Establishment of Standards for the Referral of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: An International Expert Consensus Using a Modified Delphi Process.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Resection of colorectal polyps has been shown to decrease the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps are often referred to expert centres for endoscopic resection, which requires relevant information to be conveyed to the therapeutic endoscopist to allow for triage and planning of resection technique. The primary objective of our study was to establish minimum expected standards for the referral of LNPCP for potential ER. METHODS: A Delphi methodology was employed to establish consensus on minimum expected standards for the referral of large colorectal polyps among a panel of international endoscopy experts. The expert panel was recruited through purposive sampling, and three rounds of surveys were conducted to achieve consensus, with quantitative and qualitative data analysed for each round. RESULTS: A total of 24 international experts from diverse continents participated in the Delphi study, resulting in consensus on 19 statements related to the referral of large colorectal polyps. The identified factors, including patient demographics, relevant medications, lesion factors, photodocumentation and the presence of a tattoo, were deemed important for conveying the necessary information to therapeutic endoscopists. The mean scores for the statements ranged from 7.04 to 9.29 out of 10, with high percentages of experts considering most statements as a very high priority. Subgroup analysis by continent revealed some variations in consensus rates among experts from different regions. CONCLUSION: The identified consensus statements can aid in improving the triage and planning of resection techniques for large colorectal polyps, ultimately contributing to the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Post-Endoscopy Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Rate in a Tertiary Referral Centre: An Australian Data Linkage Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: High-quality gastroscopy is critical for early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGCs), and assessment of missed cancers may serve as a key quality metric. Using a prospective gastroscopy database and data linkage with the Queensland Cancer Registry, we assessed the risk of developing UGC within 3 years of a cancer-negative gastroscopy at an Australian tertiary centre. Additional aims were to identify factors predictive of missed cancer, perform root cause analyses for missed cancers and assess overall survival. DESIGN/METHOD: We identified patients who were diagnosed with UGC within 3 years of undergoing gastroscopy between 2011 and 2016. Non-mucosal cancers, cancers distal to duodenum and patients undergoing surveillance were excluded. Cases diagnosed within 6 months of gastroscopy were defined as detected cancers, while those developing within 6-36 months were defined as missed cancers. Post-endoscopy UGC rate (PEUGIC-3Y) was calculated as ratio of missed over total cancers detected. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic and histologic variables were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 17,131 gastroscopies were performed for 10,393 patients during the study period. One hundred and twenty-six UGCs were diagnosed, including 120 detected UGCs and 6 missed UGCs. The overall PEUGIC-3Y rate was 4.8% (95% CI 2.1-10.4). The missed UGCs included 3 gastric adenocarcinomas, 2 gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas and 1 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. At the preceding 'cancer-negative gastroscopy', no macroscopic abnormalities were detected at the site of future UGC in 5/6 patients. A UGC developed in 2/6 patients despite an apparent adequate examination at index gastroscopy. Age, sex, indication for endoscopy and cancer location or histology were not predictive of missed cases, and survival was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that the PEUGIC-3Y rate was 4.8% (95% CI 2.1-10.4). The majority of missed cases were adenocarcinomas of the gastro-oesophageal junction or stomach and developed in segments which were found to be normal at index gastroscopy, highlighting the challenges in detecting subtle mucosal lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. While overall survival between patients with detected and post-gastroscopy cancers was comparable, these ultimately represent potential missed opportunities for diagnosing an early cancer and underscore the need for quality improvement in gastroscopy.

Post-colonoscopy cancer rate at a tertiary referral hospital in Australia: A data linkage analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed following a cancer-negative colonoscopy is termed as post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC). The World Endoscopy Organization has recently standardized the definition of PCCRC-3Y (CRC developing within 3 years of a cancer-negative colonoscopy). In the present study, we sought to assess PCCRC-3Y rate, perform root-cause analyses, and identify factors associated with development of PCCRC at a tertiary referral hospital in Australia. METHODS: All patients undergoing colonoscopy from 2011 to 2018 were matched to a population-based cancer register. PCCRC-3Y rate was assessed for years 2011-2015. All PCCRC cases that developed within 6-48 months after a cancer-negative colonoscopy underwent root-cause analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. RESULTS: Among 17 828 patients undergoing colonoscopy, 367 CRC cases were diagnosed during the study period. This included nine PCCRC cases, which developed at a median of 14 months (range 7-34 months) after cancer-negative colonoscopy. The PCCRC-3Y rate for years 2011-2015 was 2.16% (95% CI 0.91-5.15). All nine PCCRC cases were moderately or poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas; seven of nine were early-stage CRC (stages I and II) and six of nine probably represented missed lesions at index colonoscopy despite an apparently adequate examination. History of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (odds ratio [OR] 21.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-103.7, P < 0.001) and diverticulosis (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.4-20.5, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with development of missed CRC. CONCLUSIONS: In our tertiary referral colonoscopy cohort, PCCRC-3Y rate was 2.16% (95% CI 0.91-5.15). IBD and diverticulosis were significantly associated with risk of PCCRC. The majority of PCCRC lesions were likely missed at index colonoscopy, despite an apparently adequate examination.

