perianal complaints persisted faecal incontinence (n = 7); soiling (n = 13) and active fistula (n = 5). Eighteen (39 %) patients had an active fistula at baseline and three persisted at follow-up. Two developed a new fistula. Mean IBDQ, Vaizey and PDAI were 178 (SD 29), 7 (SD 5) and 4.2 (SD 3.0), respectively. In 17 patients, who underwent AFE, anal endosonography showed healing in nine of the ten fistulas. Anal pressures as well as rectal capacity remained unaltered in the individual patient, but showed a large range within the group. CONCLUSION: After 14 years, 54 % of the IBD patients with perianal lesions still have mild complaints. The quality of life remained moderate over a long period, which is concerning.

[Women with chronic constipation: clinical examination is more important than anorectal function testing]. / Vrouwen met chronische obstipatie: lichamelijk onderzoek belangrijker dan anorectaal functieonderzoek.

Chronic constipation is a common disorder, particularly in women and the elderly. Physical examination of patients with constipation should include rectal examination and in women also vaginal examination. The patient is asked to relax, contract and bear down on the pelvic floor during inspection of the anal region as well as during the rectal examination. Patients can be considered to have a hypertonic pelvic floor when they have difficulty in relaxing or no relaxation at all during straining on three consecutive attempts. Physical examination reveals potentially treatable conditions such as a rectocele or pelvic floor hypertonia in 40% of women with chronic constipation. Anorectal manometry and anal endosonography provide little added value to physical examination in women with chronic constipation. Anorectal function testing should be reserved for selected cases.

Differences in taste between three polyethylene glycol preparations: a randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients suffering from chronic constipation require long-term, regular therapy with laxatives. Literature regarding patient preference and acceptance in polyethylene glycol preparations is scarce. Therefore, this research aimed to identify preference between the three polyethylene glycol 3350, namely Molaxole(®), Movicol(®), and Laxtra Orange(®). Furthermore, taste is one of the most important factors leading to patients' adherence, particularly when the treatment lasts for a long time. METHODS: In this randomized, cross-over double-blind study, 100 volunteers were recruited by advertisement. The volunteers were invited to taste the preparations and grade the taste using a five-point hedonic scale (extremely poor taste [1] to extremely good taste [5]). The volunteers were then asked to choose the most palatable preparation. RESULTS: One hundred volunteers with a mean age of 35 years (range 20-61) were randomized (76 females). Molaxole(®), Movicol(®), and Laxtra Orange(®) had a mean hedonic score of 2.76 (SD: 0.82), 2.81 (SD: 0.76) and 3.12 (SD: 0.82) respectively. The hedonic taste score for Laxtra Orange(®) was significantly better than Molaxole(®) (P = 0.001) and Movicol(®) (P = 0.001). No difference was found between Molaxole(®) and Movicol(®) (P = 0.61). Molaxole(®) was the most preferred preparation for 19 volunteers (19%), Movicol(®) for 24 volunteers (25%) and Laxtra Orange(®) for 55 volunteers (56%). Two volunteers had no preference. The order in which volunteers tested the preparations had no influence on the taste results. No significant differences in age or gender were observed. CONCLUSION: Laxtra Orange(®) was most palatable preparation. This may have implications for adherence in patients with chronic constipation.