Clinical utility of purgative bowel preparation before capsule endoscopy: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Optimal bowel preparation before capsule endoscopy (CE) is currently unknown. In this multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial, we assessed clinical effectiveness of 2 types of purgative regimen and a control arm of clear fluid only. METHODS: Patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding were randomized into 3 arms: arm A, clear fluids only for 18 hours before CE and simethicone 200 mg in 150 mL water immediately before CE; arm B, same as A + 2 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 12 hours before CE; and arm C, same as A + 1 L PEG + sodium ascorbate 3 hours before CE. To assess diagnostic yield, lesions were classified either as highly relevant (P2) or less relevant (P0 or P1) lesions. Small-bowel visualization quality (SBVQ) was assessed using the Brotz score. Patient tolerability was assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10, with lower scores indicating better tolerability). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients completed the study. The mean age was 58.7 years (95% confidence interval, 29.3-87.9), and 47.2% were men. There was no significant difference in diagnosis of P2 lesions in arms A, B, and C (48.7%, 48.0%, and 45.9%, respectively; P = .94). Overall SBVQ and distal SBVQ were similar across the 3 arms (P = .94 and P = .68, respectively). Patients reported better tolerability in arm A (mean score, 1.5) compared with arms B and C (mean score, 3.5 and 2.6, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a purgative bowel preparation before CE does not improve diagnostic yield or small-bowel visualization and is associated with lower patient tolerance. (Clinical trial registration number: ACTRN 12614000883617.).

Immunoglobulin G in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis predicts clinical outcome: A prospective multi-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune markers including plasma cells (PC), anti-smooth-muscle antibody (ASMA), anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), and raised immunoglobulin G (IgG) are commonly observed in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), however their clinical significance is unknown. AIM: To determine if autoimmune markers in NASH patients are independently associated with poorer clinical outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients with biopsy proven NASH from Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand and Singapore General Hospital (SGH) were included between 2005 to 2016 in a prospective multi-centre cohort study. Patients with other causes of chronic liver disease were excluded. IgG > 14 g/L or globulin fraction > 50%, ANA ≥ 1:40, SMA ≥ 1:40 were considered positive. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess which markers were independently associated with mortality and hepatic decompensation. RESULTS: Total 261 patients were included of which 201 were from SGH. The median age was 53 and 51.9% were male. Advanced fibrosis was present in 31.4% at diagnosis. PC, ASMA, ANA and raised IgG were observed in 13.1%, 4.9%, 27.8% and 30.1% of patients respectively. After multivariate analysis, elevated IgG [Hazard Ratio (HR) 6.79, 95%CI: 2.93-17.15] and fibrosis stage (HR 1.37, 95%CI: 1.03-1.87) were found to be independently associated with increased risk of liver decompensation. Age (HR 1.06, 95%CI: 1.02-1.10) and elevated IgG (HR 3.79, 95%CI: 1.90-7.68) were independent factors associated with higher mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Elevated IgG, rather than ANA, ASMA or plasma cells, is independently associated with increased risk of hepatic decompensation and mortality in NASH. It could hence be important for prognostication.

Feasibility of resection and plication "RAP" technique for management of medically refractory GERD in patients with altered gastric anatomy.

Background and study aims Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common, especially in patients after gastric surgery. Medical management of GERD is ineffective in up to 30 % patients and revisional gastric surgery for management of GERD is associated with higher morbidity. We aimed to assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a novel endoscopic resection and plication (RAP) anti-reflux procedure for management of medically refractory GERD in patients with altered gastric anatomy. Patients and methods The RAP procedure involves endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness plication over the right posterior-medial axis extending 15 mm above and 20 to 30 mm below the squamocolumnar junction. Adverse events, technical feasibility, GERD health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scores, and medication use were prospectively recorded. Results Twenty consecutive patients with previous gastric surgery underwent RAP between September 2018 and August 2020 with a median follow-up of 5.7 months. The median procedure duration was 66 minutes (IQR 53.8-89.5). RAP was technically successful in 19 patients. One patient developed gastric hemorrhage from suture dehiscence, which was managed endoscopically, and four patients developed esophageal stricture requiring endoscopic dilation. Following the RAP procedure, significant improvement in GERD-HRQL score was observed (mean 26.9, 95 %CI 23.36-30.55, P  < 0.01). Fourteen of 19 patients reported > 50 % improvement in GERD-HRQL scores. Sixteen of 18 patients reported reduction in requirement for or cessation of antacid therapy. Conclusions Patients with refractory GERD after gastric surgery have limited therapeutic options. We have demonstrated that the RAP procedure is feasible, safe, and clinically effective at short-term follow-up. It provides a potential alternative to revisional surgery in patients with altered gastric anatomy.

Trends in Incidence of Autoimmune Liver Diseases and Increasing Incidence of Autoimmune Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are autoimmune liver diseases of unknown etiology. We studied trends in incidences of AIH, PBC, and PSC in a population-based prospective study Canterbury, New Zealand. METHODS: We collected data on patients with AIH (n = 99), PBC (n = 26), or PSC (n = 47) from public hospitals and private practices in Canterbury from 2008 through 2016. Diagnoses were made based on international standardized criteria. We calculated incidence rates for the time periods of 2008-2010, 2011-2013, and 2014-2016 and compared them using 2-tailed mid-P exact tests. RESULTS: Overall incidence rates were 1.93 per 100,000 for AIH (95% CI, 1.58-2.34), 0.51 per 100,000 for PBC (95% CI, 0.33-0.73), and 0.92 per 100,000 for PSC (95% CI, 0.68-1.21). The incidence of AIH was significantly higher during the period of 2014-2016 (2.39 per 100,000; 95% CI, 1.76-3.23) than during the period of 2008-2010 (1.37 per 100,000; 95% CI, 0.91- 2.06) (P < .05). Incidences of PBC and PSC did not change significantly. In 2016, prevalence values were 27.4 per 100,000 for AIH (95% CI, 23.58-32.0), 9.33 per 100,000 for PBC (95% CI, 7.13-12.05), and 13.17 per 100,000 for PSC (95% CI, 10.56-16.42). CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based prospective study, we found that the incidence of AIH was significantly higher in the 2014-2016 period than the 2008-2010 period; incidences of PBC and PSC were unchanged over the same period. Further studies are needed to determine the reasons for changes in incidence of autoimmune liver diseases.

Long-term outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism: results from a longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) have increased mortality in short-term; however, long-term prognosis is not well defined. AIM: In this long-term cohort study, we aimed to determine if PE was associated with increased risk of mortality or serious clinical events (SCE). Secondary aims were to ascertain predictors of mortality and SCE. METHODS: Patients admitted with clinical suspicion of PE were prospectively recruited from July 2002 to May 2003 and followed up until March 2015. Clinical outcomes in patients with PE were compared to those without PE. SCE was defined as composite of mortality, malignancy, cardiovascular events, recurrent venous thromboembolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. RESULTS: A total of 501 patients with median follow up of 11.9 years (interquartile range 3.91-12.28) was included. PE was diagnosed in 104 (20.7%) patients. Overall, 45.9% died and 57.1% developed SCE during follow up, with no significant difference in PE and no-PE groups (both P > 0.5). Major determinants of mortality were age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.06 per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.08), malignancy (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.64-2.91) and congestive heart failure (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.23-2.42). Factors associated with increased risk of SCE were age (HR 1.05 per year, 95% CI 1.04-1.06), malignancy (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.48-2.52) and congestive heart failure (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.29-2.43). In patients without PE, elevated D-dimer concentration was not found to be associated with diagnosis of malignancy during follow up (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.55-3.12). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, we did not find association between PE and risk of all-cause mortality or SCE. Major determinants of poor clinical outcomes were advancing age and underlying comorbidities.

Associations Between Mutations in MSH6 and PMS2 and Risk of Surveillance-detected Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of colorectal cancer (CRC). Contemporary and mutation-specific estimates of CRC-risk in patients undergoing colonoscopy would optimize surveillance strategies. We performed a prospective national cohort study, using data from New Zealand, to assess overall and mutation-specific risk of CRC in patients with Lynch syndrome undergoing surveillance. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 381 persons with Lynch syndrome in New Zealand (98 with Lynch-syndrome associated variants in MLH1, 159 in MSH2, 103 in MSH6, and 21 in PMS2). Participants were offered annual colonoscopy starting at age 25 y, and those who underwent 2 or more colonoscopies before December 31, 2017 were included in the final analysis. Patients with previous colonic resection, history of CRC or diagnosis of CRC at index colonoscopy were excluded. RESULTS: Study participants underwent 2061 colonoscopies during 2296 person-y; the median observation-period was 4.43 y and mean-age at enrollment was 43 y. Eighteen patients developed CRC (8 with variants in MLH1, 8 in MSH2, and 2 in MSH6) after a median follow-up period of 6.5 y (range 1-16 y). Eighty-three percent of patients had a surveillance colonoscopy in preceding 24 months before diagnosis of CRC; 94% were diagnosed with stage 0-II CRC and there was no CRC-related mortality. The overall-risk of developing CRC in the 5 y after first surveillance colonoscopy was 2.49% (95% CI, 1.18-5.23); cumulative risks for CRC in patients with Lynch syndrome-associated variants in MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 by age 70 y were 17.7%, 17.8%, and 8.5%, respectively. Age-adjusted CRC-risk in patients with variants in MSH6 was lower than in MLH1 (hazard ratio, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.04-0.94; P = .02). Of patients with CRC, 33% had an adenomatous polyp resected from same segment in which a colorectal tumor later developed. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of CRC in patients with Lynch syndrome-associated mutations in MSH6 or PMS2 was significantly lower than in patients with mutations in MLH1. Incomplete adenomatous polyp resection might be responsible for one third of surveillance-detected CRCs.

Predictors of non-attendance at outpatient endoscopy: a five-year multi-centre observational study from New Zealand.

AIMS: Outpatient endoscopy non-attendance leads to diagnostic delay and increasing wait times. We aimed to analyse endoscopy non-attendance rates and factors associated with it at the Canterbury and Auckland District Health Boards during a five-year period. METHODS: Consecutive appointments between April 2012 and March 2017 were assessed. The following procedures were included: gastroscopy, colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Predictors of non-attendance were assessed using univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 58,434 appointments were offered (Canterbury-33,697, Auckland-24,737), of which 2,694 (4.6%) were not attended. Maori (OR 3.0, 95%CI 2.63-3.42) and Pacific Peoples (OR 3.1, 95%CI 2.7-3.55) were significantly more likely to miss appointments compared with Europeans. Patients from socioeconomically most deprived areas (NZDep10) had higher rates of non-attendance (OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.72-2.63) compared with NZDep1. Males (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.32-1.56) and the Auckland District Health Board patients (OR 2.28, 95%CI 2.08-2.50) had higher non-attendance rates. CONCLUSION: Overall, 4.6% patients did not attend endoscopy appointments. Maori, Pacific Peoples and patients from socioeconomically deprived areas had higher non-attendance rates. Targeted interventions for at-risk groups would potentially lessen health inequalities and optimise utilisation of endoscopy resources.

Can colonoscopy at peripheral day hospitals meet internationally accepted quality and safety standards?

AIMS: To perform an independent review of the quality and safety of colonoscopy service at the Canterbury Charity Hospital (CCH). METHODS: Demographic, endoscopy and histology data on all colonoscopies performed at CCH between 1 October 2016 and 31 September 2017 were collected. Quality indicators ascertained were caecal intubation rate, mean withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate (ADR). These were assessed using current recommendations by the Joint American College of Gastroenterology and American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy task force. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients, mean age 44 years (range 21-62), underwent colonoscopy. The most common indications were rectal bleeding and/or altered bowel habit (19 patients). Eight asymptomatic patients underwent colonoscopy because of a family history of CRC or a personal history of colorectal polyps; six of these were over 50 years old. Twelve patients had haemorrhoids and seven patients had adenomatous polyps. The caecal intubation rate was 97.1%. Among asymptomatic patients over 50 years undergoing colonoscopy, mean withdrawal time was 7.5 minutes (range 5-10) and ADR was 33.3%. No complications were recorded. CONCLUSION: The colonoscopy service at CCH was safe and complied with the accepted quality indicators. Our data suggest that delivery of high-quality colonoscopy services might be possible in similar peripheral and day hospitals around New Zealand. Increasing colonoscopy services in such centres would reduce the excessive workload of larger public hospitals and reduce the level of unmet need for colonoscopy services.